iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Jill Steinberg
 

Testing BRCA1 Positive: What Happens Next

Posted: 10/29/2010 5:25 pm

Jon sat across from me before drinking his morning coffee, trying to accumulate enough spit to fill a large vial.

"Ew, what are you doing?"

"It's the 23andme genetic test I ordered online, remember? You're doing it next."

I made a face. I was feeding our 15-month-old daughter, Edie, her morning oatmeal, and I was a bit delirious from being up several times the night before breastfeeding our newborn, Cooper.

"Seriously?" I protested. It wasn't until the following day that I gave in and filled my vial too.

Jon thought it would be a cool thing to do. His Twitter friends were all abuzz on "world DNA day" about 23andme, the company Sergey Brin's wife started. He got a good deal on the tests and was eager to send off our spit. The only problem: You can't send spit in the mail in New York. Luckily my parents were visiting from Connecticut over the weekend and happily agreed to mail in our spit samples for us.

I had no idea what the test would tell us or even what it was testing for. By the time my six-week post-birth checkup came around I had completely forgotten about the test altogether. I asked my OB/GYN whether I should get tested for the breast cancer gene now that my sister was just finishing up a horrible year fighting breast cancer with chemotherapy, a lumpectomy and radiation. My sister tested negative for the BRCA1 gene and my mother was negative too. We didn't have any grandmothers or aunts with breast cancer in our family. My sister's cancer was "random" and therefore my doctor said there was no need for me to be tested. I would just need to get mammograms.

The very next day Jon called me from work to tell me he got my 23andme test results via email and I was BRCA1 positive. I was shocked that I was the one with the gene and yet my sister was the one with the cancer. I would learn later that there is a correlation between BRCA1 and prostate cancer in men, which means my father must have been the parental carrier who passed down the gene mutation to me. My father had prostate cancer 15 years ago and is 100 percent cancer free and healthy today.

Jon asked if I was okay after hearing the news, and I was. I felt fine. I assumed this meant I would need to have more vigilant breast screenings from now on, maybe MRIs too. In the days that followed Jon vigorously Googled everything related to BRCA1. That was typical for Jon. It took me many more days to even address the issue at hand. That was typical for me.

I casually told my best friend in an email that I was BRCA1, which suddenly felt like my new identity. She quickly called me back sounding alarmed. She knew people who were BRCA1 positive like me and who had had prophylactic double mastectomies.

"Well that's a little drastic, don't you think?" I couldn't believe what she was telling me.

That's when I started tuning in to what Jon was telling me about his research findings. Having the BRCA1 genetic mutation meant my chances of getting breast cancer were above 80 percent over my lifetime. I had a hard time grasping that breast cancer was genetically fated for me. The more that I learned, the less crazy a double mastectomy sounded. It's the only way to eradicate your chance of getting breast cancer when you are BRCA1 positive. Not doing the mastectomy would mean a lifetime of worrying as I waited for early detection of cancer. And then what? I am not as strong as my older sister, and it was hard enough watching her battle breast cancer. I couldn't put myself through what she went through at some future time, especially with two babies to consider.

One week later we met with a genetic counselor and had the test redone. I had already made up my mind about my breasts, but Jon and I were still secretly hoping this was all somehow a big mistake or that Jon's online findings were somehow inaccurate. But genetic counseling confirmed the research and my decision. I would have my double mastectomy within the year while my children were still babies, and I would have my ovaries removed in four years when I turned 35, because BRCA1 mutations also increases your risk of ovarian cancer.

Surprisingly, the decision to have my breasts removed wasn't difficult to make. I didn't struggle with the decision the way other women do. I felt that I had no other option and I didn't need to postpone the surgery since I was done having babies. Jon and I never planned to have our kids so close together but now knowing my situation we are thankful Cooper, our second, came when he did, just 14 months after our first, Edie. He was a miracle baby who arrived just in time so that I could take care of what needed to be done and then go on with the rest of my life worry-free about breast cancer.

