More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
John Shore

GET UPDATES FROM John Shore
 

The Inevitability of the Rise of Progressive Christianity

Posted: 09/30/2011 11:33 am

It is inevitable that Christians who would now be described as "liberal" will be the overwhelming majority of Christians in America. That sea change, the waters of which we already feel swelling everywhere around us, can no sooner be stopped than can the moon passing across the night sky. Today's conservative evangelical Christians who are rallying against "postmodern relativism," "revisionist secular theology," "a naturalistic doctrine of God," or however else they might label the theology of the left, are like yesterday's horse-and-buggy owners rallying against the newfangled automobile. The future of transportation was obvious then; the future of Christian theology is obvious now.

Please note the difference between "inevitable" and "good." I'm not saying that the rise of the Christian left is a good thing (though I personally believe that it is). I'm saying it's inevitable. And the reason that's true is as obvious as a Buick parked in your living room.

In the old days, it was easy for the vast majority of American Christians to believe that, say, Jews and homosexuals (to name but two of the many, many groups Christians traditionally so destine) are going to hell. And what made it so emotionally and spiritually comfortable for so many Christians to assert that? Because none of them knew any Jews or homosexuals. No Jews or gays had a nearby farm; no Jews or gays were at the county fair; no Jews or gays attended the local PTA meetings; you never ran into either at the hardware store. The Jews were (however involuntarily) sequestering themselves in places like New York City; and while you may have interacted with a gay man over in the pipes department, that was his secret.

As far as most Americans knew (or, of course, cared to know), white was right, God shed his grace upon them, and happy days were afoot.

That was yesterday. Today most people have in their lives, and deeply care for, at least one person who is no closer to being a Protestant Christian than I am to being French Canadian. Today everyone is related to, shares a neighborhood with, works with, or goes to school with someone who is gay, Jewish, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu, Mormon, Unitarian Universalism, Wiccan, Native American, Shinto, Baha'i, Rastafarian, Cao Dai, Tenrikyo, agnostic, atheist, or any combination thereof. Humans, we are a creative group, are we not?

It's a great deal more troubling to condemn to hell someone for whom you have affection than it is an abstract member of an abstract group. Growing up in my white suburban neighborhood, I didn't know a single person who was Hindu. Today there are five young men who are Hindu living right next door to me. Those young men have become friends. If part of my theology insists that my Hindu friends are going to hell, you better believe I'm going to reassess that part of my theology. I wouldn't be human if I didn't.

It's typical to think that theology is static and permanent. It's not, though. What's true instead is that theology follows sociology. And slowly but surely we are all becoming members of one big society. At the very least media, generally, and the Internet in particular, has made world travelers, and culture tourists, of us all.

The world is rapidly changing. And as surely as one day follows the next, Christian theology, as it always has (slavery, anyone?) will change right along with it. As our world grows smaller, our Christianity will grow larger, broader, more inclusive.

Last month the Public Religion Research Institute found that 44 percent of young evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 support gay marriage. It also found that 52 percent of all Catholics -- despite the explicit teachings of the Catholic church -- favor same-sex marriage.

Polls consistently now show that in America support for gay marriage is no longer the minority opinion.

This past May, Focus on the Family President Jim Daly said this in an interview with WORLD magazine:

We're losing on [the issue of homosexuality], especially among the 20- and 30-somethings: 65 to 70 percent of them favor same-sex marriage... We've probably lost that. I don't want to be extremist here, but I think we need to start calculating where we are in the culture.

When the president of Focus on the Family basically gives up on the gay issue, you know things have changed.

I'm on the board of a group called The Christian Left, whose Facebook page grows by about 300 new members a week.

That's no trend. That's the future. (Also, 350 people in the last couple of weeks have joined ThruWay Christians.)

The religious right can rail, and scream, and protest all it wants that (to quote Albert Mohler) "Liberalism just does not work." Mohler may be perfectly correct. I personally believe that he is not; I think that assertion reveals a sad lack of faith in the enduring nature of human goodness.

Either way, one thing is certain: We -- and certainly our children --will find out.

