More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Johann Hari

Johann Hari

GET UPDATES FROM Johann Hari

When We Demand Cheap Gasoline, We Are Demanding Disaster

Posted: 03/10/11 09:20 PM ET

My name is Johann Hari, and I am an addict. If you restrict the supply of my drug -- as has happened over the past month -- I become panicky and angry. If you cut it off entirely, my life will fall apart. I want my fix, I want it cheap, and I want it now. My drug is called gasoline. I eat it: My food is driven to me. I wear it: My clothing is shipped and flown to me. I travel with it: on every bus, train and plane. But if I don't go to rehab soon, this addiction is going to ruin me. This is the inaugural meeting of Petroleum Anonymous. We're all going to need it now.

There are four major symptoms to my addiction and yours, and in 2011 they are all getting worse.

Symptom one: unpredictable convulsions. There is a revolution happening all around the world's biggest oilfields, and it is getting closer to the deepest pools every day. For 60 years our governments have armed, funded and fueled tyrants, in return for them pointing the petrol pump in our direction. Just as junkies will rob their mothers and mug their grannies, we have abandoned the most basic values of our societies in pursuit of cheap oil. Initially, this created the virus of jihadism. Now some of the local populations are finally rising up in a democratic spirit against their tyrants. They are being shot at by soldiers trained in Britain's leading military academy, Sandhurst, and with weapons stamped Made in America.

Nobody knows where this revolution will stop, but today is a declared "day of rage" in Saudi Arabia, which has the biggest remaining supplies of oil in the world. The angriest part of the population, the marginalized and abused Shia, happen to live on top of the biggest oilfields, and can stare across a thin patch of water to see their fellow Shia rising up in Bahrain. Sixty percent of the Saudi population is under the age of 25, yet they are governed by an 86-year-old and half-dead "King" who bans women from driving and has rape victims whipped. It seems unlikely they can be bribed, beaten and shot into submission forever.

Even a small and brief disruption in the oil supply can cause this symptom in us. Since 1973, there have been five oil price shocks -- and every single one has been followed rapidly by a global recession. A Saudi uprising would be the biggest disruption yet, triggering $200 a barrel oil and beyond. It would be like having the 1973 oil price shock just after the 1929 Great Crash -- and change all our lives.

Symptom two: fever. In the century-long party since a pair of brothers first struck oil big-time in Texas, human beings have burned up 900 billion barrels of the black gloop. Each one of them has released gases into the atmosphere that have trapped more and more of the Sun's heat here on earth. The result is that, according to NASA, 2011 was globally the hottest year ever recorded, tied with 2005. Don't be fooled by local snow. The last time it was this hot was three million years ago, when sea level was 25 meters higher. Yes, we have a planetary fever. If we burn up all the oil that remains, we will push it way beyond current levels - or any ever seen by human beings.

Symptom three: hunger. Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman says food is soaring in price across the world as a result of this man-made fever. Last year Russia's wheat crop dried out and burned down in wildfires nobody had ever seen before. It caused the global price of wheat to double, and President Dmitry Medvedev to renounce his global warming denialism. Strange things are happening across the world's most important agricultural areas: Brazil is drying out, Australia had a drought and then a Biblical flood, and so on. While it's hard to attribute any individual event to warming, this pattern is precisely what the world's scientists predicted.

All this, in turn, helped cause the Arab revolutions. In the 1780s, there was a natural crop failure in Europe -- and the starving people had little choice but to rise up, in the French revolution. In a similar way, these crop failures today rendered many of the Arab people unable to meet their food bills -- and triggered their uprising. If we keep cooking the climate, there will be many more, with consequences we can't predict.

Symptom four: denial. Petrol is finite. It takes millions of years to form under the ground: It can't be grown, or made in factories. We all know that, sooner or later, it is going to run out. But when? The last year in which humans found more oil than we burned was the year I was born: 1979. Since then, it's been a downward graph. But it may be plunging much faster than we think. The WikiLeaks cables revealed that the U.S. suspects the Saudis have 40 percent less oil than they claim, and that the country's supply could peak as soon as next year. We already know that Russia, which currently produces as much as the Saudis, will run out by 2020, and Nigeria will run out five years later.

We have a shrinking pool of oil in the world -- and more and more people chasing it. In China, three-quarters of city-dwellers understandably say they plan to buy a car in the next five years. There is not enough for everyone.

We are going to have to kick this addiction sooner or later. We all know that. We are going to have to make the transition to fueling our societies by the mighty power of the sun, the wind and the waves. The technology exists today. It can be done without us regressing to caves, or any of the other ludicrous myths pumped out by the oil lobby. George Monbiot's book Heat is a detailed roadmap of how to do it, step-by-step. Far from killing our economies, the massive work needed to change energy sources would be a vast source of jobs -- at precisely the moment when we need a huge economic stimulus.

Every time the oil price spikes, our politicians mouth platitudes about the need to kick oil, but the change never comes. It's worth going back to the last serious proposal -- because it offers a tantalizing "what if." On April 18, 1977, President Jimmy Carter delivered a televised address from the Oval Office. He said:

Tonight I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history. With the exception of preventing war, this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes. The energy crisis has not yet overwhelmed us, but it will if we do not act quickly." He said the West must wean itself off oil or "the alternative may be a national catastrophe... This difficult effort will be the moral equivalent of war -- except that we will be uniting our efforts to build and not destroy.


What would the world be like today Jimmy Carter had been listened to by the Western world, instead of being demonized by Big Oil and booted out of office as a "whiner"? With the U.S. no longer backing Arab petro-tyrannies and occupying Arab territories, there would probably have been no 9/11. There would have been no Iraq War. There would have been no BP oil spill. We would not be facing an oil price shock today that could cripple our economies and leave backing some of the worst dictators in the world. The Copenhagen climate summit could well have established a path to dealing with global warming, rather than burying it. If we pursue Drilling As Usual, what unnecessary disasters will they curse us for 30 years from now?

Yet the most popular cry in politics today is a pledge to deny all this reality and cut petrol prices. Give us our fix! Make it cheap! Make it now! This isn't motivated by malice or stupidity: People have a lot to worry about, and lots of bills to pay. But it is shortsighted. When we demand our governments give us cheaper gas, we are -- usually unwittingly -- demanding they give more money and arms to some of the worst dictators in the world, invade more countries, create more hatred of us, and ramp up global warming. That is, ultimately, the only way it can be done.

We don't have a choice about whether we join Petroleum Anonymous. Our only choice is: Do we do it today, or do we do it 20 or 30 years from now, on a much hotter planet, after squabbling and fighting and killing for the last pathetic dregs of petroleum?

Johann Hari is a writer for the Independent. To read more of his articles, click here or here. You can email him at j.hari [at] independent.co.uk

Johann Hari has a new podcast! You can subscribe via i-Tunes or click here.

 

Follow Johann Hari on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johannhari101

My name is Johann Hari, and I am an addict. If you restrict the supply of my drug -- as has happened over the past month -- I become panicky and angry. If you cut it off entirely, my life will fall ap...
My name is Johann Hari, and I am an addict. If you restrict the supply of my drug -- as has happened over the past month -- I become panicky and angry. If you cut it off entirely, my life will fall ap...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 268
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:19 PM on 03/13/2011
When the price of gas goes up we need to stop driving. Take a bus, walk more or use a bike. If you are two far to walk, I found a cool USA built electric bicycle that has a laptop type battery and costs less than $.10 per charge to go 20 miles. I started to use it to commute when I found out my car was putting over 5 lbs of carbon into the air each day just for my 3 mile round trip. It also and looks way cool compared to electric bikes made in China. http://www.USAebikes.com
12:56 PM on 03/13/2011
Temperature was not the factor that resulted in sea levels being higher ... it was CO2 levels. And the resultant temperatures were 2 to 3 degrees higher than pre-industrial levels.

According to Hansen:
"The last time it was 3 degrees (Celsius) warmer, sea levels were 25 meters higher, plus or minus 10 meters. You'd not get that in one century, but you could get several meters in one century," he said. "The problem is that once you get the process started and well on the way, it's impossible to prevent it. That's why we need to address the issue before it gets out of control."

Another quote from http://www.earth-policy.org/index.php?/indicators/C51/ says : Yet a rise of 2–3 degrees Celsius will make the earth as hot as it was 3 million years ago, when oceans were more than 25 meters (80 feet) higher than they are today.

I haven't found any scientific report that states that the temperature was the same 25 million years ago.
03:16 PM on 03/12/2011
. Coupled with phony geopolitical crisis and the inane mantra of "peak oil" they have snookered all of us to believe that there isn't a lot of oil left and the oil that we have isn't enough. You need to look into the practice of "contango", buying oil cheap, storing it on supertankers and storage facilities for a while until you can move the price up and make a profit. And make a profit they have, investment banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs have made record profits on these activities. OPEC and big oil have recognized the largest profits in the history of money! And they did it with taxpayer money (tarp). There should be a windfall profit tax on banks and big oil. Tapping the reserves won’t work and drilling won’t either. There is a glut of oil; no place left to store it.Not driving or buying a Volt/Prius won’t work. Supply and demand have nothing to do with this market, it’s manipulated by banksters and big oil. Get speculators out of the market!
08:12 AM on 03/15/2011
And of course we Americans have a right to all we want to burn. There could never be competition for oil supplies from cash rich India, China, or others. Surely dollars held by Americans are worth and respected more than dollars held by unimportant foreigners - not to mention those euros which hardly have any purchasing power. We can have all the oil for any conceivable use forever. We are exceptional and the laws of nature don't apply in the real US and Alaska - well there are some groups we don't care about and they are allowed to experience natural disaster and manmade trouble without real help. Just as long as big banks are protected. etc. Fox rules!
03:15 PM on 03/12/2011
When congress passed the commodities modernization act of 2000 they enabled speculators in the oil market. That meant that banks and hedge funds were able to speculate and trade oil. Banks and hedge funds have been playing the market in two ways. (1) They have hired an army of traders whose only job is to pump up the price of oil. (2) Then they have hired an army of traders to drive down the US dollar. (the dollar has dropped 25 -30% in the last three years) Oil is traded in dollars, when the dollar goes down it takes more dollars to buy a barrel of oil.
01:42 PM on 03/12/2011
In the interest of presenting FAIR and balanced commentary the link http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=04212e22-c1b3-41f2-b0ba-0da5eaead952

SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO BE READ!!! Don't you agree?
01:47 PM on 03/12/2011
Finally - thank you!
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
01:27 PM on 03/12/2011
As I understand it, Henry Ford - or someone similar from the era - predicted that vegetable oil would fuel economies in the 20th century. However, petroleum turned out to be the cheapest to process and so it won favor. It's always been a sad irony that the cheapest to process is the most destructive, both ecologically and politically.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:44 AM on 03/12/2011
Good article. Keep the pressure on.
01:35 PM on 03/12/2011
Pressure on who? Commenters like me trying to post the truth linking to a government publication?
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=04212e22-c1b3-41f2-b0ba-0da5eaead952 but having them censored?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:07 PM on 03/12/2011
Hi.

I sent you a cheery reply earlier but made the mistake of mentioning the phenomenon you referred to in the last word of your comment to me. In particular, referring to its heavy-handed utilisation in this very site.

Needless to say, that message went straight to data heaven.

Anyway, no. I don't want to put pressure on you. Just people who think we can guzzle oil forever. :)
06:51 PM on 03/11/2011
Given there's a negative relationship between Barak Obama's favorability ratings and the price of fuel, I couldn't agree with you more.

You Brits are so witty!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Johann Hari
04:35 AM on 03/12/2011
That's right - everything in the world comes down to your partisan politics - from revolutions in the Arab world to trashing our climate,
01:46 PM on 03/12/2011
Nobody is "trashing the climate" and you don't have one iota of hard measurable scientific evidence that anyone is. Even Phil Jones said there's been no statistical global warming for 15 years. UAH MSU shows global temperature right where it was in the early 80's - ZERO correlation to CO2 rise. The ONLY place CO2 seems to affect climate is in computer models. Solution? ...STOP LOOKING AT THE MODELS!
05:00 PM on 03/11/2011
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't oil sold on the open market and doesn't that mean that even if the "nefarious" Middle Easterners wanted to gouge us they'd be undercut by other oil producing countries like Mexico and Russia? As for blaming commodity speculation for rising prices, my understanding is that that can only be true occasionally in the short term since speculative bubbles inevitably collapse when buyers recognize a commodity has become overpriced and turn around and sell. I'd mention the right-wing absurdity that we can blame those mighty environmentalists, like the Sierra Club, for keeping us from our endless supplies of oil, but that bit of nonsense seems to have, temporarily at least, fallen by the wayside with the BP spill. I know it flies directly in the face of the American world view that anything can be finite and no amount of cleverness ( much vaunted American ingenuity) can overcome it, but that seems to be the reality we're facing with fossil fuel energy. Oh, and that reality is why our country invaded Iraq, all nonsense about getting the intelligence wrong aside.
08:58 PM on 03/11/2011
Question and comment meant for certain posters here, not for Mr. Hari.
03:55 PM on 03/11/2011
on saudi society..........3 bits worth reading

http://nakedempire.wordpress.com/2011/03/10/on-saudi-society/
jerseyjoe99982002
less government means more in my pocket
03:45 PM on 03/11/2011
Drill more now! I am so tired of hearing how we cannot do this and that. I am not addicted, I am dependant on it like everyone else. While we are drilling LOTS more, lets also focus on other solutions that will replace our Reliance on it. Drilll drill drill!
04:28 PM on 03/11/2011
Drill drill drill. I guess you're unaware that the more remote the source of oil the more expensive it becomes to extract it (put another way, that means less energy gained in relation to energy expended) and then there's the obvious fact that drilling in ever remoter regions is a sure sign of the resource's waning abundance (oil companies aren't planning to drill 20,000 feet below sea level in order to impress us with their technological know-how). And far from caring about displaying technological know-how they know that when consumers like you are screaming "drill, baby, drill" they've got elected officials over a barrel, so to speak, and all precautions to avoid yet more ecological disasters (and those disasters diminish our economic welfare as well, believe it or not) get thrown to the wind.
07:47 PM on 03/29/2011
OK, so for the "remote" argument - isn't Saudi Arabia farther away from us than Alaska, our outer continental shelves, North Dakota, Wyoming...

And as for "waning abundance", you either haven't seen or ignore the information here: http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm/6933/US-Has-Earths-Largest-Energy-Resources
08:58 PM on 03/11/2011
What did you miss about the word "finite"?
08:20 AM on 03/15/2011
Oh, you know, the world is 6000 yrs old and oil is forming in limitless amounts every day - or the second coming is imminent so we don't need to worry about it - heck, why even send the kids to school for something they won't have a chance to use.
03:37 PM on 03/11/2011
precisely the rationale behind the president NOT supporting the no fly zone in libya. not due to their impact on oil supplies but the impact that nations state of chaos contributes to ever increasing prices for oil on world markets. if oil wasn't involved there would be a no fly zone in place over libya right now and a change in government would be likely. oil though, the price and impact on our economy changes everything. the president and his staff likely looked at the impact of extended political chaos and upheavals in the region on world oil prices and decided this is one battle we cannot afford at this time. i wonder though, to those on the outside, they see our diplomats shouting from the roof tops freedom for all, democracy and human rights reign supreme, then somewhere, somehow the oil card pops up and all those voices for freedom are silenced. oil is this nations blood and weakest link imho. even if we have the political will to do what is right in the world we cannot whenever and or wherever oil may be involved/impacted in some way. consequently to millions around the globe we appear as the world's biggest bunch of hypocrites.
ByAndForThePeople
and corporations aren't people!
02:02 PM on 03/11/2011
Back in the early years of the 20th century, most medium-to-large cities in the USA had respectable public transit systems, most of them being trolley-car systems. But, then (as now) there were loud voices claiming that private industry could run those systems better than government, so the trolley-car systems were privatized. (Happily, the underground/subway systems were typically not privatized.) In almost all cases, consortia of (or owned by) automobile manufacturers, oil producers, and tire manufacturers purchased the trolley systems. And, instead of "modernizing" them as they'd promised to do, they tore the tracks out of the city streets, junked the cars themselves, and removed the electrical lines that powered most of those systems. Their entirely successful goal was to convert the USA into an automobile- and gasoline-based economy.

And, now, most Americans can't even grasp the concept of an economy or society with any other basis. Every action that weakens in the slightest the death grip that oil has on us is fought with a passion unseen in most endeavors. High-speed rail? Hell, no! Light rail in the cities? Too expensive. Good bus systems? Not a chance. Improve the gas mileage of vehicles? That'll destroy our economy! Widen the streets to add more lanes by taking people's property through eminent domain? Of course!
01:41 PM on 03/11/2011
Liberals:

"Don't drill in ANWR!,", "Don't drill in the ocean!," "Don't build a windfarm that will obstruct the view of the Ken*edy's oceanfront estate!," "Don't mine for oil shale!," "Don't build nukes!"

"Hey, why's the price of gas so high?"
07:08 PM on 03/11/2011
None of those would change the price of oil..We should have a comprehensive energy policy, biofuel, solar, wind etc Hemp alone could make us independent from oil, and it is good for the environment, and would create jobs here.