The difficult decision for me was whether to do reconstruction with the typical implants or do the more drastic FLAP procedure using tissue, fat and skin from my stomach to recreate my breasts. I didn't like the idea of having foreign objects placed in my body that would require maintenance every 10 years, but on the other hand I was hesitant about having a 10-hour surgery and having a longer hospital stay. I didn't like either option. I went back and forth a few times until I decided on the DIEP FLAP. I wanted my chest to be natural. I wanted it to be me. Plus, with the FLAP procedure I got the added bonus of having a super duper tummy tuck.

My small breasts finally worked in my favor for once; after two pregnancies I had enough stomach flab to recreate about 80 percent of my chest. And even though my plastic surgeon said it made no difference whether or not I gained any weight before surgery, I ate cheeseburgers and fries almost daily to maintain my flabby stomach. I am probably the only mother who tried not to lose her baby weight.

My surgery was scheduled for the end of September, less than four months from when I originally received the 23andme results. It sounds like a short period of time in retrospect, but I was an emotional wreck most of the summer -- making the time go by much more slowly. I cried all the time and felt sorry for myself. I had to get it over with. I loved my surgeons, my mother could take time off and I had childcare in place. I had to get it over with.

It was scary going into surgery, and it was even more awful when I woke up. I was in the hospital a total of eight days. On the morning following my surgery I had to go back into the operating room because of a kink in one of the blood vessels that had been reattached when it was moved from my stomach to my chest. I spent most of my recovery in a step-down room with four beds and a nurse's station next to me. Nurses and doctors checked on my constantly. I couldn't sleep at night, I could barely move, and I was in agony. I pushed my morphine button more than 240 times one night in desperation even though medicine could only be dispensed every 10 minutes. My hospital experience was way worse and much longer than I anticipated. I missed my children terribly.

At the end of my hospital stay, I was in my own room and had a nice little medication cocktail thanks to the pain management team. With help from a nurse was able to take a shower. I had five drains coming out of my body. I had stitches on each breast mound, from hip to hip, and around my belly button (which had to be moved).

When I went home from the hospital I had trouble looking in the mirror. Jon, who couldn't have been more loving and supportive, wasn't fazed by my appearance, but it would take me some time to get used to this new look. I had no nipples. I had a hard mass of tissue on the left breast, which made me look uneven, but mostly my chest was flat. I hated my scars. I was bruised and stiff. I couldn't lift my arms up to the side, and I couldn't lift my babies. It was tough but I was happy to be home. I was on the other side.

My body healed quickly and by week four, post surgery, I could raise my arms to my ears. I was able to sit on the floor and play with the kids and keep up with their routines at about 70 percent. I was tired and anxious to get back to my old self even though I knew I was making great progress.

Everyday gets a little easier and I am sure I'll feel totally great just in time to schedule my remaining surgeries. I am going to do minor surgeries in the months to come to add volume and create nipples. In time, my scars will fade, I'll get back to doing yoga and running around at the park with Edie without someone helping me out. In time, BRCA1 won't be my identity.

 
FOLLOW HEALTH
 
 
  • Comments
  • 101
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:47 PM on 11/08/2010
"... Consider this fact: The lifetime risk of breast cancer of those with the "breast cancer gene" or BRCA1 or 2 is presently 82 percent and increasing every year. Before 1940, the risk of getting cancer for those with the cancer gene was 24 percent. What changed? Our diet, lifestyle, and environment--both physically and emotionally. Might these factors be a better place to look for answers on how to address our cancer epidemic?"

A wonderful article, written by Mark Hyman, MD: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mark-hyman/cancer-new-science-on-how_b_779936.html
02:22 AM on 11/06/2010
"Women with BRCA1 mutations who breast-fed for more than 1 year were less likely to have breast cancer than those who never breast-fed (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38 to 0.80; P = .001), although no such association was seen for BRCA2 (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.56 to 1.59; P = .83). Conclusions: Women with deleterious BRCA1 mutations who breast-fed for a cumulative total of more than 1 year had a statistically significantly reduced risk of breast cancer."

