It was a nice invitation, not unlike many I've received before. Every summer, a number of Christian music and arts festivals convene around the country, featuring musicians and speakers and attracting tens of thousands of young people. I have spoken at many such events over the years and, in fact, met my wife, Joy Carroll, at the Greenbelt festival in England! I'm guessing I've spoken there as many as 10 times. Joy is helping to organize an "American Greenbelt" for next summer called the "Wild Goose" Festival, an image that in Celtic spirituality signifies the Holy Spirit.
So when Lifest, a Christian festival in Wisconsin invited me to come and speak this summer, and the date was free, I accepted. Bob Lenz, who directs the annual gathering, is a wonderful man with a big heart and a powerful ministry among high school kids that has saved many from suicide. He's the kind of guy you want to say yes to. It was put in the calendar.
Then a firestorm erupted. A local Christian radio station, which had always supported Lifest, and a local pastor started circulating attacks against me, suggesting that I was a communist, a deceiver, and, worst of all, an adviser to Barack Obama. My favorite was that I was an "avowed Marxist" and that any young person that heard me would be in "spiritual peril." They were especially concerned that "the social justice message and agenda [Sojourners] promote[s] is a seed of secular humanism, seeking an unholy alliance between the Church and Government." Does that sound anything like the language of a certain Fox News talk show host who has recently come after "social justice" Christians and me in particular? Oh no, they insisted, this had nothing to do with Glenn Beck.
The intimidation of Bob Lenz and Lifest began, insisting that I be canceled or they would face pull-outs and protests. A letter was sent to local churches to call for my cancellation and, like Glenn Beck, the authors just made stuff up. Under a great deal of pressure, Bob called me to discuss what to do. He believed that these people were spreading lies and didn't want to capitulate to their threats. But they were really stirring up trouble, and people were coming after him personally. I decided to call the president of the radio station myself, to ask him what his concerns were, and to offer a dialogue with his board or anybody else he wanted while I was in Wisconsin. But he refused the dialogue unless the station's demands for my cancellation were met (sounds like Glenn Beck again).
He said he was against the "unholy marriage between the government and the church." Me too, I said. When I told him how I successfully worked with the Obama administration to preserve religious freedom in hiring for faith-based organizations who receive any public funds (such as World Vision and The Salvation Army), and spent half of my time on health care in preserving the rule against federal funding of abortion, he became silent and kept moving on to "other issues" - the last of which was Sojourners supporting a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. When I reminded him that there actually were Palestinian Christians, and that most mainline evangelical organizations now support a two-state solution, he got silent again. But he refused to change his position about me not speaking, and his final reason was that I had supported the Bush administration's faith-based initiative! So my openness to a previous president's ideas for faith-based partnerships in alleviating poverty was the reason I shouldn't speak at Lifest? This was getting quite silly. But when the wild and fabricated charges they began with all fell flat in face of the facts, they were left with not much of an argument. But they stuck with it and pulled out of the festival.
I didn't realize how big a deal this had become until I got to Wisconsin. Green Bay and Milwaukee television stations were there, with the story already in their local media and newspapers. I arrived to a series of press interviews and meetings with local pastors who were very sorry about all this and expressed hope that I would still come back to Wisconsin (I assured them that I loved their state and would love to come back).
Finally I got to speak to the young people, which was the reason that I came in the first place. I told them that I came because of them and the hope their generation provides to me. And that I liked the title of the talk I was to give: "The Call to Jesus and his Kingdom of Justice." So that's what I talked about to a very enthusiastic response from the thousands of young people who were there -- the crowd made even larger because of the controversy, of course.
I said that when we have controversy and conflict in the church and speak badly of one another as Christians, it actually turns people away from Christ. And I said what unites us is not our different cultures, nationalities, or political views. What unites us is the gospel of Jesus and his kingdom, and their job as a new generation was to make that clear. When I quoted Jesus' opening sermon at Nazareth and concluded that "any gospel that isn't good news to the poor is not the gospel of Jesus Christ," they all cheered.
The front page of the local paper in Appleton, Wisconsin, where I boarded my flight for home the next day, led with the story of the night before in nearby Oshkosh by saying, "Jim Wallis shared his Bible-based message of serving the poor Friday night to a large, welcoming crowd at Lifest despite a small number of boos at his introduction." They reported what Bob Lenz courageously said in his kind introduction: "This is my brother in Christ," he told the crowd. "I think he has a message for God's church. Part of who I am is because of this man."
