iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jeffrey A. Landers

Jeffrey A. Landers

Posted: January 25, 2011 11:18 PM

Part 2 in an ongoing series about keeping your business assets safe in the event of divorce. Part 1 can be found here.

So what is a prenup? A prenuptial agreement is a contract signed by both parties before their wedding that details what their property rights and expectations (including alimony) would be upon divorce. A well-drafted prenup can "override" both Community Property and Equitable Distribution State laws and the courts will usually respect such agreements (which is one reason why they are so powerful).

It is very important that each spouse-to-be is represented by their own separate attorney and that the prenup contain the following elements:

1. Agreement must be in writing (No oral prenups)
2. It must be executed voluntarily and without coercion (having your fiancé sign a prenup the day before the wedding is a good way to invalidate that prenup)
3. Full disclosure (no hiding of assets and/or liabilities) - this is another way to invalidate a prenup
4. The agreement cannot be unconscionable (the prenup could be invalidated if the agreement is too lopsided with one party getting almost everything and the other getting only a pittance)
5. It must be executed by both parties preferably in front of witnesses (or a notary).
6. It should be in a recordable format (such as a real estate deed).

Some attorneys even recommend having a judge witness the signing to make sure that no party was coerced into signing.

By using a prenuptial agreement, both parties can decide in advanced what property will be considered separate property and what property will be considered marital property and how that marital property should be divided.

You'd like a prenup but it sounds too legal and unromantic--you don't even want to ask him.

Okay! Here's another way to protect your assets:

If you are concerned that the terms of your prenup could be challenged and possibly not upheld in the future; or if your fiancée refuses to sign a prenup; or if you don't even want to ask, then you should definitely consider setting up a Domestic or Foreign Asset Protection Trust.

In essence, you would transfer the ownership of your separate property into this trust, including your company (this would work for most entities--C Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Limited Partnerships--but not necessarily for an S Corporation. Only certain types of trusts can own S Corporation stock, so this is something that would need to be discussed with a trust attorney that is experienced with asset protection trusts).

Without going into further detail about the various types of trusts and how they work, suffice it to say that using a trust could make the entire issue of separate property, and its appreciation, a moot point. The reason for this is that the trust, and not you, would legally own your separate property, including your company.

The transfer of your separate property into the trust should be done while you are still single and would not require any approval from your fiancée. The use of this trust would certainly not preclude you from also having a prenup. However, the prenup would no longer need to address the issue of your separate property and its appreciation. Instead it could focus on how marital property (and possibly his separate property) would be divided and who would receive alimony, in what amount and for how long.

What is a postnup? A postnuptial agreement is a contract between spouses. It is similar to a prenuptial agreement except that it is entered into and signed after marriage. In order to be valid, a postnup should include the same important elements as a prenup.

Having said that, a number of states still don't recognized postnups and even when they do, postnups are challenged and invalidated much more frequently than prenups.

Here's the reason why: Before marriage, the parties are entering into an agreement much like two business people entering into a contract and neither party has any legal family law rights on the other. Theoretically, if they don't like the contract, either party can walk away. However after marriage, the situation is very different. The married couple now have very well defined legal rights regarding support and property division and they are considered to be in a fiduciary relationship with each other (meaning each party has to act in the best interests of the other party). Therefore, any transactions between them will be viewed with caution. By negotiating a postnuptial agreement, one party will typically be giving up some of those rights and that's why postnups will usually be held to a higher standard of fairness than prenups on the theory that individuals have less bargaining power once married.

Nevertheless, if you don't have a prenup, try to get a postnup. It's better than nothing. Just understand that a postnup is not nearly as ironclad as a prenup and you never know how the courts would act if one spouse decides not to abide by the terms of the postnup.

--------------------------------------------
Jeffrey A. Landers, CDFA™ is a Divorce Financial Strategist™ and the founder of Bedrock Divorce Advisors, LLC (http://www.BedrockDivorce.com), a divorce financial strategy firm that exclusively works with women, who are going through, or might be going through, a financially complicated divorce. He also advises women business owners on what steps they can take now to "divorce-proof" their business in the event of a future divorce. He can be reached at Landers@BedrockDivorce.com.