 
 
 

Follow John Shore on Twitter: www.twitter.com/johnshore

 
 
  • Comments
  • 313
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:55 PM on 10/11/2011
Just more examples of human beings trying to make God into they want Him to be. Just because a growing number of "'Christians" support gay marriage doesn't mean that is the direction Christianity is going. It may be for them and the church's and denominations they start that allow them to do it there way, but that is not the teaching of Christ and never will be no matter how hard they try to make it. Jesus Christ always spoke the truth and the truth cannot be bent to fit what we want it to be. I am a very devout Roman Catholic and the reason many Catholics support it is because they don't understand their faith and are indifferent; especially cradle Catholics. You can't call yourself Catholic or any other Christian denomination if you support gay marriage, abortion, embryonic stem cell research to name just a few. You can say it, you can convince yourself and others of it, but you cannot convince God of it. In the end you will have to answer for the reasons you chose to have a buffet style Christianity. We all struggle with the teachings of Christ because they are difficult, everyone having difficulties with different teachings, but in the end you must face the truth and you must ask God to help you accept what you cannot accept.
DianaLynn1967
It's a great life if you don't weaken!
02:19 PM on 10/12/2011
Please quote the words of Jesus (not someone speaking for him, but Jesus himself) when it comes to any of the subjects listed above.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gal416
is a Bible verse † † †
10:52 AM on 10/31/2011
Jesus said:

Matthew 5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

The law:

Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

John 10:30 I and my Father are one.
06:34 PM on 10/07/2011
It's too confusing professing to be a Christian. There are too many contradictions between what the Bible says (according to the Baptist faith, the Methodist faith, the Catholic faith and the Church of Christ--which are the denominations of which I've been a member) and how the members behave. I know, members are human, etc. but it's difficult to get a straight (no pun intended) answer from the members of the church--they told me I was "chasing rabbits!" How patronizing and condescending! I'm now an "Independent" in both arenas--politics and religion.
01:55 PM on 10/08/2011
I humbly and respectfully submit the following perspective as a believer in God.

The Bible appears to suggest that the relationship with God is primarily individual. In addition, the Bible appears to recommend directly approaching God regarding questions you might have regarding your relationship with God.

I welcome your thoughts.
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
04:04 PM on 10/08/2011
While seconding what HuffPostThinker says, if you're having trouble doing that, rather than give up, I welcome your thoughts and questions as well.
11:19 AM on 10/05/2011
I'd like to believe this is true but it certainly conflicts with my experience. Almost all the Christians I know are intolerant conservatives, who find no conflict between their devout commitment to extreme capitalist materialism and their alleged faith. It's not just their lack of familiarity with those they hate, because, for example, homosexuals are not a new phenomenon where familiarity can be said to have bred tolerance. Since Christian teaching has ALWAYS been diametrically opposed to the selfish materialism of modern capitalism, how did this alliance of conservatives and Christians ever come to take place? It's not as if the blatant contradiction has worried them for all these decades. why will it suddenly start to trouble them now?
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
05:01 PM on 10/08/2011
If all other Christians were the intolerant conservatives you describe (believe me, I KNOW plenty of those are out there), I'd walk off and leave. But they're not. The movement John describes is afoot and has been for awhile. I'm a Christian pastor in Texas who's been addressing those discrepancies and injustices for decades. I get called the only insult they can spell that's longer than 4 letters - "liberal". The really intolerant ones who are most churchy have called me "heretic". The friends I value most are the ones who say things like, "You've corrupted me! When I met you, I was a perfectly good Pharisee, but I've been corrupted. Thank you!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
10:24 AM on 10/04/2011
"The world is rapidly changing. And as surely as one day follows the next, Christian theology, as it always has (slavery, anyone?) will change right along with it."

Or maybe Christianity will follow slavery right on out of existence. One of many possible developments. Nobody knows the future. Human life could be wiped out at any time in several different ways, including H-bombs, plague or a comet or asteroid. Words like "inevitable" are misplaced when describing future developments in mass society.
04:03 PM on 10/05/2011
"Or maybe Christiani­ty will follow slavery right on out of existence..."

