More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Jean-François Julliard
GET UPDATES FROM Birgitta Ohlsson
 

Press Freedom Under Fire in Europe

Posted: 05/ 3/11 01:02 PM ET

Today, May 3, on the World Press Freedom Day, all decision-makers in the Europe should ponder the wise words of French writer Albert Camus: "A free press can be good or bad, but one thing is certain, no freedom can never be anything but poor."

Unfortunately, the fight for press freedom in Europe is more urgent than ever. Free speech is seriously challenged in a number of EU Member States. The France-based NGO Reporters Without Borders has repeatedly expressed concern about the deteriorating press freedom in several European countries, and regrettably the 2010 Press Freedom Index confirms these fears.

Whilst some individual EU states are at the forefront of press freedom in the world, at least 14 member states are ranked considerably lower on the list. In the ranking of press freedom in the world, France has fallen to place 44 and Italy to 49. Romania is close behind at place 52 and Greece and Bulgaria share place 70 with Benin and Kenya.

Reporters Without Borders notes that the EU is far from homogeneous in terms of press freedom and that the gap between member states continues to grow. The EU is in danger of undermining its position as a world leader in respect for freedom of speech.

As a result of the Lisbon Treaty, the EU is in the process of building a common external action service, which has the struggle for human rights worldwide as one of its core tasks. However, if Europe cannot live up to press freedom at home, how could the Union, with credibility, criticize totalitarian regimes around the world?

In January 2011, Hungary took over the rotating EU presidency. The very same day, the country's new and criticized media law came in to force. This law has been illustrated as a potpourri of the worst parts of the media laws in the EU. The European Commission has criticized the legislation, which resulted in Hungary backing down on some issues. Still, however, a media council, whose members are appointed by Parliament's conservative Fidesz majority, is to monitor all forms of media. The OSCE has deemed the media council a concentration of power without precedent in European democracies.

Italy has dropped like a stone in the ranking. Prime Minister Berlusconi's power over the country's media must be of concern also outside Italy. A broad coalition of political groups in the European Parliament -- Liberals, Greens, Socialists, and the Left -- launched a resolution in October 2009, criticizing that freedom of expression is under threat in Italy. The vote was exceptionally narrow, but the resolution was unfortunately voted down with the help of the conservative EPP group, where Berlusconi's PdL party is one of the largest members.

The European Union was founded on the ruins of the Holocaust and the Second World War. The European foundation is made out of liberty, democracy, respect for fundamental human rights and the rule of law. These values are laid down in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the Treaty of Lisbon, which are endorsed in full by all 27 member states, without exception.

According to Freedom House's annual review in 2010, there is a severe backlash in the respect for political rights and freedoms in the world. We are now looking back to four years of regrettable decline, which is the longest period of decline during the nearly 40 years that the survey has been carried out. Positive role models should not be underestimated if we want to spread democracy in the world. The European Union can and should play a crucial role.

Becoming a member of the EU is not easy; candidate states must live up to the political criteria, which includes paying full respect to human rights and fundamental freedoms. These requirements of course apply equally to countries that are already full members , but today the Union has no tools to control how these rights are respected in practice.

In the field of economic policy, the European Union's watchdog role is becoming more and more important as a means to keep member states' finances in shape and ensure respect for common legislation. Giving the EU an equally prominent role in scrutinizing how fundamental rights are respected by national governments would be a natural next step to take. The European Commission has been given a strong mandate for dealing with fundamental rights through the Lisbon Treaty.

A serious discussion on how to deal with member states that compromise with fundamental rights -- including press freedom -- needs to begin now. Freedom of speech was once born in Europe, and it must be preserved to future generations. The EU has an obligation to hold the torch of freedom high in a world where the majority of mankind can not speak freely.


Birgitta Ohlsson, Swedish Minister for EU Affairs and Democracy
Jean-François Julliard, Secretary General of Reporters Without Borders

 
Today, May 3, on the World Press Freedom Day, all decision-makers in the Europe should ponder the wise words of French writer Albert Camus: "A free press can be good or bad, but one thing is certain, ...
Today, May 3, on the World Press Freedom Day, all decision-makers in the Europe should ponder the wise words of French writer Albert Camus: "A free press can be good or bad, but one thing is certain, ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:31 PM on 06/04/2011
Permit me to criticize the translation of Albert Camus' words. As it stands, it doesn't even make sense. What could this possibly mean: "no freedom can never be anything but poor"...? Google translation?

What Camus said was that "A free press can of course be good or bad, but, most certainly, without freedom it will never be anything but bad."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deluk
hot mess...
11:12 AM on 06/03/2011
rather odd...the USA is only at number 20, below most of the EU nations,
photo
muysuave41
Olive Oil Producer
04:47 AM on 05/06/2011
Lofty promises. But when conservative electorates are sprouting up everywhere a few freedoms are expected to be curtailed.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
06:47 PM on 05/04/2011
Of course, with press freedom, what's to prevent individuals like Andrew Breitbart from spreading lies?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pooka47401
Reality is the leading cause of stress!
03:59 PM on 05/04/2011
Gee, I wish that America had a really Free Press and not one that is Corporate owned and manipulated for the purposes of Propaganda. NPR and PBS are not long for this world and so Democracy Now and Air America are having to try and handle honest news and get it out to the public. Unfortunately, if you don't remember Walter Cronkite then you don't remember unbiased journalism. Heaven forbid that Americans should have adequate information to make informed political decisions!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NorthSide
02:10 PM on 05/05/2011
Gee, I wish I could have read pooka's comments in our non-free press. Er....what a minute, I DID read them, on the $315 million corporate owned HuffPost! How did that happen?
06:14 AM on 05/04/2011
Free speech is under fire in Europe....as the show trials against Geert Wilders and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff demonstrate. Thank the PC thought police.
11:40 AM on 05/04/2011
They are as bad as the lslamists in Jordan who are putting cartoonist Kurt Westergaard on trial for blasphemy this week (in absentia, of course).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
01:11 AM on 05/04/2011
This article tells me nothing. What are the restrictive policies? How are press freedoms being attacked? I do not doubt the facts, I'd just like to know what they are.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:09 PM on 05/04/2011
Thank you. I was wishing there were examples as well.
04:02 PM on 06/04/2011
In France, where I live, the press is being harassed as never before. Much of the "free" press is actually owned by military contractors such as Lagardère and Dassault, who - necessarily - have a cozy relationship with political power. Sarkozy has not hesitated to use that to force the firing of journalists and editors who crossed his path - once, for simply publishing a photograph of his daughter with her fiancé. The government also uses every charge it can, such as "diffamation" or "outrage", to strike fear in the hearts of journalists and to conduct searches and seizures. It's really mostly Russian-style intimidation, but it works. Add to that the so-called Loppsi 2 law (presently suspended by the constitutional council) which grants to the government the right to close down any internet site it wants, with no judicial redress possible, and the Hadopi laws under which the government can permanently deny internet access altogether to people accused of downloading, and you've got a picture of press freedom as seen by Nicolas Sarkozy. Before he came around, France was high (No. 10) in the press freedom index, despite the absence of an effective Freedom of Information Act (the one that exists is hopelessly slow and excludes anything the government decides to label a state secret).

In Italy I'd say the big problem is television, which is absolutely controlled by Berlusconi in his double capacity of owner of the private networks and head of government.