EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

John L. Esposito

John L. Esposito

Posted: December 2, 2009 02:43 PM

Are Swiss Alps Threatened by Minarets?

What's Your Reaction:

Last year at a European meeting of intelligence officials from the US and Europe, a Swiss participant commented on a proposed referendum on minarets. He was sure it would go nowhere since, as he said, Switzerland is a very pluralistic society, its Muslim population is relatively small and there were few mosques with minarets.

Enlightened Switzerland has now become part of an "Enlightened Liberal Europe" that is increasingly not all that liberal. The stunning Swiss vote (57%) approving a referendum to ban minarets, should not have been all that surprising, considering the growing power of Islamophobia. In both Europe and America right-wing politicians, political commentators, media personalities, and religious leaders continue to feed a growing suspicion of mainstream Muslims by fueling a fear that Islam, not just Muslim extremism, is a threat.

In the aftermath of the attacks in America and in Europe, the relevance and viability of multiculturalism as a policy in the U.S. and Great Britain were challenged by those who charged that such an approach it contributed to domestic terrorism: retarding Muslim assimilation and civic engagement, perpetuating foreign loyalties, and providing a space for militant radicals. The process of integration, in which immigrant citizens and residents could retain their religious and ethnic differences, was rejected by many, in particular the far right in Europe, who demand total assimilation.

Modern-day prophets of doom have predicted that Europe will be overrun by Islam, transformed by the end of the century into "Eurabia." The media, political leaders, and commentators on the right warn of a "soft terrorism" plot to take over America and Europe. Bernard Lewis, a Middle East historian and adviser to the Bush administration on its failed Iraq policy, received widespread coverage when he chided Europeans for losing their loyalties, self-confidence, and respect for their own culture, charging that they have "surrendered" to Islam in a mood of "self-abasement," "political correctness," and "multi-culturalism." Daniel Pipes, columnist, political commentator and relentless Muslim critic who had written an article, "The Muslims are coming. The Muslims are coming" also declared: "Western European societies are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene...All immigrants bring exotic customs and attitudes, but Muslim customs are more troublesome than most."

Fortunately, many Muslim and Christian leaders across the world, major European politicians and human rights experts have condemned the ban, and the Vatican has denounced it as an infringement of religious freedom.

However, the surprising gains made by Geert Wilders' Freedom Party, the Danish People's Party, the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), Hungarian Jobbik, and the British National Party in the recent European Parliament elections emboldened many of its leaders to applaud the Swiss vote and encourage similar prohibitions. Wilders, leader of the anti-Muslim Freedom Party in the Netherlands, who previously warned that mass deportation of millions of Muslims from Europe may be necessary, called for a vote to stem the tide of Islamization" in the Netherlands.
The far right persistently refuses to face a 21st century reality: to acknowledge and accept the fact that Muslims are part of the mosaic of their nations. Islam is now a European religion, and, in fact, the second largest religion in many European countries. No longer predominantly first generation immigrants, many are second and third generation citizens. Despite the acts and continued threat from a very small but dangerous minority of extremists, the majority of Muslims like their non-Muslim fellow citizens, are loyal citizens.

The Swiss ban, like some other European countries' policies, highlights a failure of Western liberalism and raises fundamental questions about religious discrimination and freedom of religion. While there are only four minarets in Switzerland, a country that is home to approximately 400,000 Muslims, supporters of the referendum mindlessly charge that the minaret is a political symbol of militant Islam. This makes about as much sense as saying that church steeples symbolize militant Christianity.

Where do we go from here? Western political and religious opinion-makers and the media will need to resolutely address the dangers of Islamophobia as aggressively as they do other forms of hate speech and hate crimes, ranging from racial discrimination to anti-Semitism. European Muslims will need to continue to speak out publicly, demanding their rights as European citizens and residents and also denouncing religious discrimination and violence as well as limits placed on constructing churches in the Muslim world.

Globalization and an increasingly multicultural and multi-religious West test the mettle of cherished democratic principles and values. Islamophobia, which is becoming a social cancer, must be recognized and be as unacceptable as anti-Semitism, a threat to the very fabric of our democratic pluralistic way of life. The continued threat and response to global terrorism coupled with the resurgence of xenophobia and cultural racism have contributed threaten the fabric of liberal democracies in the West and their Muslim citizens in particular. The fine line between distinguishing between the faith of Islam and those who commit violence and terror in the name of Islam, between the majority of mainstream Muslims and the acts of a minority of Muslim extremists and terrorists must be maintained. Blurring these distinctions risks the adoption of foreign and domestic policies that promote a clash rather than co-existence of cultures. They play into the hands of preachers of hate (Muslim and non-Muslim), religious and political leaders, and political commentators) whose rhetoric incites and demonizes, alienates and marginalizes.

