iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joe Cirincione

GET UPDATES FROM Joe Cirincione
 

Five Next Steps To Increase American Security

Posted: 05/04/11 03:23 PM ET

There's one less threat to America this week, but there are 21,000 others waiting to explode. That's the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Russia. In a new report, experts from both nations warn of the dangers and offer five easy steps towards a solution.

In supporting the 2010 New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said it was time to shed the Cold War machinery and redirect Pentagon programs to stem 21st century threats. The treaty was a modest step in that direction. This week, a unique group of U.S. and Russian experts has hammered out a series of next steps to keep up the momentum created by the treaty's passage.

The experts, including Amb. Anatoly Antonov, retired Gen. Evgeny Buzhinsky, Amb. Steven Pifer and Dr. David Holloway, are part of a new Sustainable Partnership with Russia Group (or SuPR Group). Their joint paper is circulating this week among top policy makers in Moscow and Washington with a compelling set of proposals for strengthening American and Russian security.

This team of seasoned defense experts urges the two countries to continue working towards reductions in their respective nuclear stockpiles. They warn:

The ratification and entry into force of the New START treaty is a positive achievement -- which helped the United States and Russia to "reset" their relationship -- but is only a first step in nuclear disarmament. There is a 50/50 chance that this relationship could relapse into a cold pause and not find the momentum necessary for future cooperation.

The New START Treaty reactivated the weapons inspection regime between the two countries and put them back on the road to reducing the two largest nuclear stockpiles in the world. But since then, momentum has slowed.

The SuPR group detailed specific, feasible steps to resolve tensions over some of the thorniest issues facing both countries and to get the process moving again. Among their key recommendations, the expert teams exhort the U.S. and Russia to:

  • Accelerate the reductions mandated by New START to ensure completion prior to the next Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference in 2015.
  • Establish greater transparency with regard to U.S. and Russian nuclear weapons, including disclosures of the number of weapons dismantled each year.
  • Make progress on NATO-Russia missile defense cooperation and the Conventional Forces in Europe regime.
  • Take an active role in facilitating the success of the 2012 Conference on the establishment of a WMD-free zone in the Middle East.
  • Widen participation of Middle Eastern states in international nonproliferation discussions, including the Nuclear Security Summit.

Together, the experts say, these and other recommendations lay a path for reducing the role of outmoded, dangerous and costly nuclear arsenals. Many of these recommendations, particularly on increasing transparency and early implementation of New START, were also identified by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and former Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov in their recent New York Times op-ed on reducing nuclear arms.

Ploughshares Fund was pleased to support this effort financially and to participate in the deliberations of the group in Moscow and Switzerland. The group plans to convene again in Washington at the end of 2011.

This article was co-authored by Ploughshares Fund Program Officer Haleh Hatami

 

Follow Joe Cirincione on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Cirincione

There's one less threat to America this week, but there are 21,000 others waiting to explode. That's the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Russia. In a new report, experts from both nations ...
There's one less threat to America this week, but there are 21,000 others waiting to explode. That's the number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. and Russia. In a new report, experts from both nations ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
the grange gorman
Rachel Corrie is the greatest person since Lennon
04:07 PM on 05/08/2011
The US needs nukes whilst israel has them , israel is the greatest threat.Russia has humannity.
03:52 PM on 05/06/2011
Joe Cirincione is still living in the cold war era! Its time to wake up Rip Van Winkle. Its Nook terr0r is in Pakistan.

Get with the program already!
03:50 PM on 05/06/2011
Do whatever is necessary to get those nukes away from the Pakistani Jihadi Army. Everything else is moot!
albar
Republicans gathered in their political graves
03:34 AM on 05/05/2011
Step ONE:

Get rid of GOP an Teawhatever they are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jeanrenoir
11:59 PM on 05/04/2011
Let's focus on the Pakistani nukes first. THEY are the threat today.
03:50 PM on 05/06/2011
I concur!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:56 PM on 05/04/2011
Listening to the right wing comments on OBL, it seems their five steps for terrorism are torture, torture, torture, torture and torture.
05:36 PM on 05/04/2011
One more step should be added to this list. Securing our southern border with Mexico would close a portal that is costing the US billions, not to mention the security threat of a nuclear device being brought into this country. If drug dealers can import hundreds of thousands of tons of illegal drugs into the US what is stopping a terrorist from importing a so-called "dirty bomb"?
08:01 PM on 05/06/2011
You can't just show up out of the blue, do what you want, waltz on across, and then go merrily on your way. The wrong person trying to smuggle the wrong thing in the wrong place at the wrong time is more likely to get their a** shot off than anything else.

Pay enough millions and there is still no better than a fifty/fifty chance that the crooks you are trying to buy will end up actually staying bought. I would only take a load on credit, because there is no way that I would go into the border area carrying big cash. And that was thirty years ago when things were safe and sane compared to now.