All lies and jests, still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest. - Paul Simon, The Boxer
When it comes to the political talking heads crowding the media platform, who, if any, do we trust the most and the least? Are the facts important or is it all just entertainment?
These are a few of the questions I asked in August when I posted an informal, online survey regarding conservative and liberal commentators. Separating the polls by political affiliation, I offered a list of the more popular commentators: Glenn Beck, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly on the conservative side; Alan Colmes, Arianna Huffington, Rachel Maddow, Chris Matthews and Keith Olbermann on the liberal side.
Working with Jamie O'Boyle, senior analyst for The Center for Cultural Studies and Analysis, I asked respondents the following:
• Have you ever listened to... (any of the listed commentators)?
• I listen to these commentators primarily for: news, analysis, opinion, entertainment, other.
• Who are you most and least likely to trust?
• Do you feel that statements of facts from these commentators are: Predominately well-checked and supportable; I trust them in general; I have no way of knowing; Would be nice if facts were supportable, but doesn't matter; It's just entertainment.
• If factual errors occur, do you believe that these commentators should make a correction?
Only three demographic questions were asked regarding age, gender and political identification.
From the raw numbers, liberal commentator Rachel Maddow received the highest individual "trust" marks at 63% overall; Alan Colmes received the lowest at 30%. Conservative Bill O'Reilly received the highest individual "trust" score at 16%; Rush Limbaugh, the lowest at 19%.
Most striking was the fact that whether respondents believed that the statements made by these commentators were "well-checked and supportable," or considered "just entertainment," an overwhelming number (96% from the conservative survey and 98% from the liberal survey) believe that "if factual errors occur, [all] should make a correction."
According to the Center's analysis, "once you strip out the self-identified liberals from the conservative survey, the answers to both surveys are almost identical. The audience sees these politically-focused cable shows primarily as analysis and commentary, followed by news."
But the Center's Jamie O'Boyle makes a compelling case for "confirmation bias - the tendency," he writes "of our brain to easily accept information compatible with what we already know and -- more importantly -- minimize information that contradicts what we already know, even if what we 'know' isn't true.
"The unconscious weighing of information is one of the reasons it is so difficult to change people's minds using logic. The information goes in but the importance the brain allots to each bit minimizes the effect of negative data while weighting more heavily the bits that already fit their preconceptions and worldview.
"Today," O'Boyle writes, "cable TV and the internet have opened up new venues for the return of a very old American dynamic of competing voices battling for mind share.
"The value of these programs to society," O'Boyle concludes "is that they raise issues -- often uncomfortable issues -- and they force the rest of us to deal with them. You might not like what the other guys say, the way he say it, or the fact that you can't believe anyone would be dumb enough to believe it, but that's your bias speaking, not his."
To read the full report, Discordant Voices, go to ethicsStupid.com, scroll down and click on "Polls."
Jim Lichtman writes and speaks on ethics. His commentaries can be found at www.ethicsStupid.com.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.