|
||
Not Home Yet: The Terrible Carnage of Bush's Final Days
Bush is going out as he came in, acting aggressively and recklessly in the absence of any support from the people. In 2000, he came to office after losing the popular vote, but behaved as if the country had handed him a resounding conservative mandate. Rather than ruling from the center of a deeply divided nation, he placed his throne to the far right, driving the country even further apart. In 2004, he squeaked by with a contested count in Ohio, reminiscent of Florida 2000. He won only the narrowest of victories with less than a majority of the vote, but continued on as if he had a vote of confidence, ignoring the growing pressure of voter discontent. Now, after the election of Barack Obama, in which the American voters have spoken clearly, Bush has turned a deaf ear to the ringing cry for change.
Subverting the will of the people, our lame duck president is hell-bent on institutionalizing his far-right-wing agenda, so clearly repudiated in the last election. He is doing so through an extensive series of rules changes, the Executive Branch version of passing legislation. With typical disdain for the law, Bush has twisted to his own purpose the process of modifying the Federal Register to force through as many changes as possible in his waning weeks. Federal standards require at least a 60 day notification period for any "significant" rules changes that would carry an economic cost of more than $100 million, while lesser changes require only 30 days. In a self-serving monomaniacal power grab, Bush has simply declared that the distinction is "irrelevant" to him, giving him the shorter window at his whim.
His minions are working furiously with reckless abandon to ensure that the new rules will all take effect before the magic day of January 20. In an unprecedented flurry, Bush has pushed 53 such rules changes through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in just the last few weeks of his Administration. We are witnessing an orgy of changes that will severely tie the hands of his successor and bypass the Congress. Bush has blithely ignored the change demanded by the electorate.
These are not benign or trivial changes to the nation's rules and regulations. Have no doubt that Bush's assault on the Federal Register threatens our civil liberties, limits a woman's right to choose her own reproductive destiny, attacks the environment and endangers the planet. Just a cursory overview will highlight the extent of the damage.
• The Department of Justice has proposed a rule that would give state and local police more authority to collect intelligence on American citizens on the basis of nothing but "reasonable suspicion" that the target "might" be engaged in criminal activity. The rule does not define reasonable suspicion or who would have the authority to designate a suspect of being suspicious.
• The Department of Health and Human Services leaked a rule that would classify oral contraception as a form of abortion.
• Bush will narrow the scope of services that can be provided to poor people under Medicaid's outpatient hospital benefit.
• Bush has changed how the government calculates occupational risks with the goal of downplaying their severity; the rule also hampers the government's ability to regulate toxic substances and hazardous chemicals to which workers are exposed on the job.
• Bush will accelerate oil shale development by weakening environmental standards across more than 2 million acres of public land in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming.
• He will auction drilling rights for lands contiguous to national parks, allow mining wastes to be dumped into rivers and streams, and exempt factory farms from critical environmental regulations.
• He has weakened air pollution standards for mercury and lead, abandoned the Endangered Species Act, and let loose gun-toting weekend warriors in our national forests.
Let us look at a few of these rule changes in more detail to get a sense of how much damage Bush has done.
Rambo Meets Smokey the Bear
The most recent in this flurry of rules changes came on December 5, when Bush overturned a 25-year-old federal restriction on carrying loaded guns in national parks. Thank goodness he is focusing on the important issues plaguing our country.
The new rule allows national park visitors to carry concealed hand guns, not to mention loaded shotguns and rifles. Ronald Reagan is simply not conservative enough for Bush and his friends at the National Rifle Association, because the original weapons ban was proposed and implemented by none other than the cowboy hero of the right. Reagan imposed rules that only allowed unloaded guns secured in a trunk or truck bed to pass through the park, with the idea of allowing hunters to transit to hunting grounds outside the park.
Bush now comes to the rescue for all those living in fear that criminals are lurking behind every tree in our protected forests. Other than pleasing the NRA, this rule change has no justification. NRA lobbyist Chris Cox claims that families need loaded handguns for protection while enjoying nature's bounty. Chris conveniently ignores the fact that the lowest crime rates in the United State are found in our national parks. Introducing loaded guns will have no impact other than to create a new threat to visitors, park officials and unsuspecting wildlife like killer raccoons and vicious attack squirrels.
Smokey Mountains -- Literally
Weekend Rambos are not the only danger to our national parks. Bush is oddly offended by clean air and clear vistas in our nation's protected forests. So much so that Bush has proposed a rules change on behalf of dirty air by modifying how air pollution is measured in America's iconic wilderness areas. Existing rules logically seek to ensure that national parks provide visitors with the cleanest air by imposing the strictest safeguards against pollution. But the change would allow coal-fired power plants to be built adjacent to parks, ignoring the impact of smog and haze. Apparently Bush pines for an urban experience when visiting woodlands.
