iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Joel John Roberts

GET UPDATES FROM Joel John Roberts
 

An Empire of People-Less Homes and Homeless People

Posted: 02/22/2012 2:19 pm

There was once a vast and prosperous empire that was the most powerful in the land. It was mightier than the ancient Mayans, more popular than the Romans, and wider reaching than the British empire of old.

This Northern Amerigo empire was the envy of the world. The elite of smaller empires sent their offspring to be educated in schools called Harvard, Stanford, and Yale. Armies of other nations feared this empire's "shock and awe" approach to war.

The world's electronic airwaves were dominated by this empire, with its entertainment media broadcasting shows peculiarly named Desperate Housewives, CSI, and House all over the globe.

People from around the world desperately sought to enter this empire through land, air, and sea. Most were turned away but many succeeded in secretly crossing its borders. In fact, some believe more than 23 million undocumented immigrants call this land their home.

Its international popularity was no surprise. Some people from faraway lands thought its sidewalks were paved with gold, and its rivers flowed with Willy Wonka's chocolate. Who wouldn't want to live in a land of Beverly Hillbillies where even country bumpkins can live in a Beverly Hills mansion, or where an average cop can drive a Ferrari Daytona Spider sports car down the glittering streets of Miami?

But like other empires of past, their power, wealth, and influence declined in time. Some people believe the decline was based on sacrilegious acts of sin. Others think national diminution was because of excessive waste, or the natural lackadaisical nature of second and third generations.

This writer thinks the decline of this great nation began when its leaders did not take care of the least of its people, those citizens who were so desperately entrenched in poverty that they had to live exposed on the land like some squatter in a Third World country.

Impoverished nations, however, typically have no resources to house its people. But in the case of the Amerigo empire, this nation of wealth and power had enough empty homes across its land to house more than 18 million of its hurting citizens. That is 24 empty homes for every Amerigo subject who is living on the streets.

Of course, the 18 million homes became empty due to the worst economy in a generation. The wealthy and politically influential merchants, also known as bankers, took back these homes and left them empty in hopes that a recovering economy would raise its value.

Most of the former homeowners took refuge in rental units. But, sadly, this nation of riches allowed three-quarters of a million of its subjects to live in extreme poverty on its streets.

With millions of empty homes scattered across the land just sitting without occupants, many in this land realized the empire had no clothes. An affluent nation possessing millions of empty homes while hundreds of thousands of its people go without homes was immoral. So the rumblings of injustice began.

But it is not too late for this wealthy and powerful nation to return to its greatness. To house its impoverished citizens in a land of empty houses would be a gargantuan shift in policy that would be heard and seen throughout the globe.

Because most would agree that an empire of people-less homes should not have homeless people.

 
 
 

Follow Joel John Roberts on Twitter: www.twitter.com/joeljohnroberts

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
06:34 AM on 02/24/2012
More like the decline began when this empire took care of too many of its people who were otherwise able to care for themselves

The American decline is not a result of a lack of largesse -- It is instead partially rooted in forced largesse beyond the ability to pay for it.
photo
itruth
fideistic deist with socratic tedencies
12:07 PM on 02/24/2012
i think it was when we decided that the value of a thing was greater than the value of the maker of said thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha Fair
Professional RepubliBilly Factchecker
06:15 AM on 02/25/2012
More than likely the decline began when this empire took care off too many of it's people in the upper 1%, those too privileged to have to work for a living or care for themselves because they had servants waiting on them.

The American decline is rooted in greed, exploitation and theft. Theft of the assets of the middle class by the deliberate manipulation of the stock market, real estate market and gross and immoral conduct by some who want to blame it on their victims to absolve their own guilt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A level Head
Consumption not investment requires subsidy
07:55 AM on 02/25/2012
We likely define decline in different terms -- You define it as being able to take less of what is not yours -- I define it as taking too much of what is not yours -- in both cases the operative words are taking -- Second -- The Middle Class has no business realistically being invested in the stock market -- They do not understand it -- Think it is a short term mechanism -- and refuse to accept that it sometimes declines and when it does flock to sell like lemmings. As for immoral conduct -- What is immoral is taking what is not yours -- What is immoral is fleecing your children out of a future by saddling them with debt -- What is immoral is borrowing money at little interest in the expectation that a home is a checkbook and then failing to repay it