iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jennifer Grayson

Jennifer Grayson

Posted: June 16, 2010 09:52 AM

Eco Etiquette: Will The BP Oil Spill Worsen Global Warming?

What's Your Reaction:

Send all your eco-inquiries to Jennifer Grayson at eco.etiquette@gmail.com. Questions may be edited for length and clarity.

The oil and dispersants in the Gulf are enough to worry about, but why is no one talking about the methane from the spill possibly reaching the atmosphere? Could this have an effect on climate change? And if so, shouldn't BP be liable not only for the damage caused by oil, but for the potentially massive greenhouse impact?

-Josh

Methane. Long associated with bovine burps and putrid landfills, it's what triggered the explosion that caused the Deepwater Horizon to burn and sink in the first place, unleashing a torrent of crude into the Gulf of Mexico that has now surpassed the Exxon Valdez as the worst oil spill in United States history. The gas is also still being released along with the oil: According to BP scientists, the mixture spewing from the ocean floor is about 40 percent natural gas (read: mostly methane), and 60 percent petroleum compounds.

Just to refresh your memory, methane is a greenhouse gas that is 23 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, methane concentrations in the atmosphere have more than doubled over the past two centuries, mostly due to human activity.

A potent greenhouse gas. That makes up close to half of the recently revised estimate of the 35,000 to 60,000 barrels of oil leaking each day. Of which an unknown portion is escaping into the atmosphere. You're right to ask: Why is no one talking about this?

When I contacted Jeff Chanton, a professor in the Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science at Florida State University who has been closely following the BP spill, he was quick to point out that the immediate short-term threat to the ecosystem in the Gulf, is, of course, the oil itself.

But, he says, "Methane is undeniably bubbling out with this oil and escaping to the atmosphere," he says. "This will exacerbate the greenhouse effect."

How much so, though, is not so clear. Based on Chanton's recent research looking at natural oil seeps on the sea floor, he estimates that anywhere from 10 to 50 percent of the methane released might make its way into the air. This, he says, is because the oil actually forms a protective coating around the methane bubbles, allowing the gas to escape to the surface instead of being dissolved in seawater and consumed by natural methanotrophic bacteria.

"We looked at several sites this past summer, and at one of the sites, the natural seep was very oily," he says. "At the site that was very oily, we did find elevated methane concentrations in the atmosphere over the site. But another site that was more shallow, where the bubbles were not oily, we didn't see that. So the oil helps the methane get to the surface by kind of armoring the bubbles and then they don't dissolve as much."

So now, for the holy cow analysis: For calculation's sake, let's use the flared natural gas figure reported by BP on June 14: 33.2 million cubic feet. (Keep in mind that this is based on the 15,420 barrels of oil BP claimed to collect that day; it doesn't account for the potential methane emissions associated with the oil that was not collected.)

Using the EPA Interactive Units Converter:

1 cubic foot (CF) methane (CH4) = .04246 pounds of CH4
33.2 million CF CH4 x .04246 = 1,409,672 pounds CH4 = 639.4 metric tons CH4
639.4 metric tons CH4 = 13,427.4 metric tons CO2 equivalent a day

For comparison, that's more than 80 percent of daily CO2 emissions for the entire New York metro area.

Of course, I'm neither scientist nor mathematician, which is why I'll be closely following the results of a team of researchers currently studying the methane leaking from the Deepwater Horizon disaster site. The group, led by Texas A&M College of Geosciences chief scientist John Kessler, hopes to uncover (along with other important data, like the precise amount of oil that has spilled) just how much of the greenhouse gas is being released into the atmosphere.

Should the spill be deemed a contributor to climate change, however, count it highly unlikely that BP will be held accountable. If Washington can't agree on a price point for carbon pollution, monetizing methane doesn't stand a chance.

Besides, getting BP to pay every penny for the damage that is measurable (like lost jobs) will be challenging enough, despite the president's insistence to the contrary: Twenty-one years after the Valdez oil spill, ExxonMobil still owes $92 million.

BP CEO Tony Hayward, however, has repeated his promise that the company will pay all "legitimate" claims arising from the Gulf spill. Let's hope that methane is the only hot air the company is spewing.

An abbreviated version of this article originally appeared on The Red, White and Green.

