Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Petro

John Petro

Posted: April 14, 2010 05:44 PM

The Bike Lane Wars

What's Your Reaction:

In an interview with WNYC on Monday, Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz explained his opposition to a new bike lane adjacent to Prospect Park.

Claiming that the bicycle lanes would "cause a great inconvenience" to nearby residents because of "horrendous" "traffic jam-ups" on the ten-block stretch of road, Markowitz went on to criticize the Transportation Commissioner Janette Sadik-Kahn because she "wants to make it hard for those that choose to own their automobiles."

But the most striking part of the interview comes early on. Markowitz refutes the notion that the city should be taking steps to reduce levels of automobile use and ownership in New York City. He laments there are some, presumably including Sadik-Kahn, who think "the philosophy of the city of New York should do and be whatever one can do to help minimize car owners."

But that is exactly what New York City should be doing. Don't just take my word for it. This is the same conclusion of Mayor Bloomberg's PlaNYC--and for good reason.

The city's PlaNYC 2030 document examines the challenges that the city will face as it grows by another one million residents by 2030. Among these challenges: how will the transportation system meet the increased demands without increasing costly congestion?

Traffic congestion already costs the region $8.1 billion in waste a year and commuters spend an average of 44 hours in traffic jams. Add one million more city residents and New York City's "rush hour" will become a 12-hour daily event.

There is a solution, but I don't think Markowitz will like it. We must take steps to reduce the number of cars on the road, even as the city's population grows.

In other cities, expanding the road network is one option (though I would argue that it isn't the best option), but in New York City, there is simply no room to expand the city's road network unless we bulldoze existing neighborhoods and displace families and businesses.

PlaNYC concludes that the only viable option, the only way to prevent crippling congestion, is for more people to walk, bike, and take public transportation. It states in no uncertain terms that, "The city cannot physically accommodate another million people if auto use continues at its current rate."

The city has made tremendous progress in increasing the use of transit and, remarkably, bicycle commuting. Transit ridership is up 12 percent since 2003. And last June, the city's Department of Transportation announced the completion of 200 miles of bike lanes in just three years. These cost-effective investments in the bicycle network are paying off: bicycle commuting has increased 126 percent since 2003, taking stress off of our congested roads and subways.

These gains are good for the small percentage of city residents who have no viable alternative but to drive to work or for other activities. Each new resident that chooses not to own a car will mean one fewer car on the road. But in order for new residents to make this choice, we must make sufficient investments in transit and the bicycle network.

This means dedicated bus lanes to speed up the slowest bus system in the country. This also means that we need to continue to add bicycle lanes so that more New Yorkers feel comfortable and safe biking on city streets. And finally, we must step up enforcement of the rampant speeding that takes place on the city's roadways. One study found that one-third of drivers on the city's streets are speeding, which dramatically increases the likelihood that a collision with a pedestrian or bicyclist will be a fatal collision.

But first, the outdated viewpoint of elected officials like Marty Markowitz must change. More cars on the road will lead to more traffic congestion. More bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit riders will mean less congestion. I know which choice I prefer.

 

Follow John Petro on Twitter: www.twitter.com/JohnPetroDMI

 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:58 PM on 05/29/2010
Bikers not only have no regard for the rules of the road, they don't even yield to pedestrians. The dirty untold secret is that there are hundreds of pedestrians injured on New York City streets and in parks every year but are not tracked because it is not politically expedient to disclose inconvenient truths. Nor are any records maintained of how many inebriated bikers injure or kill themselves or others or how many distracted bikers on ipods or cell phones cause accidents.

It is simply absurd to expect a middle aged couple from one end of Brooklyn that is no where near mass transit to ride bicycles fourteen miles to have diner and see a play in Manhattan then ride back fourteen miles at midnight. Of course, the billionaires of Manhattan may not want outerborough peasants in their turf.

