iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jim Wallis

GET UPDATES FROM Jim Wallis
 

Will We Continue to Ignore the Poor?

Posted: 09/05/2012 8:09 am

We've got a problem in this country. I know it, you know it, and the politicians know it too, but most won't even say it out loud: poverty. We're bracing ourselves for next month's release of the 2011 numbers -- most economists predict that we're looking at the highest rates of poverty in fifty years.

In the years before the recession, we were making some strides. We had programs like Head Start that helped build strong kids from the get-go. We had high employment, and things were moving in the right direction. But even then, when we had budget surpluses, we couldn't get the nation's political leaders to focus on a real commitment to significantly reducing poverty in America. Then the recession hit, and everything changed. Many of those who were in poverty last decade were pushed into "deep" poverty (less than half of the poverty line) and we have an emerging group called the "newly poor"-- those suburban families whose houses are under water, who can't pay their gas, and whose six-figure jobs dissolved when the bubbles burst. The face and the type of poverty in this country is changing rapidly: suburbs in the largest metro areas saw their poor populations increase 25 percent from 2000 to 2008 -- almost five times faster than in the cities, according to Brookings.

If you're not poor, and you don't have friends who are poor, you might have little clue about what it's like to be in poverty. For too many people before the recession, poverty was about "them." About "those people." Now, poverty is "us" -- those sitting next to us in the pews, fellow workers laid off, brothers or sisters with their houses underwater. We have a whole group of hardworking people, through no fault of their own, who are slipping through the cracks and under the poverty line. According to the Census, nearly half of Americans are under the poverty line or barely above it: they are one paycheck, one health crisis, one breath away from falling below that line. Folks who used to donate their used clothes to Salvation Army are now shopping there; families who used to donate to food banks are standing in their ever-growing lines.

We've got a poverty problem in this country, paired with leaders who won't even say the word "poverty," let alone solve the problem. We have a political class, on both sides of the aisle, that is so far removed from the hardships of a normal life that they can't even connect with the middle class, let alone the poor. We've got professional politicians who think they're representing their people, but how can they when they're forced to raise thousands of dollars per day to get re-elected?

We have a system set up for politicians to move farther and farther away from their constituents and into the hands of the donors, the rich, the powerful. Instead of representing their district, they're trolling for money and have lost touch with the people who need them the most -- the poor and vulnerable. I don't think all members of Congress came here to overlook the poor, but they were elected into a system that does it for them; in Washington, it's always campaign crunch time, and the pervasive dominance of money in politics has made it nearly impossible for the stories and hardships of the poor to make headway into the national conversations.

The Bible says a nation is judged by how it treats the poor, the vulnerable, and who Jesus called "the least of these." Will we continue to ignore the poor? Will we finally gather the political will in this country now that it's moved to the suburbs and the societal mainstream? Now that it's next to us? Now that it's us?

The poor don't have lobbyists or super PACs to get their voices heard in Washington, and they certainly don't have a real commitment in the party platforms at the conventions this season. So people of faith and conscience will keep beating the drum about poverty and asking each candidate, every candidate, what their policies will do to the least of these. Doesn't the highest American poverty rate in 50 years make this a moral issue -- and a political issue?

In Sojourners' continuing effort to bring poverty to the forefront of the political debate, we have produced a documentary called "The Line" which brings us stories of poverty from cities to suburbs, the newly poor and the deeply poor. Highlighting personal stories of a fisherman from the Gulf who no longer have shrimp to catch, to the used-to-be-banker who can't pay for his gas, this film uncovers the emerging and entrenched faces of poverty in our country. Produced and directed by Emmy Award-winning producer Linda Midgett, this film will break through the clatter and bring honest, gripping stories to light.

The film will premiere on October 2nd, the night before the first presidential debate -- visit the website and watch the trailer, learn more about the film, and sign up to host a screening. That's how we're beating the drum on this issue -- will you join us?


This post is part of the HuffPost Shadow Conventions 2012, a series spotlighting three issues that are not being discussed at the national GOP and Democratic conventions: The Drug War, Poverty in America, and Money in Politics.

HuffPost Live will be taking a comprehensive look at the persistence of poverty in America August 29th and September 5th from 12-4 pm ET and 6-10 pm ET. Click here to check it out -- and join the conversation.

 
 
 