 

Follow Jennifer Grayson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jennigrayson

Send all your eco-inquiries to Jennifer Grayson at eco.etiquette@gmail.com. Questions may be edited for length and clarity. The oil and dispersants in the Gulf are enough to worry about, but why is n...
Send all your eco-inquiries to Jennifer Grayson at eco.etiquette@gmail.com. Questions may be edited for length and clarity. The oil and dispersants in the Gulf are enough to worry about, but why is n...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
Proud member of the reality-based community!
07:51 AM on 06/19/2010
Quit lying, you climate change deniers!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
07:58 PM on 06/18/2010
THIS MAY PROVE TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE MELTING OF THE PERMAFROST AND THE RELEASE OF MUCH MORE METHANE!

See: Life Threatening Danger at http://www.aesopinstitute.org updated today.

Also, What to Do! and Worst Case Scenario - on the same website.

If a thin oil slick reaches the Atlantic and Arctic oceans it might accelerate Global Warming.

Chris Landau, a geologist, believes they need to drill 8 or more new, vertical wells, in a circle around the gusher, on the assumption that far more oil will be produced than can otherwise be controlled.

He states that huge quantities of oil might continue to be produced.

You may want to also read Moving Beyond Oil and Running on Water on that Aesop site.

With adequate support, a 24/7 development program could move breakthrough technologies into production.

We can supersede oil faster than might be imagined.

This may prove to be an emergency equivalent to all out war!

These new technologies are much less complicated than weapons systems.

The science is hard to believe, as it disagrees with conventional wisdom. But, independent and National laboratories are increasingly involved. Once prototypes for schools are in production, it will become obvious that gasoline, oil, coal, natural gas and nuclear power will face low cost competition that can leave all of them behind.

Recognize this emergency! We have a difficult, but possible, job to do!

So, let's begin to really do it! An important step is to learn more about what to do!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
01:37 PM on 06/18/2010
This aspect occured to me a couple of weeks ago, and I tried to raise it with the Rachel Maddow show. I am currently in correspondence with a section of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute on this subject, as well as the possibility that oil caught in the loop current, if it continues up the Atlantic coast and out to sea, might intefere with the Arctic Circulation Current that is basically "Europe's air conditioner. " Other concerns include the temperature of the oil venting at the wellhead, is it hot enough to have any appreciable effect on ocean temperature; and the overall effect of half a billion gallons of oil on the earth's albedo. Perhaps none of these is a factor by themselves; taken as a whole, I'm concerned that they might accelerate us to the "tipping point." In that instance, of course, all bets are off.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
08:03 PM on 06/18/2010
Please see my post on this subject. A scientist wrote Worst Case Scenario, which I have posted on the Aesop Institute website. He is greatly concerned about acceleration to a Tipping Point and suggests some ways the oil might be prevented from reaching that Atlantic and Arctic oceans where a thin film could raise ocean temperatures.

You might send your Woods Hole contact a link to my website: http://www.aesopinstitute.org

Several other articles could also prove of interest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
11:18 PM on 06/18/2010
Thank you. Glad to see I'm not a lone voice in the woods.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RaphaelJohnComprone
01:11 PM on 06/18/2010
At this point, I think ALL offshore drilling should be stopped permanently.
Also, there should be an INVESTIGATION about why BP didn't impose the same safety standards in America as they would in the North Sea. I saw a sarcastic smile on Hayward's face the whole time he was being interviewed. He wasn't sorry. He was laughing at us--at the small people who live in America.
04:02 PM on 06/17/2010
Since global warming doesn't exist this is kind of a silly question, isn't it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
01:39 PM on 06/18/2010
I actually had to check your comment history to see if you are serious. Apparently you are. I'm so terribly sorry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scottie1321
I do not make ad-homenim attacks or call names,
03:03 PM on 06/18/2010
The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/06/13/the-ipcc-consensus-on-climate-change-was-phoney-says-ipcc-insider/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
08:38 AM on 06/17/2010
The BP spill will NOT worsen global warming. Global Warming is a myth, shame, and scheme to make people like AL Gore rich. There is no such thing as global warming. 30 years ago scientist were screaming about "the next ice age", they didnt make any money off of that lie, so they changed the lie to global warming......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Struemph
09:01 AM on 06/17/2010
It's all a conspiracy to make scientists and Al Gore rich?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tamparob
Smile at the rising sun.
09:47 AM on 06/17/2010
Yea ya know...Al Gore, climate change, ACORN, SEIU, Obama's kids, marxists, people with an IQ over 60, brown-skinned people, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Rachel Maddow, critical thought, the "lame-stream media", socialist european types, health care for all, financial reform, nazis, welfare for people vs. corporate welfare...feel free to pick your bogeyman of the day.
09:52 AM on 06/17/2010
And the spill is obviously George Bush's fault.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tc399
Your personal Eschatologist.
06:25 AM on 06/17/2010
Aloha Jennifer,

