- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- Health Care
- |
- Dick Cheney
- |
- GOP
- |

OK, everybody, take out a piece of paper and write down today's lesson points from the Bush administration Ministry of Disinformation (a.k.a., the White House website):
Islamofascism - Bad! (nuclear war, invasion, death)
Islamofashion - Good! (smiles, happy, love)
Of course, nobody at the White House is using the word 'Islamofashion,' but they should be. A quick look at the first web site reveals a picture of the First Lady in Saudi Arabia wearing a women's head scarf, a tradition often referred to as wearing the ħijāb ('veil,' حجاب) or more specifically the khimār ('headscarf,'خمار). Meanwhile, George W. Bush's allies are fanning out across the nation screaming 'Islamofascism!' to anyone and everyone who will listen.
Happy in the Hijab
The headscarf, of course, is not new to U.S. diplomacy. What's new is the 'Islamofascist' right-wing hysteria now shaping the political debate in which the headscarf suddenly reappeared.
In April of 2007, Nancy Pelosi was photographed on a diplomatic visit to Syria wearing the ħijāb, leading right-wing pundits and their readers to conclude that an American diplomat who wears a khimār is appeasing fascism:
I've been to the Muslim world and I've walked around their mosques and been treated as a special guest by devout Muslims. NOT ONCE did they make me put on a veil or do anything to impose their religion on me. They knew I was Catholic and they respected that. This headscarf show is purely submission by Nance in a bid to suck up to her Islamofascist masters. No westerner does that unless she wants to do that. Knowing what real Muslims are like, this is clearly kowtowing from Nance. It makes me sick.
(full article is here)
Back in April, the right-wing had only just begun shouting 'Islamofascist!' and so there were relatively few people who really believed that Nancy Pelosi had 'Islamofascist masters.' Today, however, the right-wing is in high gear using the phrase 'Islamofascist' to convince the American public that a preemptive military strike against Iran is the only way to forestall the nuclear annihilation of the United States by a rogue nation--a rogue nation that imposes Islam on its people and forces its women to wear (ehem...) head scarves.
As a result of repeating the word 'Islamofascist' over and over again in well-planned name calling campaigns, the right is developing the dangerous habit of always talking about 'fascism' when they talk about Islam, producing a widespread cognitive dysfunction that reminds many people of the propaganda induced hysterias of the 1920s and 1930s. Although confined largely to right-wing agitators, it will soon be impossible for vast segments of the American public to distinguish between the religion practiced by Muslims ('Islam') and the propaganda pushed by Bush to whip up enough hysteria to support an attack on Iran ('Islamofascism').
Meanwhile--at this very moment when the media has picked up the term 'Islamofascist' with its typical, uncritical repetition of neo-conservative talking points--the White House photo team captures Laura Bush flashing her signature empty smile while donning an all-black khimār festooned with pink breast cancer awareness ribbons--a bizarre diplomatic cocktail consisting of one-part global woman's symbols of empowerment and two parts symbols of women's suppression, shaken and stirred, then poured generously onto the body of the First Lady.
A Message In A Headscarf
Is this Laura Bush sucking up to fascism?
Clearly not. The picture of Laura is not intended to send the message "Islamofascism, bad," but rather: "Islamofashion, good!"
What the American public is supposed to see in these moments is George W. Bush's thinly veiled effort to use the First Lady to send a message of reassurance to his princely counterparts in Saudi Arabia. That message is: Even as we smear all of Islam here at home with the made-up word 'Islamofascist,' we want the Saudi princes to know that it is just another dose of irrational fear served up hot and steaming for the American public.
Laura Bush's in a khimār means that America needs to turn 'Islam' into 'Islamofascism' at home in order to whip up enough fear of nuclear war to make a military attack on Iran seem like the only possible path to survival--but...we still love the Saudis (who don't let women drive cars).
Islamofascism, bad. Islamofashion, good!
Tomorrow's lesson: How to stop thinking and worry about nuclear bombs all the time.
(cross posted from Frameshop)
Follow Jeffrey Feldman on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JeffreyFeldman
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
so forcing womening to wear head scarfs, is good?
The head scarfs has nothing to do with islam but it purely a tribal belief.
It really doesn't matter what you call them the extremist Islamic movements around the world have been a disaster not so much for those of us in the West but for Muslims around the world. You Americans are much more generous and tolerant than we Europeans who seem hell bent on starting another race war. Anti-Islamic political parties are resurgent throughout continental Europe, not so much in the UK where bereavement over Diana is still a more accurate sign of the national temperament. Remember it was Americans who helped Muslims in Kosovo while most of Europe looked idly on.
'the right is developing the dangerous habit of always talking about 'fascism' when they talk about Islam, producing a widespread cognitive dysfunction that reminds many people of the propaganda induced hysterias of the 1920s and 1930s.'
some americans are 'appeasing fascism,' but it's not this fabricated 'islamofascism' it's the standard variety happening right here at home.
and, the author is right to point out the hypocrisy of never criticizing the highly fundamentalist and repressive saudi regime while demonizing iran's more tame and democratic brand of theocracy, which happens to be far more accepting, lenient and -relative to many other muslim nations- progressive toward women's issues.
on a separate matter, can we please stop suggesting that the hijab is always a tool of female suppression? yes, many muslim women are suppressed (as are many, many non-muslim women) but the hijab is a complex cultural item with many layers of symbolism and significance that we in the west just do not grasp. many women CHOOSE the hijab, and have a right to do so without being ridiculed and insulted by others.
while we should support the rights of muslim women everywhere, we also should not stigmatize them for the ways in which they are different from us - they should be able to practice their faith and observe their traditions as they see fit without condemnation and criticism from us.
here in calgary, arch conservative Ezra Levant, wrote abt a school bus accident in which tragically a lil girl was killed. Mr. Levant conclusion the cause of the accident Bus driver, wearing head scarf.
Plz add head scarf as the no. 1 reason of road accident around the world.
In quebec a refree during girl soccer ejected a muslim teen gal, as she was playng soccer while wearing a scarf.
Plz add head scarf as lethal force on soccer field, too bad zidane didnt use that when he head butt the italian player, that would have proved the point how dangerous head scard is
Islamofascism has "straw-man" written all over it. I guess every regime needs its "boogeyman ."
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with