iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Bell

GET UPDATES FROM Jim Bell
 

Space, Available

Posted: 02/22/2012 11:55 am

We seem to be running out of space.

Or, perhaps more accurately, running away from space. Space exploration, that is. Recent deep funding cuts by the Administration and Congress for NASA's space exploration programs are turning the final frontier into an ever-receding dream. "To boldly go" is quickly becoming "to cheaply dink around." What the heck is going on?

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the world's first successful interplanetary space mission -- Mariner 2's successful flyby of Venus in 1962. Since then, nearly 70 more American spacecraft have set out on a series of daring, exciting, and scientifically rewarding adventures to explore the Sun, Moon, and planets, sometimes in person (on the 9 crewed Apollo missions that traveled beyond low Earth orbit), but mostly with people back here on Earth exploring via the virtual senses of our silicon-based robotic emissaries. During this last half century the American frontier has been expanded to literally encompass the entire solar system.

Astronomers and planetary scientists are on the verge of making profound discoveries about the origin and distribution of life in the solar system and beyond, by exploring ancient or even present habitable environments on Mars, on Jupiter's ocean moons Europa and Ganymede, and on Saturn's icy, organic-bearing moons Enceladus and Titan. The internet has made space exploration a vicarious, shared experience that teachers, students, space enthusiasts, and the general public can directly participate in -- in real time even. Discoveries in outer space are motivated and informed by discoveries in geology, meteorology, paleontology, and biology here on Earth. In turn, what we learn about other worlds out there informs and educates us about the past, present, and future history of our own fragile and changing home planet.

Given the space program's storied history and its compelling future, it is puzzling and frustrating to see our political leaders enact or propose steps that would slow America's progress in exploring the space frontier. Budget cuts in NASA's solar system exploration program enacted last year by Congress began to put the brakes on more than a decade of amazing progress, threatening to derail existing and future robotic missions and space science education programs. The administration's recently-proposed NASA budget for the next five years would fulfill those threats, with major cuts in major planetary exploration and education programs, including a nearly 40% cut in the Mars exploration program and a 100% cut in NASA's ongoing lunar exploration program. NASA's involvement in two future international Mars missions, one with instruments and science teams already selected, would be cancelled. No new "flagship" missions, like Voyager or Galileo or Cassini or the new Mars rover Curiosity, would be started during the next five years, perhaps longer. Budgets for education programs, ongoing mission operations, and a variety of planetary science research and data analysis programs, would be slashed.

In the meantime, other nations -- who, combined, have now flown as many successful lunar and planetary space missions as the U.S. -- are vying to take over our leadership role. Our European colleagues, thwarted by NASA on their offers of partnership on new missions to Mars, are pursuing their own options with the Russians. The Russians, even after the stinging loss of a recent Mars mission attempt, are continuing to plan for future Mars and lunar missions. And the Chinese are making no secrets of their ambitions for more daring and far-reaching space missions, with robotic precursors leading eventually to taikonauts on the Moon and perhaps even Mars. Like us, these countries also recognize that exploring space is a defining imperative for a great society. If our belief in and commitment to that imperative wanes, there are others waiting to pick up the mantle of leadership.

As a nation, we do not condone skimping on equipment or training for our men and women in uniform, those who risk their lives to protect us and to help promote American ideals and values around the world. Exploring the solar system promotes American ideals and values too -- like teamwork, perseverance, ingenuity, and openness -- and also enables scientific discoveries and helps to educate and inspire our children, to train our high-tech workers, and to give us all a sense of pride in making possible truly historic events that will be remembered for centuries. While it is of course nowhere near as life-threatening or expensive as national defense (NASA's proposed new budget for its Science programs would fall to under just 0.13% of the entire $3.8 trillion federal budget), leading the exploration of space is no less worthy a goal to pursue. NASA's planetary exploration program is our modern incarnation of the American pioneer spirit, extending the frontier to worlds beyond. Let's not skimp on this, either.