The new rules would also allow 17,000 existing power plants to dump pollutants into the air with abandon. While the relaxed pollution standard was proposed by EPA political hacks under White House direction, many of that organization's own scientists opposed the change. Such opposition is understandable, because this action would undermine a key component of the Clean Air Act, recognized globally as one of the most successful pieces of environmental legislation ever enacted.
The details of this rules change are worth examining because they expose Bush's deep disdain for the law and for the people. Under the original law, existing power plants at the time of enactment were exempted until the time the plant did any major upgrade. Routine maintenance was excluded. But Bush has cynically redefined "routine maintenance" in a way that intentionally guts the law, allowing a plant to virtually rebuild without meeting modern pollution standards.
The result of this rules change will be an additional 34 tons of mercury dumped into the air by 2010, an amount 6 times what would have been emitted under enforcement of the Clean Air Act. Bush's approach to mercury is particularly sad because economically viable technologies exist to reduce mercury pollution by 90%. Bush will not be satisfied until we have dense smog that offers each of us air we can taste. His legacy will linger for generations in the haze of toxic smog blanketing our once-pristine forests.
We Don't Need No Stinkin' Species
In perhaps his greatest act of destruction, Bush has gutted the Endangered Species Act by imposing the most significant changes since 1986 to the regulations protecting animals and plants threatened with extinction. He did so while ignoring more than 200,000 overwhelmingly negative comments on the proposed change. Now, with no care for public or scientific concerns, Bush will exclude from consideration the emission of greenhouse gases when evaluating if a species could be harmed by a new project. A double blow to wildlife and climate change.
Bush will also now exclude advice from his own government biologists who evaluate the impact of federal projects, such as dams, on endangered species. Bush is silencing the scientists hired specifically to do the job the Administration is now undermining. This is an amazing admission that if facts are inconvenient to Bush's faith-based objectives, then those facts will be ignored. No other president has ever sought to silence his own scientists because he did not like the answers yielded by the natural world. But for Bush, if reality proves tiresome he simply changes the rules.
As if eight long years of hell under Bush were not enough, we now have to suffer this accelerated push to destroy our future in the last days of his reign of terror. Bush's utter disdain for the inconveniences of democracy has never been clearer. In his final backdoor assault on reason, logic, science and the rule of law, Bush has secured his legacy as the nation's worst president ever.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
I don't understand the power of the executive branch. That Bush has been able to take so much unilateral action - these rule changes, all his executive orders - seems to be a design flaw in the structure of the federal government. Where are the checks and balances?
I'm hoping someone will write a book; I'll provide the title: "The Legacy of George W Bush: The Damage Done by our 43rd President to the U.S. Government, The Country, The World, and The Planet"
This would be a four volume set.
Four volumes would be the abridged version.
Do you know anything about executive authority? So many times I was amazed at what Bush did unilaterally. I thought he must have been exceeding his authority - why wasn't anyone calling him on it? If he wasn't exceeding his authority, like I said, it looks like a design flaw in the structure of government because I don't see how anyone would be allowed to make such unilateral decisions.
What is to say that what Bush pushes though, Obama can't push back when he's in power? I don't see the threat of Bush's last minute deals except to get him friends for after he's excommunicated from all public service for lack of ideals and performance. What of these can't Obama re-do?
Because Obama does not believe two wrongs make a right, he will follow the established procedure for rules changes, which typically take one year to allow for proper comment, review and revision. Bush's changes can eventually be undone, but it will take time, and in the meantime, damage will be done.
I think that the precedents have been set for revoking the established procedures. We're not talking about anything that's ever been seen before by a presidential administration. This isn't the "usual" way it goes down at the end of a presidency, this goes way beyond the pale.
And, as you've pointed out, this administration has no concern for actual democracy, they are out to limit the people's will -- and rights! -- turning over public treasury of all kinds to a small group of money-grubbers with no concern for any other people beyond themselves.
carnage is an understatement. my newly-optimistic patriotic self cannot accept that the anti-christ called president george w. bush can continue gutting our rights unchecked. there has to be a morsel of democratic value left that can stop him!
Only time. We just have to gut it out until Jan 20. We are basically helpless before then, as ugly as that is.
WORLDWIDE GEORGE BUSH-WHACKING DAY:
It is not enough for me to see this guy go and celebrate with Obama on January 20.
I propose we have on January 19th a Good Riddance to Bush show of lights at a pre-arranged time around the world that can be timed with satellite pictures of the event. Then I want to send it to the guy to make sure he sees it.
Interesting idea!
Lots of people around the world would participate.
This is the consequence of the congress being unwilling to act in the face of blatent treason.
But I guess that's just fine these days. No reason to impeach, thats "off the table". (Pelosi)
American people are loosing more and more faith in them by the day.