All articles/blog posts are for informational purposes only, and do not constitute legal advice. If you require legal advice, retain a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, who is not an attorney.

 

Follow Jeffrey A. Landers on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Bedrock_Divorce

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:20 PM on 02/08/2011
Why would you want to set up Domestic or Foreign Asset Protection Trusts when you could just tell your client to keep his/her non-marital assets clearly separate? And, are all Foreign Asset Protection Trusts legal?

Melissa F. Brown, www.scdivorcelaw.com
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jeffrey A. Landers
09:19 AM on 02/09/2011
Transferring premarital assets into a Domestic or Foreign Asset Protection Trust has many advantages over just "attempting" to keep non-marital assets separate, such as: 1) Since you no longer legally own those assets (the trust does), those assets remain truly separate and the often heard problems of accidental commingling of separate and marital assets is now eliminated; 2) Even more importantly, most states still consider the appreciation of separate property as marital property. Using these asset protection trusts eliminates that issue, because once again the trust owns the property, not the individual; 3) The use of these trusts, also eliminates many of the unpleasantries and legal challenges associated with prenups (although they are often used in conjunction with prenups where the prenup can now address issues related to alimony and the division of marital property - rather than the issue of separate property); 4) In addition, there may be significant creditor protection benefits, subject to the fraudulent transfer and other laws, which vary from state to state. Due to the cost of setting-up and maintaining these trusts, they are not for everyone. However, if you have an unmarried client with significant assets who is concerned about protecting those assets in the event of a future divorce, a Domestic or Foreign Asset Protection Trust can be a very powerful tool. And Foreign Asset Protection Trusts are perfectly legal, provided you comply with all U.S. tax reporting requirements (the goal is to protect assets, not hide them!).
11:41 AM on 02/04/2011
Jeff,

Excellent seriesI I appreciate your most recent focus on buy-sell agreements. I have been "preaching" about their importance for years.

My new book Buy-Sell Agreements for Closely Held and Family Business Owners is an excellent reference for those who want to follow your advice. Available through my blog, http://www.valuationspeak.com, which links to all articles in the series so far, and the dedicated site, http://buysellagreementsonline.com.

Chris
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jeffrey A. Landers
12:01 PM on 01/30/2011
Because, Roudy, when you have a marriage that is good or even great, nothing could be better!

I know that to be true, because I have been (and still am) very happily married to the same fantastic woman for over 27 years.

I wish the same for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:36 AM on 01/30/2011
The real question to me is this and this is a serious question: Why would a man today ever agree to get married?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jeffrey A. Landers
06:22 PM on 01/29/2011
This is is response to both Ilsa and Keyuri.

Prenups can be a great way to deal with the financial aspects of marriage and divorce, however, legally, they cannot be used for issues regarding child custody, support and/or visitation rights (to the best of my knowledge, this is true in all U.S. states).

A court will (supposedly) always do what is in the best interests of the child.

Having said that, there are numerous types of irrevocable trusts that can be set-up for the benefit of your children. Depending on how those trusts are structured, they can remove assets from your estate; protect those assets from your own divorce and creditors; and also protect your children from any creditor and/or spousal claims (all subject to the fraudulent transfer rules of your state).
04:51 PM on 01/29/2011
Jeff.

