More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
HuffPost Social Reading
Joe DiSano

GET UPDATES FROM Joe DiSano
 

Michigan Dems, Independents Should Vote for Santorum in Michigan Primary

Posted: 02/24/2012 3:38 pm

Democrats love chaos. Few will admit it but nothing gets our blood flowing like an ugly primary blood bath. Thankfully, we are in a period of relative internal calm right now. 2012 is the only the second presidential primary cycle since 1964 where Democrats aren't sinking their teeth in each other's jugulars.

But what's a trouble making Democrat to do in the interim? I think I have a solution. A solution that will cause maximum discomfort for the power brokers of the GOP. May I suggest casting a vote for Rick Santorum in Tuesday's GOP presidential primary? 

Not Ron Paul or Newt Gingrich. Voting for Ron Paul is wasting your vote. We need to focus our fire on the one real challenger to Romney left standing. While it may be amusing to cast a vote for either of those walking punch lines, the real opportunity to embarrass Romney is to cast your vote for Rick Santorum. 

Sure the good government types and party purists will look down their noses at the thought of loyal Democrats casting a vote in the GOP Primary. It's easy to render moral and ethical judgment on those people actually in trenches slugging it out against the GOP if you don't ever get your hands dirty.
 
I am not concerned with the ethical or moral implications of voting in the GOP primary and neither should you be. Heck, even the pro-Obama Super PAC -- Priorities USA -- is up with an ad here in Michigan trashing Mitt's record on the auto bailouts.

The fact is Michigan's Republicans rammed a bill creating this statewide primary through the legislature to the cost of $10,000,000 paid for by us -- Joe and Jane Taxpayer. That gives me, and hopefully you, free reign to make mischief and maybe deliver a mortal wound to the Romney campaign.

Let's be clear though -- chances are good Mitt Romney will be the GOP nominee regardless of what happens in Michigan. But we can assist in making it as costly for Romney and his corporate supporters as possible. It is in every Democrats best interest for this process to continue right up until the GOP convention. 

Imagine a 1968 redux only with supply-siders and Republican Tea Partiers battling it out in the streets instead of hippies and Chicago police. I would wager the American public would render any political party with a brokered convention as unfit to run the government. We can help create that out come this Tuesday.
 
Now some will say that we could actually help deliver the nomination to Santorum and we may regret that outcome. 
 
Don't be distracted by the sideshow. Santorum matters little on Tuesday. He is only a convenient vessel to embarrass Romney on the national stage. The Romney people have set the bar so high in Michigan through their massive spending Romney needs to win a resounding victory in Michigan of at least 10 percent to beat expectations and quell the demands for a stronger nominee. The national press is ready to tell the story that Romney got beat on his home turf.  You can help make that happen.
  
The Michigan Republican Party delegate selection plan provides that of the 30 delegates to the national convention, 28, or two per each of Michigan's 14 congressional districts, will be awarded based on a winner-take-all determination within each congressional district. The remaining two delegates will be awarded based on the proportionate vote of the entire statewide primary vote. So, for example, if Santorum wins in 8 congressional districts he would wind up with 16 delegates plus one more based on the statewide vote, or 17 delegates. Under this scenario, the end result would be Santorum 17, Romney 13.

There are various scenarios being tossed around by pollsters and pundits alike that show either Mitt or Santorum could walk out of Michigan with a majority of delegates. 

And at the heart of it this is all about delegates, but we can help mold the perception of whoever wins on Tuesday night by ignoring the opportunity to vote for Gingrich or Ron Paul. Cast your vote for Santorum for maximum effect and maximum havoc. Don't waste your vote for Ron Paul. He has no chance of walking out of Michigan with even one delegate under the current rules.
 
To vote in the Republican primary a voter simply needs to request to do so. You don't need to say that you are a Republican, and you would still be able to vote in the Michigan Democratic Party May 5 caucuses, and to re-elect President Obama in November.

For now, savor the opportunity to cause problems for the other party. After all you are paying for it.

 
Democrats love chaos. Few will admit it but nothing gets our blood flowing like an ugly primary blood bath. Thankfully, we are in a period of relative internal calm right now. 2012 is the only the sec...
Democrats love chaos. Few will admit it but nothing gets our blood flowing like an ugly primary blood bath. Thankfully, we are in a period of relative internal calm right now. 2012 is the only the sec...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 54
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
06:13 PM on 02/28/2012
I have a slightly different reason for having made that unpleasant crossover vote - I think Santorum is more representative of the heart of the current Republican Party than Romney is, and I want to see him become the nominee so the Party can find out, once and for all, that that is *not* where the country is. A Santorum loss in November might pull the Republicans back toward sanity and finally sound the death knell for social reactionaries' influence over policy. A Romney loss, on the other hand (setting aside that a win would also be unfortunate), might drive the Party even further to the right, on the grounds of "every time we nominate a perceived moderate, look what happens! Purge the [few remaining] unbelievers!" Which would leave us as a basically one-party country with a vocal reactionary opposition - not a recipe for success.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julie Baker Morse
Wasted votes are those cast against liberty.
03:33 AM on 02/28/2012
The only wasted vote is a vote for "the lesser evil"--a candidate you don't actually support. We're frequently told that voting for a specific candidate is "wasting" a vote. In truth, it's just another way for the two major political parties to maintain the status quo.

