NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jesse Kornbluth

Jesse Kornbluth

Posted: July 1, 2010 01:48 PM

On Its 50th Birthday, Why Is 'To Kill A Mockingbird' Being Attacked?

What's Your Reaction:

I never thought I'd see the day when the lawyer who argued Brown v. Topeka Board of Education before the Supreme Court and went on to be the first African-American to sit on that Court would have his career reduced to that most dreaded of all contemporary labels: "activist."

I never thought I'd see the day when you can legally carry concealed weapons into airports and bars.

I never thought I'd see the day when allegedly smart adults would tell me that America's poor were so powerful that, given the chance to own real estate, they bought so many houses they couldn't afford that they tanked the economy of almost every country in the world.

But then I never thought I'd see the day when "To Kill A Mockingbird" --- a novel that has inspired readers for half a century --- would be derided as a book about "the limitations of liberalism" (by Malcolm Gladwell, no less, in The New Yorker, of all places) and "a sugar-coated myth of Alabama's past" with a hero who's "a repository of cracker-barrel epigrams" (by Allen Barra, in the Wall Street Journal)

But as we approach July 11th --- the 50th anniversary of the publication of "To Kill a Mockingbird" (to buy the paperback from Amazon, click here; shamefully, there is no Kindle edition) --- it's probably not surprising that we're seeing one of America's best-loved books criticized for its "politics."

And it's definitely no surprise that the downgrading is done by men.

"To Kill a Mockingbird" is a woman's book.

Written by a woman, Harper Lee, but more, written by a woman who dared to see herself as her region's Jane Austen. Told by a six-year-old girl. With a hero who's not, in any traditional sense, manly. With a message of kindness and empathy generally associated with female values:

And one more female value, once common in the heroes of Western movies, but less and less common by the time Harper Lee wrote her novel --- a willingness to do the right thing, regardless of the consequences. Readers often forget, but this is the foundation of the character of Atticus Finch: He takes on the legal defense of an African-American, knowing he can't prevail in court.

"I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand," he tells his children. "It's when you know you're licked before you begin but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."

I'm not one for stereotyping, but how many men do you know who step up to confront unpleasantness and conflict? Here's Atticus: "Best way to clear the air is to have it all out in the open."

Atticus Finch is --- let's just say it --- a feminized man who appeared a decade before America started hearing about feminism. No wonder he appeals to English teachers, who tend to be idealists. And no wonder the film is a "family" favorite --- mother choose it in the hope it will make their kids kinder. (To buy the DVD from Amazon, click here.)

In the long clock of history, we stopped killing each other over resources only a moment ago. Since then, we make progress, we take a step backward --- civilization is a recent, fragile concept. But I take it as an unvarnished Good Thing that readers have persistently loved "To Kill a Mockingbird" for as long as it's been in print. I think it's just great that Mary Murphy has written a book about Harper Lee's book: "Scout, Atticus & Boo: A Celebration of 50 Years of 'To Kill a Mockingbird.'" (To buy the book of "Scout, Atticus & Boo," click here. To buy the Kindle edition, click here.)

And it pleases me no end that, in a year when men denigrate Thurgood Marshall and get off on carrying guns in public and blame the poor for every failing of men in expensive suits, that some of the most passionate defenders of a book you'd think needs no defense are male. Like, for instance:

[Cross-posted from HeadButler.com ]

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 123
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:38 PM on 07/12/2010
Seriously, to dis the kind of valiance Atticus Finch displayed in Mockingbird is the equivalent of calling Bob Ewell a hero. But perhaps in a swiftboat fashion we can do just that!!
07:52 AM on 07/12/2010
I find it bothersome that some people find this book controversial because it shows a white family open and sympathetic to a Black person. Many of us find it bothersome because of the racist paternalism towards Black people.

What is generally missing in discussions like this is noting the imbalanced presentation of white people as heroes and Black people as backdrop or inept or victims. The book perpetuates racism in the more subtle ways of its paternalism than the blatancy of lynchings as in Strange Fruit. But it is racism nonetheless. Children of color are very uncomfortable with this book when it is taught. Our finding is that it is usually taught by caucasian teachers who have little sensitivity to the issue of racism and how the book affects children of color. The book is never taught in context of other books that portray people of color as positive role models or as primary actors with strong voices with successful outcomes.