_______________________

Jim Bell is an astronomer and planetary scientist, a Professor in the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University in Tempe, and the President of The Planetary Society, the world's largest public space advocacy organization. He is the lead scientist for the Pancam color stereo cameras on the NASA Mars rovers Spirit and Opportunity, is a member of the science camera team on NASA's Curiosity rover, and has authored several space photography books, including "Postcards from Mars", "Mars 3-D", and "Moon 3-D".

 
 
 

Follow Jim Bell on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@Jim_Bell

FOLLOW SCIENCE
We seem to be running out of space. Or, perhaps more accurately, running away from space. Space exploration, that is. Recent deep funding cuts by the Administration and Congress for NASA's space...
We seem to be running out of space. Or, perhaps more accurately, running away from space. Space exploration, that is. Recent deep funding cuts by the Administration and Congress for NASA's space...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:04 AM on 02/28/2012
Prof. Bell...

Here is a question for you... and I am kicking myself for not asking earlier... we've all been speculating about that Venus rotation period change... do you happen to know the answer? I keep saying on the other threads that to a planetary scientist it might be a trivial thing. Is it? Or are our back of the envelopes the best thing we have right now?

I hope you are reading this... I am really curious!

Thanks!
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
01:04 AM on 02/24/2012
That is truly sad. I thought when we retire the shuttle, NASA would have more money for solar system exploration, but some politicians are so shortsighted.
10:01 AM on 02/23/2012
On the bright side, supercomputers are ever-evolving. What are we at, 2.5 petaflops? The end result is highly improved spacecraft, and engine designs.

What we need today is all the information we can get our hands on because every bit of it could potentially affect the outcome of tomorrow's voyages.
04:17 PM on 02/24/2012
I have to disappoint you. Spacecraft and engines were highly optimised 40 years ago. There isn't much that can be improved with math. Current improvements are in manufacturing technology, like friction-stir welding, which allows to make large tanks at unmatched weight ratios for a fraction of the cost of old technologies. But even that is running into the limits of material strength.

The main cost advantage will come from complete reuse, by landing first and second stages instead of burning them up in the atmosphere and crashing them into the ocean.
05:22 PM on 02/24/2012
There is no cost involved, once desirable assets in space are readily attainable. Information is the first such asset and is the easiest to obtain.

What you are saying further proves my point. Factually speaking, all space technology will obviously be improved within the foreseeable future, fueled by the backbone of supercomputer design. Manufacturing is Step One.

My point was, with more information gathering, when the frequency of space travel increases, there will be less time spent making up for past expeditions that didn't occur. That is the goal of the future.
09:15 AM on 02/23/2012
Big space exploration makes a few large defense contractors wealthier but it gets very little bang for the buck and does even less for humanity. We need to focus on near earth commercially viable projects by encouraging and funding small startups and promising new technology. Our first goal should be economical access to space. Without it, truely transformational technology such as space based solar power can never happen.
09:05 PM on 02/23/2012
Why would space based solar power be transformative, or even possible? Just because somebody said so in the 1960s or 1970s without thinking about the problem seriously?

Solar power is at its best where it is closest to the user... that's everybody's roof.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
03:50 AM on 02/23/2012
But there isn't a society-grabbing goal, like preventing a potential enemy from dominating the highground. Lots of lovely and interesting small goals, but nothing that would cause the public to demand expenditure like Apollo.

Put another way, ISTM that the glorious Hubble pictures do not open the bank doors for a Mars expedition. I would also suggest that the next obvious major project is to greate a permanent launch site on, or beneath the surface of, the Moon and the technology to do that isn't around.
06:51 PM on 02/22/2012
Talk to the GOP and the tea party which are trying to get rid of government by bankrupting the nation.

Unless you solve that problem, you won't have to worry about anything else.
07:55 PM on 03/19/2012
Yet it was the Obama administration that made these cuts. I assume this is the fault of the GOP/Tea Party too? Jeez get real and wake up.