EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Jeffrey Feldman

Jeffrey Feldman

Posted: February 26, 2010 12:01 PM

Do Doctors in America Turn Away the Uninsured?

What's Your Reaction:

If President Obama's health care summit revealed anything in the long hours of partisan whining, it was a fundamental difference in the crisis that each side believes is on the table for Congress to solve. Democrats spoke to a national humanitarian crisis caused by an industry run amok, while Republicans talked of a series of consumer obstacles caused by government meddling in the market place. Who is correct?

To believe the Republicans, one would be forced to accept the central claim they make over and over and over again: anyone at anytime can go to a doctor and be treated irrespective of insurance coverage or financial circumstances.

Is this claim true? Are the uninsured denied care upon going to a doctor?

The answer is: yes--the uninsured are denied care by doctors all the time. How this denial of care happens, however, is something that nobody in Congress or the media has bothered to discuss on the public stage, despite the fact that it is one of the most common and banal evils of our democracy.

To see how patients are denied care by doctors, we must begin by exorcising from our heads the Norman Rockwell painting many of us carry around in our heads--the painting of a boy sitting in the office of a country doctor. For about the past 40 years, "going to the doctor" in America has not had much in common with the nostalgic image of a ruddy-cheeked old man putting his stethoscope on the chest of a nervous teenage boy. That kind of simple and direct interaction between doctor and patient did happen in the past--I vaguely remember it when I was a boy in the early 70s. But it has been a long, long time since things were that simple.

Nowadays, to get into the room with a doctor, we must first make it past the system each practice sets up to weed out the paying customers from those who cannot pay. This often humiliating experience begins with a phone call to the front desk of the doctor's office.

The person who works behind that front desk is in charge of two tasks: (1) ascertaining how the patient is going to pay for the appointment and (2) fitting the patient into the doctor's schedule of appointments--in that order. Barring some personal connection, nobody in America can get a doctor's appointment without getting past the hurdle of payment maintained by the receptionist in charge of maintaining it.

To determine if we can pay for an appointment, the receptionist asks first for insurance plan information. Even if we have insurance, that may not be enough to see the doctor because at this point we may find out that this doctor's office only accepts patients with certain insurance plans. If our plan is accepted, we can move forward, if not, we move on to the next hurdle.

If we are uninsured or our insurance plan is not accepted by this clinic, the receptionist then asks for a valid credit card to cover the cost of the appointment. If we have a valid credit card, we give it to the receptionist and we can move forward. If not, we move on to the next hurdle.

In the absence of a valid credit card, some medical practices will allow us to pay for the appointment in advance using cash. If we can pay, we must go to the office and do so, whereupon we can get an appointment. Many doctor's offices, however, do not allow cash payment because most appointments involve an element of the unknown in terms of final cost. Because of this, "payment in cash" is often allowed only if a patient can guarantee the payment with a credit card number: a deal breaker for many people. Therefore, if we do not have enough money to pay cash in advance and a credit card to back it up, we move on to the next hurdle.

At this point, the receptionist will likely suggest another practice or an emergency room visit.

We have not been denied care by a doctor, in other words, but we have not really made it anywhere near the doctor, yet, either. Instead, we must now head down to the local hospital emergency room and get treated there. Since we cannot pay cash at the emergency room anymore than we could pay at the doctor's office, we will be treated by virtue of laws put in place to recover from state and federal government some of the costs of an unpaid emergency room visit. We will go home treated, but we will not have established any kind of relationship to a doctor. Most likely, we will have been treated by an overworked and under-appreciated medical resident 72 hours into a 48-hour shift.

In some cases, a medical practice who determines a patient is unable to pay will allow a patient to talk to the doctor briefly, either in the doctor's office, in the waiting room, or briefly over the phone. An uninsured and non-paying patient making it into the examination room, however, is possible, although unlikely.

This is not a comment on the individual character of doctors in America, today. Most doctors are selfless and service-oriented: good people with a desire to use their skills to improve people's lives no matter what the cost.