See, every time a third party receives votes, they become eligible to receive additional public campaign financing for their candidates based on that percentage of votes, leveling the playing field somewhat for the next election. The major political parties view this as a threat, so your third-party vote definitely hasn't been wasted. It's a small blow to the two-party system, and a step towards greater choice in elections.

Voting for a candidate other than the annointed one isn't wasting a vote, either. The nominees of the political parties are still supposed to represent the will of the people. Why vote for someone if you dislike them? Why tell that party that you agree with their selection if you don't? Take a chance; set a trend. If you're willing to vote based on the issues you prioritize, others may be more likely to do so as well.

You don't get a cookie for picking the winner. All you get is the winner. If you don't like the winner in the first place, all you've done is helped that winner pass future legislation that's unlikely to be favorable to you. You're oppressing yourself. Still sound like a good way to spend a vote?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Political, dog loving, junkie.
06:14 PM on 02/28/2012
As you ask, "Why vote for someone if you dislike them"?
Because that's how the game is played. The Republican's know this better then anyone.
WE have to play that same game. So, I totally Agree with the author - Vote Santorum.
Romney deserves No less..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julie Baker Morse
Wasted votes are those cast against liberty.
09:02 PM on 02/28/2012
We don't have to play their game. If you play the "game" the way they have set it up, you're going to end up with the results they want you to have. If any other result was possible by playing by their rules, they wouldn't have set their rules up that way.

Don't play "their" game. Voting is a privilege, a responsibility, and the key to maintaining and improving America. Don't waste your vote by casting it for someone you don't like. Vote your conscience; vote your issues; vote your priorities. It's the only way we're ever going to break the rigid two-party system, provide real choices for voters, and return to an America that benefits the majority of its people rather than just the wealthy.
07:22 PM on 02/27/2012
Regardless of one's personal political beliefs this author's idea promoting mischief voting is--- if one chooses to view it as harmless -- at the very least sophomoric. My feeling however is that it is vile and intentionally undermines the democratic process. If this is what we have become as a nation, then perhaps the Republic is not worth saving.......
Dodger300
Critical analysis please, not just talking points
10:49 PM on 02/27/2012
Some states have closed primaries. Those that have open primaries invite the voters to crossover.

There is nothing mischievous about it at all.
11:08 AM on 02/28/2012
Simply because it is legal doesn't make it right. For anyone to call for people who self identify as being of one party to try to influence whomever will be the other party's candidate only serves to undermine the process and weaken our nation. Choosing a President of the United States is (or least should be) serious business--not a political game of dirty deeds. It is indeed mischief voting, and it is sad that ethically you can't even see.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Political, dog loving, junkie.
06:14 PM on 02/28/2012
Right on.
11:15 PM on 02/26/2012
I can't see myself doing that, not even under duress.
05:22 PM on 02/26/2012
Sorry for the recent near duplicate (2) posts, I was new at this and didn't know the first one went through.
04:51 PM on 02/26/2012
As a independent who received this as an email I will be voting for Mitt Romney.I like moderates from either party.
04:51 PM on 02/26/2012
To promote persons from one party to vote in another party's primary with the specific intent to negatively skew the other party's election outcome is a sickening act to ruin a right and freedom gained by the blood of our ancestors. Persons or organizations promoting such an act are a stench in the nostrils of honest Americans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:19 AM on 02/27/2012
pardon ? did you miss a time warp ?
04:44 PM on 02/26/2012
To promote persons from one party to maliciously vote in another party's primary with the specific intent to skew negatively an opposing party's election outcome, is an intentional act to ruin an American right of freedom and fairness. Anyone or any organization promoting such an un-American act is sickening and is a stench in the nostrils of honest men.
09:30 AM on 02/28/2012
But not honest women? Interesting.

Also, by this comment I assume you're also against the coordinated efforts in many states to undermine the voting rights of minorities and young people by passing overly stringent voter ID laws...such intentional acts against freedom and fairness must not pass your litmus test, either.
01:39 PM on 02/28/2012
Hello apisregina,

The term "men" in that context is like man (for all) or mankind and I think you know that - get real.