Follow Jim Wallis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jimwallis

FOLLOW POLITICS
We've got a problem in this country. I know it, you know it, and the politicians know it too, but most won't even say it out loud: poverty. We're bracing ourselves for next month's release of the 2011...
We've got a problem in this country. I know it, you know it, and the politicians know it too, but most won't even say it out loud: poverty. We're bracing ourselves for next month's release of the 2011...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 919
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayBall101
10:08 PM on 09/19/2012
Poor people are less of a problem than people who have all the money in the world,but are spiritually dead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayBall101
09:46 PM on 09/18/2012
Jesus Christ served all people and was born in a simple manger not an expensive villa.We should learn to give more to the poor because it is the right thing to do.We can never take all that we have bought on earth or saved to heaven or to hell for that matter.It is always good to share the wealth and be good stewards of God to the poor.The greatest thing that we can do for the poor is to help them find work or offer them vocational training.Otherwise,it is best to give of our time & talent whole heartedly without the recipient knowing who did the good deed.It is best to give in a humble way.Giving to the poor to me is very much like giving directly to God or Jesus Christ.We should treat all people with the same dignity & respect that we would expect God or Jesus to treat us with.
12:48 AM on 09/18/2012
by biblical standards no one in the USA is poor, end of story
03:14 PM on 09/12/2012
Obama would ignore the poor if it were politically expeident for him to do so. But matter here's the better question: Who is ignoring the poor? In my community they receive a lot of attention. Local, state and national segments of our government provide for them. Education is the best key to prosperity, and this does not necessarly mean a college education. Just basic education: drugs ruin lives; out-of-wedlock children have a much greater chance of beinbg poor; if you commit crimes, you'll go to prison - nad you're more likely to remain in poverty. All the money in the universe can not combat the ignorance that creates poverty.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lolablev
Bring Peace into your Life
11:14 PM on 09/09/2012
YES! We will FORGET the poor and worry about GOD being on our coins - says Romney (and I'm certain Ryan too).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
10:23 PM on 09/09/2012
Theoretically no, but practically yes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nomccain
08:30 PM on 09/09/2012
The irony with most Republicans is that as Christians, they tend to obey only those passages which suit them and ignore the rest, particularly those that deal with the downtrodden and the poor which they consider as a "drain on their society." Most are hypocrites, plain and simple!
12:51 AM on 09/18/2012
obamas 30k a plate ain't go'in to the poor
photo
dkandycrown
semper fi
04:57 PM on 10/03/2012
That part is true about the beginning of your post, but at least they didn't kick GOD out of their convention like the Democrats did
08:19 PM on 09/09/2012
To answer your title question, ("Will We Continue to Ignore the Poor?" ) definitely yes, if the Republicans win the election. They will cut support for the poor, the elderly, and children, in order to cut taxes for the uber wealthy.
07:50 PM on 09/09/2012
The first thing to do is cut all overseas aid those billions can be used on the poor here.
06:34 PM on 09/09/2012
This is America , yes we will continue to ignore the poor.
01:12 PM on 09/10/2012
If we spent every last penny of federally collected revenues on welfare and entitlements, we wouldn't have a penny left for anything else. Think!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:29 PM on 09/09/2012
Mr. Obama did reach out to everyone, including the unemployed, the sick, minorities and poor. He spoke credibly of sharing and caring. He's got lots of flaws, but they're peanuts compared to the other guy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimtodd
Unrepentant child of '60s
05:12 PM on 09/09/2012
Poverty is the direct measure of the success or failure of a society, while political policy regarding the poor is the reflection of that society's humanity.

It is so easy to demonize the less fortunate as the causes of all our problems. Yet, it never occurs to us to consider that the people above our station in life have the same view of us. We pretend the poor have made a choice so we can absolve ourselves of responsibility for their condition, but that is a stain that cannot be cleaned. We collectively decide what we will or will not tolerate as acceptable life conditions. When we decide that one person's misery is tolerable because they are not like us, we declare our own misery just. Would be slaves should think hard before taking up the whip of the master.
I am not saying we shouldn't expect to labor. Work is an important part of our ability to feel satisfied, to accomplish something worthwhile, but it should not be the dominant factor in life. At some point in history the system we developed to account for goods and services exchange became the purpose of the economy itself. Now products are often just the tools used to drive stock prices, and do not evolve out of market demand. The people are now the single smallest consideration in the entire economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
11:47 PM on 09/09/2012
Already fanned. I never imagined that human beings could be so greedy that they would turn their backs on others to this degree. Especially in my own country. Now I have to smile at my own naivete. Apparently money and control of resources are the only things that count for the vast majority of Americans. To the point where it is pathological, and they don't even see it. Decrying socialism and the feckless poor who won't work for a living. Did they ever consider that those people have just given up? A very reasonable attitude in today's climate of greed and avarice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig2
Living in the great State of Jefferson
03:09 PM on 09/09/2012
Good morning, Welcome to "Free Enterprise" economics. Low wages and insecure jobs for the masses. Ask yourself. Who is really being subsidized by say, Food Stamps. The farmer, processor, transporter, retailer, all benefit. As does the employer who pays a lower wage. All these pigs at the tit. Yet, they uniformly cast distain on the Food Stamp recepient. This "Free Enterprise" economics is interesting. However, I find it's not rooted in traditional Adam Smith Capitalism. When exposed I find "Chinese Capitalism" and North Korean Juche.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Craig2
Living in the great State of Jefferson
02:55 PM on 09/09/2012
Good morning, Republicans advocate "Free Enterprise" economics. Texas even voted to replace "capitalism" with "free enterprise" in their text books. Labor, workers, Unions, human rights are alien to "Free Enterprise" economics. As is Adam's, The Commons. Low wage, insecure jobs replaces labor in free enterprise formulas.

What S
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wood-Harp
Truth Reveals Light.
01:50 PM on 09/09/2012
Matthew 19:24
And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

The key is a question: Why? Without understanding why (where various paths are available for realization), one may acknowledge this passage, yet, never actually care about, or learn (or live) the message – as (a cored) truth.

Reflections: Rich Passages Through Needles
http://seaclearly.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/reflections-rich-passages-through-needles/