iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Atlas

John Atlas

Posted: December 13, 2010 12:18 PM

With progressives demoralized by November's election and Obama's retreat on the Bush tax cuts, a group of activists are fighting back against the Glenn Becks, Andrew Breitbarts and the rest of the Fox News propaganda machine. Last week a new watchdog group, IndictBreitbart.org, launched a campaign to encourage Baltimore's new State's Attorney to prosecute right wing activists Andrew Breitbart, James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles for violating a Maryland law, which prohibits surreptitious recordings and disclosure of those recordings.

If the group is successful, it will be a step toward stopping the conservative media's modus operandi of using lies, half truths, and video deception to attack everyone from George Soros to ACORN to unions, to civic organizations and their innocent members. It might also help discourage the mainstream media from repeating their false accusations, as they did in the case of ACORN.

IndictBreitbart.org claims that when O'Keefe and Giles secretly recorded Maryland ACORN's employees after entering their office, during the summer of 2009, and then published their highly edited videotapes online at Breitbart's BigGovernment.com in order to harm ACORN, they broke Maryland's Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act. The tapes helped to destroy ACORN, which at the time was the largest and arguably the most successful anti-poverty group in the country.

ACORN, which had registered millions of poor, minority and young voters, had been under siege by the Republican Party and Fox News, which falsely accused the group of widespread voter registration fraud. After several misleading and doctored videos recorded by O'Keefe were released on Breitbart's website, and played round the clock by Fox News, and then reported in the New York Times, CNN and other media outlets, the tapes caused such a sensation that a decades-old campaign by conservatives to destroy ACORN finally succeeded. The campaign led by conservative Republican and their business allies, who opposed ACORN's fight to increase worker's wages, forced the group into bankruptcy. ACORN closed its doors on November 2, 2010.

According to IndictBreitbart group spokesperson and attorney Kevin Zeese, the campaign is a grassroots effort to let law enforcement officials in Maryland know that ordinary citizens want Breitbart, O'Keefe and Giles held accountable for violating Maryland's law. If convicted Breitbart, O'Keefe and Giles could face a prison sentence of up to five years and a $10,000 fine. IndictBreitbart organizers include Democrats.com, Progressive Democrats of America and Mark Crispin Miller, a Professor of Culture and Communication at NYU.

Action

They are asking citizens to sign a letter to Gregg Bernstein, the new Baltimore State's Attorney, which will be hand delivered the week he is sworn in January, 2011. Bernstein, 55, defeated the city's longtime prosecutor, Patricia C. Jessamy, to win the Democratic nomination by a margin of just under 1,200 votes and ran unopposed in the general election.

Since the Maryland ACORN taping, O'Keefe has been arrested and convicted of entering federal property under false pretenses when he attempted to embarrass Senator Mary Landrieu because of her support for the health care legislation. He is also under investigation for attempting to lure a female CNN reporter onto a boat in Maryland to seduce and embarrass her.

In addition to helping bring down ACORN, Breitbart became famous for posting an edited recording of Department of Agriculture employee Shirley Sherrod, which led the Obama administration to fire her and then rehire her when the tape turned out to be doctored.

Last month, James O'Keefe released a set of YouTube videos titled "Teachers Union Gone Wild featuring various New Jersey teachers giving their opinions about Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ), using crude language, and criticizing the state's teachers unions.

One of the teachers heard on the video, Alissa Ploshnick, known for her teaching skills and commitment to her students, was secretly recorded saying she saw another teacher refer to a student using the n-word, and that the teacher was demoted, but allowed to continue to teach.

Following the release of the video, she was suspended for seven days and denied a pay raise for being recorded using the n-word. Ploshnick, whose strong interpersonal skills and dedication made her especially adept at helping youngsters overcome dyslexia, had to hire an attorney to resurrect her reputation, which she felt was recklessly damaged by the conservative activist O'Keefe.

In each of these incidents, the main stream media quickly published the false accusations by the conservative activists resulting in harm to those they attacked. The organizers of the IndictBreitbart campaign believe that the enforcement of Maryland's law will help prevent secret taping and the smearing of innocent groups and citizens who can easily fall prey to the antics of smear artists parading as journalists.

"It appears that these zealots are engaged in a nationwide pattern of criminal activity for purely political reasons," said campaign spokesperson Zeese. "But, in Maryland, we don't take kindly to outsiders coming here to commit crimes that harm our citizens and community organizations. And so, with a new prosecutor in Baltimore who has campaigned on the rule of law, we are urging him to move quickly and decisively to bring these criminals to justice."

This new campaign will face an uphill battle since State's Attorney Bernstein promised that his top priority would be on boosting the conviction rate for those charged with murder and other violent crimes. But by going after some of the worst right wing media deceivers, just the threat may help. And according to the new group, over 2000 people have already signed the letter to Bernstein since the launch of this campaign.