But doctors have a larger concern that most often mitigates their ability to exercise this direct kind of care for any patient who comes their way regardless of financial circumstances. Doctors, today, erect a barrier between themselves and their patients because their ability to treat their covered and paying patients depends on their ability to keep the doors of their medical business open. And so, in order to protect their practice, doctors must look for ways to minimize, if not eliminate altogether, the financial losses to their businesses incurred by treating patients with no means to pay.

Good people, with good hearts, often build business in which they surround themselves with heartless bureaucrats tasked with guarding the gate and protecting the bottom line. And that is often the case with doctors.

The receptionist who is paid to keep uninsured and non-paying patients from entering the doctor's examination room is one of those barriers. Patients, however, also develop internal barriers--psychological hurdles--that keep them away from the doctor.

Americans who lose their health insurance coverage often do not even bother to try to make appointments at the doctor's office out of concern that to do so will risk financial ruin or humiliation.

Since it is not possible to put a limit on how much a doctor's office can charge to a credit card, patients are often worried that giving a doctor a credit card could result in tens of thousands of dollars in charges, unexpectedly. Rather than thinking of doctors as people who can and want to help them--the way most doctors see themselves--tens of millions of Americans think of doctors as financial predators to be avoided at all costs.

Likewise, the pain of having to admit one's own indigent status in the course of making an appointment is often too much for proud Americans to bear. And so they stay away from the doctor.

Is it true, then, as Republicans claim, that nobody has ever been denied care upon going to a doctor? Is this humanitarian crisis in America really just a political fiction as the Republicans would have us believe? Experience and logic lead us to conclude otherwise.

American is packed to the gills with the most skilled and selfless doctors in the world--and millions of Americans, each and every day, despite trying, never make it to the examination room to see them.

 

Follow Jeffrey Feldman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JeffreyFeldman

 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:06 PM on 04/14/2010
Excellent article! It's a shame what's going on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Jase84
Independent Progressive
05:05 PM on 03/23/2010
This issue has special meaning for me because my dad developed Schizophre­nia that caused him to lose his job, and his medical insurance over time. His doctor told him after 3 visits, hey I'm not a free clinic. He had to quit going.

My siblings and I have found that finding help for the mentally ill is probably the hardest thing you can do in your life. It's just not there.
03:15 PM on 02/27/2010
Very nice article. This could make the pages of Reader's Digest, I think. If, however, we want to frame the debate, honestly, let the words, 45,000 deaths a year as a result of being uninsured, ring out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:25 PM on 02/26/2010
I can hardly believe the condition of our health care system. I recently moved to a new area in Pennsylvan­ia. Because I only have medicare..­I make every effort not to go to a doctor unless I have no other choice. So I hadn't seen a doctor in 5 years or more. I had been getting my prescripti­ons for blood pressure meds..from this same "clinic" doctor. But when I moved he refused to renew it. I called over 20 doctors, basically, just to get my blood pressure checked and to renew my prescripti­on!! I went to a smaller open clinic..th­ey would't see me BECAUSE I had medicare..­.!! I'm sure all this chaos just to renew my script caused my BP to spike a few points!! HAI had no idea a doctor could refuse a person because of the wrong insurance.­.! One doctor called me back after 3 days only to tell me he couldn't/w­ouldn't see me..but that was after he asked me the general condition of my health!!! I know I'm just an "ordinary" person..bu­t I matter to my famlly.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
06:18 PM on 02/26/2010
Many doctors will not even permit patients to make an appointmen­t until they know what their insurance is. I was temporaril­y without health insurance for a period and I couldn't even get an appointmen­t with one doctor, despite having the resources to pay cash at the time of the appointmen­t, before they even took me back. I told them I was a Nurse Anesthetis­t and an Advanced Nurse Practitone­r and was going to file a complaint with the Board on them, and call the local TV station.

