More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jennifer Grayson

Jennifer Grayson

Posted: October 7, 2009 02:26 PM

My friend is a hardcore vegan and says I can't call myself an environmentalist, since I still eat meat. I disagree, since I sincerely care about the future of the world and do a lot to help the environment. I even volunteer with an organization to plant trees in my community. What do you think? Are you a vegetarian?

-Peter

Oh, please. We can bicker over the semantics of the word environmentalist until we're all green in the face, and alienate our fellow do-gooders by telling them they're not do-gooding enough, but the fact remains that we're not going to accomplish any lasting change by doing either. We've got ice sheets in Antarctica in "runaway melt mode" and oceans acidifying before our very eyes; as far as I'm concerned, an environmentalist is anyone who is making concrete changes to protect our natural resources and spread the message of conservation to the billions of people who reside on this planet.

Using your friend's logic, I'd also have to add that having children excludes one from being an environmentalist, since the most effective way to reduce global warming and pollution would be to just stop procreating. Granted, I know environmentalists (vegetarians as well) who have made this difficult choice, but they are a rarity. And no matter how ardent a greenie you claim to be, unless you live in a cave, there's a good chance there's room for improvement: Johnny may be a vegan, but he has two dogs that contribute to the 10 million tons of pet waste polluting our waterways every year; Suzy eats all organic but can't live without her daily Diet Coke; Bob outfitted his entire house with solar panels but flies to Europe four times a year on business; and so on and so on.

That being said, I think if you consider yourself a passionate advocate for our planet, yet find yourself hitting the drive-through for a McRib thrice a week, you might want to rethink the latter. I'm not going to use this space to debate the environmental repercussions of every conceivable food choice -- it took Michael Pollan two books to do just that -- but the information fueling your friend's snarky statement is correct: Adopting a vegetarian diet is indeed one of the most effective ways to slash your ecological footprint. If you currently eat a typical meat-heavy American diet, then switching to a lacto-ovo vegetarian one will cut your carbon footprint by almost a ton a year, not to mention drastically reduce your water consumption and help stop deforestation in the Amazon.

It may enrage some of you to learn that I am not, in fact, a full-fledged vegetarian. But I am working to limit my meat consumption, which is why I took the Meatless Monday pledge earlier this year. As a -- yes -- environmentalist, I believe we'll have a more resounding impact if we focus on solutions that people can reasonably embrace. My friend Joanna Lee, who works on the Meatless Monday campaign, agrees. "It's unrealistic to expect every individual to become a full-time vegetarian," she says. "In engaging a broad audience, every person's small meat reduction, collectively, makes a big difference." (Lee, by the way, also considers herself an environmentalist.)

A funny thing happens, too, when you don't berate your friends and family for not subscribing to your particular eco philosophy and instead encourage them to make small, doable changes: Those smaller changes often lead to larger ones. That's why I like to call Meatless Monday the gateway drug to vegetarian eating. I started with Meatless Monday in May, and with each passing week, I found myself experimenting with more meat-free eating, like making lentil soup for weekday lunches, or ordering tofu when I went to my local Thai joint for dinner. And then, I started buying slightly smaller portions of meat for my family at home, filling the void with more vegetables and complex carbs. I estimate that overall, I've cut my meat consumption by 30 percent.

For those still working toward a vegetarian (or flexitarian) diet, there are other ways to tread lightly on Mother Earth via your food choices. Buy organic, grass-fed, or locally-produced meat; stay away from fossil fuel-intensive processed foods (to wit: Kraft Foods' Boca Burger, with its "enriched textured soy protein concentrate product" made from genetically modified soybeans); and consider growing your own vegetable garden.

I'll leave you with this thought: Being an environmentalist isn't some hipster club that you're only allowed to join if you're a card-carrying member of the Sierra Club and drive a Schwinn. It's the rancher who decides to start raising her cattle without growth hormones and antibiotics; it's the Wall Street investor who focuses on renewable energy companies; and it's the big-rig trucker who decides to fill up his tank with biodiesel. My ultimate goal is for every person on earth to consider how our individual actions impact the bigger picture. We'll make the most progress when we focus more on contributing and less on criticizing.

Send all your eco-inquiries to Jennifer Grayson at eco.etiquette@gmail.com. Questions may be edited for length and clarity.

