More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Democracy 3.0

What's Your Reaction:
America is anxious, for good reason. But in the relentless media stream that gushes forth every day, endlessly looping the litany of horribles -- and what politicians and pundits say the government must or must not do about them -- no one ever turns the mirror around.

Never any headlines or speeches about what "we the people" need to do to become more effective partners in this great experiment called self-government.

Yes, in campaign season, the get-out-the-vote machines roar to life.  And this past year, there's been a remarkable coalition of interests calling for a surge of service.  Let's hope that continues, as it will make us a better and more compassionate country.

But beyond the essential acts of voting and volunteering, there's a third leg of civic engagement required for democracy to thrive.  A more demanding and daily form that is key to ensuring that America has the wisdom and will to successfully and sustainably address our many problems.

But we the peeps are never inspired to engage on that level.

It's critical that we shatter this silence.

Survey after major survey tell the tale: the vast majority of Americans are deeply and willfully uninformed about the big issues that shape all our lives and/or disengaged from participating in political problem-solving in any meaningful way.

This dual-edged civic flaw has atrophied the muscles of participatory democracy, and has paved the way for the special interest-dominated politics that have brought us to the brink.  Even among the informed minority, most have withdrawn from the public square, as they feel there's no effective way to make their voices heard without screaming, so why even bother trying.

The bottom line is that the much praised but never challenged American people know way too little about the issues, the policies, or how government works at even its most basic level.  And they apparently care even less.  The statistics about political ignorance and disengagement are jaw dropping, and I'll link to them in my next post.  For now, I'd just like to set the discussion table with a core proposition:

Politics as usual not only doesn't work anymore -- it can't -- regardless of who is president, or which party controls Congress.  It's not that they're all corrupt or two-faced or feckless.  Most are actually quite well intentioned.  But they're forced to govern in a sea of public passivity, so they surf the only waves that can buoy and propel them.  You'd do the same if you were in their position.

The result is rabid polarization, policy pabulum, and a slow but inevitable decay of all we hold dear.

If we really want to kill this cancer, there's only one answer.

We -- The People -- need a radical upgrade in the way we practice democracy.

A new operating system that motivates and rewards a nation of well-informed citizens -- actively participating in political decision-making on a regular basis -- helping shape the national debate rather than being shaped by it.

Is that really possible?

Yes, and in future posts, we'll explore how. But the first step is overcoming inertia -- because most Americans currently claim they don't have the time to keep up to speed on current events, or to dig beneath the surface to see the true impact of government policies -- and don't really feel it's their job anyway.

Yet this aggressively passive civic mindset is the very thing that creates the political power vacuum that's filled by those who aren't shy about making their voices heard and who therefore shape the policies and finance the governments we so endlessly and futilely complain about.

This dysfunction must be mended or we're all in deep trouble.  Future generations all the more so.

Confronted by increasingly complex crises on every front, America needs all the wisdom it can get, from as many sources as it can get it.  No president or Congress can rise to the challenge alone.  It's axiomatic -- they will always bend to the will of powerful private interests as long as the voice of the public interest remains weak.

The only antidote is an active, vocal, thoroughly informed and thoughtful citizenry.

We are not a stupid people.  Far from it.  We inherently have all we need to excel as citizens -- everything except the will.  Yet this rampant civic laziness and the political ignorance that flows from it is considered a taboo subject for those who lust for votes or ratings.  As such, there's long been a conspiracy of silence among politicians and the media to avoid talking about any of this.

But talk about it we must.  A lot.

In future posts I'll share the fruits of two years of research, as well as a series of video essays I've produced on this subject featuring a dozen of America's leading political philosophers and civic engagement experts.  The upshot is that there's both good news and bad news.

The bad is just how incredibly far we need to go to become a nation of citizens able and willing to engage in serious self-governance.  And why it's literally a life and death matter.

The good news is that there are proven methods and processes for motivating and enabling citizens to learn about issues, cast off cynicism, and make their voices heard in a highly effective way.

We live in strange and threatening times.  But also fascinating times, filled with viral opportunity.  And we get to choose which road to ride on.