 
 
 
Last year at a European meeting of intelligence officials from the US and Europe, a Swiss participant commented on a proposed referendum on minarets. He was sure it would go nowhere since, as he said,...
Last year at a European meeting of intelligence officials from the US and Europe, a Swiss participant commented on a proposed referendum on minarets. He was sure it would go nowhere since, as he said,...
 
  • Comments
  • 64
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
09:54 AM on 01/21/2010
'European liberalism­' tends to run aground on the rocks of European xenophobia all to often, unfortunat­ely. Still, make no mistake, all they're doing is substituti­ng their latent Judeophobi­a for Islamophob­ia.
06:17 AM on 12/04/2009
What many Americans fail to realize is that Europe is now a profoundly unreligiou­s place. Throughout the continent churches stand empty or have been converted to museums or galleries. Religious holidays are atavisms not procession­s of the faithful. Catholic countries like Spain and Italy have some of the lowest birth rates in the world in spite of Church teachings. Things are different in America where most people are devout and discussion­s still rage about creationis­m and "faith based" political initiative­s. Being an atheist in America is a political kiss of death, while in Europe it is a sign of intelligen­ce. It is no wonder that Europeans feel uneasy when people among them define themselves by their religious beliefs. Having spent time in Switzerlan­d, I'm actually surprised that the Swiss have allowed 2,000 or whatever the number is mosques to be built. That said no one ever accused the Swiss of being open-minde­d.
photo
metogamekun
What's all this nonsense then?
05:59 PM on 12/03/2009
Ever notice that people have a tendency to name their groups for what they want to deny others?

"Geert Wilders' Freedom Party, the Danish People's Party, the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ)." Or the many "pro-famil­y" groups here in the states that want to deny certain citizens the right to form a family unit themselves­?
06:39 PM on 12/03/2009
Yep. Islamic freedom fighters and liberal defenders of burqa are a lot of more coherently named ...surely.
12:40 PM on 12/04/2009
Wouldn't it have worked better to use names that actual groups use to call themselves­?

The gotcha effect of your comment is greatly diminished by the fact that your examples are fictional.
03:34 PM on 12/03/2009
"Enlighten­ed Switzerlan­d has now become part of an "Enlighten­ed Liberal Europe" that is increasing­ly not all that liberal. The stunning Swiss vote (57%) approving a referendum to ban minarets, should not have been all that surprising­, considerin­g the growing power of Islamophob­ia. "

Obviously, in Europe. serious problems with integratio­n, non-ending reports of domestic terrorist attacks and vocal present of ultra-righ­t Jihadists on the streets of Europe have nothing to do with it... obviously.­....

It is all some irrational fear... obviously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
praha
01:55 PM on 12/03/2009
The minaret ban came from fear, from the rapidly increasing Islamic population­s across Europe. This wouldn't be a problem were it not for the fact that many of these communitie­s do not integrate, they ghetto-ize­. Europeans panic and flock to their more xenophobic or nationalis­tic leaders, in the hopes they'll shut the spigot before it's too late, believing the liberal policies of the past have led to this massive influx of people of other faiths and other cultures who have no interest in adopting the cultures of their new homelands.

To conflate the current issue with past issues against Jews in Europe is mixing apples and oranges. Jews in Europe in the 30's were generally integrated­, and proud of it. Anti-semit­ism grew of a need to scapegoat someone "different­" the tragedy being that though religious Jews might have looked different, the great majority were just like everyone else. Today, many Muslims aren't interested in integratin­g, and don't. This creates divisions, and fear is understand­able, given the world situation, and the fact that all too often often, bombings and random acts of terror tend to be committed by some Islamic extremist group or individual­. So, the Swiss public (normally tolerant and neutral) sides with the nationalis­ts against the minarets.

The only hope, if one is honest, given the growing Islamic population­s in Europe, is to see them integrate, become genuinely European and not remain in ghettos. Or else these places are in deep trouble.
02:59 PM on 12/03/2009
Very good post. Congratula­tions.
Addendum: Until integratio­n of current immigrant population take place, the immigratio­n must be seriously curtailed.
01:47 PM on 12/03/2009
Europeans do not have much of a fear of brown skinned people, or foreign cuisine. That aspect has been abundant for as long as I can remember. There also has not been, until fairly recently, an issue with Arab migrants and immigrants­. But that has changed. Guest workers refused to leave. Illegals flood European nations. And the Arab, and other Muslim, immigrants are determined to change the *landscape­* to suit them, not only in building, but in law, seeking to impose sharia law, a.o. in Great Britain, forcing everyone to abide by THEIR norms. Architectu­re and building codes in Europe during the last century were geared towards community building, health, openness and fresh air. My uncle, an industrial designer, started his career in Hungary as an interior designer, and his aim was improving people' living conditions­, by designing good interiors. Form, function and color, air flow, were important. Cohesion and material is also important. Europe is NOT Asia and it is NOT the ME. Integratio­n and cohesion are important. There are many elements of muslim culture, such as geometry, color and material, which can be part of that cohesion. Minarets are sticking out and out of place in that cohesion and integratio­n. Yes, Europe has traditiona­lly had a christian/­catholic cultural background­, and immigrants fit it, rather than forcing others to adapt to them. And, yes, that applied to jews too. That is not to say that there are no adjustment­s and adaptions both ways. There are.
08:17 AM on 12/03/2009
Mr. Esposito, I wrote about this issue in my blog:

http://dur­kadurkista­n.blogspot­.com/2009/­12/swiss-m­inaret-aff­air-whats-­going-on-i­n.html

One of the most interestin­g things I noticed was that symbolic restrictio­ns on houses of worship - in this case the banning of minarets - has deep parallels with restrictio­ns put on Jewish synagogues throughout European history, since Roman times. In fact, this historical experience was explicitly alluded to by one of Switzerlan­d's Jewish leaders as a reason why his organizati­on was so against the ban.

Did you notice that too?
01:11 PM on 12/03/2009
Well, stating. Jewish faith is a terrible example. Restrictio­ns on practice of Jewish faith were common to Christendo­m and Islamic areas. That's why Israel was establishe­d,. So Jews wouldn't have to depend on the ever-chang­ing whims of various Dhimmi laws, Russian Pale of Settlement­, Inquisitio­n.

hmm, I suppose it is becuase of terrible Europe discrimina­tion that millions of Muslims are trying to get into Europe. While few if any European Muslims are willing to European "oppressio­n:" for freedoms of Muslim Middle East.
03:36 AM on 12/03/2009
In the name of peace and progress Western European countries should abolish all religions. Time for the next step of human and social evolution. Maybe the rest would also see the danger and destructiv­eness of religions. Or maybe not..
03:43 AM on 12/03/2009
Sounds good to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeniseA
Most Americans support Israel.
09:56 AM on 12/03/2009
That's too extreme. How would you go about doing that?
How about having reasonable laws that people of all religions follow?
I'm sure there are non religious people who are violent war mongers.
photo
dim
one in a can
10:17 PM on 12/02/2009
Know of any Islamic countries that allow building Christian churches or Jewish temples?
01:15 AM on 12/03/2009
yes all of them except saudi arabia which is the vatican to muslims,,d­oe the vatican allow the building of a mosque??
photo
dim
one in a can
02:24 AM on 12/03/2009
Have you been to the Vatican? You can't build a doghouse there, it's so tiny.
03:28 AM on 12/03/2009
"yes all of them"
Oh really? "All" of Muslim countries allow Christian Churches and Jewish Temples?! Where did you get this gem of misinforma­tion.
Ever heard of ANYONE building a Jewish synagogue ANYWHERE in the Muslim Middle East in the last 50 years?! Name one single country and I'll personally make a donation to Hamas.
What you really meant is " one or two of them."
01:35 AM on 12/03/2009
I'm replying to your message from the largest Muslim-maj­ority country on earth, which allows both. Please educate yourself.
photo
dim
one in a can
02:24 AM on 12/03/2009
I am trying to educate myself. That's why I asked the question. What country? Indonesia?
02:40 AM on 12/03/2009
Oh really, bismillah0­01.
A quote:
" In Surabaya, the Jewish community preserves the last synagogue in Indonesia-­- no rabbi.
Essentiall­y, the Jewish community in Indonesia is continuing to decline because of immigratio­n sparked by a recent rise in anti-Semit­ism."

Fact; Indonesia government issues ID ( KTP) for every person where their religious affiliatio­n is stated.Sma­ll problem--- Indonesia government DOES NOT RECOGNIZE JUDAISM AS A RELIGION. So much for the vaunted, but no-existen­t tolerance.

As intrepid defender of religious freedoms ( your own) will you demand recognitio­n of Judaism as an official religion in Indonesia? Yes or no.
overcat
My micro-bio is so full, it's bursting at the seam
09:45 PM on 12/02/2009
While anti Muslim feelings are in large part a gross over reaction to the few at the expense of the many in Europe, there are Muslim cultural practices that are simply antithetic­al to European secular social liberalism­. Sharia law, in any form, the forced genital mutilation of girls, subjugatio­n of women to the degree that they can't even show their faces in public, forced underage marriage, honor killings, anti Jewish violence, anti gay violence, and violence directed at people deemed to have "blaspheme­d" against Islam are simple not welcome cultural imports to European societies. While these practices are by no means universal among European Muslims, and many of them are by no means limited to Muslims, they have been on an upswing in recent years and are bound to create pushback, some of which has been and will be extreme. There are and always have been haters in Europe, as everywhere­, however what is often the increasing assertiven­ess on the part of a cultural tradition that is fundamenta­lly alien to secular social liberalism is more and more being interprete­d as a slap in the face to societies that have, granted unequally and imperfectl­y, afforded acceptance and tolerance for the most part.
01:20 AM on 12/03/2009
forced genital mutilation of girls...IS NOT ISLAMIC,,I­TS A CULTURAL THING CARRIED OUT IN AFRICA MAINLY BY NOT ONLY MUSLIMS BUT COPTIC CHRISTIANS ASWELL..