An interesting statement, esp. since slavery is far from being "out of existence". It is simply against the law now...in the USA. As far as Christianity - doesn't it amaze you that here we are 2000 yrs. later, discussing this topic or Christ ad nauseum? The fascination is a futile inevitability. Even if it was "outlawed" that would only turn the flame into a blaze. There are just as many Atheists obsessed with the issue of Christ as Christians...and without a common enemy, what would become of Atheism? Perhaps, it won't make any difference anyway, considering there are enough ways we can destroy each other without any reason at all...
05:18 PM on 10/03/2011
"Either way, one thing is certain: We -- and certainly our children --will find out." The expression 'progressive Christianity' is itself and oxymoron. The divisions between all forms of faith continue to deepen and not one offers any development on the message that might plausibly create progress towards a unified humanity. But a massive 'sea change' is indeed on the way, and it begins with the perfect storm. A religious and cultural furore so contentious, any clash of civilizations may have to wait.

The first wholly new interpretation of the moral teachings of Christ for two thousand years is spreading on the web. Radically different from anything else we know of from history, this new 'claim' is predicated upon a precise and predefined experience, a direct individual intervention into the natural world by omnipotent power to confirm divine will, command and covenant, "correcting human nature by a change in natural law, altering biology, consciousness and human ethical perception beyond all natural evolutionary boundaries." Like it of no, a new religious claim testable by faith, meeting all Enlightenment, evidential criteria now exists. Nothing short of a religious revolution appears to be getting under way. More info at http://soulgineering.com/2011/05/22/the-final-freedoms/
01:28 PM on 10/03/2011
Progressive Christianity is old liberalism with a new trendy name.
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
05:02 PM on 10/08/2011
And still vastly more loving and wiser than the Pharisees ;)
11:36 AM on 10/03/2011
Interesting article and perhaps even encouraging. It is strange to me that so many comments equate a liberal church with a lack of doctrine, as if that by itself were bad. But I disagree with that assessment. As a Christ-follower my faith and trust resides in the person of Jesus, not doctrine. Yet, I share an orthodoxy that stands firmly in the tradition of the 1st Century church. In attempting to reform the abuses within the church of his day, Brother Martin Luther did not invent anything new. In many ways I would argue the progressive church is really more conservative because we are trying to go back to the 1st Century church.
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
12:00 PM on 10/03/2011
"trying to go back to the 1st Century church" - as would I
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chw777
10:37 AM on 10/03/2011
"It's a great deal more troubling to condemn to hell someone for whom you have affection than it is an abstract member of an abstract group. Growing up in my white suburban neighborhood, I didn't know a single person who was Hindu. Today there are five young men who are Hindu living right next door to me. Those young men have become friends. If part of my theology insists that my Hindu friends are going to hell, you better believe I'm going to reassess that part of my theology. I wouldn't be human if I didn't."

John, I understand your compassion. I dont think any "normal" person wants anyone to "be destroyed and shut out from the presence of the Lord". But God does not change and His word does not change. It just does not change. God's word means what is says and says what it means. You cant change it just because you dont like parts of it.

You are NOT the judge of God's Word, it is the judge of YOU!!
01:42 PM on 10/03/2011
And THAT is why we firmly believe that anyone who eats a cheeseburger or who carries keys in their pocket on Saturday is going to hell!

HIGH FIVE!!
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
04:07 PM on 10/08/2011
Oh, crud! I thought it was FRIDAY. Mea culpa, mea culpa.......
gmikejake
resist evil
05:15 PM on 10/03/2011
Integration may, inevitably, force churches to become more progressive? Well maybe. As a "different" progressive who has lived for decades in conservative, fundamentalistic, evangelical, christian, even dominionist, territories, please know that these "christians" are perfectly capable of shunning, excluding, even chasing away "agents of the devil," "communists," etc. They can often work very hard at making you go away. If they really don't see you as "fully human," then appealing to our mutual humanity is moot. And, yes, sometimes they try valiantly to "introduce" you to their lord ... including threats, condemnations, fiery sermons, and even an occasional "shut up" or two. If you do not choose to be "saved," "we all know who's side your on." Conservative politics and religion can make for an interesting mix ... God as a Republican ... a very conservative Republican.
03:05 AM on 10/03/2011
"What's true instead is that theology follows sociology"

