On the first anniversary of President Obama's announcement of new provisions for purposeful travel to Cuba, the situation is murky if encouraging. The Office of Foreign Assets Control led by Adam Szubin, a Bush appointee, does not publish a monthly updated list of licensees on its site as it does of Travel Service Providers, nor does it even provide statistical data.
Based on a data base provided by OFAC to blogger Tracey Eaton under the Freedom of Information Act, it appears that in 2011 OFAC approved 440 applications from 289 organizations, about 1/3 of the total submitted. Good governance or an overly restrictive mind-set? (The data base is here and a list of licensed organizations here. )
Some are not for profits with decades of involvement like the Center for Cuban Studies. Others, like National Geographic, are broad based tour operators reincorporating Cuba in their portfolio. Some, most notably Insight Cuba, offer frequent open enrollment trips. Others take only their own members like university alumni associations. Not even OFAC knows how many universities and religious organizations have taken advantage of the general license as these groups have no obligation to request its approval or report their trips.
The President's announcement permitted any US airport that handles international flights to serve as a gateway to Cuba for charter flights. About a dozen have been approved by US and Cuban authorities. Tampa has proven most successful and its elected officials are proactive, in contrast to Miami which grudgingly profits from its primacy. However, charter flights from Atlanta, Chicago, a second one from JFK and from other cities without a large Cuban American population have been suspended or never begun. The weekly Baltimore-Havana flight that starts March 21 will find it challenging to sustain itself unless the White House further liberalizes travel for the rest of us. (Full schedule of flights prepared by Marazul here.)
A major error by the White House was to leave too much discretion in the hands of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the instinctively suspicious embargo enforcement arm of the Treasury Department. OFAC is proving to be a choke point rather than a facilitator, apparently most concerned about not angering hard line opponents of travel in Congress.
Based just on our organization's sequential application numbers, OFAC received between our first application of February 24 (CT-17448) and our sixth revision of October 27 (CT-18710) a total of 1262 applications and revisions during eight months. No one knows how many applications have been rejected, or are in "pending" limbo.
As one attorney wrote:
it's a bureaucratic black hole. it requires persistence. For instance, the regs state clearly one can apply "by letter", and I did, following carefully the instructions. When, months after submitting it, OFAC said it was waiting for my application form, I pointed out that the regs state the application can be by letter. No response yet. With another applicant they said the sample itinerary did not show enough "intimate people contact", which is a mystery because there was clearly all sorts of people contact daily.
Several weeks later, one of his applications was rejected:
OFAC felt the environmental study program, where we met with Cuban professionals and other Cubans every day on mornings, afternoons and evenings, did not have enough intimate contact with Cubans.
Applications are "denied without prejudice" because of a subjective judgment that
"substantial portions of the proposed activities set forth in the itineraries do not appear to include arrangements for educational exchanges that will result in meaningful interaction between the travelers and individuals in Cuba."
The only solution is for the White House to constrain OFAC's ability to subvert the President's goals.
1) The President could use his authority to give all people to people travelers a general license.
Their ability to rent cars, pick up omnipresent hitchhikers, use public buses and trains, and stay in casas particulares (bed and breakfasts) will foster greater spontaneous engagement with Cubans than is afforded by the group tours currently required by OFAC and available only through Cuban government sanctioned ground operators. Their dollars will also provide more direct support to the emerging private sector rather than to state enterprises.
Every American should be able to attest to a purpose of non-tourist people to people educational travel, just as every self-identified Cuban American simply attests to having relatives within three generations. Certainly some will take advantage, gaming the system, to just hang out at the beach. That happens already with the tens of thousand of Americans who feel morally justified to simply ignore travel restrictions--without legal sanction since the last year of the Bush Administration.
Not every Cuban American who travels is doing so for family reunion and support reasons, but the Administration has decided that the control of cheating is less important than maximizing the volume and breadth of interaction. The same logic applies to the rest of us.
Real liberalization will far better implement the President's goals for purposeful travel, substantially increasing the number, diversity and authenticity of American visits--and significantly reducing costs so travel by families and back-packers becomes feasible.
2) An even easier intermediate step is for the President to grant general licenses to all IRS registered non-profits and third party providers of educational exchange as he did to universities and religious organizations.
That would remove them from the time consuming, inconsistent, arbitrary and possibly polticized bureaucratic log jam of OFAC.
The biggest organizers of study abroad programs are commercial and non-profit companies that bundle students from different schools. They have been totally shut out by OFAC and have lost a full academic year of business. (See October 11 Chronicle of Higher Education here.)
3) The President should allow all US travel agents and tour operators to book authorized travel instead of only 250 licensed Travel Service Providers that are mostly Cuban American and mostly located in Florida.
4) Finally, all Americans should have a general license to attend and organize educational and professional conferences in Cuba.
The Cuban American caucus in Congress will oppose these steps as it vehemently has every single opening to date. Senator Marco Rubio attacked on the floor of the Senate the excellent programs of Insight Cuba and the Center for Cuban Studies. Representative Mario Diaz-Balart failed in his legislative effort to roll back Cuban American travel to the hyper-restrictive Bush era. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen went off the deep end about commercial trips offered by the Smithsonian Institution.
They are terrified that too many Americans will draw their own conclusions about the complicated and evolving reality in Cuba. The hard liners' argument that travel provides economic support for Cuba's "evil regime" is nonsensical and disingenuous. Even 100,000 non-tourist travelers in the context of over 2.7 million foreign tourists plus 400,000 Cuban Americans will have marginal financial impact. Were their objections actually based on principle, they would similarly oppose travel to China, Vietnam, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and many other countries.