-- from http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/96/14/1094.full
10:23 PM on 11/04/2010
I have a friend who was diagnosed with ovarian cancer. She was 21 at the time. Her ovaries were so thoroughly covered with tumors that they looked like cauliflowers. The doctors wanted to remove them immediately, but she refused. She decided to do a cleanse instead, she changed her diet to organic raw vegetable and fruit. She also divorced her husband that she was very unhappy with and she quit the job she hated. Four month later she was cancer free, she lost 30 pounds and found a new carrier as a journalist.

That was ten years ago. Now she is a happy mom of a year old boy.

Another of my friends, my husband'd best friend in the world, had a prostate cancer. It got diagnosed just about the time he found out that his wife is cheating on him. He also refused treatment, instead he divorced his wife, quit his corporate job and went back to pottery, which is his passion. He also changed his diet to raw foods. That was eleven years ago, now he is a happy and healthy husband to a wonderful woman.
10:28 PM on 11/04/2010
There is another person I knew, she was a roommate of mine for about three years. She was diagnosed with breast and liver cancer (in her mid fifties). She was a very angry, very bitter person. The first thing she did, when she found out she was sick, was to push everyone away. She was all alone when she had four weeks left to live. Then her daughters came to see her, before she died. One of her daughters decided to move to the town we lived in to be close to her mother, she was bringing her daughters with her. For a moment my roommate felt loved, needed, happy. At the next checkout it turned out that her cancer disappeared. She was perfectly healthy.

Nothing changed in her life however, she remain as unhappy, as judgmental and as angry as ever. The cancer came back year later and, despite chemo and all sorts of other treatments, she died.

