iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Ridley

John Ridley

Posted February 13, 2009 | 07:55 PM (EST)

The Republican Bipartisan Myth


Shangri-la and Brigadoon and Bipartisan. Three mythical places. One of which few Republicans have seemingly ever heard. Because if there is one thing we can take from the first weeks of the "New" Washington, it's that the (liberal) Democrats are incompetent (old news, really) and the Republicans are disingenuous when it comes to bipartisanship. Oh, sure, they talk up the swellness of President Obama every chance they get. And will continue to do so as long as his approval numbers are above fifty percent. But most GOPers tend to become like children who dance hysterically in a sandbox when it comes time to play with others.

Despite all the sit-downs Obama had with the Republicans -- apparently too many for Speaker Pelosi's tastes -- and despite the fact that the House version of the Stimulus Bill contained specific tax breaks for which the Republicans had asked -- though not to the degree they wished -- not a single GOPer would break ranks, step up and vote for the bill. A surprisingly "my way or the highway" attitude for the minority party whose eight years of good cogitating was a major factor in whipping America into the stellar fiscal shape we find ourselves.

When three Republican Senators voted for the Senate version of the bill -- Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, and Maine Sens. Olympia J. Snowe and Susan M. Collins, who in particular worked tirelessly with moderate Dem Sen. Ben Nelson to try and reach a true bipartisan compromise -- they were immediately put on a "hit" list by the conservative National Republican Trust PAC. The PAC's executive director Scott Wheeler stated: "We just want to send a message that we're going to have a long institutional memory, and we're going to remind your constituents of what you did."

What they did? What'd they do? Vote for a bill that might ultimately not be big enough to get the country out of the worst economic mess most Americans have ever lived through? Wouldn't it be punishment enough to dis-invite them to some soirée held at South Carolina GOP chairman Katon Dawson's whites-only country club? To be fair, Dawson resigned his membership to the Forest Lake Country Club in Columbia, SC last September. That was just a gratuitous dig I had to throw in because... I wouldn't have been allowed into the club to hand it to him personally. But to the point of Trust PAC's tactics; sure, it's not unusual for one political party to target another political party over a vote. But for a party to head hunt their own...?

And then, of course, there's Judd Gregg. Never mind that Gregg himself lobbied for the job of commerce secretary, never mind New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch making a deal to appoint Republican J. Bonnie Newman to Gregg's seat. When it came time to engage in the greater good, Gregg, in his own words, realized he could not be a "team player." Worse, working with the president he "couldn't be Judd Gregg." Political solipsism if ever there was. Gregg being something like the T.O. to the Senate.

Regardless of the Republicans' centrist deceptions, I would hope that Obama continues to rise above and reach out. Hopefully there will be others such as Specter, Snowe and Collins who put the people's work above myopic party ideology. But if nothing else, as the economy improves, President Obama's actions will serve to shame the lip servers of bipartisanship into taking up true residence.

For more perspective, visit www.thatminoritything.com.

