First Monday, First Tuesday

Posted October 1, 2007 | 08:32 AM (EST)



stumbleupon :First Monday, First Tuesday   digg: First Monday, First Tuesday   reddit: First Monday, First Tuesday   del.icio.us: First Monday, First Tuesday

The first Monday in October -- today -- is opening day for the Supreme Court's year and the date most associated with Court. When it comes to the future of the Court, though, the day that matters far more is the first Tuesday in November, Election Day.

In the Senate debates over President Bush's nominees to the Court, John G. Roberts, Jr., and Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Republicans were fond of reminding Democrats, "Elections have consequences." They sure do -- as the last year on the Court proved. Roberts and Alito joined a conservative bloc that included Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and (usually) Anthony Kennedy to rewrite the law in some of the Court's most crucial areas -- like abortion, school integration, and church-state relations. This year, there may be more of the same, as the Court is poised to take on such combustible topics as the constitutionality of gun control, the trials of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, the new photo ID requirements for voters, and the permissibility of lethal injections for executions.

All of these changes, however, may look modest and preliminary if a Republican wins the next election. The next three likely departures on the Court all come from its embattled liberal wing. John Paul Stevens, David Souter, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg are all expected to leave the Court in the next few years. Conservative replacements will unite the Court in a way the nation has not seen since the mid-1960s, when Chief Justice Earl Warren led a phalanx of liberals. Of course, the Roberts Court would present an ideological mirror image of that increasingly distant epoch.

This is as it should be. The Constitution allows presidents to shape the Court in their images. All presidents try, and most succeed. Informed voters will recognize that they'll not only be choosing a president in 2008, but shaping the Supreme Court for decades to come.

Jeffrey Toobin is the author of The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, which has just been published.

Comments for this post are now closed


Comments
53
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

Hint sample
View Comments:
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)

Mr. Toobin states, "The Constitution allows presidents to shape the Court in their images. All presidents try, and most succeed. Informed voters will recognize that they'll not only be choosing a president in 2008, but shaping the Supreme Court for decades to come."

So, what do I find puzzling in this statement? If both Bush' #41 and Bush #43 have shaped the courts in their image then we are for sure in trouble for decades to come.

Underscoring the deep hostility towards civil liberties and freedoms is the stunning childish and immature behavior of Clarence Thomas, a Bush #41 appointee, whose paranoid schizophrenia has been seething for over 16 years since his confirmation by a Democrat-controlled committee.

Now, thanks to the Bush deep partisanship we have at least four equally partisan, activist right wing ideologues on the bench, Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia (RATS) whose agenda is to shred in little pieces our U.S. Constitutional rights and individual freedoms. One by one we read their fractured logic in rulings with ever-increasing 5-4 decisions which have diluted and even overturned many of the hard-fought-for advances in civil rights legislation.

The Bush/Republican ideologues have nothing but contempt and loathing for the U.S. Constitution which they treat as a liberal document to be destroyed through their like-minded anti-U.S. Constitution RATS court. They are succeeding beyond the right wing extremists' wildest dreams.

Americans must turn out in overwhelming numbers in November 2008 if they want to curtail the totalitarian bent which has come to define the entire Republican Party and their RATS Star Chamber court which has masqueraded as the Judiciary branch of government.

Instead of judges who represent corporate interests, personal ideology and images of vainglory-seeking presidents, why not have judges who in truth represent the images of the people and the democracy to which these judges should be held accountable? I refuse to believe our country would want less.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:44 AM on 10/02/2007

Then I'll hold my nose and vote for Hillary if she's the nominee. I hate doing it but the supreme court is at stake. I only hope she doesn't put a "moderate" on the court who swings towards the right to please republicans. I just don't trust her.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:56 AM on 10/07/2007

You don't have to hold your nose. There is, right now, a candidate, Senator Barack Obama, who was a professor that TAUGHT constitutional law, who, by definition, understands the very weighty implications spoken of in this post.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:30 PM on 10/07/2007

Just think of it!

Our President invaded Iraq to show them just how corrupt a democracy can be- and they are taking his advice!