I know those people, I did not read about them in a book, or on a website, I live with them. And I see in them a beautiful example of what can happen when a person truly takes responsibility for her life, and for his body. this is why I am leaving the comments I am leaving on this forum.
03:14 PM on 11/04/2010
Life is so hard and scary, when it needs to be survived at all cost.
12:26 PM on 11/04/2010
too many words...
The thought of spending the rest of my life going back to the emotional worry of history repeating itself does not appeal to me. Through a detailed family history of both sides, a gynocological oncologist revealed additional risk factors, and recommended a full hysterectomy, incuding my pelvic lining, which can often be the site of "ovarian" cancer even after the ovaries are removed. I whole heartedly believe it is the right thing to do, and will be completing the surgery in 2 weeks. Whether or not cancer is found doesn't really matter. What does matter is that thru viligent monitoring and a skilled and seasoned doctor, I will have a different fate than that of my mom. Should I test BRCA+, I would also consider a mastectomy in the future. I would make your choice in a New York minute, and applaud you for your candor and resolve in taking power and control over your body. Anyone who judges you or others for making those difficult decisions, should walk one day in your shoes. My emotional wellbeing could not be preserved if I had to spend the rest of my life worrying about breast or ovarian cancer. Yes, we all will die of something. But I'll be damned if it will be caused by either one of those 2 diseases. Those of us with wonderful, supportive family (like your Jon) are the lucky ones! Best of luck and good health to you and your family.
02:22 PM on 11/04/2010
Stacy-
So sorry to hear all this, I truly hope your surgery goes well. Ovarian cancer is so hard to detect...our doctors reiterated that several times. I hope your surgery goes smoothly and that your recovery is as bearable as possible....our thoughts are with you.
12:25 PM on 11/04/2010
This is an amazing article that I intend to forward to each of my 5 sisters. Thank you, Jill for sharing this thought provoking account of your experience with both genetic testing and your proactive response. I am going through a similar experience, but not with breast cancer - my genetic gift would likely be ovarian cancer. My mother, who in all likelihood was a carrier, was diagnosed with Stage 4 ovarian cancer at 39 and lived barely a year before it stole her away from her six young daughters and a husband who adored her. Granted, 1986-1987 didn't lend much in the way of preventative technology, so I have used every tool available to me for screening and testing. Long before the anouncement of BRCA, I feared that I would suffer the same fate as my mother. I have worried for 23 years, every year holding my breath for a normal CA-125 and pelvic ultrasound. Last year, when I turned 40, I felt like I had dodged a bullet, having made it to an age my mother barely saw. Magically, all of my worry ended and I spent one full blissful year with no worries of a death sentence via ovarian cancer. Having just had all of my regular testing, my CA-125 results showed a significant increase from last year, a pelvic ultrasounded showed a mass, and a CT confirmed the existence of a tumor. Seriously?
10:10 AM on 11/04/2010
I applaud Ms. Steinberg for making this tough decision! As a previvor with the BRCA2 mutation myself, I know what it's like to be harshly judged for opting to do the prophylactic surgery. I'm scheduled for a nipple and skin sparing mastectomy Feb. 22. I'm only 23, but I'm confident in my decison, and so are my incredibly supportive parents. My family history started with my 44 (now 47) year old mother who developed an aggressive form of breast cancer that often strikes younger women. Thank God she's alive today, but a mammogram did not catch her cancer, so I don't fully trust the surveillance. This, and the fact that I'm predisposed to the highly aggressive triple-negative (not hormone related, and taking Tamoxifen or avoiding birth control does me little to no good), gives me reason enough to go through with the surgery. Women are developing this horrible disease at younger and younger ages these days. I can't even get the recommended mammogram or MRI until I'm 25.... so why should I sit back to worry and wait for two long years about my high likelihood of getting breast cancer? I want to get this over with and get on with my young life and new career. Also, it must be said... thank you Jon for being an amazing and supportive partner to Jill!
02:21 PM on 11/04/2010
Thx you for your kind comments...and good luck and our thoughts for an easy surgery and quick recovery.
08:41 AM on 11/05/2010
I was not tested until after my breast cancer diagnosis. I am a BRCA2 carrier and chose a bilateral and reconstruction due to the high chance of recurrence within five years if I did not. I applaud women who have the courage to find out before they get cancer and do preventative prophylatic surgery when recommended. It beats cancer and chemo any day. People should not judge this very personal decision. It's hard enough to make it. www.nancyspoint
02:32 PM on 11/03/2010
Jill, thank you for bravely sharing your BRCA story. I'm beaming at the support from your amazing husband, Jon. He exemplifies what it means to truly be a man.

It frustrates me to see so many comments about relying on a healthy diet & lifestyle to somehow counteract a genetic mutation that is part of every single cell in our body. I'm angered by the suggestion that BRCA+ carriers are better off managing risk through surveillance. Do you, as someone who suggests that, understand how emotionally difficult it is to have ultrasounds, MRIs & biopsies every three months until the doctor finally says, "you have breast cancer"? With a BRCA mutation, there is nearly a 90% chance that you’ll hear those words someday. Yes, early detection is important & yes, surveillance makes sense for the general population, but a different set of rules applies to BRCA mutation carriers.