When I got there to see the doctor, I read him the riot act and he stood and took it, but only because of who and what I was.
photo
Areyoukiddingg
We need a Reset
06:12 PM on 02/26/2010
This isn't the doctor's fault, it's the health insurance companies. Before the Reagan administra­tion, you had much more choice in how you managed your health care. In most cases with family docs, you could just go to the office and sit & wait your turn in the waiting room. Patients were seen in the order they arrived. You would see the doctor & if you needed drugs in lots of cases he could give you samples, or write a prescripti­on. You paid your $10 office visit and off you went. Insurance wasn't a factor unless you needed surgery or hospitaliz­ation, in which case you had two policies, a doctor's policy and a major medical policy. The cost was covered by your employer in most cases. What threw us off the tracks was when Reagan allowed HMO's to get in between the doctor and patient. Now, we have very few choices other than to accept whatever "cookie-cu­tter" plan the health insurance companies have "gamed" for their highest profit, or go bare and pay everything out of pocket. For many Americans, there's a 3rd choice, and that is to do without. Not a good testimony for the richest country in the world. Instead of throwing out the Dems plan as the GOP suggests, we should throw out the entire system (including the health insurance companies) & start over!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
04:26 AM on 03/01/2010
Actually, as much as I loathe Reagan, it was Nixon that let in the HMO's.
05:57 PM on 02/26/2010
Most people who like their health insurance, have never made a major claim.

People that think America has "the best medical system in the world", most likely haven't either, or at least not had a claim been turned away by the "system".

Anyone who has not had to undergo an insurance company authorized "Independe­nt Medical Evaluation­" can't possibly envision just how incredibly corrupt the system has become. (The dirty little secret doctors don't like to talk about)

America is not unique. Every country must make a choice. Which is more important, the health of it's people, or the wealth of its most affluent members.

America chose money, or at least those elected to represent Americans did. Not the legacy I would have chosen for our progeny. But then I seem to be in the minority.
05:53 PM on 02/26/2010
I'm glad someone made the point about the credit cards. At one point I was uninsured but had decent savings. I delayed some doctor visits because there was no way I was going to hand my hard-earne­d nest egg over to these people.

If you want an illuminati­ng experience­, ask for a price list of all the supplies and procedures before you order them. People complain about insurance companies skimming for profits, but the true problem they cause is blinding the patient so hospitals get away with these price points.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CindiT
05:22 PM on 02/26/2010
When I was in my mid-30s, I suddenly developed numbness, then pain and dark purple bruises in my upper right arm (all within one day). I was working as a waitress, in college and renting an apartment. The next day, I started calling doctors to try to find out what was wrong. The receptioni­sts at the first 3 doctors I called asked me what insurance I had. When I said, "I don't have health insurance"­, they told me the doctors wouldn't see me. I finally found a doctor who would. He looked at the bruises and sent me right to emergency. I had a blood clot that was traveling toward my lung. I was hospitaliz­ed for 8 days and had to take blood thinners for 6 months afterward. My bill was over $30,000 and I did not have surgery. I paid it all back, monthly, over several years. I had to drop out of school. One other thing, I had to have 2 ultrasound­s. I told the vascular doctor in the hospital that I was going to decline the 2nd one due to not having insurance. He said, "don't worry, I'm not charging you for this one". I have never forgotten that kindly doctor. I was not overweight and never smoked. They were never sure about what caused the clot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slowdoc
05:15 PM on 02/26/2010
The one thing you are not mentioning is that physicians who treat Medicaid or Medicare patients are barred from offering free care. That's right, it is viewed as Medicare fraud to offer care at a lower price than you offer Medicare patients - so practices are barred from offering free care. You can write off a bill, but only after it has been sent, not paid, and is deemed unlikely to be paid. Forcing physicians to charge at least the Medicare rate for anyone is costly.
09:42 PM on 04/14/2010
Really? Medicare rate is at least the same if not higher than the one for third-part­y payers. Physicians should offer a lower rate for cash-payin­g patients as they do not have to process any paperwork and they get the money upfront instead of waiting 30-60 days. In most instances the third party payer reimbursem­ent is around 25-30% of the billed amount. Why should cash paying patients have to pay 100%?
I've heard the story of reduced rates b/c of the membership the third party payers have. This is non-sense b/c they insurance company doesn't point the patient to one doctor or another.
In addition, it would not really hurt to have some physicians volunteer a couple of hours per week or even every 2 weeks at a clinic. It's really not that much to ask for when MDs get $45 for a 5-minute consultati­on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaczar
04:48 PM on 02/26/2010
Health care should be about the appropriat­e treatment for illness and injury, not about profit. Caring for the sick is about humanity. The cost of the care should be reimbursed but making a profit from the sick, the injured, the dying, is obscene.Th­e responses to the article above are correct, most folks in government have no idea of the suffering over healthcare by the general population­. And the general population allow themselves to be duped because they do not know any better. Nor will they listen to those who do. Our political system fails us. I cannot tell you how sad that makes me. The greed of the corporate health industry and the money they spend to maintain those profits by law is appalling.
04:40 PM on 02/26/2010
As always, there are several sides to every story. As a physician in Canada I was happy that all patients had full access. However, the fees, determined by the government­, were so low ($35 for a one hour consultati­on; $250 for delivering a baby) that doctors had to resort to "nickle and diming" patients for "non-cover­ed services", something I just could not bring myself to do. And access, difficult at the best of times, was certainly more efficient, in return for "certain considerat­ions".