For children of color the experience of this book is often devastating, destroying their positive self image, particularly when they are a small minority in a sea of white faces. In this setting they feel viewed as ‘less than.’ This is not the way to effect equity in education for all.
photo
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
10:17 AM on 07/09/2010
The right hates this book because Atticus Finch is a hero that does not shoot people and defends a black man. Bob Ewell reminds me of a teabagger.
photo
KCM7
“I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know”
05:38 AM on 07/07/2010
We are still killing each other over resources.
Wait until water becomes scarce.
Then you will see man's humanity in all it's glory.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
pattio66
I'm here!!!
01:35 PM on 07/06/2010
I'm not surprised that To Kill a Mockingbird made the list of books banned at one point, my mother the librarian brought it home and made me read it, just as she did with any book that someone tried to have banned during my childhood. It's one of the great treasures of American literature, the fact that it's still generating such buzz 50 years later is a testament to its universality.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
pattio66
I'm here!!!
01:32 PM on 07/06/2010
even MORE books banned in the US at one point or another:

The Devil's Alternative by Frederick Forsyth
The Figure in the Shadows by John Bellairs
The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
The Great Gilly Hopkins by Katherine Paterson
The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood
The Headless Cupid by Zilpha Snyder
The Learning Tree by Gordon Parks
The Living Bible by William C. Bower
The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare
The New Teenage Body Book by Kathy McCoy and Charles Wibbelsman
The Pigman by Paul Zindel
The Seduction of Peter S. by Lawrence Sanders
The Shining by Stephen King
The Witches by Roald Dahl
The Witches of Worm by Zilpha Snyder
Then Again, Maybe I Won't by Judy Blume
To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee
Twelfth Night by William Shakespeare
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary by the Merriam-Webster Editorial Staff
Witches, Pumpkins, and Grinning Ghosts: The Story of the Halloween Symbols by Edna Barth
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
pattio66
I'm here!!!
01:31 PM on 07/06/2010
more books banned at one point or another:

James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
Lady Chatterley's Lover by D.H. Lawrence
Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman
Little Red Riding Hood by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm
Lord of the Flies by William Golding
Love is One of the Choices by Norma Klein
Lysistrata by Aristophanes
More Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
My Brother Sam Is Dead by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier
My House by Nikki Giovanni
My Friend Flicka by Mary O'Hara
Night Chills by Dean Koontz
Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
On My Honor by Marion Dane Bauer
One Day in The Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn
One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest by Ken Kesey
One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Ordinary People by Judith Guest
Our Bodies, Ourselves by Boston Women's Health Collective
Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy
Revolting Rhymes by Roald Dahl
Scary Stories 3: More Tales to Chill Your Bones by Alvin Schwartz
Scary Stories in the Dark by Alvin Schwartz
Separate Peace by John Knowles
Silas Marner by George Eliot
Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
Tarzan of the Apes by Edgar Rice Burroughs
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
The Bastard by John Jakes
The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier
The Color Purple by Alice Walker
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
pattio66
I'm here!!!
01:28 PM on 07/06/2010
Books Banned at One Time or Another in the United States

A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L'Engle
Annie on My Mind by Nancy Garden
As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner
Blubber by Judy Blume
Brave New World by Aldous Huxley
Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson
Canterbury Tales by Chaucer
Carrie by Stephen King
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller
Christine by Stephen King
Confessions by Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Cujo by Stephen King
Curses, Hexes, and Spells by Daniel Cohen
Daddy's Roommate by Michael Willhoite
Day No Pigs Would Die by Robert Peck
Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
Decameron by Boccaccio
East of Eden by John Steinbeck
Fallen Angels by Walter Myers
Fanny Hill (Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure) by John Cleland
Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes
Forever by Judy Blume
Grendel by John Champlin Gardner
Halloween ABC by Eve Merriam
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Prizoner of Azkaban by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire by J.K. Rowling
Have to Go by Robert Munsch
Heather Has Two Mommies by Leslea Newman
How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell
Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
Impressions edited by Jack Booth
In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak
It's Okay if You Don't Love Me by Norma Klein
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:40 PM on 07/06/2010
"pattio66"
8:35 PM CST

Thank you very much for these great memories...and there are at least a couple dozen here I haven't read but will add to my must read least...in fact, I'm copying the entire list for re-reads...!!...

