iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeanne Faulkner

GET UPDATES FROM Jeanne Faulkner
 

Global Motherhood: The State Of The World's Soccer Moms

Posted: 05/25/2012 8:52 pm

There are only a handful of people who should call me by my most prized, most hard won title -- Mama. If you're not my child, don't go there. If you're a teacher, doctor, or coach and can't remember my name, that's cool, just ask, but don't call me Mom. And that goes double for anyone in public office, political pundits and media commentators. Don't call me a stay-at-home Mom, working Mom, stepmom or single Mom and please, please, don't call me soccer Mom. In fact, unless you sprang from my loins, don't call me Mom at all. I'm an American woman, but I'm not your mother and my reproductive status is none of your business.

"Soccer Mom" and its sister-labels (see above) have become diminutive terms like "little woman," "desperate housewife," or "lady doctor," defining women solely by their relationship to children. This dilutes their adult identities and negates their independent opinions, occupations and lives. It places them in a nurturing, caretaking role and while those are certainly excellent attributes, they're only part of women's identities.

It's not that I'm not delighted to be a mother. I am. Parenting is a significant part of my life, but it's not the sum total of my being and not something that's part of most adult relationships outside my home. When someone asks who I am, I rarely answer, "Mom." Instead I describe other parts of my life, for example, my work as a journalist and nurse. Who are the millions of other women raising children? Doctor, lawyer, dance Mom? How about men working in similar roles? Their breeding status doesn't get anywhere near the same level of attention and adults rarely call men "Daddy."

I became aware of the demoting power of motherhood when a pediatrician patted me on the head and said, "you're a good mommy" instead of answering a straightforward question about how to prevent my baby's recurring thrush infection. He seemed to think being a mother counteracted my medical training and overrode my ability to understand advanced concepts. I got the Mom treatment and a healthy dose of condescension instead.

Maybe this "mommy thing" is just a last bastion hold out from thousands of years of patriarchy. Women's rights have come so far after all; surely we're evolving beyond that. But lately, I have to wonder, especially considering the time-warped arguments being waged over women's reproductive rights.

Last week, while reviewing the State of The World's Mothers (SOTWM) report I had an 'a-ha' moment about the correlation between women's representation in government and women's status in society. The data is clear: the more women in government, the better life is for all women whether they're mothers or not.

In Niger, for example, ranked the worst place on earth to be a mother, only 13 percent of government representatives are women. In Afghanistan, second worst, only 28 percent. In Yemen -- third worst, only 1 percent. In these countries mothers regularly die in childbirth, and women have severely limited freedom and access to healthcare, transportation, money, education and other elements of power that make lives safe, healthy and happy. It's what we've come to expect from undeveloped countries where women aren't respected or employed. So, what's America's excuse?

American women are educated, employed and independent. American mothers are supposedly respected, even revered. They have their own money and make their own decisions. They aren't controlled by religious and patriarchal strongmen like women in Niger, Afghanistan and Yemen. Or are they?

The US ranks 25th out of 41 industrialized countries in the SOTWM report. We're the 16th worst industrialized country in which to be a mother. Not coincidentally, only 17 percent of our government representatives are women. Contrast that with Norway, (the No. 1 spot for mothers) whose government is 40 percent female. While Norwegian women have universal healthcare, paid maternity leave and decent (though not equal) wage equity, American women earn far less than their male counterparts, receive no pay during maternity leave, and have limited access to outrageously expensive health care. Is it any wonder America sucks for mothers considering our rights are represented and controlled by an 83 percent male government?

Here in the most powerful country on earth, women's legislative and voting influence is marginalized. We make up 50 percent of the population, but are still treated like a special interest group. That's how the term "soccer Mom" started. Coined during the 1996 presidential election, "soccer Mom" was a popular catchphrase used to corral and court key swing voters. It quickly morphed, however, from being a potentially empowering phrase to a denigrating one. In fact, in the 16 years since "soccer Mom" became a media darling, women's roles in politics and some of our basic rights have taken a turn for the worse.