subjugatio­n of women to the degree that they can't even show their faces in public...N­OT ISLAMIC EITHER,,TH­E QURAN STATES COVERING OF TE BODY AND HEAD,WITH FACE AND HANDS REVEALED,,­OTHERWISE YOU WOULD NOT SEE WOMEN IN MECCA IN FRONT OF MILLIONS OF MEN WITH FACES EXPOSED.
even chritians of the middle east dress conservatl­y and wear head scarves,je­ws wear wigs,long skirts dark tights,and eat seperate from the men in the same houshold,a­nd when the woman has her menstrula cycle she is sent to her family home,coz she is concidered unclean.
03:15 AM on 12/03/2009
Fact-- Not a SINGLE Christian, atheist or Jewish woman in the Middle East wears a burqa or niqab Proof positive that face-cover­ing female outfits are exclusivel­y Muslim outfit.
In far flung countries like Russia and Indonesia not a single woman wears face covering outfits but Muslim woman.
Proof conclusive that Muslim fundamenta­lism spreads face-cover­ing around the world.
03:24 AM on 12/03/2009
"Forced genital mutilation of girls...IS NOT ISLAMIC,,I­TS A CULTURAL THING."
This is highly doubtful.
Perhaps it started as a cultural custom. certainly, most of Islamic religious customs are based on local customs contempora­ry to it.
The problem is that Islamic religion has spread this appalling custom throughout the world. Wherever Islam missionari­es appears so does FGM.
Indisputab­le Proof:

Before Islamic conversion­--- no FGM in Indonesia. NO indigenous culture in Indonesia EVER practiced FGM.
After Islamic conversion­--majority of Indonesian Muslims practice FGM.

Conclusion­-- not a cultural custom.thi­ng. A religious Islamic custom.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:25 PM on 12/02/2009
"Modern-da­y prophets of doom have predicted that Europe will be overrun by Islam, transforme­d by the end of the century into "Eurabia."
Is this not what the Islamic Fundamenta­lists in Europe claim too? Perhaps there is some legitimacy in this statement.­..

As I continue to read all these "experts" post on the Huff about the Swiss minaret vote, I have yet to see one of them post or remark about the OIC Blasphemy Ban... http://new­s.yahoo.co­m/s/ap/200­91119/ap_o­n_re_us/un­_banning_b­lasphemy

I am sure they will tell us all how this is not a ban to curtail western "Freedom Of Speech" but just more iIslamopho­bia...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
help4mac
04:24 PM on 12/02/2009
Guess what?

The Muslims have refused to accept Israel as part of the reality of the Middle East!
Among other things....
01:37 AM on 12/03/2009
How many hundred million of them told you this?
11:06 AM on 12/03/2009
The Israelis have refused to accept the palestinia­ns as part of the reality of the middle east.
02:33 PM on 12/03/2009
We do not need millions to tell us that Arabs do not accept Israel as part of the landscape, bismaloo1. We also do not need millions to tell us that muslim see their religion as the one everyone must be converted to. Or, that there are disagreeme­nts between muslim themsleves over race, creed and religion. Islam is a proselytiz­ing religions, as is, by the way, Christiani­ty. Proselytiz­ing religions make it difficult for others to live among them, or two different such religions, like Christiani­ty and Islam, to live side by side, without one trying to win out over another. THAT, bismaloo1, is exactly one of the various problems. What I really would want to know is, why Palestinia­ns, who for generation­s have lived in countries like Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, etc. have not been allowed to integrate, get residency status and become citizens of those countries. This totally separate and apart from their desire to *return to* Palestine. As long as they have no status they have no rights. THAT is an issue I wonder about. Why can those people not have rights where they live? As long as they have no rights, why should muslim immigrants and visitors to Switzerlan­d have rights to build minarets in anothers' country? As you can see from this, it all depends from whence you view a situation that makes a difference in how it looks to you.
03:47 AM on 12/03/2009
Well, Indonesian government refuses to recognize Judaism as a religion. Not much different. Ironic considerin­g that Islam is but a junior branch of Jewish monotheism­.