iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Della Volpe

GET UPDATES FROM John Della Volpe
 

Where Obama Should Invest Now

Posted: 09/15/10 04:28 PM ET

Talking recently with Russian scholar Gregory Asmolov about Ushahidi's latest efforts in Russia with the wild fires got me thinking. If a handful of social entrepreneurs from Kenya could create an open-source "social mapping" platform that successfully tracks and sheds light on violence in Kenya, earthquake response in Chile and Haiti, and the oil spill in the Gulf -- what else can we use it for?

At a time when close to 20 million Pakistani flood victims are desperately waiting for relief from the U.S. military and international organizations -- Wired's Danger Room reports that our government is relying on "home-brewed" mapping tools because our government's efforts have been far too "tech-lite" to date. The good news is that the open-source community around the world has stepped up and filled the void, helped people, and made an impact. The bad news is that America has not done more to help. Now is the time. Let's take a minimum of .5% of 1% of the president's 6-year $50 billion Transport Bill -- or $250 million -- and invest in two things immediately -- small business and collaborative technology.

I believe if the U.S. government selected 10 technology-based small businesses, gave each one $25 million, then we could build the proper infrastructure (perhaps using Ushahidi's collaborative platform) and apply these tools to shining a light and solving ten of the biggest problems facing our country today.

Some of the money can be spent on building the platform, other elements on customization, education, training and reporting. The bottom line is that we cannot continue to primarily rely on the open source community to guide our military humanitarian efforts, disaster relief or other essential services.

If the White House made the decision to move on this by Thanksgiving, I believe that one-year later:

  • The State Department would have a robust tool conducing and measuring public diplomacy;
  • The Pentagon would have tools for managing humanitarian aid;
  • The Army, Marines, Navy and Air Force would have the resources to truly help military families in need;
  • The Education Secretary would have a tool for keeping in constant contact with teachers, parents and students about the issues of the day and areas to improve; and
  • Law enforcement would have the tools necessary to curb violent and white-collar crimes.


There are hundreds of small businesses and thousands of Millennial (and not) strategists and programmers dying for an opportunity to do something exciting. Jobs would be created. Lives changed. And with everything that's bad going on, what's better than creating opportunities for Americans to go back to work and help their country.

Do it.

 
Talking recently with Russian scholar Gregory Asmolov about Ushahidi's latest efforts in Russia with the wild fires got me thinking. If a handful of social entrepreneurs from Kenya could create an op...
Talking recently with Russian scholar Gregory Asmolov about Ushahidi's latest efforts in Russia with the wild fires got me thinking. If a handful of social entrepreneurs from Kenya could create an op...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:53 PM on 09/19/2010
@guveqzero - "Government involvement is the only way?" Sooooo if that is true then why are we having the highest unemployment levels since Depression? I mean your President Obama, has just spent Billions of our dollars in stimulus funds for what? Last numbers can back and said it cost 25 million per job to be created!!! You and your logic...FAIL!!!!
FYI It took me 4 hours to get a new driver's license at DMV!
04:42 AM on 09/19/2010
By Thanksgiving? That'll never happen. With elections coming, no parties are going to increase government spending. After elections, there will be a greater number of republicans, and that most likely means no spending. Helping small businesses develop technology is probably a great way to get America out of the nasty economic situation it's in right now, but law makers are elected by the people. People want to see the economy fixed as soon as possible, so politicians appeal to them with short term solutions. Those politicians are elected or stay in office, and America digs itself a deeper hole. It needs something that it doesn't have right now: a future, and that comes with becoming an innovator in technology and employing people.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:18 PM on 09/16/2010
This is eactly how China and other countries work. Except, it's a continual process of encouraging development of ideas, designs and products to be made in their countries. It works. The US can't seem to get over the stupid idea the the free market will do everything if left alone. Well sorry to disrupt your dream, but the free market will take your creative ideas and send them to China and India for more profits. Government involvement is the only way to be able to compete with the rest of the world. It's time to stop being foolish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
new beginning
Practice random acts of kindness-change the world
08:05 AM on 09/16/2010
Have you noticed how every time government tries to interfere in the market place, that there are unintended consequences? By selecting a few pet projects to fund and promote, they remove the ability of what would have been competitors who may have even better ideas, from competing.

