Flawed Messengers and Wooden Soldiers: Why Obama Beat Clinton -- and Why He'll Beat McCain, Too

stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust

Posted May 8, 2008 | 10:48 PM (EST)



Show your support.
Buzz this article up.

After all the pontificating on TV, in the end it didn't come down to sideshow jive like the Reverend Wright Imbroglio or the Great Sniper Fire Lie. It didn't come down to micro-demographics, or gas prices, or the war in Iraq. Incredibly enough, it didn't even come down to the issues of race and gender. No -- in the end, I believe, it all came down to a hard-to-pinpoint, rarely discussed, but desperately important matter: the personal authenticity of two human beings.

Let me digress for a second, though it's not really digressing. The impetus for this piece actually came this morning, as I tried to keep my eyes open watching John McCain on TV. I do not recommend this as a morning regimen. Try it. You'll feel an overwhelming desire to crawl back under the covers. To the degree that you can force yourself to watch him sleepwalking around the dais and spouting empty syllables, you'll find yourself wondering about peripheral issues. Like: why does a man who seems to be simmering with rage use the phrase "my friends" so compulsively? What's the real skinny on that lacquered blond lobbyist? And how did they finesse the payoff he got from the Keating Five? Somehow, the man himself is just...not there.

He's a Wooden Soldier.

But that's the thing about McCain. It's not just that his so-called "straight talk" is obviously badly-bent nonsense. Stylistically as well as politically, he's everything wrong, everything wooden, everything false. Like Clinton, he seems to be missing a core, and that lack of authenticity makes every word he says immediately forgettable (unless it's so dumb as to lodge sideways in the mind, like the Hundred Years War threat or his Bomb Iran joke.)

Unfortunately for Clinton, she campaigned as a Wooden Soldier, too.

By the seventeenth time she claimed to have found, or re-found, or re-re-found her true "voice" -- first she was the Imperious and Inevitable One, then she was the nice-nice I'm-So-Honored One, followed (a day later!) by the Hateful Vicious Shame-On-You One, and still later the Weirdly Sarcastic The Skies-Will-Open One, and then the Shot-and-a-Beer Working-Class One, so gol-dang down-home that you expected the next photo-op to show her smoking crystal meth in a trailer park -- until finally, with the Gas-Tax-Holiday Fake Populist One, she exhausted all the possibilities -- and exhausted the patience of America, too.

Meanwhile, Obama remained Obama. Quiet when called for, inspiring when given the chance, and once in a while a little obnoxious (remember when he told Hillary "you're likable enough?" I mean, admittedly she kind of asked for it, but it was pretty gratuitous.) In short: a human being. For me, a pivotal moment--unremarked-on by the robo-pundits on TV -- came in Obama's second Reverend Wright speech. I'm paraphrasing here, but he said it was crucial to remember the core meaning of his campaign, "even if the messenger is flawed."

Even if the messenger is flawed.

Here's a game that's zany fun for the whole family: try to imagine Senator Clinton saying such a thing.

That's right: never happen -- unless...

Unless Mark Penn told her that polling showed there was some kind of Flawed-Messenger Demographic out there yet to be milked for votes.

And here's zany family game #2: try to imagine Obama getting in front of the TV cameras on a night that gutted his entire campaign, pasting a transparently phony smile on his face, and crowing "it's on to the White House!" as Michelle and the kids fought off tears on the podium behind him...

Never.

I think people relate deeply to the concept of The Flawed Messenger, because who among us is not one--in our family-life, our work, our spiritual pursuits? Being a Flawed Messenger is innately heroic (the Messenger part) but also deeply humbling (the Flawed part) -- all in all, a perfectly respectable thing to be. And I believe that on some psychic level, people torn between Clinton and Obama felt more comfortable voting for a man who confessed to being a Flawed Messenger -- not just in the speech, but in the way he carried himself.

Clinton's ultimate gift, among many, to Obama was obviously the Gas Tax Holiday. It nailed down her credentials as a Wooden Soldier -- the epitome of the old-fashioned, say-anything, 20th-century politician. She went once too often to the voters-are-dullards well, and it finally pissed them off.

It's a mistake McCain will make, too, because like Clinton he just can't help it. Part of it is generational. Clinton and McCain came of age in a Nixonian universe -- and there has never been a more Wooden Soldier than Nixon. (In my own personal dictionary, when you look up Wooden Soldier, there's a photo of Nixon doing his ghoulish two-handed V-For-Victory salute.) And part of it is a choice, based on an outmoded belief that voters want an Impregnable Persona instead of a genuine human being.