BICYCLES ARE TOYS AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES. THEY ARE NOT A TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE. MARKOWITZ IS CORRECT !
02:57 PM on 05/29/2010
Then there is are the bikers. Occasionally they are found on congested roadways that once allowed the free flow of traffic. Occasionally they are seen in the actual bike lanes. Typically, they are weaving in and out of car lanes, cutting in front of moving cars with all the abandon of an immortal while giving motorists hart attacks. They blithely cruse through red lights without so much as a sideways glance. Possibly in the troughs of ipod nirvana or just drunk or stoned. A near head-on collisions was observed when an oncoming car was forced to swerve in order to avoid hitting a biker who cruised through a red light. Then there are the bikers who ride along in a cars blind spot as the car turns. The biker is distracted on his or her ipod and rides straight into the side of the car. Then sues the driver. There is the biker who pops out from behind a line of cars in cross traffic forcing a car that started to proceed after a stop sign to jamb on the brakes. Then the biker cries that the car didn't stop at the stop sign. There is the charming couple riding their recreational childhood toys down a one lane street side by side hogging traffic. There are the want-to-be circus bikers racing madly through the middle of heavy traffic at high speed darting from lane to lane as though they want to realize a death wish.
02:57 PM on 05/29/2010
Recreational biking fanatics and Luddites would have us all believe that their favorite childhood primitive form of transportation is the savior of life on earth.

The fact is that while biking may be a healthy form of aerobic exercise for a few so inclined and a necessity for the desperately poor it is not a reasonable nor rational transportation alternative. The reality is that automobile traffic volume is down and congestion is up. There are fewer car on streets where DOT has deliberately constricted traffic flow with unnecessary physical barriers, needlessly convoluted traffic pasterns, and pointless traffic light patterns. The clearest result of DOT's policies is jammed up traffic. Slow moving motor vehicles burn more foreign fuel and emit correspondingly higher and more pollution. The also waste an immense amount of people's time. It now takes thirty minutes longer to travel from downtown Brooklyn to South Brooklyn during rush hour than it did twenty-five years ago when there were more cars.

Traffic calming results in frustrated drivers doing stupid things. Each day can be seen at least four cars go through red lights and other cars perform countless illegal maneuvers. Traffic calming traffic light patterns result in drivers racing at insane speeds to the next light in the hope of reaching it before it changes or simply as a futile act of frustration and anger.
04:55 PM on 04/20/2010
Apparently now some Park Slope residents are complaining and trying to kill the Prospect Park West bike lane. They claim that the bike lane "will interfere with pedestrians crossing the streets." On the local news one idiot resident actually said that "people will have to look both ways while crossing the street." The hardship! PPW is downright dangerous for bikers, it's like a highway, and because of this people bike on the sidewalk, which actually is dangerous for pedestrians. As a biker in the neighborhood I really hope this plan goes forward.
10:46 AM on 04/15/2010
"This is the same conclusion of Mayor Bloomberg's PlaNYC--and for good reason."

Unfortunately, this is not the point of view of the Mayor himself. Judging by his actions taken through the Economic Development Corporation and the Department of City Planning, he agrees with Markowitz - that more cars are better!

In recent years, the EDC and City Planning have developed a number of suburban-style, car-oriented projects, such as the Costco-anchored mall in East Harlem last year. In many cases, they mandated a number of parking spots higher than generally required by city law. These projects are in direct conflict with PlaNYC and with DOT's strategy of reducing car use.

Bloomberg's attitude towards cars in the city can be best described as "schizophrenic." Different city departments are tugging in different directions; Markowitz and the majority of other city politicians just happen to agree with City Planning and not with DOT.
08:48 PM on 04/14/2010
An automobile with a single occupant is a huge waste of resources. Too bad it's the norm for commuting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
decaf
01:07 AM on 04/15/2010
its true, cars are huge waste of resources and great contributor to global pollution.

bicycling offers us all an opportunity to free our nation from the yoke of foreign oil. and choosing to ride a bike, for just a couple hours a week, tremendously reduces ones risk of heart disease and diabetes.

healthier people make for a healthier nation. join the bicycle movement. www.bicycleforaday.org