To learn more, go to www.IndictBreitbart.org.


John Atlas is the author of the new book SEEDS OF CHANGE, The Story of Acorn, America's Most Controversial Anti-Poverty Community Organizing Group available at The Progressive Book Club and Amazon.com

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 68
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:10 PM on 12/26/2010
Hey people. Answer me this.

1. Wouldn't any decent person approve of Brietbart's actions since the intended targets were engaged in criminal wrongdoing? Much like a person issued a speeding ticket in the process of pursuing another car getting away from a bank robbery?

I know you guys REALLY hate Andrew, but really, if someone broke a law (minor) to expose a rightie doing bad things that would be ok wouldn't it?
02:59 PM on 12/26/2010
Its a pleasure to see the left so up in arms at Breitbart who has used, and continues to use the left's tactics against them. Its a pleasure to see black people accused of racism that they are guilty of, and marxust insurgents exposed(Acorn) in criminal wrongdoing. Since liberal policies can't stand on their own, but must stoke anti-white hate to exist, silencing Breitbart as a liberal priority makes logical tactical sense. But even if he is jailed, his tactics have been learned by the right and his organization will continue to grow in their influence and exposure to disinfect the country of marxists.


In fact, the tactic of trying to silence us will only grow attendence to our cause. Its the 60s all over again, thanks to immoral baby boomers. Please please don't force gay marriage on me over obtaining bread for my family...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazzie
Speaking truth to stupid
08:01 PM on 12/13/2010
Breitbart acting as a modern day Fagin to the James the Artless Dodger and his little gang of misfits has no interest to me. What I find to be most egregious about this whole affair is how the so called professional and responsible media swallows his BS whole and without question. Even after the ACORN tapes have been proven to be nothing more that edited propaganda and the Shirley Sharrod affair he's still given time on main stream television and treated as a journalist. I don't support indicting him for this as it just adds fuel to the fire as it sends us down a slope that's already slippery enough.
techjockey
Keeping My Gratitude Higher Than My Expectations..
07:49 PM on 12/13/2010
The right wing conservative's comments on this article is an excellent example of their obstinant idiocy. They seem to enjoy being lied to.
They seem to like to propagate misinformation.
This is not a right/left issue, it is an issue of getting relevant, truthful information out there in the media so we can inform our opinions. It does no one any goood when "one side" purposefully & fraudulantly discredits a person or situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:14 PM on 12/13/2010
Breitbart and O'Keefe are journalistic barnacles; they'd be nowhere without the Bad Ship Fox, a major "news" outlet with a proven contempt for truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
townzl
08:22 PM on 12/13/2010
You're fanned also. Don't forget that Ship of Fools also.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
petef59
edit my micro-bio
09:01 PM on 12/13/2010
RICO Act?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
townzl
08:18 PM on 12/13/2010
Very well said tj, f&f.
Norsky
RINO some say. I say Republican.
04:40 PM on 12/13/2010
It's only illegal if you record what the police are doing.
04:18 PM on 12/13/2010
Tell me, where do I sign. Let indict!
04:44 PM on 12/13/2010
Instead of wasting money on a case that would be thrown out the second a judge saw it why don't you use it for charity or something?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gypsysailor
Things that might have been never were.
07:32 PM on 12/13/2010
Excuse me but I'll bet you would be crying foul if it happened to you.
photo
CelticMajic
The answer lies in each of us individually
03:46 PM on 12/13/2010
So lets get this straight. It is not important that ACORN employees provided advice, it is only important that those seeking the advice did so under a false flag. Hmmmmmm, now lets compare that to WIKILEAKS. Should WIKILEAKS undergo the same scrutiny?
photo
Epiphany2b
Always waiting for the light to dawn
03:57 PM on 12/13/2010
It wouldn't even have mattered if they had sought advice under a false flag. What matters is the fact that the advice given was doctored to make it sound like they were advising them to do something illegal. I don't think WikiLeaks is doctoring the material at all.
04:45 PM on 12/13/2010
The videos were never doctored. The clips showing the employees giving said advice are legitimate.

Notice that ACORN didn't sue breitbart or fox news...
Norsky
RINO some say. I say Republican.
04:41 PM on 12/13/2010
What advice did they really give them Celt? And what was illegal about it?

I mean, let's move beyond the talking points. Shall we?
04:55 PM on 12/13/2010
Advice on how to avoid taxes and obtain housing for illegal child prostitutes.
03:31 PM on 12/13/2010
I'm totally confused... and have been since the 'ACORN scandal' took place. I always understood there are 'libel' and 'slander' laws designed to discourage or prevent what you claim... "the main stream media quickly published the false accusations by the conservative activists resulting in harm to those they attacked". Why would you resort to a round-about "surreptitious recordings" law to stop these people? Seriously, if you can't punish these people for 'purposeful harm' through 'false allegations', I'm inclined to say "don't bother" and "I'm done concerning myself with these stupid, childish games". It's not a matter of 'how' they did what they did, it's a matter of 'what' they did.

