While local races outside Denver rarely garner much media attention, a recent analysis of the mayoral race in Aurora, Colorado, published by Colorado Peak Politics, drew my attention.
CPP's take, in a nutshell: while the race for mayor of Aurora is basically among various flavors of Republicans, including one convert to the party and one defector from it, the race is not your father's GOP primary, "establishment vs. grassroots" as CPP aptly puts it. Instead, the race is really between the "old guard" and the "new guard." Here, CPP gets it right.
Where things get complicated, however, is distinguishing new from old in an era when the GOP is just now recovering from the bloodletting of last year's gubernatorial disaster, resulting in Democrat John Hickenlooper taking the contest easily and leaving GOP insiders to wonder who was left on the bench for the next go around.
This Aurora race may just have some contenders. As CPP acknowledges, three solid candidates have jumped in. Steve Hogan, the Democrat-turned-Republican, is a 24-year veteran of the Aurora City Council. He failed twice in runs for Congress (as a Democrat) but has hired a solid team of veteran GOP operatives for this run, garnering the endorsements of some former conservative superstars such as Governor Bill Owens.
Next up is Ryan Frazier, a friend of mine and also an Aurora City Council vet who most recently ran for U.S. Senate, then Congress, in 2010.
And then there is Jude Sandvall, also a friend of mine and a young private-sector entrepreneur who has never before held any public office, and whom CPP correctly dubs "a great guy with solid conservative principles" who "would make a good mayor."
Both Frazier and Sandvall have enough insider experience to be considered "old guard" (Sandvall also ran unsuccessfully for office as a candidate for RTD's board), but unlike Hogan they both also have enough passion and youth to be the poster child for new leadership.
Interestingly, CPP paints things differently, picking Frazier as the uniquely fresh face, or "new guard," and tagging Sandvall as just another establishment candidate. No matter how much one might like Frazier, however, and I do like him, that's not a fair or objective analysis. Sandvall is certainly less known than Frazier, but if anything that makes him an even fresher face and an even newer guard.
Reared in the Midwest by a union electrician father and a homemaker mother, Sandvall moved to Colorado because hard work paid off. His ice hockey prowess landed him a scholarship at DU. When that scholarship ran out and he could no longer afford DU, he didn't give up. He transferred to Metro State and worked night shifts to finish his economics degree.
Sandvall then rose through the ranks of a small business, starting at the bottom and learning firsthand on the way up what it means to create and to preserve jobs, and to have "P&L" responsibility. Because he has never held a government job, he has never counted on taxpayers to pay his salary or his pension.
I would be surprised if Sandvall comes to be regarded as the slickest candidate in this race, but slick seems to be wearing thin with Colorado voters. None of the new statewide officials we elected in 2010 -- neither Hickenlooper, nor Treasurer Walker Stapleton or Secretary of State Scott Gessler, both Republicans -- could be described as slick. And Denver's new mayor, Michael Hancock, won his 2011 election by beating the gladhanding and gregarious insider Chris Romer in a landslide that shocked the political establishment. So much for slick.
Perhaps that is where CPP and I agree, both empirically and philosophically. Voters want and deserve genuinely new leadership, not just another round of politicians who act like the ones who got us into our ongoing local and national fiscal turmoil.
Where we disagree, apparently, is whether to cut Jude Sandvall from the list of rising stars in this new environment. In my view, it's far too soon to do that.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.