iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joanne Bamberger

Joanne Bamberger

Posted: November 18, 2009 02:36 PM

Sarah Palin in 2012? Some are chuckling, but they might want to rethink their take on the first woman on a GOP presidential ticket.

Conservative pundit David Brooks laughed out loud at the suggestion, calling her a "joke". Others point to 2008 wannabes Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee as more qualified and doing better in polls than Palin when people talk about GOP Presidential hopefuls. Of course, most thought that quitting her day job as Alaska Governor was the death knell for her political career, but I think this is just the beginning of Palin's national political career. After all, she was just on Oprah!

Seriously, as I have to remind some who've accused me of being a closet Republican, I'm no political fan of Palin. But when people dismiss her out of hand, I keep thinking one thing -- remember the last politician we scoffed at as not even close to being competent enough for the White House?

Yup -- George W. Bush. And then we said, "Oh, well, at least he'll only be a one-termer like his father." We were 0 for 2 on that front.

It turns out that the "smart" Bush wasn't the one people related to -- as a nation, we preferred the baseball-loving, brush-clearing, recovering-beer-swilling-guy. More people liked Bush because even though he has two Ivy League degrees, they saw the "common" man in him, and that made them connect with him in a Dr. Phil sort of way.

People also related to Barack Obama in spite of his Harvard degree because he, too, had a good dose of the "everyman" in his life story -- son of a single mom from middle America who struggled with his identity and didn't have things just handed to him on a platter.

But voters wouldn't find a working class story appealing with Palin, right? Think again. There are plenty of voters who find her accessible and according to a recent Rasmussen poll, a majority of Republicans like her and think she shares their values. You can "betcha" Palin will use that angle for all it's worth. According to an excerpt in the New York Times from her book, Going Rogue:

We know what it's like to be on a tight budget and wonder how we're going to pay for our health care, let alone college tuition. ... We know what it's like to work union jobs, to be blue-collar, white-collar, to have our kids in public schools. We felt our very normalcy, our status as ordinary Americans, could be a much-needed fresh breeze blowing into Washington, D.C.

Plus there are still plenty of women who are smarting over Hillary Clinton's loss and who just might vote for Palin if she's the candidate in 2012 because they don't want to wait one more second to see a woman in charge of the Oval Office.


Don't laugh too hard! Democrats aren't doing such a bang up job at the moment -- they're dragging their feet on Paycheck Fairness, throwing reproductive health under the bus and we still aren't further on paid sick days even though we're all spreading the swine flu to each other like wildfire.

Palin is a wily one so I'm not counting her out for 2012, but I wonder if she's got something else on her agenda. I'm betting that being President is a little too much real work for her and that she's angling for something else.

My official prediction is that Palin wants Michael Steele's job as head of the Republican National Committee. Even though Steele has taken his share of jabbing and isn't the most effective one, the position of RNC Chair can be an extremely powerful position -- maybe even more powerful than President when it comes to selecting candidates for races around the country. Plus, you don't have to worry about all those pesky voters, campaign debates and whistle-stop tours! One of the most important roles of a party chair is to be fundraiser-in-chief and that's something that Palin has proven she excels at.

As much as many would like to dismiss her from the national stage (myself included), Palin isn't going quietly. Whether you like her or not, one has to acknowledge the power in that. Whether she runs for President in 2012 or sets her sights on some other political plum, she'll definitely have plenty of pocket change to look for a pied-a-terre in the lower 48 where she can set up base camp.

What do you think? Are Palin's 15 minutes up or is she the new secret weapon to lure women back to the Grand Old Party?

Joanne Bamberger is a political anaylst and writer in Washington, D.C. and the founder of PunditMom blog, a site about the intersection of motherhood and politics. Her work appears in the just released, Kirtsy Takes a Bow: A Celebration of Women's Online Favorites and she is at work on a book about political motherhood (Bright Sky Press, Fall 2010).