I told the young crowd that heeding what the Bible says about serving the poor and seeking justice was not about social action or politics, but rather about nothing less than restoring the integrity of the Word of God in our lives, neighborhoods, nation, and world. Their response to that indicated that many young people today are no longer stuck in the old arguments and divisions in the church.
Most seemed to feel that the controversy and protest looked pretty foolish and unnecessary after the event had taken place. Many thanked Bob for standing firm against some pretty nasty attacks and pressure. But if the attackers had succeeded with intimidation to cancel a speaker they didn't agree with, there is no doubt that the tactics of distortion and intimidation would have been repeated in other places. That is, after all, how some media celebrities now make their living, and they are encouraging others to follow their example. The newspaper article ended with my saying it was time to "replace the gospel of Glenn, Rush, Sean, and Bill with Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John."
When I got to the TSA agent at airport security, she looked at my ID, smiled, and said, "So, you're Jim Wallis! I hope you felt very welcome here; many of us are very glad you came." I did feel very welcome and am very glad that I came.
Jim Wallis is the author of Rediscovering Values: On Wall Street, Main Street, and Your Street -- A Moral Compass for the New Economy, and CEO of Sojourners. He blogs at www.godspolitics.com.
Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis
---
There is something mighty peculiar about a religious persuasion that is obsessed with it's own self-image lest it "turn people away" from its deity.
Imagine you are attending your local Greek god bacchanal. Now some officious type saying that we must mind our p's and q's lest our outre behavior turn people away from Zeus?
Who thinks like this, anyway?
Here's an idea for all you christians who are wringing your hands over this: Forget about the rest of us. We're really not interested. We're really not paying attention. We really don't care.
Just keep your anti-woman, anti-homosexual agendas out of our government. Keep your sexual god-squad to yourselves.
And then, feel free to beat each other up to your heart's content. You can always find a reason to fight amongst yourselves, if only you will try.
But I know enough about the Bible to know that if you are a follower of Glenn Beck, you are not a Christian. Any ministers out there want to debate me on the subject? Let's go.
This is more of the same. Face it: you and Beck are brothers.
Beck's a carnival sideshow who makes a lot of money because our population is dumb.
1) What is the greatest need of human beings?
2) What is the gospel of Christ?
I commend Mr. Wallis for advocating for the poor, even if I disagree with him on how to best achieve those goals. But I have only ever heard him phrase the gospel in terms of helping the needy. I have only ever heard him speak of sin in terms of wealth and corporate greed. My main issue with Mr. Wallis is that he reduces the gospel to a political message, one that stresses class warfare and redistributive change, but is quiet on reconciling all peoples to God through the death and resurrection of Christ.
2) Love
But unfortunately, its also woefully unspecific, indistinguishable from the moral teachings of any other religion or philosophy. Even John Lennon came to this conclusion, and from a agnostic point of view.
Maybe a better question is this: what did Christ accomplish for the world?
Collective Salvation through atheist Marxism .
I know that you DO "love your neighbor as yourself", in the end, that is more important than any doctrine or dogma.
It's one thing to believe in a supernatural patriarch who dangles the carrot-and-stick dilemma in front of humanity, simultaneously promising immortality and threatening eternal suffering, but to actually focus on the fine differentiations between these superstitious factions simply draws attention to the absurdity of their shared world view.
Who cares about the author's 'persecution'? Both he and his persecutor are operating from a regressive and infantilized ascertaining of reality. Let them fight it out; let them throw their feces at each other.
I still dig Mad magazine.
"I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it." -Abraham Lincoln
In terms of women being second class to men, you have apparently not read much Scripture on that. Both men and women are created in the image of God, therefore establishing their equality in value. Jesus died for the sins of both men and women, again marking their equality in value. When God was giving commandments in the Old Testament He included a stern warning against anyone who oppressed widows. Maybe you should lighten up on the anti-Christian hate speech.
As for scripture:
But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God...any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled dishonors her head--it is the same as if her head were shaven... For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. (For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.) That is why a woman ought to have a veil on her head, because of the angels.
As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.
I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent.
Which leads to:
http://www.visionforumministries.org/home/about/biblical_patriarchy.aspx
I guess they aren't that much against the "unholy marriage" of government and church if it works in their favor. Nothing like expecting public funding for discrimination.
I love schnauzers, btw! :-)