Re:the ID issue - completely different. ID laws would apply to anyone and everyone equally, no negative impact on rights of any kind. We need ID to drive, get a passport or even to get on an airplane. Doesn't hurt minorities. Voting is for citizens not all occupants. People should be identified to see if they are a registered voters. Nothing wrong with that.
03:52 PM on 02/26/2012
It worked against Al Salvi In Illinois
06:17 PM on 02/25/2012
No, Joe, I will not be doing that. It wasn't cool when Rush asked Ohio Republicans to cross party lines to play with the 2008 Ohio primary, and it isn't cool now.
I do hope that Republicans manage to nominate Santorum though. Conservatives have been saying for 3 years now that McCain lost because he was supposedly "too moderate". Let's put that myth to rest. Go ahead Republicans, nominate Santorum. He'll lose 36 states, and my moderate Republican friends might get their party back from the wingnuts.
04:00 PM on 02/26/2012
Sausage may not be cool, but poor people eat a lot of it.
The only problem with voting for Santorum is if he actually became president.
You have to decide for yourself if you are willing to risk having voted for that.
04:25 PM on 02/26/2012
And remember when Al Gore lost Tennessee how badly it played for Dems.
02:19 PM on 02/25/2012
Sure, go ahead. Then if Santorum gets more votes, Romney can legitimately say that democrats are so scared of him beating Obama that they had to play foul. Good news for Romney either way.
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
01:45 AM on 02/26/2012
And how could anyone prove this happened? If Santorum happens to get more votes - unlikely in the latest polling - that will be the story. Neither you, i nor the media will have the slightest idea of where these votes came from. Anyway, these schemes get bandied about all the time and never come to anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Political, dog loving, junkie.
06:16 PM on 02/28/2012
Not even close.
If Romney loses Michigan - HUGE loss And embarrassment for Romney, alone.
12:55 PM on 02/25/2012
No, this guy above is foolish and has no idea what he is talking about. If you want to get our country back on track, vote for Romney! Don't vote the wrong way and ensure that Obama gets in or our country is in deeper trouble than we could have ever imagined possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theBUSHdemocrat
02:39 PM on 02/26/2012
Any Michigander who votes for Romney should quit their job and attempt to maintain their livelihood the way Romney would have us: bankrupt and unemployed. To brag about being a hometown boy while not supporting the automotive industry is an insult that Michiganders should not take lying down.
02:52 AM on 02/28/2012
What job? There are no jobs. And bankrupt? This president will ending up costing us $7 trillion in debt in just four years. In five years we'll be paying more towards interest on the debt that on social security. I'm a conservative Republican. I can understand why someone would vote for a moderate, centrist Democrat like Bill Clinton. I wasn't old enough to vote in 1996 though. How could anyone vote for someone SO FAR to the left as Barack Obama? Check out www.iousathemovie.com and educate yourself about how dangerous this radical Marxist is and what he's done to our country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Political, dog loving, junkie.
06:19 PM on 02/28/2012
Kind of like Bush? How much "deeper" could we have all gotten??
Give me a break and grow up.
12:51 PM on 02/25/2012
What a low-down thing to promote, this guy above here. He is someone who doesn't value good character, good morals, honesty and integrity, or our country for that matter. I would not even consider doing what he is suggesting because I care more about our country and getting it back on track with someone like Romney who has the integrity, honesyt, and leadership ability to do it above anyone else. People should use their heads and not do things based on someone else's values or lack of values but do it because they feel it is honestly the right thing to do. You guys wans Obama in there for another term? If he gets in there for another term, you can say goodbye to our wonderful country as we have known it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:23 AM on 02/27/2012
Short term memory loss ? Bush vs Gore ring a bell ? Good God listen to yourself . What country will we have left if another repug gets in ?
Dodger300
Critical analysis please, not just talking points
10:46 PM on 02/27/2012
Obviously, you are trying to protect Romney because you are afraid the plan will work.

It doesn't matter, because Obama will beat any candidate the Republicans nominate, and probably by a landslide.

Mark my words.
11:30 PM on 02/27/2012
Know what? It has nothing to do with protection. It has to do with being a person of integrity and doing the right thing for the right reasons. You are kidding yourself when you say I am trying to protect Romney. I am standing up for what is right, and I believe it is an insult to this GOP campaign to resort to these kind of underhanded measures to gain a vote. I would say that Santorum is pretty desperate indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mappy3
Political, dog loving, junkie.
06:17 PM on 02/28/2012
Didn't think of that. Love it!
Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie VanderMolen
take media to task
12:10 PM on 02/25/2012
Um,... The Republican establishment has its ace in the hole (Ruth Johnson). I'm sure when it comes to it Ruth will do her party duty and omit some counties and lose others. Mr. DiSano implies that voting for Santorum will bleed the GOP establishment of money. Money means nothing to these people. The only ones to gain from Dems voting for Santorum and supposedly throwing a wrench into the works are the TV stations. I do plan on voting Santorum just so I can personally do something to harm the GOP. It makes me feel some what better that I can take some action -- albeit miniscule -- to retaliate against a party that has devastated my state that I love. If anything, Dems and independents should vote for Santorum for that reason alone.
12:52 PM on 02/25/2012
Pretty low class in my opinion your proposed actions, Sir.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie VanderMolen
take media to task
02:49 PM on 02/26/2012
That's working poor class to be precise, and all thinks to the Republicans.
09:09 PM on 02/24/2012
All the payoffs and all the Benjamins couldn't put Romney Mittney back together again.