NYR More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joanne McNeil

GET UPDATES FROM Joanne McNeil
 

The Bookfuturist: Where Are the iPhone Addicts and Facebook 'Stalkers' in Contemporary Fiction?

Posted: 10/14/10 03:47 PM ET

It is getting harder and harder to find relatable characters in fiction these days. Sure, many of them have gone for years without eating anything or ever going to the bathroom, and hardly ever do they fumble through awkward sexual encounters; but it is their blissful immunity from technological distractions that stands out as particularly foreign.

The average fictional character is either so thoroughly disinterested in email, social media, and text messages he never thinks of it, or else hastily mentions electronic communications in the past tense. Sure, characters in fiction may own smart phones, but few have the urge to compulsively play with the device while waiting to meet a friend or catch a flight. This ever-present anachronism has made it so that almost all literary fiction is science fiction, a thought experiment as to what life might be like if we weren't so absorbed in our iPhones but instead watched and listened to the world around us at a moment's rest.

Jonathan Franzen's novel Freedom could be considered, among other things, a pre-Facebook novel. Much of the action takes place in 2004, back when the site was for university students only. Franzen seems to wink at us when a character reaches for his (lowercase, physical object) "facebook." But what about the present? It's hard to imagine the female protagonist Patty isn't on Facebook today. Is she a friend or fan of Richard, the aging indie rocker she loves, who is not her husband? What kind of emotions does she experience when she scrolls down his page?

Even novels that acknowledge the way that technology saturates contemporary culture still never quite depict a sense of distraction in the narrative. Gary Shteyngart's Super Sad True Love Story is an ambitious satire of internet addiction set in the near future of livestreaming everything. But the parts of the book involving email and instant-message exchanges are presented no differently than the epistolary passages in nineteenth-century literature, (granted Jane Austen characters never said "JBF.")

The ADHD, multitasking, always-distracted world of today runs counter to the linear, leisurely-paced storytelling that makes a literary novel. To present email and text messages as they often feel would create an experimental novel, as if descending from Brion Gysin and William S. Burroughs cut-ups. Communicating with technology might be just a little too difficult for even the most skilled novelists among us to describe yet. In the meantime, the distraction-free world of contemporary fiction is an idyllic respite for the rest of us overwhelmed with it.

 
It is getting harder and harder to find relatable characters in fiction these days. Sure, many of them have gone for years without eating anything or ever going to the bathroom, and hardly ever do the...
It is getting harder and harder to find relatable characters in fiction these days. Sure, many of them have gone for years without eating anything or ever going to the bathroom, and hardly ever do the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:40 PM on 10/21/2010
I'm sure books have been written about people sitting on Facebook and Twitter but haven't been published. Why on earth would I want to go out and spend $10 to read about people doing what I do every day. A GOOD writer knows the reader seeks escape and excitement... not to simply read about what he already knows.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:40 PM on 10/16/2010
It's because deep down all smart authors know this is all a passing fad, the don't want to date their stories with nonsense that 1-2 generations(or years at this pace) from now will look at and laugh.
12:12 PM on 10/16/2010
Most people are not absorbed in their iPhones and listen to the world around them. If you weren't always absorbed in your iPhone, you would have noticed.

Besides, have you often come across fictional characters you go to the bathroom? Not unless it brings something to the story, right?
Same for email, Facebutt etc ....
11:40 AM on 10/16/2010
See William Gibson's latest: Zero History. And no, it's not scifi. I think efforts to stuff work into genre is often futile and counterproductive.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CMB1969
raging moderate
06:04 PM on 10/15/2010
Unless an author is author is on the caliber of, say, James Joyce, an interesting novel is not likely to be crafted around a characters banal, everyday activities--it is when the protagonist puts down the iphone and starts interacting with actual people that there is the basis for a plot.
04:40 PM on 10/15/2010
"The average fictional character is either so thoroughly disinterested in email, social media, and text messages he never thinks of it, or else hastily mentions electronic communications in the past tense....This ever-present anachronism has made it so that almost all literary fiction is science fiction, a thought experiment as to what life might be like if we weren't so absorbed in our iPhones but instead watched and listened to the world around us at a moment's rest."

The reason you don't see much computer/phone fiddling in today's novels is the same reason that you rarely saw characters watch TV in 1950s novels: it's in essence a passive activity. The character is not active; he or she is going nowhere. How many readers want to read paragraph after paragraph of Facebook interaction? Not me.