 

Follow Jennifer Grayson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jennigrayson

My friend is a hardcore vegan and says I can't call myself an environmentalist, since I still eat meat. I disagree, since I sincerely care about the future of the world and do a lot to help the enviro...
My friend is a hardcore vegan and says I can't call myself an environmentalist, since I still eat meat. I disagree, since I sincerely care about the future of the world and do a lot to help the enviro...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:54 AM on 11/11/2009
I think your meat carbon foot-print would off-set your other green effort, even worst.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:56 PM on 10/15/2009
I agree! Having more than two children has such a strong long term impact that it negates anything else you try to do to reduce your "footprint".
12:19 PM on 10/11/2009
The message to make small changes and to encourage rather than proselytise is essential to achieving wide-spread longlasting benefits - excellent article. Too many activists end up resembling those parodied in Monty Python's Life of Brian - 'Splitters!' - amusing, or alienating, depending on your viewpoint, but failing to inspire change.
04:53 PM on 10/10/2009
The answer to your question seems to be: probably not. But, the devil is in the details. Like, if someone ate one serving of meat a year than that would probably not devastate our ecology. Or, is a vegetarian someone who eats eggs? Even if they are or not, we still commit unspeakable crimes against chicks, which is an aspect of environmentalism indeed if environmentalism is about a balanced environment. Thus, the answer to your question is that we humans (and certainly Americans) need to stop being such greedy, blood-thirsty people and that would greatly improve our environment in more ways than one.
10:33 PM on 10/09/2009
Ironic that there has been a reported sharp decline in green house gas emissions in the last year due to the economic recession. Notice the word "steep" in the title.

http://www.livescience.com/environment/etc/090921-recession-causes-steep-fall-co2-emissions.html.

This would mean that the problem is humans not the animals grown for consumption, because there has not been a significant decrease in meat production.

Explain that.
02:19 PM on 01/05/2010
I'll give it a try. The article you linked to referred to a steep drop in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. CO2 is the greenhouse gas that people talk about the most, and the one primarily associated associated with car and airplane exhaust and energy ineffiency. Animal agriculture produces CO2 as well, but the much bigger problem is that animal agriculture is the prime source of human created methane and nitrous oxide (NOx), two greenhouse gases that are many times more powerful than CO2. Methane contributes 23 times as much greenhouse gas than the same amount of CO2. NOx is far more potent yet. These are the two animal agriculture byproducts that the UN has blamed for most of the industry's share (19%) of human made greenhouse gases.
03:50 PM on 10/09/2009
Of course. Don't have more than 2 children. Possibly the best thing anyone can do for the planet.
09:08 AM on 10/09/2009
I am veg, and think any effort to save the planet is great. There is no greater lover of the earth than native american, who ate meat, the differenc is they only killed and ate what they needed. Nothing was raised for the purpose, they ate what the land gave.
10:27 PM on 10/09/2009
Unfortunately, that's a myth. Native Americans domesticated turkeys, maize (corn), dogs, llamas and Alpacas, among others. They certainly raised these "for the purpose" and the most recent studies indicate many of the N. American tribes were as intensive -agricultural as the S. American tribes. As for hunting, driving buffalo off a cliff, driving rabbits into nets and similar hunting techniques often killed more than could be used "at the time". In fact the potlatch was based on excess. Amerindians had both good and bad things about their cultures (there was more than one). It's likely that the Amerindians had about the same impact on their environment as European stone age cultures had on theirs. The big impact comes with greater population density and the "industrial revolution" in Europe. In considering "the right thing to do" one should not be distracted by myths.
01:19 AM on 10/09/2009
I don't think you need to be a veg to be eco-conscious, but it makes a lot of sense to eventually become veg if you are really into saving the planet. I started off eco-conscious, then tried veganism (as a way to fix my messed-up body) and now realizing that I'm (hopefully) helping the environment MORE being veg! It's the "easiest" way to care about the Earth, I think.
However, if someone is a veg who buys a lot of things in plastic, who prefers to eat takeout, drive their car just around the block (I've been guilty of that) or any other insane non-eco-conscious task, then what is the point (other than if you love animals and it's a diet to help your body)?
I think Meatout Mondays is an awesome idea for anyone to start, and being a flexitarian PLUS not using your car as much PLUS stop using so many throw-away items can have so much effect on the world.