Confidence: Congress = 9% President = 10%? Lowest on record and for good reason.
As bad as these final actions are, they are nothing compared to what he's already done at the behest of the elite that control him and the rest of the spineless congress.
It is true that these final acts by Bush pale in comparison to starting an illegal war, ignoring climate change and deregulating Wall Street leading to a financial meltdown, to name just a few presents left to us by Bush. But these recent rules changes will have lasting and detrimental impacts; they also ensure that Bush leaves with a lasting reminder of how petty and mean-spirited he truly is at his core, in case anybody needing reminding.
Concerning the Congress, I would certainly not apologize for them. But when the Senate is split down the middle, not much can get done. Either side can easily block the other. With Bush in office and 49 Republican Senators on the Hill, I would not come down too hard on the Democrats. After January 20, if the Congress remains ineffective, we need to bring out the big guns of disapproval.
Maybe so, but it's seemed to me that, for some reason, Bush has been extraordinarily intimidating to Congress. He's done such blatantly wrong things, and Congress, both parties, have acted so cowardly. They seem to have forgotten that the Legislative is equal in power to the Executive.
If we click our heels together three times will it be January 20, 2009 12:15 p.m EST? Let's give it a try - all together now.......
I'm counting the microseconds to Jan 20; it cannot come too quickly. We need to end this nightmare.
I live in a state w/ 2 national parks. The whole needing a gun in a national park is bunk! You can't take your dog into a national park but you can bring a gun?? If you're worried about bears, bison, or being attacked by a wolf or a mountain lion make some gd noise!!! My sister, who owns a business not but 50 feet from Yellowstone National Park doesn't even have a gun in her house and there are bears going through her yard ALL THE TIME. My grandmother once asked her "when you go camping or hiking, don't you worry about the bears??" My sisters reply "No, I don't worry about the animals, I worry about the gun toting white guy that thinks I'm a bear or a mountain lion!!!" National parks are one of the last sanctuaries of nature, we don't need the "Bush Stamp" on that too. Hasn't he already done enough to the animals, environment, etc???
Interestingly, the justification given for removing the gun ban does not include protection from wild animals. No, the NRA and Bush believe park visitors need protection from human criminals. Amazing, really. The new rule makes absolutely no sense other than to appease the NRA. There is no good rationale for carrying a concealed loaded weapon in a national park. Just another crazy Bush legacy.
"The NRA and Bush believe park visitors need protection from human criminals" Which in turn would prompt more people to get/carry guns legal/Illegal and there by making the NP's a shooting gallery.
I don't understand the passion of gun-rights folks. I wonder if it's not just about guns, but that guns are a symbol for something.
Listen up people! We can do something about this outlandish hash Bush would leave us with. Call and write letters to your senators and representatives and tell them to use the Congressional Review Act of 1996 to repeal these toxic rules.
Bush is not just the worst president we've ever had, he is the most dangerous. Does he believe in the End Times and that they're coming soon? He acts as if he does and so he doesn't need to have any worry about the serious damage these rules will do to the environment and global warming and to us in the form of severely decre longer obligated to install four seat belts AND the person without a seat belt will not be able to sue if injured by lack of a belt. His total indifference to the well being of anyone but his rich buddies is mind boggling. I keep wondering how Laura Bush can stand to be in the same room with him, how does she keep from strangling him while he sleeps. Compassionate conservatism is an obscenity in his mouth.
It's almost as if Bush is trying to redefine the term "Scorched Earth". Yet, it's not unexpected. Bush has always thought he knows what is best and he must think he still has a couple of those political Capitol dollars to spend. Besides it's kind of like a Christmas present for his industrial cronies.
Contact Congress, I left out the link to look them up.
http://www.usa.gov/Agencies/Federal/Legislative.shtml
Tell them to use the Congressional REview Act of 1996 to repeal the rules. Obama won't be able to undo them but Congress CAN if we can get them to stand up to Bush, finally. It is incredible how much they still let him get away with, even at this late date. For a lame duck prez, he just keeps on keeping on with his destruction of this country, all for the benefit of industry and business. How can he have any conscience and still be able to sleep at night?
This is truly appalling! What can anyone do? Anything? I am really upset about oral contraceptives being classified as a form of abortion-- that is absolutely CHILLING.
Not true; he is pushing through more than twice the number of any rules changes after the election than any president before him; and he is not done yet.
To be fair to bush (GOD it irks me to have to write that!!) he's not the first President to do something like this, nor will he be the last! Granted, his "laws" may harm more people than other have before him (or hopefully, ANYONE after him!!!) but he's truly doing no more and no less than Bill Clinton, Daddy bush, Raygun, Carter, Ford, LBJ, Eisenhower, etc... have done before him!
three words... OFF THE TABLE! three more.. BY THEIR NECKS!
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