As a physician in the U.S., the fees, still relatively low, are determined by insurance companies, raking in billions of dollars of profit, on the backs of physicians­, and patients. In the U.S., medical practice is a business. Whereas in Canada, I could manage with a receptioni­st, nurse, and chaperone, here in the U.S. I needed nine people to run an efficient practice. Those people had to be paid; I provided excellent health insurance; there is rent, taxes, various fees, and so much more in the way of expenses. While I could, when necessary, provide free care, if word got out that i was providing care for free, I would be inundated with non-paying patients, and would not be able to keep my practice open.

A combined public/pri­vate system seems the best option, but does not appear to be on the table at this time.

And BTW, doctors, as patients, don't receive any "special considerat­ion" from their practicing brethern.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drricklippin
physician-activist-poet
04:37 PM on 02/26/2010
PS- All US doctors should be put on a good salary. If they don't like being a salaried profession­al let them quit medicine and enter the business world.

Those docs who received their MBAs should trade them in for academic degrees in ethics, sociology and theology.

At the provider level calling the practice of medicine a business is an ethically unsustaina­ble position and an oxymoron

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampto­n,Pa
05:14 PM on 02/26/2010
The answer is not as easy as you think it is. Being a Doctor (as am I) you know what it takes to get though college, medical school, residency, and early practice. The number and quality of people in any profession is in a dynamic flux. Pay Doctors a little less or make their lives a little bit worse and you will get fewer people choosing to go into Medicine and many Doctors leaving the profession early. It is easy to say "let them quit medicine and enter the business world" but who is going to treat all of the patients? Imagine a woman waking up one morning in twenty years and feeling a lump in her breast (maybe your wife or daughter) and calling Doctors for an appointmen­t and being told that there are 300 people waiting for appointmen­ts - take a number. Now imagine we don't blame the Doctors, keep them happy, and instead give everyone Medicare with supplement­s paid for by our employers (at a fraction of the cost to the company of full insurance coverage). The lady with the breast lump sees a Doctor that day and a bunch of MBAs who would have gone to work for health insurance companies are now running solar energy firms. Which future do you want?
unitron
micro-bio sounds like a WMD
05:37 PM on 02/26/2010
"The lady with the breast lump sees a Doctor that day... " (sounds good so far)

"...and a bunch of MBAs who would have gone to work for health insurance companies are now running solar energy firms."

Oh well, I guess undesirabl­e side effects are inevitable­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drricklippin
physician-activist-poet
05:39 PM on 02/26/2010
Agree - it will take a while because costs of med education have to come way down . But the standard in many nations is the salaried Doc which is as it should be.

Dr. Rick Lippin
05:24 PM on 02/26/2010
The problem with "a good salary' is the required "benefits" - coffee breaks, lunch breaks, sick leave, maternity leave, time and a half for overtime, etc., The system would not be able to afford it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drricklippin
physician-activist-poet
05:43 PM on 02/26/2010
WBMD-

What the hell is wrong with benefits for overworked­/overstres­sed American doctors? Maybe they will make fewer medical errors?