Shangri-la and Brigadoon and Bipartisan. Three mythical places. One of which few Republicans have seemingly ever heard. Because if there is one thing we can take from the first weeks of the "New" Was...
Shangri-la and Brigadoon and Bipartisan. Three mythical places. One of which few Republicans have seemingly ever heard. Because if there is one thing we can take from the first weeks of the "New" Was...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 457
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
01:48 PM on 02/17/2009
So if all the spending of the last eight years got us into this mess, how does spending more make sense?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peanut2005
live & let live
03:03 PM on 02/17/2009
You have to spend money to make money. This stimulius is investing in the country. Better to do something then not do anything at all. tax cuts help if you have a job and if you are going to spend it. When I got my check last year I put it towards a credit card bill. How doe that help the economy? We need to create more jobs and that way people will shop and people will be able to work again. Supply and demand.
05:58 PM on 02/17/2009
So just like the government , why did you have a credit problem? You have to spend less when you make less or when your funds need to go to things like national security, recovery from 911, recovery from Katrina, healthcare for illegals... During the War in Iraq life went on as usual for all Amercians except those serving and their families. No one sacrificied, not either side, so the lesson needs to be it all starts with each person making responsible and wise choices and holding leaders accountable. Good luck with your credit problem, but I doubt the extra 8-12 dollars a week it is believed each of us will get from the stimulus plan will help much. Now if you lost your job and you get one that Mr.O has "created" or he has "saved" yours you are very fortunate , my friend, not like some of the over 2000 here in Maryland who lost their healthcare and job all within 11 hours and without warning.
06:38 PM on 02/16/2009
I was very happy to see how the GOP acted during this process. This is the exact attitude that lost McCain the presidency. That lost so many house and senate seats along with it. I can hardly wait till the next election in two years, because I am sure the GOP will lose many more seats as they continue to act the only way they know how. They are not true leaders in themselves but are blind followers - following the likes of Rush Limbaugh to their political doom. They vote for bills that have simple addition and subtraction. Like if I take away from the poor and give to the rich I can get more for my self. They can't think in algebraic equations such as - if I spend money on creating healthy workers I can have more workers to build more of the projects that are also funded from the fund which in turn gives money to the common person to spend on more items that in turn creates even more jobs which will increase tax revenue from both paychecks and items purchased. which will allow even more tax cuts as well as more spending. So elementary yet they can't get it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dav ram58
05:04 PM on 02/16/2009
The Republican mantra is to give tax breaks to the rich and they will do the right thing by it. Yeah right. They did the wrong thing throughout the 80's and from 2000 to 2008. Now we find that billions of dollars set aside to rebuild Iraq has been pilfered away. The Native Americans were on to their ilk from the beginning - white man speak with forked tongue.
04:28 PM on 02/16/2009
President Obama should continue to trust his instincts which have been spot on. Reach out but it is just as well that only the 3 Republican "moderate" senators play ball. As long as his programs are well founded and , hopefully , work, President Obama will accomplish many important things in 8 years. And the working class will be better off than they have been for a long time. I grew up in a working class union household, and we were never in danger of disaster as households are today and there was never a question whether my brother and I would go to college.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
barnybilt
04:23 PM on 02/16/2009
Nobody has the guts to tell those Republicans to their faces what they really are. The media gave them more slots and air time to spout there bull then they did Pres.Obama. They feel big because they had peoples attention and could rant and rave while having their faces plastered all over the place.
They wanted their ideas to be used in the bill. Their ideas are why the bill was needed. They have ruined this country with their ideas. They have hurt the people they claim to be for like small businesses who are mostly republican owned. The media has been showing businesses who are barely holding on but they never ask if the owner is a republican. Why they have any support left I'll never know because they have hurt everybody. Like being against National Healthcare which is a problem for the whole country. Rich and poor alike are being ripped off by our present system.
Who votes these people into office?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Matthew Benzor 1
12:05 PM on 02/16/2009
Obama should've never pick judd gregg he should have picked ARNOLD the govenator for commerce secratery.arnold would not let the president down he said it on cnn that if was chosen for a cabinet spot he would work for the president. he's a real man unlike gregg who let his party push him around and tell him what to do.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
hollybork
02:28 PM on 02/16/2009
Very good idea. Thanks, Matt!
09:29 AM on 02/16/2009
Hey let Manny be Manny and let Judd be Judd. He was for being Sec. of Commerce before he was against it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonCosenza
04:04 AM on 02/16/2009
The battle over the stimulus may bear fruit for the Democrats long before any economic results of it can be digested. In fact, we already see the flowers forming.

The Republican Party, in their unfathomable celebration of their defeat on the stimulus, are now plotting against their own members. As if Sen. Specter is going anywhere. As if Maine is going to be electing right-wing Republicans in this century. Don't forget the new target that Gov. Charlie Crist has on his back for supporting the stimulus and *gasp* appearing with Obama to do so publicly.

All these scare tactics will only lead to a further schism in a party that has for the most part already consigned itself to the Confederacy. Rather than figuring out how to win back the hearts and minds of the electorate (of all of America, not just the Matrix-like "Real America"), they are more interested in "finding their voice", which is a euphemism for doubling-down on their far right position and excommunicating all party members showing any dissent.

