As the leading national organization providing crisis intervention and suicide prevention services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) youth, The Trevor Project has served the needs of LGBTQ youth at a dark moment in their lives for the past 13 years -- offering hope and expertise when few others are can.
The findings in Dr. Hatzenbuehler's recently published study in Pediatrics largely mirror what we have learned through the Trevor Lifeline regarding social environments and the risk for suicide among LGTBQ youth -- namely that young people who live in areas with a more negative sociopolitical climate towards LGBTQ young people and without affirming resources are at an increased risk for suicide when compared with their peers in more supportive environments.
More than 70 percent of the thousands of calls to the 24/7 Trevor Lifeline originate in the southern and central regions of the United States, where there are traditionally fewer legal protections, in- and out-of-school support services and accepting environments for LGBTQ young people. While there are wonderful programs in these areas that do excellent work, some youth in these areas receive less support and face tougher challenges in their communities and schools.
For example, 1.95 percent of the United States population resides in the state of Missouri, yet 3.37 percent of the 2010 volume to The Trevor Lifeline originated there -- illustrating a disproportionately high demand for LGBTQ crisis intervention and suicide prevention services in that state.
Dr. Hatzenbuehler's research serves to highlight what we have seen for more than a decade: Non-accepting community, school and familial environments are associated with an elevated risk for suicide attempts among LGBTQ youth. Examining counties across Oregon, he finds that youth living in environments with less support for lesbian and gay people are 20 percent more likely to attempt suicide than those youth living in areas with support.
We applaud Dr. Hatzenbuehler's work as a starting point, but do want to stress that there is much work to be done in examining the interplay of social environments and suicide among LGBTQ youth. For example, this study does not include transgender youth and those who do not fit into narrow gender stereotypes. Examining how social environments react to gender non-conforming behavior among youth is critical. From what we have seen in our own research and experience, social environments for transgender youth are likely even tougher and may play a role in their elevated risk for suicide attempts.
Nonetheless, the data here are drawn from a population-based sample, a relative rarity in LGBTQ youth research, which has largely depended on smaller convenience samples. This study highlights why asking sexual orientation questions on larger population-based surveys is so important; those data allow us to make larger generalizations and better target our programs to the young people most in need. The absence of data speaks to an even greater need for gender identity data in large research studies like this. Dr. Hatzenbuehler highlights several valid limitations to his ecological study, but these limitations should inform future research about the complex nature of suicide among LGBTQ young people.
Protective factors against suicide among LGBTQ youth include school safety, support and connectedness (including Gay-Straight Alliances), wider community support, and strong connections with parents and families. It is our duty, as caring adults and allies, to ensure that youth have connections and support -- regardless of the social environment in which they live. We must also remember that young people in more progressive cities can struggle with community and personal acceptance, just as young people in rural, more conservative parts of the nation can flourish with support and acceptance. The research finds that: "Characteristics of the social environment increase the risk for suicide attempts among LGB youth, over and above individual-level factors." Therefore a larger scale approach that focuses on changing environments for LGBTQ youth is suicide prevention.
Follow Jeffrey Fishberger, MD on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TrevorProject
John Shore: Are Christians Culpable in Gay Teen Suicides?
What I've seen is increasingly harsh rhetoric and demonization of LGBT people that only resulted in the SPLC identifying some of the worst offenders as "hate groups" LAST YEAR.
I see incremental gains in less-than-equal "civil unions" being met with concerted efforts to write discrimination into state constitutions.
For data of the kind you're seeking, I'd suggest starting with The Trevor Project web site, HRC (Human Rights Campaign), and checking out this article about the FBI stats on hate crimes:
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,001.htm
The last of these has some interesting insights as to the problems with anti-gay hate crime reporting in the 2003-2004 cycle.
I could have guessed these results just as accurately.
The fact that you are capable of love is what I think is important. Being gay isn't evil. A woman seeking an abortion and desperate, broken and/or a sexual assault victim isn’t evil either. We are all imperfect beings; and our experiences are unique to our set of circumstances and our independent being. Some suffer more than others without just cause and for whatever reason. Quit judging others based on your belief system, and/or life experiences. None of us have the right to do that.
if you aren't working to rid the world of hate and be a solution, then you are a source of the problem.