 

Follow Joanne Bamberger on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PunditMom

Sarah Palin in 2012? Some are chuckling, but they might want to rethink their take on the first woman on a GOP presidential ticket. Conservative pundit David Brooks laughed out loud at the suggestio...
Sarah Palin in 2012? Some are chuckling, but they might want to rethink their take on the first woman on a GOP presidential ticket. Conservative pundit David Brooks laughed out loud at the suggestio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:08 PM on 11/26/2009
"Plus there are still plenty of women who are smarting over Hillary Clinton's loss and who just might vote for Palin if she's the candidate in 2012 because they don't want to wait one more second to see a woman in charge of the Oval Office."

i'm truly sorry you think women are that petty, it must have a huge impact on your self-esteem.
12:53 PM on 12/08/2009
You don't have to be petty to recognize someone else's pettiness. Otherwise YOU would be petty for calling that author petty. Some people are of course that petty. I know people who voted for Obama for no better reason than they heard McCain voicing some of the words of the "Bomb Iran" parody song. Petteeee! Switching parties for such a trivial reason, eh? I know all sorts of unlikely people who admit they might end up voting for Palin. One would do so only if Palin gives up support for Israel and war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:36 AM on 11/26/2009
"Plus there are still plenty of women who are smarting over Hillary Clinton's loss and who just might vote for Palin if she's the candidate in 2012 because they don't want to wait one more second to see a woman in charge of the Oval Office."

i'm truly sorry you think women are that petty.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jamaicalover
Team Obama
07:51 PM on 11/24/2009
As a woman I wouldn't give Sarah Palin the time of day. She's not for all women just women like her from small town American the "real americans" as she calls herself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tennys Daughter
A fool and his money shall soon perish
01:53 PM on 11/24/2009
Sorry, but you can't compare Sarah Palin with Barack Obama. She's not in his league.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
LeftLeanWing
Ah.. I said..Ah Said I said... Proceed Guv'nah
02:39 AM on 11/24/2009
W had the George Bush name ---- which made him immediately familiar.

We didn't have prominent 24/7 News / Huffpo / Twitter Etc. To SlapChop him into little pieces.

Many people assumed that he would have his father's formidable council and would essentially serve his father's Lost Second Term..

And if you look at tapes of him while campaign for Governor in Texas he sounds very sharp then.
06:30 PM on 11/23/2009
1) Bush did not win, he was awarded the presidency by the SOTUS.
2) Bush is a member of a very powerful family that has its hands in many sectors of the global means of production (including the illegal sector). He had all kinds of help getting to the presidency that an ordinary person would never have. Palin is as vacuous as Bush but she doesn't have the institutional support and family ties behind her. Bush pretended to be a right-wing populist but he was completely and totally for big crony capitalism. He HAS cronies who are capitalist. Sarah really doesn't. (Of course, they wouldn't hesitate to use her if they thought it would work.)
11:55 PM on 11/20/2009
I could see Palin trying to be the *vice* presidential candidate again -- but with a younger healthier co-candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wendy Johnson
09:58 AM on 11/19/2009
George Bush had money and powerful friends. What does Sarah have that can compare? A couple mil from her book deal won't pay for a long, grueling Presidential campaign, and neither will the undying loyalty of a bunch of little guys and 25-percenters. She's going to have to get a lot of big contributors on her side, and "going rogue" is not that great a way to do it.
11:42 AM on 11/19/2009
Sarah has powerful 'friends' too.
Without them she never would have been elected governor of Alaska.
photo
notadumbblonde
Strong and independent
05:39 PM on 11/19/2009
I don't know if she has friends who elected her governor; I think it was the right time, and she was a fresh, beautiful, charismatic face; remember, her appeal took this country by storm, but it had to happen in Alaska first. Those people up there had already been through what this country is going through with Palinmania.

The guy in the White House was elected on the same deal - not many political friends, but he's very handsome and charismatic. Imagine two peas in a pod - Palin and Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wendy Johnson
05:44 PM on 11/19/2009
True, in context. But there is a big difference between knowing the movers and shakers in one of the least populated states in the country, and being the son of an ex-President, grandson of an ambassador, etc.
photo
future primitive
Voice in the Wilderness
03:18 AM on 11/19/2009
These are all valid observations, but I have to disagree. Dubyah kind of sneaked up on the electorate in his first term, there was nowhere near the disinfectant light on him four years ahead of the election. For his second election, he was able to wrap himself in the folds of a war of his own choosing. Palin is out there under the hot lights now and melting.