Feel free to let your party whittle itself even further into the dustbin of history, Mr. Steele. When you're all done, it may just be those moderate colleagues you target today who end up inheriting what's left of the GOP estate, and perhaps they'll even be able to rebuild the party into a national one.
10:17 PM on 02/15/2009
I can see through this. This is the GOP's way of trying to stay relevant by pushing this bipartisan crap. They were in charge of the white house for 8 years and they tried to shove their agenda down our throats. They have become irrelevant because America has moved past their divisive ways. Playing the race card, yelling for tax cuts and challenging patriotism doesn't work anymore. If they truly cared about anyone but themselves, they would have done something about the economy when Bush was still in office. Now we have a President who cares about all of us, not just the ones who voted for him and the GOP will do anything to try to obstruct this.
03:58 PM on 02/15/2009
It amazes me that you folks say that the Democrats reached out and the Repulicans rebuffed them? Where did they reach out? This "spendulous" plan is big on spending and short on stimulous. Where are the incentives for businesses to hire? Why does most of this stimulous not kick in until 2010 or later?
This plan was drafted by the House, which is controlled by Democrats, and it had little or no imput from Replublicans. How is that bipartisan? Could it be that they did not vote for it for the same reasons the democrats did not support the invasion of Iraq? Because it was a thinly vield political agenda grafted on to a national crises by the party in power? I'm no fan of Republicans, but this bill is clearly a long list of Democrat projects that will do little to stimulate, grossly increase the size of govenment and the cost is passed on to our kids just like the Cons did with the Iraq war. How is that change?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peter777
06:09 PM on 02/15/2009
Democrats, especially Obama, reached out and got their hands bitten. The Republicans got a lot of tax cuts into the package as a minimum, and many things were taken out because of their objection. To be effective the bill had to have spending. What is so hard to understand about that? The truth is that the Republicans think they will be lining up to win back the house or senate next time with their opposition to Obama's direction. The truth is that they decided to oppose any stimulus bill at the onset- it is their political strategy- to hell with America. No amount of compromise was going to change their opposition, unless the bill was based totally on tax cuts and then mostly to the rich. But, winning the next election is a long haul for them. Majority of Americans recognize that the party has no ideas, and many believe it has no integrity.
01:19 PM on 02/16/2009
I agree, the Republican party has shown me NOTHING but bad ideas, lies and certainly NO INTEGRITY for all of my adult life. As hard as I fought for Obama in this election, I will fight five times as hard to keep the seats Democrats have won in the next election and increase them. We have learned in this last election that we have a voice, it matters, and how and when to use it effectively! Obama's election has proved to the American people that when we believe in something and all work together, we can make it happen! Don't get complacent, anyone! Use these opportunities to get involved at the local level, start working on local support now, and we'll be ready to rock come 2010! Or should I say, BARACK?!?!?!
PS. I'm still damn PROUD of my President, how 'bout you guys?!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HHarvey
Do not feed the trolls
07:39 PM on 02/15/2009
I wouldn't consider 36% tax cuts in this stimulus plan not "reaching out" nor were they ignored. Obama took what they said and included their tax cuts, problem was the republicans wanted 100% tax cuts and it was their way or the highway. Talks went on and this bill was wrangled many times after that. There were more republicans in the senate that could have jumped on board like the two senators from Maine and Senator Spector, but they refused.
03:32 PM on 02/15/2009
Bipartisanship is way, way overrated. If voters were interested in what the GOP had to say they'd have elected them. To hell with them.
04:41 PM on 02/15/2009
That's what the Republicans said for the 12 years they had control of House and Senate. Look where it got us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HHarvey
Do not feed the trolls
07:41 PM on 02/15/2009
I actually like a healthy balance in my government making decisions, but I was angry too at the republicans. I'm still willing to see how they will deal with other legislation that comes before them before I call for their heads. I was appreciative of the three republican senators who risked their own parties wrath to make some changes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patricksmom
Extreme cat and dog lover
05:55 PM on 02/16/2009
We all want a 2 party even better multi party system. I don't know that we need the current Republican party.
01:17 PM on 02/15/2009
There is the possibilitiy that in the 2010 elections the 3 courageous Republicans, who unlike what McCain falsely promised, put "Country First" will win in landslides because the voters won't be fooled by the Repugs RINO campaign.