Small business needs to have the freedom to move. But government "help" is often anything - but.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:35 PM on 09/16/2010
Just because our government isn't good at doing it today doesn't mean that they won't improve. Look at what Japan, China and India have accomplished. Without support from their central government, their success would not have been possible in the global marketplace
05:43 AM on 09/16/2010
The government can't create jobs. And it shouldn't try.

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=1112
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:26 PM on 09/16/2010
Your statement is meaningless. The government is actually our representatives. Are you implying that people should just give up?

Government got the US out of the Great Depression by creating jobs to make war goods, taking excess labor from the market while putting them in uniform and consuming all the military goods that could be made. What part of this don't you understand?
12:43 PM on 09/16/2010
Read the article I linked and learn something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
01:54 AM on 09/16/2010
Online movements to track problems in real time and report on them are awesom.

But why do we have to spend $250 million dollars on them?

I'm sure the DOD already has far more sophisticated systems in place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
01:28 AM on 09/16/2010
I made this argument on the OpenGovernment social network more than a year ago:

Transform SBA into a Microfinance Agency for startups
http://opengov.ideascale.com/a/dtd/2532-4049

"So far we've been spending trillions to try and resuscitate defunct DOW companies and a non-existent Wall Street.

I propose that we give Small a chance and let Big digest its trillions.

To wit, we need to transform the SBA from a place for dry cleaners to get loans into a dynamic, web driven micro-finance agency."
photo
brighterside
Fall seven times, stand up eight
04:55 AM on 09/16/2010
Hey Jabailo. Fanned for having an awesome idea!

SBA loans are so hard to get for a startup and the red tape is unbelievable. Plus why get an SBA loan when you can get it easier from the bank?

If removing a lot of the loopholes that SBA's have in giving loans, there will be an injection of funds throughout the nation.

Another idea might be to have an agency within the SBA act as a venture fund/incubator. Government can own an equity in an idea or process and might be able to turn that into a profit for themselves. Not all will survive but those that do, and change the world, is when the government can get a return on investment plus more.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SilentSolidarity
So what do you need? Besides a miracle.
12:06 AM on 09/16/2010
We should, but they won't do that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William1950
everything I say could be wrong.
11:39 PM on 09/15/2010
they should invest in hydraulic drive systems for automobiles... 150 mpg.. small diesel engines key word small... way less moving parts, no expensive batteries.. key word, no.... could be building them tomorrow.. and this would get us through the next fifty years or so to where electric is actually viable.
look em up, hydraulic drive automobiles.
11:24 PM on 09/15/2010
There are many start-up small businesses that are working on these problems who (like my own company) can't get credit or capital in today's environment. We need much less than $25M and every City has small businesses and developers that can rise to meet these needs. Ushahidi is great and partnering with the developing world to tackle this stuff is the right thing, but let's not forget that solutions can come from local business which create local jobs and are begging for a break like what Wall Street got.
photo
Scottt01
Ask what you can do for your Country!
10:38 PM on 09/15/2010
How about we let businesses come up with the capital to develope these progams and give the tax payers a break. Why does the tax payer have to foot the tab for everyones pet projects....oh yeah, redistribution of wealth, carry on.
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
12:49 PM on 09/16/2010
Because, businesses send their capital overseas to maximize their profits. If you are part of that foreign profit stream, you are lucky. But most Americans are not, that's why government must step in to stop wealth from being transfered to foreign countries. Investment is one way to stop the outflow, another is to establish tariffs. The global free market is not free at all. It redistributes wealth.