More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John F. Bruno

John F. Bruno

Posted: February 16, 2011 04:26 PM

One of the many factors causing the global loss of reef building corals is anthropogenic climate change, which is slowly warming the world's oceans. When summertime temperatures are warmer than usual, corals can die from "bleaching" and disease outbreaks. This in turn is devastating for the countless organisms that inhabit coral reefs.

A new paper (Graham et al 2011) by an international team of marine scientists describes a framework to predict and measure the impacts of coral loss on fish populations. They created an "extinction risk index" for reef fish, based on the habitat requirements, feeding ecology and other traits of each species. For example, obligate corallivores, fish that feed on corals such as butterflyfish, were scored as highly sensitive. In all, 56 of the 134 coral fish species studied were found to be at risk from loss of their habitat, shelter and food sources caused by climate change. Those most in jeopardy were the smaller fishes with specialized eating and sheltering habits. One of the interesting findings from this exercise is that fish predicted to be vulnerable to climate change are not vulnerable to over-harvesting, and vice versa.

The team then tested their model by comparing its predictions to documented fish extinctions caused by a massive coral bleaching event that occurred in 1998 in the Indian ocean in which whole landscapes of corals died off. The fish species predicted to be the most sensitive to such habitat degradation experienced the greatest population losses.

Taken broadly, their results indicate that more than a third of coral reef fish species are in jeopardy of local extinction from the impacts of climate change.
 
"The loss of particular species can have a critical effect on the stability of an entire ecosystem - and our ability to look after coral reefs depends on being able to predict which species or groups of fish are most at risk," explains lead author Dr. Nick Graham of the ARC Centre of Excellence in Coral Reef Studies and James Cook University. "Until now, the ability to do this has been fairly weak."

"Where there is a widespread death of corals from a climate-driven event such as bleaching, the fish most affected are the ones that feed or shelter almost exclusively on coral."
 
The study does, however, offer encouragement by showing that the fish most at risk from climate change are seldom those most at risk from overfishing or other direct human impacts, pointing to scope to manage reef systems and fishing effort in ways that will protect a desirable mix of fish species that promote ecosystem stability.  

Dr. Tim McClanahan of the Wildlife Conservation Society explains:

Critically, the species of fish that are important in controlling seaweeds and outbreaks of deleterious invertebrate species are more vulnerable to fishing than they are to climate change disturbances on coral reefs. This is encouraging, since local and regional commitment to fisheries management action can promote coral recovery between disturbances such as storms and coral bleaching events.


One thing I really like about the paper is that it focuses on the impacts of habitat loss on reef inhabitants. Corals are dying in droves from climate change and local impacts like runoff from coastal deforestation, but reef scientists are not worried about coral extinctions. It is reef ecosystems that we are going to lose along with all the ecological splendor and economic value that is based on them.
 
Their paper, "Extinction vulnerability of coral reef fishes," by Nicholas A. J. Graham, Pascale Chabanet, Richard D. Evans, Simon Jennings , Yves Letourneur, M. Aaron MacNeil, Tim R. McClanahan, Marcus C. Öhman, Nicholas V. C. Polunin and Shaun K. Wilson, appears in the latest issue of the journal Ecology Letters.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
09:04 PM on 02/16/2011
And at least a third of freshwater fishes in North America are at risk- that's dozens and dozens of species. Mainly from habitat destruction and groundwater reduction. Exotic species and toxins (including endocrine disruptors) also contribute. When warmer water and increased drought begin to have greater effects, many more freshwater fishes could go under. Its too bad... but so long as bubba can 'fish' for his artificially cultured and genetically modified bass and so long as they are stocked at absurdly high levels so there is no work involved in 'catching' them- bubba and too many other people don't care.
theprogressiveanalyst
Ignorance is a dangerous thing
07:49 PM on 02/16/2011
Left unaddressed is what will happen to the fish that prey on the coral fish which will lose their habitat? How will this affect the larger food chain? I'd like to see the good professor at least mention a supposition regarding this issue as it must go beyond the reef habitat.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mississippi Red
Stoke City: ugly football that works
09:06 PM on 02/16/2011
You know what will happen to those fish that rely on reef species for food. What may be more damaging is what will happen to the reef when so many herbivores are gone- algae smothering the reef could have larger negative effects.
06:16 PM on 02/16/2011
That's the sound of one shoe falling. We await the second with baited breath so that we might be the first to add the pair to this list: http://notrickszone.com/2011/02/10/unfalsifiable-science-proof-of-climate-change/

But don't, whatever you do, let the media or the grant-awarding bodies see it. After all, we're saving the planet, and we don't want our funding stopped for anything.