One thing is clear... the U.S. no longer has a justice system when crimes like these go unpunished. Just because the majority of Americans are duped into believing that the end results are in their best interest doesn't mean that the justice system (hello attorneys, judges, politicians?) should allow these crimes to occur. Though I'm glad to know that somebody is trying to stop these 'what-should-we-call-thems' ('social terrorists?), this article only further confirms my suspicions that American society is hopelessly corrupt.
02:39 PM on 12/13/2010
Yeah, those video tapes have been a real pain lately. It isn't pleasant when your own words and actions come back to bite you. Why does the left always fear the video?
03:32 PM on 12/13/2010
You mean the FAKED, ALTERED and DUPLICITOUSLY EDITED videos, right there info? Why does the right always fear the truth?!?
04:47 PM on 12/13/2010
Nobody is claiming the videos were "faked, altered and duplicitously edited". They were edited for time but every news program you see is as well.
photo
Epiphany2b
Always waiting for the light to dawn
03:42 PM on 12/13/2010
Because those on the right don't have enough to cause trouble with, so they doctor the videos to say what they want them to say. Why does the right fear the truth?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SIMPLICIMUSS
Kampf gegen Dummheit !
03:48 PM on 12/13/2010
Did they doctor the Philly Panthur videos as well ?? As anything ever been done about that ?
04:47 PM on 12/13/2010
There are no claims nor evidence that the videos were doctored.
02:00 PM on 12/13/2010
LOL! Recording is legal in public places.

ACORN recievded public funds, making it's offices public places.

What a wast of time and money. Notice how nobody is refuting the actual material.
proudcalib
I never said it was going to be easy
02:24 PM on 12/13/2010
Bull - surreptitiously recording conversations is illegal, and a private office is, by nature, not a public place. Nice try though.
04:05 PM on 12/13/2010
ACORN was reciving public funds, which makes their office public. Federal law says only one party needs to consent and in any case it is legal if you are recording possible criminial acts:


The federal wiretap law, passed in 1968, permits surreptitious recording of conversations when one party consents, "unless such communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State." Amendments signed into law in 1986 and 1994 expand the prohibitions to unauthorized interception of most forms of electronic communications, including satellite transmissions, cellular phone conversations, computer data transmissions and cordless phone conversations.



Read more: What is the law regarding recording someone (audio, video, camera) without their consent? | Answerbag http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/29004#ixzz181nA5VYJ
photo
Epiphany2b
Always waiting for the light to dawn
03:48 PM on 12/13/2010
Public or private, Maryland law says you cannot record anyone without their knowledge.
Twelve states forbid the recording of private conversations without the consent of all parties. Those states are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington
04:04 PM on 12/13/2010
But federal law (which trumps state law) says you can:


The federal wiretap law, passed in 1968, permits surreptitious recording of conversations when one party consents, "unless such communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State." Amendments signed into law in 1986 and 1994 expand the prohibitions to unauthorized interception of most forms of electronic communications, including satellite transmissions, cellular phone conversations, computer data transmissions and cordless phone conversations.



Read more: What is the law regarding recording someone (audio, video, camera) without their consent? | Answerbag http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/29004#ixzz181nA5VYJ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JazzyJim
Nuzis stay to the Right
01:55 PM on 12/13/2010
Signed on. The dragon must be slayed by cutting it off at the head. Lies and Propaganda and the rest will fall.
01:53 PM on 12/13/2010
I'm confused. How can Breitbart be held responsible for the teacher being suspended for using the n-word. He didn't make her do it; he just recorded the fact that she did! I'm sure the actions were taken because she USED the word, not because she was TAPED doing it. That's the problem. Liberals don't see the point that DOING something is just as bad as being CAUGHT doing it!
03:38 PM on 12/13/2010
You should have just ended a "I'm confused"...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
townzl
08:09 PM on 12/13/2010
I was thinking the same thing, agreed and fanned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
whirlybird
Time's a-wastin'!
12:59 PM on 12/13/2010
Excellent plan. I sincerely hope it works. These illegit strategies are the essence of the recent Republican coupe. That and lots of illegit money.
01:45 PM on 12/13/2010
A democrat talking about illegit money. That is awesome.
02:28 PM on 12/13/2010
This is rich: Reps use lies etc to gain traction for their policies.

Let's see, oh yeah, the ACA aka health care "reform". I read the bills AND the CBO/CMMS analyses and EVERY TIME I HEARD A DEM TALK about the subject it was nothing but lies.

And in other news, POLITICIANS LIE ALL THE TIME!