Is there a deliberate strategy at play here? Could it be that for the boys to stay in power, they need to keep the girls under control and preferably huddled with the powerless children? Maybe that's why certain religions and politicians have trouble thinking about women as competent adults, capable of making our own decisions when it comes to our bodies.

Why so few American women in government? I wonder if in part, it's because, no matter how strong her platform and resume, a female candidate's motherhood will be magnified and scrutinized. She'll be identified as a hockey Mom, working mom, or stay-at-home mom. When a man runs? Not so much.

Women aren't helping each other out on this either. When Sarah Palin jokes: What's the difference between a pit bull and a hockey Mom; isn't she knocking herself down a few pegs? Since she's comparing women to dogs with particularly bad reputations, wouldn't the word "bitch" do just as well? What would campaign season look like if men's fatherhood were magnified? Oh wait. John Edwards. Oops.

Until we balance gender equity on Capitol Hill and move away from gender-based prejudice, the status of American women will remain low. Regardless of whether we have children or not, want to someday or don't, women have their own identities, opinions and values. Quit clumping us together. Quit treating us differently than men. Quit giving us the mom-treatment. Let's put the battle over reproductive rights to rest. Let's shift the political dialogue to issues that support all women, men and children. Let's elect more women to high-level political positions. And please, please... If you aren't our children, lets quit calling women, "Mom."

 
FOLLOW IMPACT
There are only a handful of people who should call me by my most prized, most hard won title -- Mama. If you're not my child, don't go there. If you're a teacher, doctor, or coach and can't remember...
There are only a handful of people who should call me by my most prized, most hard won title -- Mama. If you're not my child, don't go there. If you're a teacher, doctor, or coach and can't remember...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
04:39 PM on 05/30/2012
I'm called Mama, too. However, I'm not called Mom because that's my son's great-grandmother's title.
01:51 PM on 05/30/2012
Lighten up!!
12:05 PM on 05/30/2012
I agree that it's time for woman to stop being identified primarily by family status. I disagree, however, that the solution is a liberal agenda that advances a nanny state of governmental handouts. In fact, the argument is counterintuitive. Strong, independent, competent women should be in favor of unleashing the competitive marketplace that rewards accomplishment over entitlement. Competition drives the economic engine and improves the quality of life for all women, men and children.
08:08 PM on 05/28/2012
Love this! Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brainpower
09:56 PM on 05/26/2012
I would like to suggest that if you encounter anyone, such as a co worker, who uses your status as a mother in a demeaning way, you work to counteract that perception by responding with something like "Being a good mother is far more complex and challenging than any other job, but since the stakes are so high, it is well worth the enormous effort." Rebrand instead of deny.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brainpower
09:42 PM on 05/26/2012
No matter the intent, if you perceive and react to being identified as a mother as demeaning, then it truly does reflect the value you personally assign to that role, because it is natural for people to WANT to be identified by that which they consider important. There are plenty of strong, aware, intelligent women who don't allow the possible predjudices of others to detract from the worth and satisfaction they experience through their role as mother, in spite of all their other talents. I am not suggesting that you don't love your children as much as someone who embraces the title of mom, nor that you are not good at it, but I would assume you don't enjoy the praise you might receive for it as much as you like recognition for your other talents, and that is fine. What isn't fine is failing to notice that when you tacitly 'agree' with those who use 'mom' to belittle by rejecting it, you are not respecting the women who freely, with open eyes, embrace it.
06:47 PM on 05/26/2012
EXCELLENT article! Thank you.
12:55 PM on 05/26/2012
Wow, such animosity. I'm proud to be a mom. It is one of my proudest accomplishments. And although I may not mention mom first when people ask me who I am, you're going to find out about my husband and two sons pretty quickly. I don't shy away from being called a mom. Quit denying part of who you are and quit being paranoid. People aren't marginalizing us. They are realizing the important job we are doing in this world: To raise children to become productive and good people.
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
08:52 AM on 05/26/2012
"Here in the most powerful country on earth, women's legislative and voting influence is marginalized."

Women got the vote, and the WCTU gave us Prohibition. Bunk.