That should tell you something about theology........
12:42 AM on 10/03/2011
I am not of this world. I am a pilgrim passing through a strange and hostile land. I am faithful to Jesus Christ. I believe in Jesus Christ and Him crucified, yet He has risen. Should I die this day, I won't be leaving home...I'll be going home.
01:14 AM on 10/03/2011
And you're not alone, my sibling. This world can change all it wants. He remains faithful.
12:34 AM on 10/03/2011
Be warned and do not fall prey to these lies. God is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The world may change, but God will never change. There is no such thing as "human goodness", the Bible says that "none are righteous, no not one". Only God is good. Jesus warned us to beware of these wolves in sheeps clothing. The Bible says, "love not the world, neither the things that are in the world; for if you love the world, the love of the Father is not in you." We are to be seperate from the world. We are to be holy as Christ was holy. Any church that preaches and teaches tolerance of the things that are clearly stated in the Bible as abominations to God is in danger of God's judgement. Know what is acceptable to God and what is not. Paul said, "Study to show thyself approved." Stay in the word, not the world.
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
04:11 PM on 10/08/2011
God may never change, but if man wants to draw close, man must be willing to allow transformation - including letting go of foolish interpretations of other men who place religious burdens on them but do nothing to help them.
thebigbike
ran away to be a cowboy
11:16 PM on 10/02/2011
fascinating to read the "theological" objections to this opinion. One always has to remind oneself, that volume of noise does not equate to numbers espousing the noise.
10:15 PM on 10/02/2011
I curious to know why Mr. Shore thinks that liberal Christianity is going to rise rather than irreligion. Mainline Protestant denominations have losing members on an absolute and percentage basis for decades. It just doesn't seem like liberal Christianity has the ability to effectively propagate to the next generation. Sure, you'll get one generation of liberal Christians, but their children will likely be irreligious. The appeals of irreligion are pretty obvious. It costs nothing, doesn't waste your Sunday mornings, and doesn't require you to profess things you don't believe about gays, hell, magical resurrections or anything else.
gmikejake
resist evil
05:28 PM on 10/03/2011
And you can spend a little less time with bullies.
photo
GDWhiteman
Christian mystic iconoclast
05:05 PM on 10/08/2011
Noting the parallel rise between fundamentalism and atheism, it's really only a matter of living and loving like Christ. To paraphrase: "The Pharisees will always be with you." The good news, is that Jesus doesn't much like Pharisees.
07:41 PM on 10/08/2011
I can't figure out what you're trying to say or how what you are saying relates to my comment. You should equate irreligion with atheism either. Religion/Irreligion and Theism/Atheism are orthogonal.
09:06 PM on 10/02/2011
John, I am curious of what you think the reason was that Cain and his offering was rejected by God in the book of Genesis?
10:21 AM on 10/07/2011
If I might interject, an apparently reasonable theory appears to have been suggested. Per this theory, the emotive impact of viewing and causing the death of a living being appears to be suggested to have been intended to be associated with rejection of God’s leadership. The Bible appears to suggest that the impact upon humans of rejecting God’s leadership is death.

The Biblical story appears to present an interesting irony. The Bible appears to suggest that Cain offered soil-based produce as a sacrifice to God rather than a living animal. Nonetheless, the Bible appears to suggest that Cain is attributed with the first taking of a human life.

I would be grateful for your thoughts that brought up this question.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nigel Goodnow
08:11 PM on 10/02/2011
I'd like to share the author's optimism, but it's difficult. Jews, Muslims and Christians have been living next to each other for 70 years (at least) in Palestine and don't seem to like each other very much; Christians in 15th century Spain got tired of coexisting and kicked out everyone; Turks didn't like the Armenians, German (Nazi) Christians the Jews and medieval Japanese the Catholics; Iraqi Christians have all but been run out of the country after being there for centuries. The author's thesis seems to be that familiarity breeds fondness, but I'm doubtful that history backs him up very well.
I think it more probable that what so often passes for tolerance is merely apathy. It's easy to tolerate you if I really just don't care what you believe. Keep it to yourself and become part of the vague American dream of progress, individualism, education and wealth, and we can all get along fine. Just don't ask too many questions, think too hard or wonder what it all means. If you actually think that your religion has something to say about the actual world, there will not be "tolerance", at least not as envisioned here. Of course, this vaguely deistic existentialism is a thin soup on which to build a civilization, but I suppose we'll have to try it before we know it fails.