Deconstructing John: Revisiting His Bad Language

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

I have been struggling with something about the 'mainstream media'. I find myself both puzzled and fascinated by what they choose to cover. Here's a 'for-instance,' which I saw last week on MSNBC -- a brief discussion about whether or not one of the candidates intended an obscene gesture when scratching his face. I saw this, complete with slow-mo replay, in my own two horror-filled eyes.

But this complete lack of any coverage about one story in particular has finally enraged me enough to take keypad in hand to perform the following Public Service. I have seen nothing anywhere -- anywhere -- in the 'mainstream media' about a remark made by John McCain to his wife Cindy, and I intend to rectify that situation.

I will present and then diagram the sentence, as perhaps the teachers who taught little Johnny McCain (or 'McNasty', his high school nickname) did back in the 'good-old days' when sentences were studied. I will do this so there can be no guesswork, no questions about what the good Senator was trying to say.

Perhaps I should also speculate about what might have been the events leading up to this particular 'moment'. Had McCain woken up on the wrong side of the bed? Did he have bad cheese in his omelet? Did someone cut the Senator off in traffic? Wait, doesn't the guy have a driver? I guess you could say I'm not quite sure what the motivating events leading up to saying this particular sentence might possibly be. But I do believe for any analysis to be considered complete, very, very intense scrutiny is necessary, you know, kind of like the scrutiny being given to other people's, ...let's say, preachers?

Let's begin, shall we?

Now, here it is -- here is what John McCain said to Cindy McCain in 1992, during a prior campaign, in front of strangers and campaign workers and three members of the press:

"At least I don't plaster on the make-up like a trollop, you cunt."

Okay. Now, to give a 'fair-and-balanced' context, Cindy had just reached up to the Senator's balding head and said, "You're getting a little thin up there." Well, we all know you men and your hairdo's... wait a minute, isn't that ladies?

(Hey, I like bald guys).

We'll start with, "At least I don't." Easy to understand. "At least" is a short phrase, colloquial, a way to begin a sentence. A superlative of 'little,' it indicates the speaker has a world-weary stance. "I" refers, of course, to Senator McCain, and "don't,' a contraction of "do not," is a negative verb.

Next: "Plaster." Well, it's getting a little complex, here. "Plaster" has several meanings. Is "plaster" being used like "a pasty form to walls"? Then, hmm. Because combined with the phrase coming up, that could be significant. But I'm betting the Senator meant "plaster" as in "to cover conspicuously or overspread."

Moving on.

"... on the makeup." Again, a double entendre. "Make-up." We all hope and assume that's what the Senator and Cindy did after their fight (and one prays -- for her sake -- that this one was a doozy), but whether they 'made-up' is not crystal clear. But to use a simile, "Plaster" goes with "Cindy's Make-up" like, umm, "Turkey" goes with "Store-bought, mix-with-water-in-the-package Cheap Gravy." (Guess who was the 'A plus' English student)?

"Like a trollop." Certainly getting to the meat of things, now. For me, this brings up one big question, one that has 'nada' to do with this sentence. How old is John McCain? What kind of person uses 'trollop'? Did he remember to shut the Frigidaire? Did he put the milk in the icebox? Take the trolley to the shore, after the press conference? Did he go to the dock to shout, "Stevedore"? Shouldn't he be dating Helen Thomas?

I just know he left the Victrola on.

UrbanDictionary.com defines 'Trollop' as 'slut whore tramp strumpet ho prostitute skank bitch harlot tart floozy hussy and bimbo.' Hey! Is that John "Jo!" McCain trying to subtly sway the ghetto vote? Using subliminal seduction? Wouldn't he have been more successful calling her a 'bitch'? Isn't that the word all the young-ones use?

Which leads us to our very last words. "You cunt."

Ah, there it is. Conveniently tucked in at the very end. The 'c-word.' The word so awful that Meredith Vieira had to actually make an apology on the "Today" show after Jane Fonda said it on-air. It's a word so awful in America (unlike in Australia, where hunting buddies might say, "You're a funny cunt!"), but considered so awful in contemporary England and the US that people might have trouble reading it or publishing this very piece.

Hey, Eminem doesn't use it.

And yet it was said by a man, running for President, to his wife. Something polite society and Eminem -- a dude who threatened his own mother's life -- can't and won't print. Even Huffington Post used "c**t" in their story. The Wall Street Journal: "The questioner used the word; we won't." And an Iowan newspaper politely called it, "an expletive relating to the female anatomy." And yet, Senator McCain said it to his wife in front of their God and everyone and members of the press.

Now, I am sure there are those among us who feel Senator McCain's stands on the issues are far more important that this, and that's your right. Maybe you think John's correct about Cindy. Maybe you think this about your own girlfriend or wife. And again, I say as long as you're a tax-paying citizen, you are allowed the maximum amount of dysfunctional relationships that the world will gladly provide. I'm not crazy enough to think that people don't call each other awful things all the time.

But why has there been nary one comment, not one clip, nothing in the endless loops that seem to fill each and every cable TV broadcast? As him, he can deny it; pseudo-end of story. Endless videos of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who is not even running for President. But nothing about this. So this must be bad.

I personally do think how you speak to your wife, especially in front of the press, is a great indicator of who you are as a person. I'd imagine you speak to your wife about how you'd talk to the gardener or your secretary or your yoga teacher ("downward dog, yes sir!") or the Secretary of State.

And here I was going to try to present this with 'no commentary.'

The 'c-word' first pops up in 1230 England, a derivative of a street called "Gropecunt Lane," which was frequented by prostitutes. It also can be found in this amusing 1355 wedding ditty: "Give your cunny wisely and beg after the wedding." A chef might use it commonly today, as in slicing vegetables 'thicker than a cunt hair.'