Life, as it always has been, is out there, not inside a screen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
06:11 AM on 10/15/2010
I like to watch movies from the 70s, ones that take place in offices, when its just before the "PC Revolution". I keep thinking, what did those people do all day. Yes, if its about reporters, they come in, type and they go off and then "sniff out a story".

And what about people at home. Just where to people actually take their time if they're living an average suburban or even urban life. You can't sit at a coffee house or shop at the market 16 hours a day right?

Just what exactly do people do. I know what I do...I spend a lot of time reading web pages. But what would a "me" do...if I were me, 30 years ago. In fact, there could have been no me.
01:46 PM on 10/15/2010
What about much longer ago? People used to talk, tell tales and sing a lot more.
12:14 AM on 10/15/2010
I think you are overlooking a significant amount of technology junkies throughout the genre. There are many, if you're a sci-fi reader. At least as many as there are heroic starship captains in sci-fi.
12:04 AM on 10/15/2010
Joanne, I do agree that there is a general (historical) lack of technology in a lot of the fiction that we may encounter, but I believe this is trend (or lack thereof) is slowly starting to shift. A lot of crime novels frequently refer to technological communications as a way to advance plots. Looking at a different medium, in this case television, shows like The Big Bang Theory (TBBT) portray characters using technology. Yes, they are always surrounded by technology anyway - it is BBT afterall - but aspects of the plot are revealed through the character's engagement with technology and the plot moves on after someone or other receives an sms or sees an update on Facebook. I am sure that the same degree of engagement with technology will continue to permeate published works and fiction in particular. It seems like novelists who want to portray a realistic world in their narratives may view technology as integral to that endeavour.
http://www.ebookbotics.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:56 AM on 10/16/2010
I really miss good modern fiction. I think new fiction misses the mark today, because most contemporary writers simply lack the knowledge of technology, modern social sciences, current events and basic psychology that they would need, in order to write insightfully about what we experience today. Consequently, they write cliquish efforts that reduce useful insight to nothing more than embarrassing rhetorical experiments.

I don't think fiction writers are alone. As we go through our lives, it seems to most of us, that everybody else in our lives is out of touch. Lawyers are too specialized to understand business management. Politicians are too specialized to understand public administration. Doctors, Engineers, Small business owners -- most of the rest of us are stuck with an eighth-grade level understanding of pretty much everything going on around us that isn't part of our specialty. It's why Dr. Ron Paul is a Libertarian; why Tim Geithner doesn't see why he should care about unemployment; why Fox News can sell spin as truth to their audience; and why Newt Gingrich thinks that just sounding clever is good enough to get him elected President.

I have been looking HARD for a good novel about working in the High Tech industry, for 20 years now. Let me know if you run across anything that captures the experience.

tt77
06:58 PM on 10/14/2010
or maybe you just need to branch out in your reading...
05:17 PM on 10/14/2010
Most of the people I know (cetainly myself) read books to get away from the mundane cr*p you see on facebook, twitter, the internet (and even the news, now-a-days). Even though these services/products my have the potential to do great things, the majority of what they are used for in reality is utterly disposable.

I, for one, am not interested in knowing what a fictional character, in a perfectly enjoyable novel, thinks about his girlfriend's facebook page, or who his favorite Jersey Shore character is, or what brand of smartphone he uses.

The one exception would be in the case of satire, such as in the new Windows Phone 7 commercial. George Saunders, for example, is great at it.
01:49 PM on 10/15/2010
I like Boris Akunin. Escapist adventures.
05:11 PM on 10/14/2010
I would argue that the reason we haven't seen it in contemporary fiction has more to do with the publishers than the writers. I suspect there will be many authors that attempt to bring the new reality into their writing over the next couple of years. The question is will publishers shy away from what they know makes money and take a risk? My gut tells me they will have to wait for an established writer to make that leap or one of the Kardashian's to find a ghost writer to express their true genius.
06:53 PM on 10/15/2010
Here here!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KalNJ
03:59 PM on 10/14/2010
Most of the things people do on Facebook, Twitter, Smartphones, etc. are so mundane and boring, how would a writer write about i?
Why would the reader care?

I'm sure this technology would eventually make it into literature - it's sure going to be interesting.

http://www.ManOfLaBook.com