I inherited BRCA2 from my mother, who was 34 when she was diagnosed. I watched helplessly as cancer destroyed her body and robbed 3 young children of their mother. Seven months ago, I learned that I was BRCA+. I evaluated the options my doctors presented: surveillance, chemoprevention, & preventative mastectomy. I’m 31 & single & was absolutely terrified of having my breasts removed. Five months ago today, I did it. I can say now without reservation that it was absolutely, 100% the right choice. Someone commented above that preventative mastectomy is drastic and unnecessary. Breast cancer is drastic. Doing everything one can
02:35 PM on 11/03/2010
The rest of my comment was cut off...the last sentence should read, "Doing everything one can to prevent cancer MAKES SENSE."
02:20 PM on 11/04/2010
Your comments are so spot on to how we felt. I'm so glad to hear everything went well for you 5 months back. And I'm thrilled your wonderful comments have pushed the nonsense diet comments down. Thx for your thoughts.
09:23 PM on 11/01/2010
Genes and their function are controlled by diet, exercise, supplementation, toxins, aging, and many other factors. Gene targeted therapies are just coming of age, and gene expression can be changed to reduce risk factors as well as cure cancer itself by turning the genes that allow the cancer to grow to be turned off.
12:45 PM on 11/03/2010
There is no evidence that diet can counteract genetic dispositions. Further, as the article points out, my wife had a family history. It does not surprise me that there are no statistics, studies, or facts of any kind in your comment.
11:51 PM on 11/05/2010
I don't have time to do the homework you should have done yourself. It is called pub med.
09:13 PM on 11/01/2010
The whole point of orthomolecular medicine, diet, nutrition, and detoxification is to not let genetics + environment = your fate. The surgeons must love this test. The sad story is their are probably many other modalaties which might stop the paitent from getting this cancer even if they are positive for the gene. The fact that women are counseled only to get this surgery, and not any other options is totally pathetic, and shows the current state of medicine in our society. The other bizarre thing is that only 1 lab does the test in the country. I would want a second lab to do the test to make sure it is right before doing radical surgery. Labs though very accurate can make mistakes. If you are that 1 in 500 that was a mistake would you like to find out later that you did this radical surgery, and the results were wrong or mixed up with another patient.
12:45 PM on 11/03/2010
We had the test done twice
11:54 PM on 11/05/2010
Through the same lab right. They have the patent right. Hope their are two independent labs that now do the test. One lab controlling the rights to the test, and its interpretation is a scary thing. Especially when such drastic measures are reccomended.
08:38 PM on 10/30/2010
Does it really matter all that much what we will die of?

This preventive procedure might have reduced the risk of breast cancer but it does not reduce the risk of other cancers, illnesses, infections, accidents, all the many things that can kill us. And that will kill us, eventually.

This procedure does not guarantee that the patient will not die, it does not guarantee that the patient will have no cancer, it does not guarantee that the patient will live for another 20 years, 20 months, 20 weeks, 20 days even.

This procedure merely reduces the risk of contracting this one, particular illness. It doesn't even remove the risk entirely, only reduces it.

Is it really worth it then, cutting off parts of ones body, for that?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
NoraHuffposter
Liberal socialist
09:29 PM on 10/30/2010
With a high risk of developing cancer, it is worth it for many women to undergo the procedure. Ultimately, it is a personal choice and Ms. Steinberg is generous to share her experience. Your post is full of hypotheticals and none of us are guaranteed anything but faced with such a tremendously high risk of breast/ovarian cancer, she chose the best option for her (and one I would choose myself).
10:25 PM on 10/30/2010
Well, we will all die, and we will most likely die of something. That is not hypothetical.

Also risk even high risk, isn't certainty. She might have gotten cancer, but she might not have. The procedure might have prevented cancer - but it might not have. That's hypothetical.

But all that aside - I agree with you, everyone makes their own choices about what's best for them.
07:14 PM on 10/31/2010
Thx Nora. It's disappointing that pausha's comment is at the top of this thread. There's a lot of more reasoned and thoughtful comments throughout.
07:01 PM on 10/31/2010
This takes an 80% risk of cancer and reduces it to under 1%. We think those statistics are overwhelming.
11:46 AM on 10/30/2010
To readers: Please DON'T follow the author's drastic and unnecessary response if you have this gene. My heart goes out to her but her surgery was radical and unnecessay and I'd like to prevent others from taking this step. This gene DOES NOT mean you will invariably get cancer nor does prophylatic surgery mean that you will NOT get cancer. Unfortunately the author could still get cancer despite her precautions and she might never have gotten it at all. The cancer researchers in studying this gene and its outcomes, have studied it in large families where other factors may have contributed to the cancer rate (such as diet and lifestyle choices).

The best course is a healthy lifestyle with surveillance. My mother had post menopausal cancer and still lived a healthy 20 years and died from another cause. It is NOT a death sentence.

