When Mark Halperin made his distasteful remark about President Obama on cable TV, he provided a glimpse into the media that the right refuses to acknowledge and progressives seemingly cannot prove. Conservatives wailing about the liberal media are as wrong on that subject as they are about taxes. The media is not liberal.
Overwhelmingly, the journalists working in national media are conservatives. There are very few of them who do not earn six figure incomes. Tax policies of George W. Bush and potential Republican presidents in 2012 are more favorable to employees of national media than are those of a President Obama trying to eliminate tax cuts to upper income brackets and reduce the deficit.
Halperin's own dickiness is a kind of icon for the disaffection the rest of us in fly-over America feel for much of the national media. The East Coast condescension of editors and journalists who want the rest of the country to know they are smarter than the rest of us is annoying in the extreme. Halperin's politics, in particular, have always been thinly veiled. He cannot hide his Republican and conservative leanings and you need to hear only one interview to ascertain his perspective. The same is true of most "analysts." The on-air broadcasters and political thinkers in New York and Washington spend a great deal of their time sitting around breathing each other's fumes and waiting for absurd notions to become their conventional wisdom.
In Texas, where we have watched our governor disastrously privatize Medicaid and force 147,000 children off of health care rolls, bring minimum wage jobs to the state and proclaim an economic boom, operate a Youth Commission where children were raped and given extended sentences when they complained, we find George Will writing a column that describes Perry's "exceptionalism," which is probably accurate if the reader considers that the Texas governor pushed through a law forcing women to have a sonogram before they get an abortion. Will appears to have flown to San Antonio for a lunch with Governor Dick and got enough of a crush that he offered a rhetorical flourish over Perry's "French cuffs and cowboy boots." Will was obviously encouraged he has acolytes West of the Potomac.
Of course, it's no secret that Will is a conservative determined to keep us little people out in the prairie informed of how we should think. What exactly is the reach of progressive media and its thinkers, though? The conservatives who own the national media, whether that is Murdoch or Disney, provide a forum for people like Halperin and other pseudo-analysts to complain about publications like the New York Times. But it was the bitchy "gray lady" that enabled the fatally flawed reporting of Judy Miller, which was central to fomenting a political environment in Washington that led to our ongoing disaster in Iraq. The paper of record was not a liberal enemy when conservatives figured out how to manipulate its editorial content.
FOX News, at least, is a known commodity for viewers. Chris Wallace's dickiness is as obvious as a lapel pin. There is no attempt to pass off FOX people (let's not pretend and call them journalists) as analysts, the guise under which Mark Halperin stalks the green rooms of Washington and New York. The Hannity's and the O'Reilly's pull fatuous nonsense out of the ether and then push it on the streets like it is fact as they denounce Keith Olbermann as a tool of the liberal elite media. Disagree with Olbermann all you want but his perspective is backed up by intellectual rigor, evidence, and reporting, which, in the eyes of conservatives, makes Olbermann "kind of a dick," too. Facts remain "stubborn things."
Let's retire this notion of objectivity in the media. It is a kind of mythology taught in journalism schools and checked at the door as soon as a reporter walks into the newsroom of a large media operation. No one is objective, not even reporters, maybe especially not reporters. We are all a product of our experiences. The goal is fairness, making certain that facts are properly assessed, perspectives weighed for credibility, and the report is informative based upon available information. And there aren't always two sides to a story. Sometimes there is only one. The fool standing on the Golden Gate Bridge who says he can fly before he jumps does not need to be refuted by a scientist explaining why human flight is not possible. Sometimes there is just the truth.
But what do I know? I've been told a few times that I'm "kind of a dick," too.
Also at: http://www.moorethink.com
Follow James Moore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/moorethink
Apology Accepted, Mr. Halperin
Jon Stewart Riffs on Mark Halperin's Obama Slur on 'Daily Show'
The Morning Fix: Mark Halperin pulls a Spicoli! AOL bags MoviePass. Scripps ...
Mark Halperin Called Douchebag By Grayson Daughters - Atlanta Social Media Day
Axelrod: What Halperin said was `stupid and tasteless,' but ultimately a `mistake'
If you look it up, liberal means that you are for deregulated markets, international intervention and free trade
So ,yeah the media is liberal
If the media really was 'Liberal' like they claim, these right wing liars, hypocrites and frauds would be falling all over themselves in favor of bringing the Fairness Doctrine back.
.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO2dScuNnDI
Thank you. You've helped me to see that I must finally give up the frustrating habit of screaming at the television, asking Why? Where's the truth that the reason the President did that was because . . . ? Why aren't they reporting that Republicans in Congress are blocking all the job bills presented by the Democrats? Why, Why, Why?
It was so exhausting. Now I'll stop asking, stop expecting the whole truth to come out on television, even on MSNBC (the morning shows).
Instead, I will start helping to spread the truth, by blogging, by writing letters to editors, by volunteering to work phone banks, by sharing with friends, family members, anybody who will listen, and by calling news directors of television stations to complain. We have VOICES. We must use them and stop relying on others to stop the LIES.
But I feel like it didn't used to be this way. There seemed to be more honesty, integrity and individual journalistic heroes in the "old days."
This is such an excellent point! Why is it that even supposedly reputable news organizations think they've done their job, when they have paraded out talking heads on each side of an issue. Knowing the extreeme arguments on each side does little to provide clairity. We really do need journalists to provide that sense of fairness so eloquently stated above.
No one is right (correct) here--pro-life or pro-choice is just an opinion and not an objective fact. Problem is opinion feels good and opposing fact is gross. You can't vote on social issues cause there is no right or wrong. That's like deciding whom to shoot--the left-handed kid or the right-handed one? No basis for the shot. Look at them both equally without handedness being the judge and hear the facts. There are facts if you care to listen. There are no facts if you've already decided. To be independent is the ultimate in a land of individuals and freedom.
Know how communism fell--cause Gorbachev would have starved without the bags of grain stamped USA. That was a fact and he let that fact rule him till it did him in. Being right isn't the end all. Knowing the truth is. And not my truth or Beck's or Maddow's truth; your own truth.
People V.S. Government and corporations.
He's wrong almost all of the time about everything and yet he still has a secure job as a high paid DC political pundit. If I was wrong at my job as often as Halperin is at his I would have been fired years ago, and rightfully so.
Mark Halperin = Always wrong, just like almost all of his peers on the right.
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/24/hack_list_2/index.html
.