Congress just took a small but important bipartisan step to make America safer.
On July 13 the House of Representatives approved an amendment offered by Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) and Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), along with Rick Larsen (D-WA) and John Garamendi (D-CA), to increase by $35 million the funding for the Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) Reactor Conversion program -- a component of the Global Threat Reduction Initiative.
This is a significant victory for nonproliferation. The Reactor Conversion program takes HEU, which can be used for a nuclear weapon, out of those research reactors in the world that still use this material for fuel. The reactors are then converted to run on a safer, non-weapons-usable form called low-enriched uranium (LEU). This program is part of the Obama administration's commitment to secure all vulnerable fissile materials worldwide in four years.
Rep. Fortenberry said:
I am committed to strengthening momentum on efforts to secure fissile materials and prevent the proliferation and misuse of sensitive nuclear materials and technologies here and around the world ... There are some relatively straightforward steps that we can take to reduce our vulnerabilities, and one of these is to strengthen the Global Threat Reduction Initiative.Rep. Sanchez agreed:
The danger that nuclear materials or weapons might spread to countries hostile to the United States or to terrorists is one of the gravest dangers to the United States - nonproliferation programs are critical to U.S. national security and must be a top priority.The United States spends a total of $54 billion per year on nuclear weapons and related programs. Much of that money is wasted, but programs like the Global Threat Reduction Initiative are our front-line defense against nuclear terrorism.
As Congress continues its debates over the national debt and determines national security budget cuts, it should not take the axe to programs that are central to preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and material around the world. The HEU Reactor Conversion program and the GTRI program are examples of these types of necessary programs, and this week's victory in the House should be celebrated -- no matter how minor.
Reps. Fortenberry, Sanchez, Larsen and Garamendi should be commended for their tireless efforts, as should all House members for their bipartisan cooperation to pass this amendment. A number of nongovernmental organizations were also instrumental in this success, including the Council for a Livable World, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Women's Action for New Directions, and the Friends Committee on National Legislation.
Follow Joe Cirincione on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Cirincione
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/05/16/depth-techical-overview-rapid-nulclear-meltdown-fukushima-reactor-1-22795/comment-page-1/#comment-194791
"The New york Academy of Science estimated the number of deaths from Chernobyl as being approximately 980,000.
The US National Academy of Sciences report concluded in 2007 that no dose of radiation is safe. The radiation exposures are cumulative in effect in causing cancer, x-rays and CAT scans included.
The WHO stated in 1956 that the genetic heritage is the most precious property for human beings.
The IAEA fixed all that on May 28, 1959 when they took charge of the UN's WHO statements .
The truth never changed, just control of the information. Meanwhile, cover ups concealed accident after accident at nuclear plants. Atmospheric testing was banned but now this state of affairs leaves us in an existential fight.
Inform yourselves as much as possible. If we are spared the Fort Calhoun/Copper River disasters, Fukushima is evidence enough. Watch the mortality and morbidity grow. That's the proof right there.
Confusing internal emmiters (and diminishing the adverse impact) with external exposure is their game.
Once we are wise to their game. the old sunburn analogy is revealed as fraud, i.e., a false representation, knowingly made, with the intention for others to rely to their detriment...
Fanned and Fav'd!
Please keep posting the truth!
America would be wise to do the same thing, as we have huge coal deposits
and should immediately shift our energy generation toward "clean" coal in the
future and "cleaner coal" in the midterm...
UNTIL
we can produce enough Solar to meet our demands!
1 Dollar for Coal matched by 1 dollar for Solar will allow the USA to transform itself
into a World Leader in Clean Energy instead of remaining an Energy Addict...
When do we get real HELP from our Leaders instead of more of the same old Baloney!
Check out this Superb Infographic and it will show you that what we are being told is WRONG!
Infographic: Nuclear Power vs. Energy Efficient Homes
http://theenergycollective.com/petertroast/61269/infographic-nuclear-power-vs-energy-efficient-homes
http://www.lutins.org/nukes.html
Read & Heed
Ask Japan!