Please read this FAQ sheet from the National Cancer Institute that explains the gene and what they recommend in detail.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Deli
Life after death, why wait?
02:00 PM on 10/30/2010
For the author to say she had no other option is sad to me. Even genetics can be overridden. They are NOT the deciding factor in life. Early detection is key with cancer and know you are susceptible means getting screened. But mammograms are not good either. The thermograghic method is better. Better clarity of the results, the earliest possible detection, and no side effects.

Also, it is a myth that breast implants require "maintenance". My doctor is one of the best in the nation and he said that is BS to for making money. Mine are 25 years old and going strong. He said anyone with breast implants that still look and feel good should never have any kind of replacement surgery they can last for life.
11:10 AM on 11/01/2010
I completely agree with you. Genetics are not 100% of what creates our life experience - it may only be 50% or maybe less. We see many families where certain diseases seem to run in the family, but not everyone gets them, or they can be avoided through lifestyle choices. Moreover, in reading about how the NCI researchers came to their conclusions about this gene, well....they might be wrong in how it affects the majority of people. It would not be the first time medical researchers have been wrong, or drew the wrong conclusion. I feel that the author's actions are too drastic, based on the NCI's own recommendations, and on my personal experience.
nancynancy
Atheist.
02:34 PM on 10/30/2010
It is misleading and irresponsible to suggest that survellience and a healthy lifestyle are the best course for everyone. Each woman must consider her own situation and make her own decision. The fact that your mother lived for 20 years is irrelevant -- many women, like my own mother, die within three years.

What is relevant is that prophylactic surgery has been shown to reduce the risk by 90%. This option might not be your choice, but it is, in fact, the most effective way to prevent the disease.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lesann
Resistance is Futile
08:26 AM on 10/31/2010
My husband runs 5-6 miles every three days, does cross-fit, lifts weights and never eats red meat or any meat for that matter. However, he has a genetic predisposition for high cholesterol. He can never seem to get it under 200. Sometimes you cannot out maneuver genetics.
11:10 AM on 11/01/2010
It is not MY suggestion. If you actually go back and read the link I provided, you will see that it is the recommendation of the National Cancer Institute.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Cuyahoga
I asked Hank Williams, how lonely does it get ....
01:39 AM on 10/30/2010
I should have added to my comment - tomorrow there is a memorial service for my sister's best friend, San Diego, who lost her 9 year battle with breast cancer. She is in her early 40s, leaves behind a husband and 2 young children.

I also should have mentioned that my cousin who just had the surgery last month learned from the path reports that precancerous cells were in her left breast.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Cuyahoga
I asked Hank Williams, how lonely does it get ....
01:33 AM on 10/30/2010
A few months ago I wouldn't have even read this article. However, a 63 yr old cousin tested positive and 3 weeks ago had her breasts removed. I've talked with her almost daily since 2 days post surgery and she hasn't had nearly the horrific experience the writer of this article experienced - she was home in 2 days and said the pain was minimal. She did not have any skin or fat removed from her abdomen, and did mention having some pig skin used in part of the graft.

She alerted all of her cousins -- male and female -- and now we're making our own decisions about the genetic testing.

Thank you for writing this.
nancynancy
Atheist.
08:53 AM on 10/30/2010
I wouldn't want any woman to be scared away from the prophylactic surgery because of the author's grueling experience. A mastectomy with the immediate insertion of small implants like I had 15 years ago is much simpler, safer, and far less painful. I believe it's the most sensible option for many women.

Incidentally, I had my surgery done in Costa Rica and the total cost including travel and hotels was just 20% of what it would have cost me here in the US. The care was excellent.
09:13 PM on 10/30/2010
This is why I chose to tell my story...so glad it was helpful.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
11:04 PM on 10/29/2010
As grueling as it was to undergo the procedures, this brave lady has protected her family from undergoing even worse suffering. It's a fine example.
09:13 PM on 10/30/2010
Thank you for your kind words