Fanned.

J.B.
7/6/10
photo
ThinkTwiceWriteOnce
Jarndyce v. Jarndyce
01:11 PM on 07/06/2010
"Why reasonable people go stark raving mad when anything involving a Negro comes up, is something I don't pretend to understand." ~Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird, Chapter 9, spoken by the character Atticus
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:05 AM on 07/06/2010
Excellent book, thanks for coming to its defense. The only false note in this review is the suggestion that we've "stopped killing each other over resources."
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
02:59 AM on 07/06/2010
I have always loved this book. I found it complex on so many levels but what I remember loving about it the most is the almost magic realism of Scout's world. There are times I recall from my childhood that I remember as having an almost magical quality, and I think children do tend to look at life with an almost hypersensitivity and imagination we generally lose as adults. People seem to be analyzing all the characters literally, but I think Harper Lee deliberately imposed Scout's viewpoint and everything and everyone is seen through the lens of Scout. In one sense it is a political fairy tale of the South. It isn't the literal narrative that is so important, but the layers of meaning and perception. There is no sense in comparing Lee and Faulkner' writings. Each author intended something very different.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 AM on 07/06/2010
In today's climate of thought-manipulation, Jesus is discounted as too liberal. Atticus, as a more "contemporary" figure with integrity and humanity as well as the will to pursue justice especially when unpopular, is not the way today's "powers that be" want Americans to model themselves.

The book could get banned. Too much in favor of the underdog. Actual justice? Cannot have that!

(However, when a man or even a movie role that exposes sensitivity, humanity, nurturing qualities; this is not "feminizing." This is humanizing. Please stop genderizing certain human qualities.)
bklynsparrow
creating reality from unreal things
02:59 AM on 07/06/2010
I totally agree. Especially your last sentence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abliss2379
10:03 AM on 07/06/2010
"Humanizing" would be the choice of secure, open-minded people, I think, while the less secure among us, who react so negatively to humanizing characteristics, might well see it as "feminizing," hence the negative reactions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:47 AM on 07/08/2010
Brooklyn: Hello! It's good to be in agreement with you, friend.
07:22 AM on 07/04/2010
Certainly, Amazon has more for sale than just the items Kornbluth directs us to?

Seriously, what should have been a thoughtful opinion piece became a literary info-mercial, overloaded with product placement.

"To be or not to be" (To purchase more ontological dramas from Amazon, click here).
10:09 PM on 07/04/2010
I thought that was exactly the point. To promote sale of the book, the DVD and the latest book about Harper Lee, with a "literary info-mercial, overloaded with product placement." There have been thousands of "thoughtful opinion pieces" about "To Kill a Mockingbird." The writer here was writing a commercial to sell more. It was a little back-hand for the critics of the book.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Sutpen
A for-real Socialist
10:25 PM on 07/05/2010
Sell more? Hasn't that thing sold enough copies? I mean, it's not like anyone needs to throw a benefit for Harper Lee, is it.
09:49 PM on 07/05/2010
I hadn't noticed that - thanks for pointing it out. How about a link to Powells Books instead? hah! And as for there "shamefully" being no Kindle edition, I suppose that is the author's decision (or her estate).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:54 PM on 07/03/2010
Very good movie, very good performances. It lost best movie to "Lawrence of Arabia", understandable. However I would rate Peter O'Toole's and Jack Lemon's(Days of Wine and Roses) rolls as better than GPecks. He's excellent but I feel it was less of an acting stretch and didn't ask as much as O'Toole's and Lemon's rolls did. 1962, the national Zeitgeist was right for this movie to be honored and appreciated as it was.
05:56 PM on 07/03/2010
TKAM is also a profile of a gifted child and her perceptions of the world she's gowing up in. One of the most fascinating aspects of the book is the relationship between the child/adult views in Scout's narrative, especially the intersection of the child Scout/adult Scout reflections. This fragmented perspective allows readers to participate more richly in the narrative.