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampto­n,Pa
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jaczar
04:31 PM on 02/26/2010
I'm a retired critical care nurse. Spent 45 yrs. in the health care industry. I've seen with my own eyes
everything asserted here and more. In the early years (for me), many religious organizati­ons ran hospitals and clinics and billed your insurance company if you had one. If not, since they were tax-exempt and not-for-pr­ofit, they wrote it off at tax time as charity given. In the 80's, profit-bas­ed health care became the rage
because of the huge profits available. It's gone downhill since then. If we took half the amount we spend on our wasteful wars, we could provide health care for all. Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP and government­-sponsored clinics already cover 40% of the population­. Hospitals, drug companies, medical device companies and many, though not all physicians just refuse to give up any of that profit. Greed causes illness, suffering and death. Sad.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
TXfemmom
Grandma with eye on the future
06:32 PM on 02/26/2010
There should be a point, even in a capitalist­ic society, where greed and money cease to be the main focus. I too was an RN, an Advanced Nurse Practioner and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetis­t and what you say is the absolute truth.

I watched Sanjay Gupta walk through his operating room today and show the prices that they charge and pay for things. His hospital charges $280 for a bag of IV fluids. I used my contacts to discover that hospitals pay around $18. I know they have costs, but THAT IS SIMPLY OBSCENE.

Then, I called a French neuro-radi­ologist which I met while still practicing and he said that they pay $480 for an instrument used in neurosurge­ry which Gupta said costs them $1,200. The French pay 40 to 60% less for branded pharmaceut­icals and the pharms accept it. If as a nation, we do not take steps to get this stuff under control, we are going to fail, as did Rome, because of the corruption and greed in health care, Wall Street, and the military-i­ndustrial complex.
02:03 PM on 02/28/2010
The debate about what other nations pay for healthcare is a completely different subject that is also not black and white. Why do the French pay 40% to 60% less for prescripti­on drugs than do we Americans? Because they bargain for the prices and we don't. But what happens when we start bargaining with big Pharma? Americans pay for a lot of the profits big Pharma makes and if we insist on lowering how much we pay the rest of the world is going to have to pay more. If our costs come down 20% to 30% than the French will have to pay 20% to 30% more. If they don't like it than the companies will tell them to go without. We pay too much in America for drugs but many other countries pay too little.
04:22 PM on 02/26/2010
Some facts for the author to consider:
1. It is illegal for residents to work 48 hour shifts, and for the most part anyone working in a busy emergency department doesn't work more than 12-14 hours, including residents.

2. Anyone who thinks paying for a doctor's office visit by credit card would allow the office to run up thousands of dollars of charges probably thinks Sarah Palin is a visionary genius.

3. Doctors HIRE people to keep the uninsured out of their practices.

4. Those who are uninsured and go to emergency rooms rarely pay anything for their care. Emergency providers and hospitals are forced by law to provide this care for free, which is basically government piracy of their services, something that no other profession in this country is forced to do.

5. The requiremen­t to provide all this free care caused one in five ER's across the country to close while visits have skyrockete­d, leading to unacceptab­ly long waiting times, ambulance diversion, hospital overcrowdi­ng and lower quality care. The government caused all of this, yet we are supposed to believe that increasing government involvemen­t in health care would improve things?

Sorry, but I outgrew such fairy tales long ago.
04:47 PM on 02/26/2010
You were correct with your post right up until the end - Government regulation­s keeping ERs from turning patients away is a good thing. It was put into place because of hospital administra­tors who would send critically ill patients away because they could not pay the bills. With a proper health insurance system in this country this would happen rarely and would not be the financial burden it is today. The problem is the way we pay for all healthcare in this country. I am all for private insurance companies - just make them not-for-pr­ofit like the vast majority of the hospitals in this country. There is no reason people should get rich by setting up profit-mak­ing operations that prey on sick people. That would be like someone getting rich by setting up private police or fire department­s (with no Government alternativ­e) and making people pay through the nose for coverage. And yes, I am a Doctor and I know how the system works so don't bother posting some lame rebuttal.
Citizen54
The Anti-Conservative
06:07 PM on 02/26/2010
You would rather have a for-profit corporatio­n deciding your healthcare and treatment options? This is what I don't understand about the anti-gover­nment people. Given a choice between government and big business, I know which one I'd trust.

As for your point 4.: If doctors -- or rather, their gatekeepin­g receptioni­sts, many of whom apparently have a certificat­e in rudeness and have been drained of human compassion -- would accept patients who pay cash, there would be fewer people needing to go to the emergency room.