But, in the early part of the 21st Century, that choice is dead wrong. The Democratic runoff proved it -- and (you heard it here, folks!) it will be proved once again, thank God, in November, when Obama defeats John McCain and becomes our next president.

 
 

Comments
83
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)

Another outstanding and refreshing mandate of Barack's is his early statement that if someone else is hurting than he's hurting, too. His real compassion is palpable. And folks see him working so hard for this bid, long days away from his children who he has been seen connecting with in an effortlessly, unfeigned way; we can understand his love for them as a basic drive of his candidacy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:04 PM on 05/12/2008

IMO what all the pundits and so called experts are missing in the Obama mania is the deep seated desire for change among Americans. The last year or so has shown what people think of the Congress and the President's handling of the country and our direction in toto. Congress was ostensibly elected in 2006 to change the direction and they end up giving Bush everything he wants. No change there. Bush is at modern day record lows in his approval ratings but he is a lame duck so he doesn't really care. So along comes McCain with his 'experience'. Hillary with her, cough, cough, 'experience'. And a fresh face that promises a new beginning. Well, maybe Obama will be good for the country and maybe he won't but in this election one thing that will be clear to the politicians; is that we, the people, are sick and tired of the same old politicians making new promises. And we are tired of the same old brand of 'experience'. We've heard the promises over and over with nothing to show for it. It is time for a change and as it turns out, Obama is the only one holding out that hope.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 PM on 05/12/2008

Nice to know I'm not alone. You gave voice to everything I feel about Barack Obama, even using the phrase, "Beautiful family", as I have done. I feel he is a genuinely great man, and the flaws of great men and women can be, well, great. But he has his wife, (his rock) and his daughters, and he will have a great cabinet. And greatness tends to attract greatness. I just can't wait. The possibilities!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:06 PM on 05/12/2008

Great Article; I agree. Knowone was willing to say that, but Clinton and McCain, more alike than Obama and Clinton. I think she meant to degrade Obama so bad, pumping up McCain, she forgot what Party she was in. Winning is everything to both Clinton's and McCain.

All along though, Obama has been the toughest, almost at times so frustrated and tired, but tough and without damning his three opponants, Hillary Clinton, John McCain and Bill Clinton. Neither McCain or Clinton has had three full blown opponents. That shows strength. His temperament for a president is awsome. His judgement is balanced. His humbleness and his verbal 'correctness' is right on. the other two, have imploded and their still trying to figure him out. That is his success. We feel what he is about, but they're left wondering.

Obama will win. He does have positive feedback from so many countries, and yes, journalist covering Hammas said it would be a good thing. Joe Lieberman, distorted what he said, now claiming we should be weiry of him, another guilt by association. Lieberman should go back to Isreal, stay in his war mongering part of the world and leave us alone. He shouldn't be in the senate, he is radical.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 PM on 05/12/2008

Great article!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:47 PM on 05/12/2008

"It's a mistake McCain will make, too, because like Clinton he just can't help it."

Beyond that, superior tactics by the Obama campaign have his opponents right where he wants them:

http://mentalshift.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/12/1483867-obamas-political-prowess-in-three-acts-act-ii-the-setup#comments

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:30 PM on 05/12/2008

I hope you are right.

But let's not get smug and over-confident.

Like Dems were in the last election. Remember that one?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:15 PM on 05/12/2008

Great article, and prophetic, I hope. I think it will come down to an episode, perhaps in a debate, when McCain, for a moment, does or says something that weirds everybody out. "My friends, we have to protect our precious bodily fluids....", that kind of thing. He'll look old, weird, and definitely NOT someone you want with a finger on the trigger, even to those who are planning on voting for him whatever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:39 PM on 05/12/2008

This was a great article and explains the reasons why I'm supporting Obama. It's not that I don't 'get' the fact that he and his team have learned to play some of the politicking game. For example, there's an article that describes the contributions by his PAC to the campaigns of other Democrats, some who are Super Delegates. All of the current candidates do this. There is some practical merit to it... a Democrat wants to see more Dems in office. Plausible 'game' playing.

The big ... and I mean BIG difference between him and Clinton or him and McCain for me has been the authenticity/genuiness thing. He is not perfect. America would be foolish to look for perfection in political candidates. But you get the sense that this guy is a genuine human being. And given our place in the world, we need a genuine person in the White House rather than someone who we sense is just telling us what we want to hear. My biggest gripe with Hillary Clinton has been her lack of authenticity. McCain seems to have lost his place a few months ago by doing the anti-McCain routine of taking positions that he would have never supported 8 or 4 years ago. His brand of flip flopping has totally wiped away in my mind any notion of his former authenticity.