The methane which is being released has not been measured accurately but neither BP nor anyone else can pay for this. It is far past the point at which tossing money at it will do any good. The problem is described here: http://drtom.posterous.com/why-everyone-is-stalling
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dragonmaster
05:56 AM on 06/17/2010
Interesting question--

however things are looking so bad regarding global warming at this point-it cannot get much worse.

At another Blog- Climate Progress the opinion on the Medias Role in the scant coverage of the dire future we many have- and the lack of real coverage on the increasing strange weather are probably a necessitated calculated risk of cover-up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FIGI
07:44 PM on 06/16/2010
Can methane cause tsunamis in the Gulf?

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1059976/pg1
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
03:36 PM on 06/16/2010
Thanks Jennifer...Got this in an email from EDF today. I don't know what is going to happen in the Senate with the Clean Energy Bill....but I hope that people have called their Senators.
Anyway this is the video I got.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jPjJPVdR4g
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VA Magoo
08:43 AM on 06/17/2010
So do you do your part to conserve energy? Sell all your electronics. Stop watching tv, get rid of your computer, drop your ISP. Return to the farm and the Quaker way of life. Have you sol your car yet? Why not? It use fuel, it causes pollution, How are you going to heat your home? cant burn wood, you have to cut down trees for that. Cant use electricty, that uses fossil fuels and pollutes the air.
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
10:00 AM on 06/17/2010
Chill...chill. I am angry about all this as well. I have solar panels and drive a hybrid car ....Point is I am getting greener...
I don't know anyone who cuts down trees. A couple of years ago, here in Austin, a company accidently cut down some trees in South Austin..........what a firestorm!
One of the best things about living in Austin is the town slogan "Keep Austin Weird" A push against big business and the like. All my friends shop locally owned....and mostly green.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
01:53 PM on 06/16/2010
Sorry....this is the more in depth explanation here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVdnkMxocl0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
01:50 PM on 06/16/2010
Seems this is the real devil in the details.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1jDJ1ARPJQ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bella Cennato Wade
12:50 PM on 06/16/2010
thank you Jennifer for talking about this. I too have been trying to point out that the enormity of the oil spill ultimately may be eclipsed by the volume of methane being released.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
01:08 PM on 06/16/2010
I hadn't even THOUGHT about the methane aspect!! I've been trying to get information on just what the OIL would affect if/when massive amounts reach the Gulf and begin to be swept along in terms of how this will affect weather patterns here and abroad.

THIS topic is of monumental importance and it's been hard enough to find analysis on longer term impacts on the Gulf Stream.

Many thanks to the author for raising this point.
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
03:36 PM on 06/16/2010
ditto from me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nellre
growth is not sustainable
10:51 AM on 06/16/2010
Was the environmental impact of the Ixtoc spill studied?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Jennifer Grayson
HuffPost's Miss Eco Etiquette. Editor, The Red, Wh
06:13 PM on 06/16/2010
Very few studies were actually done, but here's an article that discusses a few:

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=51843
outnow
Ban the bomb
10:19 AM on 06/16/2010
Tony Hayward looks and acts like an oil sock puppet. He says whatever will hide the nature and extent of the environmental and economic damage to promote profits. Unless the hole is plugged soon, his company will not survive this catastrophe.
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
03:37 PM on 06/16/2010
Like I care if his company survives-----Not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisd3
Excelsior!
04:00 PM on 06/18/2010
Unfortunately, his company needs to survive, otherwise you & I will be footing the bill for the cleanup, the unemployment, and all the rest of it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RaphaelJohnComprone
01:15 PM on 06/18/2010
Why does he think MONEY will be compensation? The point is that NO AMOUNT OF MONEY can replace the damage that was done. MONEY can help change things, but it won't get the oil off the beaches.
The Atlantis is the next rig BP will blow up in a couple years. They'll say the same thing over and over again, just like they did when the spilled oil in a pipeline in Alaska.
The Pentagon should get a contract with a different oil company with a better record. It is time to throw BP off the bus.