De-Regulation and Choice

There is one more element in the equation that goes into the effort to roll back legal abortion in test cases like South Dakota, and that is how strange it is that an administration that prides itself on a "free market" economy, and daily pollutes the environment by deregulating greenhouse gas emissions, and allowing gross polluting trucks, under NAFTA, to pour toxic waste into California's air, now wants to regulate decisions a woman makes in the privacy of her own home, and in consultation with her physician. In fact, these "free market" folks want to transform licensed physicians into government pitch men who function as FDA warning labels on a pack of cigarettes.

A country that has infrastructure in place to deprive women of pay equity, and equal opportunity while, simultaneously, peddling "welfare to work" programs only succeeds in creating a faux caste system from which only the most indigent suffer, and these are the women they want to deprive of choice when choice is the only thing they have.

Moreover, should Roe v. Wade be overturned, or turned over to the states to decide, there won't be fewer abortions, only fewer poor women having abortions, so this is not about ideology, after all, but about privilege.

Keep in mind, too, that the word "regle," in French, means "rule." Fascinating, isn't it, how those who are best at breaking the rules, in Washington, these days, are working hard at making rules from which they may, someday, too claim immunity. As a society, we're willing to immunize cheats, liars, war criminals, and law breakers, but prosecute any physician who acknowledges a woman's constitutional right to seek remedy from an unwanted pregnancy.

Governmental interference in a woman's personal decision to terminate her pregnancy is no different from governmental intervention in the bedroom. It's the same principle really.

The arranged marriage of health, politics, and religion is one that can only lead to divorce.

After the National Security Agency scandal, and revelations of telecom eavesdropping, any illusions we had, as citizens, to privacy have been quickly dispelled. The "war on terror" is really a war on privacy, after all, is it not?

Leave regulation for the oil companies, military contractors, banks, and credit card companies that are gouging the consumer, and keep them the hell out of our private lives.

Comments

[sarge]

Well said!

It is presumed that anti-abortion efforts are manifestations of legitimate religious beliefs. If so, what does that say about a religion that eschews choice, but makes allowances for war, poverty, torture, executions, environmental catastrophe, and the annihilation of species?

It would seem the political hypocrisy is mirrored by religious hypocrisy. (I wonder if anyone will be denied the "Sacrament of Holy Communion" for voting for Obama.)

It is also ironic that those most eager to deny the right to privacy...Republicans like Craig/Vitter/Foley....seem to also be those with the most to hide!

[Rockerbabe]

Regulating oil companies, trucking companies, banks, credit card agencies, para-military organizations, military and defense oriented companies, etc is a no, no; would interefere with the boys' club agenda of pursuing murder, mischief and mayhem. God forbid we do that!. There has to be some order in this country and the boys have decided we girls get the order and they get the disorder. Their time is acoming. . .some their ring leaders will be gone and none too soon.