And as complicated as the pundits make it ... it's as simple as that for me.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:25 PM on 05/12/2008

I can't wait for the Obama - McCain debates! Obama is going to rock the house, Why? Because he has a core and he speaks from it, because it is based in TRUTH! Nothing to fear nothing to hide. I think it is wonderful that really all they have on Barack Obama is this "beaten to death" Rev. Wright non issue. You'd think Rev Wright was running for office by the way the media handles it! Bring It!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:05 PM on 05/12/2008

I have to agree with you Brebo, Obama is so refreshing these days. He finally has broken through the noise of the political system here in this country and has challenged America to better politics, more accountability, and TRUTH.
I love it. He will win the Presidency by a LANDSLIDE. The Repubs will be relagated to the minority party they had in the 70's and 80's. And we will finally get stuff done in this country.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:56 PM on 05/12/2008

i agree with the premise.

awareness of government shiftiness is ever-increasing. i dont think young people, especially educated ones are at all willing to buy the old-timey image of a sinless father figure president. a little honesty works better. the posturing is grating.

but we cant underestimate the still very large population that is looking for a big strong daddy as president.

McCain at his best can pull off that image, and thereby give obama trouble. but lately he doesnt even seem to succeed on that level. desperately cackling and smiling to not appear angry... its sad. he doesnt seem to know that anger would probably work better with the sort of people who would choose him over obama. (its okay if daddy flips out every now and then... he still loves and protects us.)

i do suspect that the kind of political character that succeeded 25 years ago (see Reagan) will die off due to natural selection.

but all of us here might be wrong. its happened before.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:08 PM on 05/10/2008

Not only 25 years ago. What about only 4 years ago? Barack Obama is a decent and straightforward man who can connect with others. He speaks with authenticity, and looks the other straight in the eye. One can tell that he really cares. He is not the typical run-of-the mill politician. That is unusual! He doesn't tell you what you want to hear, but the truth!!! My, that is refreshing!!! He is down to earth and empathic, and I can't wait to see him win. I wil celebrate on that day, like I have never celebrated before, because on that day, I will finally feel safe! McBush doesn't have a chance, because with his tightly scripted speeches, and his continual mistakes, people will realize that his mind is going, and his lack of intelligence and integrity are only more of the same!!! It is time for a change. It is time for Barack Obama!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 05/12/2008

John,

Great article. Wooden soldier is spot on...especially the "he seems to be missing a core". That's it exactly. I've been trying to describe what I feel when I listen to him talk...you captured it perfectly. Guess that's why they pay you the big bucks.

I love it when McCain slips up and accidentally tells the truth like he did the other day when he admitted we were in Iraq for the oil...or when he said it would be fine if we were in Iraq for 100 years.

Can't you just hear the meeting that happened with staffers afterwards?

Menopausal Mick

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:45 PM on 05/09/2008

I agree. Excellent article. So true. Obama WILL be the next president. For the first time in my life I am proud and excited about a politician! Obama is the real deal! YES WE CAN and YES WE WILL! :)

~ Bobbi ~

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:04 PM on 05/09/2008

One quibble mr. Eskow,

The "likable enough" was totally misunderstood by the media. Anyone who can't digest subtle irony will miss Barack at his funniest. Everyone seemed to think "you're likable enough (for a girl)" was the intended meaning, but Barack was making a joke:
"You're likable enough (and if you were any more likable we'd be losing big cause we're working superhuman hours to defeat you)". In other words, "we wish you weren't so likable." Watch it again on youtube and I think you'll get it. Obnoxious? no, sly and ironic.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:19 PM on 05/09/2008

This is why Chuck Hagel needs to be Obama's VP. He's got everything you're talking about in terms of a grounded, humble, genuine person of substance. Plus it would be historic purple ticket symbolizing true unity and change. i encourage anyone to read about Hagels credentials here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Hagel
and watch a few videos of him here: http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=xaqec2tSd68&feature=related

Hagel would absolutely be Obama's best choice for VP. They would win in an unprecedented landslide.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:49 PM on 05/09/2008

Hagel will be in an Obama Administration. I don't know if the rank and file Dems will want Hagel to just jump into the scene after being a Republican for so long. However, the man is not a typical Repub, and will switch parties if he wants to be VP.
What will he bring? More voters, and Independents for sure.
How will that translate in terms of states in the general election? I don't know, Nebraska is a red state, but may shift to Obama since both are from the Mid West.
He arguably may not give him the key states that Obama needs namely Ohio and/or Virginia.
That is why Obama picking the governor of Ohio as VP or Webb of Virginia makes just as much sense.