I have been writing eco articles on my site, www.gearupandplay.com
09:53 PM on 10/08/2009
By that definition lions, bald eagles & even whales are "bad". All evolutionary information says that we are omnivores, not "vegans". Our correct biological niche is as predators who also eat plants. Even Chimps aren't "vegans". For a person who lives in a house (with or without solar panels) to argue about "ecology" is a bit hypocritical. What did it take to BUILD that house? It's not like most homes have the minimal environmental impact of a cave (Neanderthals and Cro-Magnon). Even a mud hut can last centuries (see several archeological studies for proof). We can only minimize our impact on the planet by one of two actions: either we reduce our total numbers or we move OFF the planet. Eating the food that would feed a deer or cow (cows are domestic aurochs, just as chickens are domestic jungle fowl) doesn't solve the problem, it just moves to which animal(s) and environments we impact. There's no reason to ignore our correct biological niche; what we need to do is to fill it correctly. Lions and zebras co-exist as do wolves and caribou. None are "better" or more "moral" in their lifestyle than the other. The difference between Lions and people is that there are so many of us. If we halve our numbers, we can pretty much halve our impact on the planet as well -- that's a lot more effective than shipping cantalope cross country so we can feel good about not eating chicken.
03:38 PM on 10/08/2009
People can survive eating almost anything, depending on where your ancestors came from. Inuit peoples have survived for millenia eating almost nothing but meat a good portion of the year. And yes, with a balanced diet of vegetables including good sources of protein, you can do quite well.

The more people we put on this planet, the more difficult to eat without causing environmental damage. Ten thousand years ago, the planet's health didn't depend on whether the few million people in the world ate meat. Now such things do have an effect. In the future, the KIND of vegetables we eat may make a difference. "Oh, you're one of those LOW WATER vegetable snobs!"

The best things we can do for the planet are to minimize our impact every way we can. High on the list should be things like promoting education and women's rights around the world (they go a long way toward lowering birth rates), and family planning services. Beyond that, eat less meat and make sure the stuff you do eat is raised in a more sustainable fashion, live close to work, work close to where you live, insulate your house, quit buying way more than you need, and walk and bike when you can. Oh, and be nice to people...here and on the other side of the planet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dgoshilla
02:33 PM on 10/08/2009
Yes, this question is horrible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:54 PM on 10/08/2009
"The stick: If you want to go vegetarian and don't have the self-discipline, visit a slaughterhouse."

Yes, it's pretty darned horrible, and a lot could be done to make death more humane and processing of meat more sanitary.

The death of animals only seems horrible to us because we identify with animals. If we were more in tune with plants we'd be crying when sharp blades slice their heads off and throw them into the backs of harvesters with other dead and dying plants, and then pull the rest of them up by the roots to clear the fields. Studies have shown that plants communicate, that they feel stress, etc. They just don't do it on a wavelength we recognize, and we turn our inability to perceive their pain into "it's fine to eat plants."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:47 PM on 10/08/2009
"It may enrage some of you to learn that I am not, in fact, a full-fledged vegetarian." Apparently you think some of us are econazis, and perhaps some of us are. Each one of us makes decisions based on our own beliefs and understandings - in relation to being green as in every other aspect of our lives - and those who sit back and say "tsk tsk, you're not doing enough" need to evolve just a little more.

I've been on the green train since before it became fashionable, and the new age greenthugs make me ill. Those of us who are mature enough (I am) saw it in the hippie era - people who were hippies simply because it was fashionable. The minutes polyester leisure suits and disco balls showed up, those people were gone.

The greenistas will be toast once it becomes unfashionable to be green. But the rest of us need to push on, always conscious of our impact on the planet and making responsible choices while still having fun and living a balanced life. Whatever that means for you is what it means. I'm nearly certain it means something else to me, and that's all right too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustMyWords
08:41 PM on 01/04/2010
Unfortunately, there are quite a few very vocal econazis (good word, by the way) who seem to be all too fond of pointing out where everyone else is lacking, and a goodly number of them seem terribly prone to announcing "I am vegan" in much the same tone you might imagine hearing "I am the Second Coming." They seem to have missed out on a bit of wise advice: you can catch more flies with honey than you can with vinegar. Telling people "do it my way or you're worthless and it's not worth the effort" usually only has one result - people say, "well, the hell with you" and don't try at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cybermome1207
01:42 PM on 10/08/2009
I'm a flexatarian..

vegan during day..local and organic at night..But most nights I eat beans and veggies..
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
12:41 PM on 10/08/2009
"...unless you live in a cave..."

No, that's no good, you'll be disturbing the bats. Any human existence at all is going to have some effect on the environment. I cut my carbon emissions in half, reduced but didn't eliminate meat in my diet, and I call myself an environmentalist.

If you give up meat and still have a big carbon footprint, you are not an environmentalist, just a vegan.