iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Bridgeland

GET UPDATES FROM John Bridgeland
 

Raising the Dropout Age

Posted: 01/27/2012 5:02 pm

There are no silver bullets to solve the dropout crisis and blunt instruments often go too far. But when President Obama in his State of the Union address urged states to raise the legal dropout age from 16 to when students graduate or turn 18, we cheered.

Almost a decade ago, we worked with Hart Research to listen to the perspectives of dropouts all across America to understand their life stories, challenges, hopes and solutions to keep more students on the graduation track. Among many findings catalogued in the report for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation called The Silent Epidemic, we discovered something alarming.

In places like Baltimore, dropouts described how they "signed out of high school" forever on their 16th birthday. We soon learned that the majority of states permitted young people to drop out of high school at the age of 16 and that many of these laws had been written 100 years ago when young people left school to work in factories and on farms. The economy of the early 20th century did not demand a high school diploma or college for many jobs, as it does today.

We also discovered a study co-authored by the now Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Alan Krueger, with two compelling findings -- because of compulsory schooling laws, roughly 25 percent of potential dropouts remain in high school and will increase their earnings by more than 7 percent with an additional year of schooling. The more than one million students who drop out every year translate to hundreds of billions of dollars in costs to the nation. Updating state laws to reflect new market realities made good economic sense.

Nearly every developed country in the world has a compulsory schooling requirement and the United States is no exception. Those who have voiced strong opposition to the president's call to raise the dropout age might consider that most states already determined more than a century ago that a compulsory school age law was a good idea that reflects our nation's core belief that every child should get an education. The only issue is whether these laws should be updated to reflect the fact that, in today's economy, a high school diploma and some postsecondary education are prerequisites for most jobs.

Most governors agree and the wave of updated laws has created good momentum. About a dozen states have raised the legal dropout age over the last decade, now ensuring that a majority of states do not permit young people to leave school on their 16th birthday. States such as Indiana and New Hampshire have had strong leadership from governors and state legislators, with the stories of how they updated their laws to reflect 21st century realities featured in our report The Case for Reform: Raising the Compulsory School Attendance Age. Even in the 18 states that have not updated their laws, such as Alaska, Kentucky, Maryland and Wyoming, legislation has been introduced to do so.

Some states have gone further, such as Tennessee -- a state that leads the nation in boosting high school graduation rates 15 percentage points over the last decade -- by linking an increase in the compulsory school attendance age with suspension of driving privileges. States are aligning their policies with the recommendations from the National Conference of State Legislatures Task Force on School Dropout Prevention and Recovery and the Civic Marshall Plan to Build a Grad Nation.

If the research and economic arguments are not overwhelming enough, the voices of dropouts seal the deal. In the largest national survey of high school dropouts, more than 80 percent reported that dropping out was the worst decision of their lives. Most wanted schools, teachers and parents to expect more of them and provide more supports along the way. Ironically, the low expectations from those around them were in stark contrast to the high expectations dropouts initially had for themselves.

Laws reflect our values. Imagine the signal a state law sends to a young person that permits them to drop out at the age of 16. Such laws bless the act of dropping out, while dropouts later view the permission as a curse, as they struggle to find work and raise their families.

Updates to these laws are not a single-stop solution, but an important strategic, economic and symbolic step that states can take. So, let's give children the birthday present they deserve and so desperately need. Coupled with other proven reforms and supports, raising the compulsory school-age law is a powerful tool that helps stem the dropout tide.

John Bridgeland is CEO of Civic Enterprises and author of The Case for Reform: Raising the Compulsory School Attendance Age, The Silent Epidemic: Perspectives of High School Dropouts, and many other reports on the high school dropout epidemic.

 

Follow John Bridgeland on Twitter: www.twitter.com/civicenterprise

FOLLOW EDUCATION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:43 PM on 01/30/2012
I would suggest a different approach.

Allow any student to drop out after 8th grade (the grade that the Amish go through).

Allow any student who has dropped out to return to school once the have realized that they do in fact need an education - even if it is many years later.

Continue public education through 14 years - community college and technical college.
07:54 AM on 01/29/2012
Raisung the age for dropping out is just another way to punish schools, not hold students accountable. Tie welfare payments, section 8 housing, and EBT cards to school attendance, state test scores, and grades. That will adjust a few attitudes about going to school..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tyler Muller
03:58 PM on 01/28/2012
Drop out age is not the issue, the issue is that our current educational system and the way the kid's are raised, they feel that their diploma is not important. If school became more than just going through the motions, and teachers were passionate about what they taught, and they could offer kids smoke breaks (the drop outs at my school smoked) kids would be more willing to sit through school. You cannot force something on somebody who is not motivated.
08:05 AM on 01/28/2012
There is nothing more anti-learning that the idea of keeping students who have zero interest in learning in school so that those "bad students" can torment the students who are trying to learn.

If schools were interested in students who wanted to learn, they would lower the drop out age to 14 so that students who want to learn can go to schools with pro-learning environments.
01:09 PM on 01/29/2012
It can't be either pay attention and learn or good-bye. Society suffers from the throw-aways with increased crime and a larger number of people on subsidies. Maybe we need to offer the difficult kids an abbreviated educational choice. How about a work-study school - half a day of classes
and links to jobs through a separate facility? Get them out of the place where they are a disruption to a fresh start. Put back options for work training accompanied by reading/math skills geared to living in the real world.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
06:57 PM on 01/30/2012
They should be allowed to drop out at age four. There is no point cluttering up the kindergartens with unwilling students. Let those who drop out work for Newt Gingrich as janitors or for Mitt Romney after relocating to China.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ifquilt
10:57 PM on 01/27/2012
One idea might be to quilt forcing everyone in to classes that are college bound. High Schools offer very few vocational courses. How fun it would be to go to school for the guy who loves to work on cars and get to go to school and learn there too. What a great motivator to learn Math and Reading. Just an example of how we are reallly limiting our poplutation instead of pushing them toward personal success. Not everyone wants to be a college graduate, it should be ok, so lets teach them what they want to learn.
01:15 PM on 01/29/2012
This - after all - was the purpose of public education to begin with. Provide everyone with the same set of survival skills. Let them choose the path they want to follow. Those who are academically talented will go on to college at some point. Those who enter the work world will have a leg up in the skills they need to be hired. When I went to high school, you chose a path after 9th grade. You were offered your choice of academic, commercial (office/retail) or vocational. In later years there were part time school- part time job options. All of these choices led to your high school diploma.