I certainly would like to hear more on this though. It seems to really go to Obama's core principle of uniting the country, it would be HUGE to have Hagel as a VP. HUGE. As an Independent, any of those three choices makes sense to me.

I love the thought of Hagel, the more I think about it the more it makes so much sense.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:10 PM on 05/12/2008

Good God, yes. McCain is so obviously going to go down to one of those historic electoral defeats that we'll all marvell later that there was any suspense, at all.

He's a flawed candidate, who is on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of every single policy issue that's important to the public this year. He's a generation too old when the nation wants change, running as a member of a tired and corrupt governing party, a party the public now knows is tired and corrupt. He's a phoney, a man who has cycled through so many personae over the years that it'll be no difficulty finding footage that nails the matter to the mast as firmly as Hillary's Bosnian Bullshit. He's running as a member of the governing party in a recession. In an unpopular war. As a member of the old guard when the nation wants change. And as a hypocrite, breaking HIS OWN LAW on campaign finance, and while alienated from his own party's base.

Got all that?

And because of it, despite his promises of a new civility, he has to run the same race-based personal attack campaign against Obama that Hillary Clinton just went down in flames trying. Hillary was, of the two, by far the more dangerous opponant. Every time McCain tries to attack Obama, guess who he's going to sound like? Yeah, Hillary. And we already know how well that went down.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:25 PM on 05/09/2008

Wooden soldier of yesteryear vs digital facade of today. Today we have manipulated high tech facades, digitally created. Either way the American people lose and not much changes. The lobbyist and special interests still prevail.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:45 PM on 05/09/2008

Except that with a digital face, there's a core consisting of all the people who upheld Obama online: the small donors having given more than any company or special interest, the people having carried our chosen representative into the record books because WE want to be the ones he owes--We, The People of the United States. Nobody said it's perfect, but it is MORE perfect and unified: far more real, exponenially more representative, and refreshingly more democratic than anything in our history.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:46 AM on 05/10/2008

This is a great post. I do think it's an authenticity thing. I remember seeing Barack and Michelle at a campaign stop which was a town-hall meeting. Like everyone else, I've seen him be great at the soaring-speeches-before-crowds, and maybe seem a bit distant. So, this was really quite a revelation because he and Michelle looked like actual human beings, with a relationship that they had to work on, doubts about his running for president and the toll it would take on their family, etc. Of course, they could both be superb actors that can fool silly people like me (which is what I'm sure some of the more ardent Hillary supporters would say), but I don't think I've ever seen Bill and Hillary have a moment like that (and I've always assumed that Bill, at least, was a brilliant actor). The Clintons are all about power and the attainment of power, and when they are together, they seem like two people who don't really connect except as power-seekers and policy wonks. And that's not really a comment on their marriage, it's a comment about the two of them as people. (It's also probably why she's been able, over the years, to accept/ignore all the humiliation he's thrown her way with this dalliances). The games are more important than the relationships, and winning is more important than what you actually do once you win.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 05/09/2008

John, I could not agree more. Obama's sense of who he is informs his campaign, his world view, his humanity. This allows him to improvise -- to be open to new ideas, resolve conflicting points of view, capitalize on opportunities as they present themselves.

The other two candidates, in attempting to be "what the voters want' compromise their humanity. It makes them rigid in their thinking, closed to fresh ideas, and unable to react honestly to the situations that present themselves. As Obama said yesterday of McCain, they "lose their bearings."

Clinton and McCain say to voters "I am one of you." It is the biggest Lie in politics. Since when is a former First Lady and standing U.S. Senator from New York with a hundred mil in the bank, or a decorated war hero with a brewery-heiress wife worth three hundred mil and her own private jet anything like you and me? They don't have any concerns about their health care plan, or paying for their children's college, or making next month's rent, or what they're going to do for a living when the plant shuts down.

Obama, on the other hand, says to the voters, I am unique, and so are you, and it is our ability to weave our unique histories into a shared vision of America that presents us with the ability to meet our challenges and realize our potential for greatness as a nation.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:31 AM on 05/09/2008

Authenticity is what so many of us crave and why so many have been turned off to politics. It's also why so many of the people supporting Obama were so turned off by Clinton. It was never her gender or the fact that she was a Clinton. On the issues, there's very little difference between the two. But with Obama, you get the sense his views are based on his own beliefs and values. With Hillary, you get the sense that everything is based on polls. What she says and does and doesn't do seems calculated. Take her vote for the war. She supported it cause polls favored it and she worried she'd look weak on national security. Then when the war became unpopular, she came out against it. She's the Democrat's version of Mitt Romney. It's hard to relate to her or feel like there's a real person there because who she presents seems like a manufactured product to sell to the public.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:27 AM on 05/09/2008

You seem to be under the illusion that the American electorate are not "dullards". While we all wish this were true the fact is that in the majority of cases Americans are dullards. How else can you explain the election of Bush the Squanderer twice!!

