iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeff Biggers

Jeff Biggers

Posted: September 30, 2010 10:47 AM

Party down, Big Coal lobbyists! Give those Ameren utility dudes a raise.

After investing nearly $800,000 in political contributions, Big Coal utility giant Ameren just got confirmation that a pay-off check for nearly $1 billion is in the mail, courtesy of US taxpayers.

Rock on, Energy Secretary Steven Chu!

All Ameren has to do is kinda sorta maybe refashion one of its coal-ash spewing World War II-era coal-fired and oil-burning plants into FutureGen 2.0 -- an infeasible, prohibitively expensive, accident and leak-prone, and chimerical scheme of oxy-combustion technology that will sorta kinda maybe capture, compress, pump and dump CO2 into Illinois' aquifers and porous caverns.

Don't worry: The company helping Ameren built the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, so they're good to go.

And get this: Ameren is already sending its boys over to Illinois to soak the state's taxpayers for a probable hike in utility rakes to cover any costs not bankrolled by the federal "clean coal" welfare program.

As business leaders in Mattoon, Illinois, noted recently, after their town got shafted on the FUTUREGEN rollercoaster, they even question why anyone wants to "become the 'dumping' ground for other people's waste."

Good question. The answer, according to US Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) is a handful of jobs. After receiving more than $135,000 in political contributions from Ameren and other Big Coal lobbyists, Durbin can now crow that he pulled in $1 billion in US taxpayer funds from the federal stimulus to create approximately "500 jobs, pipeline construction would add another 275, and there would be 75 new permanent jobs."

Do the math: Those are some expensive government-funded and subsidized jobs.

According to energy analyst Rory McIlmoil at Downstream Strategies, spending that billion dollars on clean energy projects would be a vastly better investment all around:

There are other options available to the Department of Energy for investing in projects that would generate electricity while also reducing carbon emissions associated with that generation. For instance, $1 billion in energy investment using taxpayer dollars could be used to develop 500 MW of wind power or 125 MW of rooftop solar panels, and once these were installed, there would not be any fuel costs, carbon emissions, or risks related to the geologic sequestration of CO2. Additionally, investing public funds in solar or wind rather than FutureGen would prevent additional costs to human health and the environment that would result from the mining, processing, and burning of coal at FutureGen. Finally, while the FutureGen project would--according to the Alliance's own estimates -- create a total of 11,000 jobs nationally, research by the Political Economy Research Institute suggests that $1 billion in investment in solar or wind would create even more jobs than the proposed FutureGen project: 13,300 for an equal investment in wind, and over 13,700 for an equal investment in solar."

Too bad the cancer-plagued farmers contaminated by coal slurry in nearby Illinois communities never received such compensation.

Too bad nearby farmers are now losing their ancestral farm houses and fertile rows of corn to longwall mining and more coal slurry is slated for their aquifers.

Too bad Illinois coal miners who are dying daily from black-lung disease can't get a little more of this pork.

FutureGen 2.0 is not even scheduled to sorta kinda operate on a commercial scale for a decade, so we don't even need to note the issue of peak coal and FutureGen's increased coal production needs.

No, today is party day for Big Coal and its utility partners, and Big Coal-bankrolled politicians like US. Sen. Dick Durbin.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doubleB
01:51 AM on 10/04/2010
Makes ya wonder... if we invested that money in energy efficiency, where would we be? How many jobs would be created? On a kWh to kWh basis, energy efficiency projects cost about half as much as Traditional coal... not this Futuregen pipedream. If we made the country 25-35% more efficient, how many old, dirty coal and / or nuclear plants could we simply decommission? What if we harnessed all the geothermal energy in Yellowstone (i.e. the supervolcano that we're so worried will erupt again...) and converted it into electricity, grabbed energy from any other hotspot available, used the distant ones to create hydrogen or charge car batteries, and used enhanced geothermal in other areas? Geothermal is cost competitive with coal right NOW, not 20 years into the future like some other technologies are.

This is all about which corporate polluter pays the largest amount to bribe our politicians. It's doesn't have one iota to do with common sense.
01:28 PM on 10/04/2010
Right on, we should be investing in solar.
06:05 PM on 10/03/2010
Mr. Biggers, I see what your are trying to say, but when you write, "Don't worry: The company helping Ameren built the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant, so they're good to go." that's actually a complement. Three Mile Island underwent an unplanned loss of coolant event which resulted in a partial meltdown. Even though the core melted, the only release of radioactivity was a small amount of noble gases. No one was injured and no loss of personal property occurred. In other words, despite the best effort of the operators to mess up the situation, the containment vessel held. Good construction, not bad.

"For instance, $1 billion in energy investment using taxpayer dollars could be used to develop 500 MW of wind power or 125 MW of rooftop solar panels, and once these were installed, there would not be any fuel costs, carbon emissions, or risks related to the geologic sequestration of CO2."

500 MW of wind or 125 MW of solar is part of the story. Wind and solar capacity factor are only about 28% - 32% and 15%-25% respectively. That $1B could be used to purchase 10 Hyperion Power Modules, small nuclear reactors. They will provide 20 MW 24/7 for 10 years.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:45 AM on 10/01/2010
I sympathize with the author, and I do want to see a lot more money invested in alternative energy development, but:

Much of our nation continues to rely on coal for its power. As we transition to PHEVs and EVs for our personal transportation, those parts of the nation which still rely on the dirtiest types of coal plants for electricity will not be cleaning up the air by making the switch to the new technology. Cleaning up our existing coal plants in the Midwest and Northeast, those parts of the country which rely the most on the dirtiest types of coal plants, is something that needs to be done.

As soon as possible, we need to stop taking stored carbon from the earth, in the form of oil and coal, and stuffing it back into the atmosphere. In the meantime, cleaning up the exhausts of our petroleum and coal burning vehicles and power plants needs to be done.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:18 PM on 09/30/2010
I feel you. for the record, though, they could install twice as many solar panels than that - $8/watt is enormously outdated.

or, if they used that billion over and over as PACE loan funding, they could keep installing 250 MW over and over until every sunny roof, parking lot and brownfield in the US had PV on it, and every structure was retrofitted for efficiency. for FREE.

but, as you say, it's far more important to get the unicorns scrubbing the coal stacks with pixie dust in Illinois.

Hate to say it, but this was a big Obama priority, too. He went on and on about FutureGen during his campaign (product placement!), so they must know where the bodies are buried...