Two of our nation's largest polluters, based in Texas, are funding an aggressive campaign to destroy California's precedent-setting Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as AB 32. The Texas oil companies, Valero and Tesoro, are footing the bill to the tune of millions of dollars. Their California oil refineries are among the ten worst polluters in the state. The oil billionaire Koch brothers are also dropping some serious money to pass Proposition 23, a ballot initiative aimed squarely at this important law. But before we talk about about the current crop of Texas energy billionaires trying to subvert the best emissions law in the country, let's cast our minds back to 2000 and 2001.
No one had ever been "friended" on Facebook. Only birds tweeted. Getting through the airport didn't involve a cavity search. Lady Gaga was just another kid in middle school. Suddenly, without warning or apparent reason, energy in California got so expensive that the state was nearly bankrupted and the Governor was driven out of office. California families paid a heavy price, people went without essentials to keep the power on, rolling blackouts and brownouts were common.
We now know that there was no energy crisis or shortage. Traders at Texas-based Enron manipulated the energy market in California to reap billions in profit. Employees of the company were caught on audio tape joking about how badly they had defrauded Californians:
Enron employee 1: "They're f*****g taking all the money back from you guys? All the money you guys stole from those poor grandmothers in California?"
Enron employee 2: "Yeah, grandma Millie, man"Enron employee 1: "Yeah, now she wants her f******g money back for all the power you've charged right up, jammed right up her a*****e for f******g $250 a megawatt hour."
Charming. California still hasn't recovered financially from this fraud. Enron is gone, collapsed under the weight of their own greed and corruption. But it is clear that the fossil fuel pushers from Texas don't want to see California go into rehab.
California Assembly Bill 32 was a hard won victory, making this attempt to overturn it all the more troubling. AB 32 was passed in 2006 and requires that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. The bill regulates greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).
The Environmental Protection Agency has affirmed California's right to control greenhouse gas emissions and AB 32 makes that right a reality. This law, if properly implemented, will make California a leader in creating green jobs that improve the quality of our air and water, and reduce the ever-increasing pace of climate change. Because California is the eighth largest economy in the world, the impact of requiring better emissions standards will have a positive ripple effect throughout the economy as businesses improve their technologies to comply. The scale of change beyond California is the very thing Valero and their pals are afraid of.
In oil companies' attempt to overturn AB 32 by passing Proposition 23, they are pressing the Orwellian argument that the law will worsen unemployment in California. Prop 23 proposes that the law could not take effect until certain minimum unemployment levels are achieved statewide. This is the Karl Rove tactic of attacking your opponent's strength. AB 32 is a job creator, so let's paint it as a job killer.
Fraud in electoral claims is as old as elections. Fraud from Texas-based energy companies is a demonstrated fact of life for Californians. The oil companies and their billionaire cheerleaders will bring down a rain of money to pass Proposition 23. Our ability to protect the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 depends entirely on getting out the truth and getting out the vote.
Follow John DeCock on Twitter: www.twitter.com/jdecock
California's AB 32 Called Economic Boon
Schwarzenegger Marks Four Years of AB 32, Touts Clean Tech
Study: Barely Noticeable Impact on Small Business From Clean Energy Standards
Schwarzenegger: AB32 Celebrates 4th Anniversary
FORUM: Vote "Yes" for 23; support jobs
Boxer-Fiorina Debate: Fiorina on AB 32
Because AB 32 is being used as an excuse to permanently slaughter tens of thousands of acres of healthy desert habitat for Big Solar and Big Wind profits from such "green" luminaries as Chevron, BP, Shell, Goldman Sachs, and Morgan Stanley.
Meanwhile AB 32 is NOT being used to promote non-lethal clean energy production within the built environment that WE will own. Why not?
You can't support killing off huge sections of healthy wilderness and pretend you are saving the planet.
If you want to reduce GHG emissions, you don't bulldoze 100,000 acres of CO2-sequestering habitat, killing every living cell, then put concrete and steel (mostly made from coal plants) all over what used to be wilderness, then string SF6-spewing powerlines hundreds of miles to where power is needed!
You reduce consumption through efficiency including passive technologies and designs, then you produce the clean power at point of use. The net power is the same, because transmission losses offset any solar insolation advantages the desert has over more coastal load centers.
If we used the roughly $20 billion we are spending on Big Solar and Big Transmission in this "fast track" disaster, and used it for PACE loans so that WE could install rooftop solar, we could have 2 MILLION houses fully powered by solar, producing 7,000 MW of clean power right where it's needed, all over the state, making it more reliable and much more affordable.