More

Jerusha Klemperer

Jerusha Klemperer

Posted: March 26, 2009 02:37 PM

Kill Your Microwave, I Dare Ya

What's Your Reaction?

I grew up in the golden era of the microwave (an era you might call the '80s but which I myself call "middle school'). People were momentarily so excited about ye olde heating box, they were buying cookbooks about how you could cook everything in the microwave--before they discovered that age old lesson that just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. Ever tried to cook a chicken in a microwave? Blech.

After Alice Waters pooh-poohed microwaves on "60 Minutes" last week, people started asking what's so bad about a microwave anyway? Was it her chef-i-ness that made her averse to microwaves or her environmentalism? If it's environmentalism, she might be forsaking it for naught. An excellent post over at Treehugger explored these questions, pointing out that most experts agree that a microwave is actually very energy efficient; firing up your stove for every little melting job doesn't make sense.

As a city dweller who has lived with mostly teeny, tiny kitchens, I killed my microwave years ago when I moved into a studio apartment. Counter space was precious and a big plastic box meant no room to chop veggies, so I gave it to a friend, wondering as I did so if I'd miss it terribly. I never did. Once, about three weeks after I moved, I wanted to melt some chocolate for brownies. I unwrapped the chocolate, put it in a pyrex bowl, and cast my eyes about the small kitchen, confused and forlorn. So I pulled out a pot, put the chocolate in the pot, and once I realized that "hey! You can, like, heat stuff on the stove!" I never looked back. It turns out that if you are not reheating homemade baby food, and you don't eat frozen dinners, there aren't that many times you actually need one.

Plus, I like interacting with my food. I am reminded of a Harold McGee article in the NY Times just about a year ago. He wrote from his kitchen science perspective about cooking with your microwave, addressing its inability to be all things to all people, but gamely trying to find its culinary virtues.

I finished the article unconvinced. For me, slow food isn't about being anti-microwave, but I do think it's about knowing your food; McGee talked about pine nuts cooking on the inside but not browning on the outside (the whole point of toasting pine nuts), and the strangeness of needing to keep opening and closing the microwave door to assess the state of affairs, and it makes me think that a microwave gets in the way of that knowing.

Follow Jerusha Klemperer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/eathere2

I grew up in the golden era of the microwave (an era you might call the '80s but which I myself call "middle school'). People were momentarily so excited about ye olde heating box, they were buying co...
I grew up in the golden era of the microwave (an era you might call the '80s but which I myself call "middle school'). People were momentarily so excited about ye olde heating box, they were buying co...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Curandera
03:35 PM on 03/30/2009
When my daughter was 6, she came home from school very excited because a lunch lady at schooled warmed up her lunch in a "heating box"!

She's now 10 and we did succumb to buying a microwave a few years ago. With two very active children (10 and 11), who are constantly hungry and independent, microwave warming is much less dangerous than stove top (think soup).

We all do spend a lot of time cooking and baking the old-fashioned way, but the microwave is a nice extra.
10:31 AM on 03/28/2009
I once had a roommate who did processed nearly everything in her microwave. She heated water in a cup for tea. Once she prepared a three-cheese quiche and nuked it. Can you imagine how bland and unsavory it looked? Imagine how it tasted.

Slow cooking on the stovetop or in the oven allows ingredients to mingle and your food will taste a lot better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:39 AM on 03/27/2009
If you don't do a lot of cooking, you might not appreciate a microwave. Though, I must admit, that I don't trust them (radioactive-wise).

I have the darned thing in my pantry now (because even a small one takes up too much room) in an effort to ease the monster out of my life.

Then, I started making homemade granola and, well, the blasted thing is now suddenly indispensable. Nearly all granolas contain vegetable oil (and sugar). Since we have an "oil-free" household I have to make my own granola. And well, excursions into granola baking in a conventional oven is an excursion into futility (smoke, fire, flames--okay, not THAT bad, no flames).

Granola can be made with ease in the mic. I make a big jar of it each week and we carry granola with us in small jelly jars whenever we leave the house.

Sigh......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
antaeus
Marriage Equality Is Here
11:37 PM on 03/26/2009
The microwave is a prime example of a technology in search of a demand. All that kitchen real estate to boil water? And microwaved water for tea is terrible!

My mother-in-law insisted we needed one, and the one was a behemoth. After ten years I donated it, and I haven't missed it once. It's not about chef-ism or food snobbery; they just aren't necessary, or even terribly helpful.
03:58 PM on 03/26/2009
Pfft. Been living without one at home for more than three years.
03:22 PM on 03/26/2009
Also, I find it a little unsettling to cook my food with a "magnatron." Although it does sound cosmic. Oh, and it kills all the enzymes.
03:45 PM on 03/26/2009
I'm a biochemist and take it from me, heat from any source kills most enzymes - unless of course you're heating Taq polymerase or something from a similar origin.