I am sure Republicans know that and thus will make as much defeatist noise as possible.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:36 PM on 02/16/2009
Amen, keepacoolhead. Surely they aren't as ignorant as the ranting right wing of their party. I think they proved that during the election. They've had it w/ the divisiveness of the radical people, still trying to run their party.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:37 AM on 02/15/2009
There are no moderates left in the Republican party save the 3 Senators who voted for the stimulus bill. They've either left because they saw the direction their party was headed in, changed their positions to be in sync with the Neocons or were pushed out by the Neocons. In 8 years Karl Rove made damn sure to screen all moderate Republicans out of the party and Congress.

Also, Senator Specter is in big trouble of losing his seat in the next cycle. The rabid Neocons in his party are gunning for him in PA because he voted for the bill.

The sooner Obama recognizes this, the sooner he can paint the picture for the American people of just who the GOP really is.
01:46 PM on 02/15/2009
Obama was supported financially by a huge percentage of Americans and voted for by them. If the PAC vampires try to suck the blood out of The Three Patriots in 2010, why, we will just send them more mney than they can ever spend!
We can and will also finance any opponent of the uglies who are now tryint to take our man down.

Let' s just give Presidnet Obama the gift of not having so many Republicans to watch do the make believe Bipartisan dance..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HHarvey
Do not feed the trolls
07:43 PM on 02/15/2009
Hmmm.... I like how you think. Democrats financially backing moderate republican senators who help? Who would have thought it?
04:42 PM on 02/15/2009
The more Obama continues to reach out and the more the Republicans in Congress reject him the more likely it is that those Republicans voted in in 2010 and 2012 will be moderate.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StillIRise
The past, present and future are one
02:11 AM on 02/15/2009
"Regardless of the Republicans' centrist deceptions, I would hope that Obama continues to rise above and reach out."

I too share this hope with you. President Obama is showing true leadership, even in the face of the Republicans' abject refusal to be leaders themselves. His effort to engage the Republicans in a bipartisan approach to their and the nation's universal concerns (i.e. the economy) is honorable, in spite of their rejection, and those who suggest that he should be like them are, IMO, looking at it backwards. THEY'RE the ones who need to change, not President Obama. But even if they don't - which is unlikely that they will - he is not only not letting them stop him from going forward with his agenda, but the contrast between his statesmanship and their partisan politics-as-usual game is merely showing the American people who they are, and President Obama just looks better and better, and he's still winning! He's giving the Republicans enough rope to hang themselves, and that's exactly what they're doing!
09:38 AM on 02/15/2009
Totally agree! Those 3 were putting the welfare of the people above party, which will probably bit the repugs in their a$$. It was amazing that while the repug house was against the stimulus, Governor's -including Repub- were in WDC salivating over coming funding to their states. I'm hoping others are taking names of those putting party above welfare of people!
12:25 AM on 02/15/2009
How about we start buy letting all the elected officials have enough time to read this 'stimulus' bill... this way the people get a chance to actually know what we're all voting on??!!
07:30 PM on 02/15/2009
That's a bogus complaint. The House bill was out for several weeks. The Senate bill was just changes in the House bill, not a new one, and the Compromise bill was simply changes to that.

We had them on Huffpo and people were reading, comparing and commenting on them.

It's also intriguing that people who had no chance to read the bill had so many fine print complaints.
11:36 PM on 02/15/2009
Wrong... this is over a thousand pages and needs time for review and debate... none of that is happening here!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patricksmom
Extreme cat and dog lover
05:57 PM on 02/16/2009
Reading a bill hasn't been a common practice for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montestruc
War is the health of the state--Randolph Bourne
10:24 PM on 02/25/2009
I have a solution for that. Change the constitution such that in order for a legislator to vote in favor of the bill he must read it aloud and have it recorded, and if he does not his vote is no. If the words he reads do not match those of the bill, it also counts as a no vote.

That will get three good things done done.

1 make sure your congresscritter reads what he votes on.

2 tend to reduce the size of bills

3 waste their time so that they will get less done and stay out of our hair.