whats your view on hashing out custody agreements and child support while dealing with the pre-nup post up and asset protection. Custody battles are more frequent these days as time and ties to child = support and alimony. The 1978 cssa guidelines have been re=designed with hi tech custody issues taking precedence. The only way I can see women protecting themselves is with custody agreements being hashed out in the good times as well.
09:42 AM on 01/29/2011
As an attorney specializing in asset protection, I almost always recommend to my single clients that they consider doing both a self-settled spendthrift trust (the techincal legal term for an "asset protection" trust), as well as a pre-nuptial agreement. One of the issues that suggests a pre-nuptial agreement is important even if a self-settled spenthrift trust is created is that the pre-nuptial agreement can cover the issue of alimony or separate maintenance (and a self-settled spendthrift trust cannot). The matrimonial partners in my firm also tell me, and I would tend to agree, that there is often a "relationship benefit" to negotiating a pre-nuptial agreement - it gets some potentially difficult issues out in the open before marriage so that the parties can enter into their marriage with honest expectations. I don't think there has ever been a person unhappy that they had established a self-settled spendthift trust before marriage, or negotiated a pre-nuptial agreement, but I'm sure that there are plenty of people out there who are unhappy that they did not.
10:07 PM on 01/28/2011
Very insightful article, Jeff. I did not realize there was a "post-nup" option. I will definitely pass on this article to my business owners friends. Thanks!
09:10 AM on 01/28/2011
Jeffrey. This is an informative post. I was not aware of "post-nups". As an advocate for children, I was wondering if pre / post nups ever involve the security of children both fiscally, but more importantly, emotionally.
08:53 AM on 01/28/2011
Thanks for this information Jeff! I've learned so much from your articles already. I'm looking forward to the next one!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:26 PM on 01/27/2011
Excellent information, Jeff You provide creative solutions that most business owners don't know about. I urge people to read this article for a better understanding of their options.

Chery Lazarus, Divorce and Renewal Coaching
www.easiertransitions.com
01:12 PM on 01/27/2011
Great information, I had no idea there was a way around asking for the uncomfortable Pre-nup.
The wave of the future for anyone that has assets to protect.
07:30 AM on 01/27/2011
Good information. I'm glad I took the time to read this article. I particularly like the part that discussed about the alternative of a trust fund. I agree with Sherry about it not being used enough, and yes, it does seem like a much smoother way to have things prepared in the unfortunate case of divorce. To me, it also seems like a more unbiased approach that doesn't bring bad feelings or mistrust when going into a marriage. However, differ among various countries. So "word to the wise", if you are an American and you plan to marry outside the United States, it's probably a good idea to know about the laws in that location. For example, a Prenuptial Agreement in Thailand where I currently live is different than back home in America, mainly because it requires the agreement be officially registered with the Thai government and prior to the marriage. So it does make a difference where you marry. Sometimes people are not aware of the significance until it's already too late. I don't want to discourage anybody from living or marrying abroad. But I think it's important to do a little homework beforehand. Good article Jeffrey.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jeffrey A. Landers
06:40 PM on 01/26/2011
Excellent question Tiffany!

If assets are transferred to a trust after marriage, you need to be mindful of your state's Fraudulent Transfer laws (I will be covering Fraudulent Transfers in Part 4 of this series).

Once the possibility of a divorce is actually on the horizon, any transfer, gift or sale of assets (business or personal), which removes those assets from the reach of your future ex-spouse, or makes it difficult for him to access those assets, could be deemed a fraudulent transfer. (FYI, in most states, the “look-back” period for fraudulent transfers ranges from 4 – 7 years)

So if you transfer your assets into a trust (with his knowledge and consent) and 3 years later you file for divorce, you can be pretty sure that he is going to come back and say that this was a fraudulent transfer - That you knew at the time of transfer you were planning a divorce and that the main purpose of the trust was to put those assets beyond his reach.

If you did this transfer while you were still single, it would be pretty hard for him to make the argument that you were planning your divorce before you were even married!

So yes, this can still be a very useful technique after marriage, but you need to do it as soon as possible so that you can get past the look-back period.

Hope that helps.
12:34 PM on 01/26/2011
Great article, Jeffrey! I particularly liked your reference to establishing a trust as an alternative, or in combination with, a prenup. It's an excellent way to define non-marital assets and is used too infrequently. This is especially true with pre-marital business assets that involve other partners and employees. I look forward to reading more of this series!