In addition to increasing the impact of exchanges on the people of both countries, a stronger initiative by the President will create thousands of jobs in the US travel industry and support services.
He must end the immoral Jim Crow system which gives unequal access to the right of non-tourist travel by Cuban Americans over that of everyone else.
He can even gain politically if he responds to the pro freedom of travel sentiment of two thirds of Americans, including 57% of Cuban Americans, rather than accommodates to bullying by a special interest that is committed to his defeat.
Fund for Reconciliation and Development
Follow John McAuliff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/cubaaction
An important vehicle for building trust is to have freedom of travel in both countries. It will be interesting to see which leader has the political strength and self-confidence to do it first, President Obama or President Castro.
In the meantime the purposeful travel of groups allowed by the President is our only vehicle for creating greater understanding and to build trust. By legal definition, it excludes tourism, e.g. sun and sand holidays. This particular project is designed to introduce colleges and universities to the ways they can send their students to Cuba under a general license (no application necessary).
There are people making serious money from Cuba travel, private sector tour operators, but I assume you embrace the profit motive as an important aspect of the US economy.
Which brings me to the logical question of who you are, Mr. Capiro, and whom you represent. You post actively and repetitively all over the blogosphere. Is this a purely personal self-financed venture or do you represent someone or an organization that funds your work? Either is fine, but it would be useful to know which is the reality.
John McAuliff
Fund for Reconciliation and Development
15.3 - Visitantes por países / Visitors per country of origin. Cuban americans are not counted on the US column or any other column because the Castro government does not recognize other citizenship and they want to charge more money$$$$$$$$$$$)
2003 = 1,905,682 ( US 84,529 )
2004 = 2,048,572 ( US 49,856 )
2005 = 2,319,334 ( US 37,233 )
2006 = 2,220,567 ( US 36,808 )
2007 = 2,152,221 ( US 40,521 )
2008 = 2,348,340 ( US 41,904 )
http://www.one.cu/aec2008/esp/15_tabla_cuadro.htm
HAVANA TIMES : The (Non) Right of Cubans to Travel
Above all, travel for Cubans is not a right, but a legal privilege. It is a condition that can be granted or rescinded. It is a revocable concession by an unappealable power and is without a defined judicial framework. In all cases, the departures of these people imply considerable fees that can end up in well excess of US $500, an immense sum for a population with exceedingly depressed wages that average $20 a month. On top of this, once in the destination country, the traveler must make payments to the Cuban embassy in that country a sum that varies each month they remain in that country, which is a highly uncustomary practice between $40 & $150 a month. There are no laws or clearly written regulations covering these processes; rather, there are arbitrary and discretionary practices that mix starkly fascist reins of political control with mercurial motivations of the worst kind. In this way, the Cuban government denies a right that it alternately sells to those who can afford it.
CLICK LINK FOR ARTICLE!
http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=18972
Restrictions on movement within Cuba is an unfortunate spin-off of the terrorism that emanates from the US, particularly Miami. Such is life when you are under constant threat from a powerful neighbor. Perhaps the US should prosecute and jail their terrorists, like Posada Carriles, instead of leaving them to wander freely and live normal lives.
One of the aims of the US is to entice as many of Cuba's highly educated professionals to as possible. Cuba puts a tremendous amount of effort and resources into educating doctors, teachers and scientists etc. If they want to leave they can, but only after paying their debt to the society that produced them, so Cuba requires that they work for a minimum of four or five years towards this goal. They are then free to leave as part of the 20,000 immigrants per annum agreed with the US government.
Even if my recommendations for Presidential action were adopted, a 10% increase in total visitors (which last year was 2.7 million non Cuban American) is wildly optimistic. Cuba can accommodate them by the expansion of services already underway, additional joint ventures, greater use of the non-peak season, and the mechanism of the market, i.e. full fare higher margin Americans will displace discount visitors from Canada and Europe.
While there are security issues as long as USAID indulges in interventionist "democracy" programs such as put Alan Gross in prison, Cuba calculates correctly that the greater impact is on American visitors who will return home to become advocates for a normal relationship, including the end of the embargo.
John McAuliff
Excerpt: “These programs are comparable to what we and other donors do to support democracy and human rights in repressive societies all over the world. Possible counterintelligence penetration is a known risk in Cuba. Those who carry out our assistance are aware of such risks. …the Cuban government arbitrarily arrests and detains citizens who try to exercise basic freedoms…Unfortunately, given these circumstances, we are not always able to publicly convey the details and impact of our programs.”
2) Question: Democracy programs were supposed to evolve under the Obama administration. How is that happening?
Answer: This isn’t regime change anymore. We’re helping Cubans “freely determine their own future.” Also, the emphasis has shifted. We’re channeling as much aid as possible directly to Cuba rather than spending outside the island. We’re helping a wider range of people, not just legacy dissidents, but LGBT groups and the disabled.
Excerpt: “This focus on the island supports our efforts to reach broader segments of the Cuban population, while deepening the direct impact of the programs.”
Comment: I wonder if support for the LGBT community is a jab at Cuban gay rights activist Mariela Castro. She directs Cuba’s National Center for Sex Education and is President Raul Castro’s daughter.
http://cubamoneyproject.org/?p=1961#more-1961
Or, indeed, if Congress can bring themselves to open the gates, that "full fare higher margin Americans will displace discount visitors from Canada and Europe". That's an assumption of the purchasing power of non-Americans which may not be borne out.
A European friend suggested that it may be a good idea to visit Cuba now, before American tourists arrive in numbers and spoil it. I'm rather afraid that this remark reflects a fairly wide-held perception of Americans generally, and I'm sure that Cuba is only too well aware of it.