See, George knew what he was doing- why just shred one Constitution in America when you can start a new 'democracy' and teach them how to shred their own and kill their own citizens with religious diatribes and lies as george has done with his religious ideas...

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 10/02/2007

Tahnks, Jeffrey!

Americans,if you like the President this 'SUCKA' COURT gave us in 2000, you'll just luv what they are about to do with your citizen rights through their corporate fascist mentality.

If 50,000,000 people VOTE to elect a new democratic president, then 50,000.000 people can also SIGN THE NATIONAL INITIATIVE which would change the LAW and PLACE A TERM LIMIT ON SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FROM NOW ON....

unless, of course, you like this 'SUCKA' COURT!

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:23 AM on 10/02/2007

Election day is NOT always the first Tuesday in November. Clause 4 of the Constitution: Election day
The Congress may determine the Time of choosing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
The Congress sets a national Election Day. Currently, Electors are chosen on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November, in the year before the President's term is to expire. The Electors cast their votes on the Monday following the second Wednesday in December of that same year. Thereafter, the votes are opened and counted by the Vice President, as President of the Senate, in a joint session of Congress.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:46 AM on 10/02/2007

Being conservative isn't necessarily bad. In fact, a true conservative would interpret the acts of the Bush administration as illegal: condoning torture (Abu Ghraib), rape and murder (Haditha), indefinate detention without any charges or access to legal counsel (Guantanimo) and illegal surveillance upon citizens without warrants (even under FISA, which gave lower standards than the original constitution). Then there is NCLB, which overrides the rights of states to set their own standards of quality and proficiency in education, allows the military to access student records (violating FERPA - right to privacy for minors enrolled in educational institutions). Add on the contempt of Congress (Gonzalez and others in the Justice Dept. and administration) who refused to turn over evidence under subpoena or to testify.
Then there are those signing statements and recess appointments, to avoid the system of checks and balances, oversight, inquiry and to circumvent laws with which the administration does not agree it should abide by.
I'd like to see this court, conservative or otherwise, adhere to constitutional principles, the rule of law, and address these grievous attacks on personal liberties, violations of both American and international laws.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 09:31 AM on 10/02/2007

In your excellent "The Nine", you describe how Kennedy tacked left after Bush v. Gore. Why has he now tacked back to the right?

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:04 AM on 10/02/2007

They have also been bastardized by the corruption of this admin and it's supporters (esp. corporate). It has been effectively nullified by thes appointments. There are no more gov't checks and balances and therefore WE have been silenced. We ahve already lost the Democracy- now we need to try not to loss the country ( china 'owns' a good portion of US an dour future already). It seems Bushco started waging war on US as soon as he took office- Dicks been at it for decades now.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:55 AM on 10/02/2007

As it should be? I don't think the founders could have imagined so self-serving a President that he would have wanted the law shaped to pay back his base.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 AM on 10/02/2007

Roberts was put on the court as a reward for his role as a lawyer representing Bush in Florida after the 2000 elections hadn't gone in favor of Bush. He's also there in case any politician in this country ever grew a pair and went after anyone in this fear-mongering, war-profiting administration. People this greedy and paranoid do everything they can to cover their asses for those rare times when "the people" have their moments of lucidity.

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:17 AM on 10/02/2007

Hi Jeffrey,

I always enjoy your legal explanations and opinions on CNN. As you know well, many of us are not lawyers, we're lay people. And, we appreciate your style along with your honest and clear presentation and analysis of the facts--as pertinent to the law.

I will buy your latest book--even though I already have a pile of history books waiting to be read. But, yours is special to me because it's about the Supreme Court. I used to have a lot of respect for that institution. But, I lost all respect for the justices when they gave the 2000 election to George Bush.

Keep up the great work and please continue blogging at Huffingtonpost! Also, I like to read the posts your blogs engender.

Peace

NoblesseOblige

favoriteFavorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:40 AM on 10/02/2007
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next › Last » (4 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in


 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Jeffrey Toobin›
 

 Site  Web ask.com