That's the beauty of America.  Her light flickers, but a beacon still.
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:46 PM on 12/25/2009
An interesting read. I recently began studying the subject of participatory democracy and civic engagement, including Peter Levine's work. I recommend Carole Pateman's seminal book Participation and Democratic Theory, Deepening Democracy by Fung and Wright, as well as Everyday Democracy published by Demos UK (http://demos.co.uk). My only major problem with Abelson's assessment is that he seems to imply that public passivity arose not from the concerted efforts of those in power to marginalize the masses (contributing to our current state of cynicism and contempt) but from some other failure of human impulse or imagination. To be sure, our democratic deficit in not simply the byproduct of unintended deficiencies in the structure of government but rather the deliberate design and manipulation of government in the service of elite interests. This can be traced back to the framing of the Constitution and consequent attempts to pacify the population and control the public mind. This historical oversight (and somewhat naive view of power) would likely hinder any move toward reclaiming democratic control over our core institutions. This fact must be taken into account when striving to increase public involvement in meaningful decision-making. Needless to say, I eagerly await his further elaboration of these ideas...
04:59 PM on 12/25/2009
this great video illustrates the MASS method of public engagement: http://vimeo.com/4931804
11:16 PM on 12/15/2009
The speed of the shift really depends on your point of view, but democracy is being reinvented, community by community, because the traditional forms of government-citizen interaction don't work for either government or citizens. Jeffrey is right that our internalized guilt about citizenship - we assume "getting involved" has to be a lonely, arduous, thankless task - is one of the main obstacles in the way of this shift. But when he describes some of the latest democratic innovations in his upcoming posts, Jeffrey will show how these initiatives can give people a whole new sense of what it means to be citizens.
10:49 PM on 12/07/2009
I am not certain what jhNY means by suggesting that this country is a democracy "up to a point", but the assertion itself proves the basic premise of this piece: who else can there possibly be to blame if our democracy is not complete? Us and only us, always and forever. Also, check the Supreme Court for other high-level positions by appointment!
I have less time than I would like to fully engage in every critical issue that faces us, but I keep myself aware of the headlines and drill down on the issues on which I am passionate. I engage my family, friends and colleagues in discussions about "my" issues and I am often rewarded when someone thanks me for making them aware of a topic that escaped their attention.
I was recently reminded of how much of a culture of discussion of issues I came from, growing up in a liberal Northeastern suburb during the mid-fifties, and I would not trade those dinner-table experiences for anything in the world, even if I shrank from them in my easily bored youth. It formed a foundation for engagement and a profound respect for democracy that has informed the entirety of my adult life, and I think it behooves everyone who considers the content of Mr. Abelson's post to commit themselves to spending time talking to their families, especially the kids, whose future depends on their learned commitment to carrying forth the dream of the founders.
jhNY
Mercy.
05:50 PM on 12/07/2009
Fact is, The US is a democracy up to a point, and voters choose who represents them in government at every level, except of course the sacrosanct Fed-- too important to be left to the vagaries of the citizens' opinions. The two parties provide us with a choice between the evil of two lessers, to use a phrase once visited on Philadelphia moyoral poltics, and the third parties catch the teeny overflow. But the author's idea of how much its citizens must be educated before they can be trusted to be responsible for their own representation, is just the author's idea, even when equipped with his own study of years' duration, and the citizens, with or without the author's blessing, will be doing the electing with or without his instruction, no matter how well-intentioned his instruction might be. And finally, the type is way too small for any but the unrepentantly myopic to endure...
08:52 PM on 12/07/2009
I think by the time Jeffrey gets finished sharing his research, it will be clear that his vision is not "just the author's idea" but represents a set of concrete and effective practices with a growing movement behind them. Stay tuned.
10:35 PM on 12/07/2009
The current degree of citizen education and involvement has produced the current result. If that is good enough for us, then we need think no further. If it's not, a suggestion that we get more involved or educated is not exactly controversial and warrants thoughtful consideration.
I, for one, am very interested to hear this author's description of a process by which we might better conduct this faltering but worthy experiment. We train and study for our jobs, is our country which shelters us less important?
Finally, it is the concepts and dreams bestowed by the vehicle of type that count, not the ease or comfort with which they are absorbed. In this instance of well-formed words describing a potential formula for national and human success, size does not matter.