I don't think John McCain was calling his wife a 'potato peeler' in front of the press. I can only imagine how he speaks to her when no one's around. Again, I believe what you do say and to those you love -- in a somewhat casual moment -- can be considered a pretty darn good indication of how you will behave under pressure. I think we've seen just the tip of the iceberg as to what might come flying out of a President McCain's mouth to his Vice President or his Secretary of State or to the head of NATO or a terrorist.

But why is it just me whose pantaloons are in a twitter?

(http://rawstory.com/news/2008/McCain_temper_boiled_over_in_92_0407.html)

 
Comments
11
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:

Thank you so much for printing this article as well as a big thanks to the writer. Its very well written. What an important question to be asked. This particular piece should be sent to moveon or similar so it gets the widest possible distribution.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:01 PM on 05/23/2008

I agree. The telling points of character: how a person treats a waiter, shares an umbrella in the rain, responds to tangled Christmas tree lights, or uses or not the "c" word on his wife can speak volumes. And should inspire more vigilance in others in seeking evidence of a toxic pattern.

My first choice for president was John Edwards. (I was impressed with the mutually respecting "partnership" of his marriage.)

We need a paradigm shift away from patriarchal leadership in this country, based on power, to a partnership one. (And the testosterone-driven cowboys will raise "girlie-men" or anti-"bitch" rhetoric to combat such a shift to altruism).

John Dean names the "authoritarian personality" enthralling the masses. I see it as a kind of addict-personality enthralling "enablers".

Today, reading and reflecting on McCain's over-reactions, I see it as perhaps the symptom of someone with PTSD. Sen. McCain's profound historical stresses may induce him to too easily go to the end of the dial when provoked. Yes, let's empathize, but not volunteer as a country to be subject to its dangerous dysfunction.

I appreciate the double standard you emphasize in regards to MSM, too. Like Rathergate, the McCaingate story in the Times disappeared as slyly as Rather's exploration.

As for the provocative question: What was Mrs. McCain's reaction later in private? I hope she was proactively protective of her dignity. Or mollify by providing a favorite donut? (Oops, that was AP...)

Thanks.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:37 PM on 05/21/2008

I LOVE IT!! THANKS!

Now all we need is a video so it can be looped over and over again.

The sermons they took of Rev. Wright were from 1997, and 2000 and so on. So if old things can be dug up to define a candidate, then so can the comments made by the candidate before!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 AM on 05/21/2008
- txbyrd I'm a Fan of txbyrd 2 fans permalink

I don't think you can sum up a person's attitude with one snippet of information or one remark, even one as gross as this.
But things can start to add up. This comment. Anti-choice. The vote against removing obstacles for women to use the courts to sue for gender discrimination. And the 'other' tasteless joke that was also buried, but never denied and apparently resulted in an apology.

It is here
http://www.salon.com/news/1998/06/25newsb.html

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:16 PM on 05/20/2008
- ofbbg I'm a Fan of ofbbg 2 fans permalink

This is an issue between husband and wife. Neither the media nor busybodies like you need to comment. Don't you think that Bill might have used that word in re Hillary - and that she might have used even fouler language after some of his many "indiscretions"?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:43 PM on 05/20/2008

I can't believe i came here to read this stupid article we need articles on issues not attitudes or personalities.

WRITE A BLOG ON ISSUES AND I WILL COME BACK OTHERWISE STOP WITH THE PETTY CRAP.


GOBAMA08

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:57 PM on 05/20/2008

It's the character issue, sweetie.

And it's worth considering: Why is it that "What Jeremiah Wright says..." is plastered all over the news with every expectation that Barack Obama pay for it; why is it an off-the-cuff comment Senator Obama made at a private fundraiser in San Francisco--with no attempt made by the "journalist" for clarificat­ion--becom­es breaking national news? Why is every word the senator from Illinois and his wife, every word HRC utters, a major media matter while John McC gets a pass on this shameless, vulgar, disrespectful dismissal of the woman who shares his life, bore his children and stands behind him every step of the way on his trek to the WH?

Why is Obama pilloried by feminists for addressing a reporter as "Sweetie"--when he was distracted, talking to someone else and she ("Sweetie") interrupted-- but the same feminists ignore the big, bad "C" word aimed at another woman while swearing they'll vote McCain rather than Obama?

Is this an issue? You bet your confused patootie it is. What happens down the road, when a potential President McCain blows hot at the wrong world leader in perilous times? Do we shrug it (and it's consequences) off? Call it Dirty Diaper Diplomacy and grin sheepishly?

If this isn't a clarion call for Democrats of the "feminist" persuasion to unite, I don't know what is.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:00 PM on 05/20/2008
- ofbbg I'm a Fan of ofbbg 2 fans permalink

Let's face it - some "world leaders" NEED to be told that they're vicious despots, e.g. the Saudi royal family, the N. Korean leadership, Iran, Syria, Myanmar, et. al - perhaps in the most non-diplomatic language possible, so that there's no misunderstanding. How successful has the make-nice diplomacy really been over the centuries?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:57 PM on 05/20/2008

Obviously, you don't know what constitutes a real "issue", then DANIELLECLARKE. And you probably should hold off on the use of unpleasant words and all caps. It makes you look vulgar.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 05/20/2008

Brilliantly said. This is an arguement that has replayed in my mind for the past week as the media has continued to feed over Senator Obama's use of the word "sweetie".

To quote a poster on Wonkette, I would rather have a president who called a stranger "sweetie", than a president who called his wife a "cunt".

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 02:34 PM on 05/20/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect