Recently, an article purported to show the ten most socialist states in America, connecting the argument to party politics. It may surprise you that free market economists have ranked the least socialist states, and half of them voted for Obama. On the other hand, among the most socialist states, many have cast ballots for Republican nominees.
Socialism at its core is a political term applied to an economic system in which individual property, like money, is held and used in common, within a state or a country as an attempt to equalize the standard of living for the average citizen.
He also connected the argument to Obamacare (the Affordable Care Act), support for policies by the Democrats and President Barack Obama, as well as Republican opposition to this socialism.
Fukushima gets his data from taking the percentage of a state's GDP (form the National Association of State Budget Officers) that goes to a state's total expenditures (from the Bureau of Economic Analysis).
But what if there was a different way of calculating not only a state's level of socialism, and connecting it to politics more directly.
The Economic Freedom of North America, put together by Dean Stansel and Fred McMahon at the Fraser Institute, calculates economic freedom via several variables, including taxes, spending and labor freedom. And they calculate a rating for each state based upon those factors.
What might surprise you, is how all of this is connected to politics, or isn't.
You'd expect the most socialist states to line up with President Obama in the Democratic Party's camp, or at least most of them to be there. And we should see the least socialist states to back the Republican Party, right?
And that's the case with "state socialism."
Of the 20 "least socialist" states in the Economic Freedom of North America, half of them (Delaware, Nevada, Colorado, Illinois, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Iowa, Connecticut, Indiana and Minnesota) voted for Obama in 2008.
The other half supported John McCain: Texas, Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Georgia, Utah, Alaska, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Kansas.
Of course, Romney helped retake Indiana and North Carolina (the latter by a narrow margin). And maybe the next ones on the list of least socialist are red states, right?
Wrong. Virginia, Oregon, Massachusetts, California, Washington, New York and New Jersey all cast ballots for Obama. Meanwhile, only four of the next 11 picked McCain and Romney: Tennessee, North Dakota, Idaho and Arizona.
Well, maybe the most socialist states backed Democrats, perhaps. That would also not be the case. These include Montana, New Mexico, Hawaii, Arkansas, Maine, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Kentucky, Vermont and West Virginia.
Perhaps socialism in America is just a little more complicated than which party the state voted for. Maybe it's a little more than state spending alone. Maybe it's about the power to regulate, the labor market and the ability to tax a host of products more than sheer volumes of dollars spent. And maybe both parties dabble somewhat in seeking to control the economy.
John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Ga. He can be reached at jtures@lagrange.edu.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.