In addition, the two Bush terms put a lot of people wise. Once bitten, twice shy. No to mention the Palin we see now makes Bush look like a super genius. I think he was a really terrible President, but I never feared an epic, meltdown level, failure like I would if she were in office.

I think Palin, on either slot of the ticket, would carry the blood red states, and get annihilated everywhere else. As far as going for the RNC job, she seems kind of job averse to me.
11:45 AM on 11/19/2009
I am actually grateful to McCain for outing her. If she had been able to 'sneak up' on the 2012 elections her handlers would have had another four years to sanitize her image and implant
talking points. They did a lot of sanitizing last year but had to do it in a hurry and lots of people
saved info that later got scrubbed. Now it is posted all over the alaska political blogs. And it's
not going to go away.
02:50 AM on 11/19/2009
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."

P.T. Barnum
photo
Aardvaark
I'm a Swedish American, son of China Missionaries
06:56 PM on 11/18/2009
With her penchant for revenge, she'd be great as head of the Republican party -- for the Democrats. She'd scr@w anyone that got in her way or disagreed with her, and blame them for anything that went wrong. The Republicans would soon either be so fractured or so hard line that they would become totally irrelevant.
06:30 PM on 11/18/2009
Can Palin still claim to be just like Joe the Plumber now that she's making millions?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:57 PM on 11/18/2009
Look, WE LOVE SP!!!

We love to hear about her, and her latest adverntures. Even the HuffPo, a "liberal" outlet, gives her more space than her newsworthiness warrants!

But we love to here about her for different reasons: She is the darling of the 25percenters, the ones that think Sadam caused 9/11, believe that we'll never run out of oil because god is still making it, and that if we can only elect Cheney president... Yes, 25%! Too many? You betcha!

The rest of us, we love SP, too! Admit it, come on! She is the person you love to hate; she's the school bully who though charming, will stab you in the back; the coworker who screws up and blames someone else, who will take credit for work that went well but she had nothing to do with; she is the woman who preaches values while her own family is dysfunctional; she is the opportunist that will say whatever comes into her head to bamboozle the listener (usually unsuccessfully, and therefore the fun); she is the everyday ignoramus wannabe who thrown into the limelight gets grabby with the baubles and then denies it because she is one of the "little people"; she is a know-nothing who with a wink and a smile hopes to wing it through the issues and who craves the big time which makes you want to watch and hope that she crashes and burns, but slowly please, it is sooooo delicious!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doublels
say it out loud...I'm a Lib & I'm proud
03:13 PM on 11/21/2009
great post!! fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atomicjim
Wide acceptance of an idea is not proof of its val
04:57 PM on 11/18/2009
After last year's vice-presidential debate my wife, who was a Republican then, but an avid Hillary Clinton supporter, looked at me and said, "If they think I'm voting for that m.or.on (Palin) just because Hillary lost, they're crazy.

I think a lot intelligent women, both democrat and Republican would agree.

My wife is now an independent, as am I (I was a democrat); we change because we were sick and tired of the politics of both parties.
04:43 PM on 11/18/2009
I agree. Far too many of my fellow liberals are giving the Republicans too much credit by conceptualizing them as smart enough to avoid voting for Sarah Palin, when they fail to realize that this country contains no shortage whatsoever of 1gn0rant down-home white bread who are equally as stoopid as she is.

The prospective election of Sarah Palin has nothing to do with sensibility. Simply put, all Sarah needs is enough million m0r0ns to turn out for the voting booths on election day and we've had it.

Bottom line: Never underestimate the stoopidity of the American people.
12:59 PM on 12/08/2009
You're so right jhamm1! But don't forget that the other side--our side--is also full of people defined by their operant conditioning, just a unmeditative in their reactions. Most people I know dislike Palin as quickly and immediately as her supporters love he. It would be a cause for being dissed if you took your time about it!