As this election process progresses it seems that there is no limit to how low you can go. I am willing to be big money that before this is over the rabid right is going to spew so much hatred and outright lies that they will have to use a ladder to find whale crap on the bottom of the sea. We see it already with the Hamas rubbish and the secret Muslim nonsense.

If the American public were not dullards this stuff would not only not work those that used it would be rejected and treated like the scumbags that they are. Sadly instead of that reaction those same scumbags are given multi-million dollar contracts to spew their lies and hatred on cable news and radio.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:44 AM on 05/09/2008

Damn, I was all warm and fuzzy and here you are pissing on my charcoal. You are right obviously, but I don"t have to like it!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 11:57 AM on 05/09/2008

Which explains a lot! Maybe that is why many from an older generation don't relate to Obama. They expect the wooden solider to be "presidential". Clintion certainly fits that image.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:00 AM on 05/09/2008

Obama WILL listen to the people..he always has. He can and will win against McCain. He is picking up supers at a slow rate, I believe this is to allow Hillary to gracefully bow out. Unfortunately, she can not see the writing on the wall. Her desperation will cause alot of damage. This is the greatest concern.
Hillarys comment about "white working class voters" was a slam to Obama and his skin color. ( forgetting he is both black and white) This comment is unacceptable to many Americans. First of all, we, may not possess a college paper degree. But we DO have commom sense and this requires NO paper document at all.
This labeling is very degrading. She needs to be pushed out. Why is everyone scared of the Clintons? They have had their time. Supers need to end this NOW!!!!!!!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:48 AM on 05/09/2008

I suspect, as do some others, that he's not picking up Supers at a slow rate, so much as he has them 'cached' and is releasing them (some anyway) at a trickle to ensure that his campaign is showing constant momentum forward, even when he loses a state or two along the way.

It's the smartest way to ensure that the news cycle doesn't just reflect on Hillary's 'Win', while still showing the inevitable, relentless fact that even when she 'wins', she loses.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:33 PM on 05/12/2008

I think it's terrible that she is using Americans who have not had the opportunity of higher education to embellish her credentials as to why she should be the next president. Many people, many parents want their children to go on to college and many can't because tuition is so out of reach for so many from all walks of life. I also think it abhorrent for her to pit one race against another. It's a truly sad and dispiriting thing to see. Just because a person doesn't have a college degree doesn't mean they are not intelligent and well read and can make sensible choices about their life.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:54 AM on 05/09/2008

SMP and apoyo - this is one of the things that disturbs me most about the current Hillary argument about why she is suppossedly the better candidate -- it paints all working class people as bigots who won't vote for a black person. There are certainly working class people who will behave this way, but there are also upper class, so-called "educated" people who will do the same. One hopes they are in the minority in both groups. As a middle-aged woman, I'm also supposed to be part of Hillary's "natural" constituency. However, so much of what she has said and done has so turned me off that I wound up voting for Barack in the primary, and I've never regretted it. What I don't understand is why working class people aren't insulted by her current position, and why so many of them keep voting for her.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 03:02 PM on 05/09/2008

Wonderful article. It's about time the media is seeing through the smoke and mirrors and realizing this campaign is all wrong. It was like "tell the people anything as long as they believe me" is how Hillary ran her campaign. She was so polarizing and so negative, it made you feel bad inside. And for her to keep saying "this is the way you do it in Washington" made you feel "since when". I don't ever remember such a raunchy campaign as this. Not even the Kerry one wasn't this low-down.

So thank you for putting it into perspective and hopefully we can get through the rest of it in peace. I just wish it would end because it has drained all my energy trying to stay above the mire.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 07:26 AM on 05/09/2008

John, I always enjoy your articles. One thing I've always liked about Obama is his willingness to admit when he is wrong. His humility is in stark contrast to Hillary Clinton's arrogance, who in her universe is apparently never wrong about anything. I think John McCain is a weak candidate and could be beaten, if Obama is not injured by whatever slime the Republican attack machine will hurl at him this fall.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 05/09/2008

Indeed. I just wish more Americans exercised their built-in bullshit detector.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:06 AM on 05/09/2008
Page: 1 2 Next › Last » (2 pages total)
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in