The Supreme Court ruling in favor of same-sex marriage was a good day for America. But it also made official something I've been saying for years: America embraces every lifestyle except one -- being unmarried.
This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and posted freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email.
"Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization's oldest institutions."
So wrote Associate Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy as part of his historic majority opinion in favor of same-sex marriage in all 50 states.
It was a good day for America, a good day for civil rights and for tolerance.
But it also made "official"- - sort of, coming from the nation's highest court -- something I've been saying for years: America embraces every lifestyle except one -- being unmarried.
Advertisement
I think marriage can be wonderful. And I know many couples who are married and happy, just as I know many single people who are happy.
Kennedy's sentiment conjures up images of couples, sneakers slung over their shoulders, walking on the beach hand in hand while a single man (or woman) scrounges for dinner in a nearby dumpster.
Kennedy's opinion, though I'm sure not intended this way, is also more than a little condescending. "Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness..."?
I suspect this was not the hope of many same-sex couples. I suspect the hope of many if not most was to be given full recognition that their relationships were equal to heterosexual relationships, and that before the Court ruled that they could marry in all 50 states, many of these couples were content, committed and anything but lonely.
Advertisement
I find it hard to believe many of these couples felt they would be condemned to live in loneliness even if the Court had not ruled the way it did.
In Kennedy's mind, apparently, not being married is to be condemned to live in loneliness. Perhaps the Justice, who I admire, is not aware that half the marriages in the United States end in divorce, and that, conservatively speaking, half of those who remain married are anything but happy.
The divorce rate in 1965 was only 25 percent, and I remember well that children of divorce were extremely rare when I was growing up, and we tended to shy away from them as if they carried smallpox.
As "Mad Men" and other programs have accurately depicted, just because people didn't divorce as readily then as they do now didn't mean they were happy in marriage. They cheated. They drank. They popped pills. They just didn't visit lawyers as much.
And while the divorce rate for same-sex couples is slightly lower than that of male-female unions, that is to be expected, given the brief history of gay and lesbian marriages. I wish same-sex couples all the happiness, but the odds are very high that their marriages -- and divorces -- are going to be very similar in every way to "traditional" marriages.
Advertisement
Gay marriage still has hurdles to clear, of course, from sorting out the details of how things such as assets and medical care and immigration status are handled, to the more immediate fight of some county clerks in refusing to issue marriage certificates to gay couples, to lingering bias that will show itself in unpleasant ways, no matter what the Supreme Court says.
But gay marriage has cleared some important hurdles, and more Americans favor it than oppose it, a far cry from even 10 years ago. That's a good thing, a victory for tolerance.
I'm less optimistic about how Americans view singlehood. It is odd that in the face of so many divorces and listless, loveless marriages, so many people still look upon being single as a sad and lonely ordeal to be endured or pitied.
In my long dating experience, I've encountered only a tiny handful of women who are comfortable with being single (and I hear from them about many men who apparently long for marriage just as much). This included many women who were married for 20, 25, 30 years and often were left by philandering or alcoholic or abusive husbands.
Yet, the one thing that scares them more than those feckless former spouses is the prospect of having no spouse at all.
Advertisement
"Condemned to live in loneliness," may be an appropriate phrase for people serving life sentences in prison. It isn't appropriate for people whose condition of life is being unmarried.
Earlier on Huff/Post50:
5 Ways Boomers Will Be Remembered
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.