More

John Tepper Marlin

John Tepper Marlin

Posted: December 16, 2008 03:03 PM

The Fed's Zero-Interest Policy -- Tokyo on the Potomac


The Federal Open Market Committee has reduced the target fed funds rate to a range of zero to one-quarter of a percentage point, officially entering a very-close-to-zero interest rate policy. This policy is associated with the Bank of Japan since the Japanese stock market and real estate bubble burst in 1990, and especially the period 1999-2006 when the Bank of Japan's zero-interest-rate policy was officially in effect. The FOMC announced today:

A target range for the federal funds rate of 0 to 1/4 percent. Since the Committee's last meeting, labor market conditions have deteriorated, and the available data indicate that consumer spending, business investment, and industrial production have declined. Financial markets remain quite strained and credit conditions tight. Overall, the outlook for economic activity has weakened further.

Meanwhile, inflationary pressures have diminished appreciably. In light of the declines in the prices of energy and other commodities and the weaker prospects for economic activity, the Committee expects inflation to moderate further in coming quarters.

How does a central bank have any influence once it gets close to a zero-interest rate, when banks are reluctant to make loans and investors are trying to stay liquid because the economic environment looks unpromising and balance sheets are weak.

The Bank of Japan has pursued a policy of "quantitative easing," putting money into the economy through purchase of assets such as government securities. Since the 1950s the Federal Reserve has preferred to buy and sell very short-term Treasurys, but a quantitative easing policy would push purchases up into longer-dated debt. The FOMC has explicitly announced it might do this:

The Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote the resumption of sustainable economic growth and to preserve price stability. In particular, the Committee anticipates that weak economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for some time.

The focus of the Committee's policy going forward will be to support the functioning of financial markets and stimulate the economy through open market operations and other measures that sustain the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet at a high level. As previously announced, over the next few quarters, the Federal Reserve will purchase large quantities of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities to provide support to the mortgage and housing markets, and it stands ready to expand its purchases of agency debt and mortgage-backed securities and as conditions warrant. The Committee is also evaluating the potential benefits of purchasing longer-term Treasury securities. Early next year, the Federal Reserve will also implement the Term Asset-backed Securities Loan Facility to facilitate the extension of credit to households and small businesses. The Federal Reserve will continue to consider ways of using its balance sheet to further support credit markets and economic activity.

The FOMC says the Federal Reserve will employ "all available tools" but the truth is that the Fed is inventing new tools as it goes along. Former Fed Governor Larry Meyer has it right when he said that the Fed will do "whatever it takes" to try to get out of the current credit freeze. Meyer is speaking tomorrow at the New York Association for Business Economics, of which I was president in 2002-2003.

The FOMC action was unanimous among the ten members attending, two below full strength. Christine Cumming voted on behalf of the New York Fed, since Timothy Geithner is preparing to take over, if confirmed by the Senate, as President-elect Obama's Treasury Secretary. The New York Fed is the only Federal Reserve Bank whose representative always has a vote on the FOMC Board along with the Chairman and six other (when the Board is at full strength) Federal Reserve Board governors. Four of the other 11 Federal Reserve Banks are voting members of the FOMC on a rotating basis.

The Federal Open Market Committee has reduced the target fed funds rate to a range of zero to one-quarter of a percentage point, officially entering a very-close-to-zero interest rate policy. This pol...
The Federal Open Market Committee has reduced the target fed funds rate to a range of zero to one-quarter of a percentage point, officially entering a very-close-to-zero interest rate policy. This pol...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinara
01:59 AM on 12/18/2008
Banks don't stimulate the economy, this is a myth. lower interest rates simply deepen the recession. Stop the FED.
02:31 PM on 12/19/2008
Hasn't made a dent yet, failed for Japan. Whose in charge here, anyway?
04:12 PM on 12/30/2008
Bush for another 23 days.

Look at Obama's stimulus plan: It's great
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
12:22 AM on 12/18/2008
Do you reckon it will work any better for the Federal Reserve than it did for the Bank of Japan?
04:38 PM on 12/17/2008
John is right on the mark. I was living in Tokyo in the early 1990's just after the real estate bubble burst and I remember grabbing an Asahi Shimbun on the way home from work that had a big headline across the top that read (translated), "Economy Finally Hits Bottom."

And this was a while before the interest rates there were taken down to the floor. Things, of course, got worse even after the Asahi's declaration and the interest rate cuts and the same will happen here without some real firm and imaginative guidance from Obama and Congress. 0% interest ain't gonna cut it.

We are in a classic national decline, but nobody seems to recognize it because we use some trumped up sense of American exceptionalism to mask what is really little more than delusion. The Romans did that. The British did it. The Soviets did it. Now so are we. America is not different from any other empire in history. Let's start by recognizing that and retrench our society. If we don't, we will surely die.
08:50 PM on 12/17/2008
I would take offense with your assumption that "nobody" recognized the decline. Plenty of people, myself included, have been recognizing the situation as dire for a long time. That we were not listened to is simply an obvious instance of Kassandra syndrome.
02:22 PM on 12/17/2008
100% agree with Desmo's comment - END THE FED. Zero to 0.25% interest rates = nothing left to work with. It's time to move our currency back to a commodity standard, and away from the private banking cartel (the Fed is a PRIVATE bank, in bed with other world central banks, with profit as their main goal, and we're being charged - hideously through the hidden tax of sustained inflation since the Fed's conception in 1913) for the use of their money creation services.

Look at the Fed's track record since 1913. Boom/bust, GREAT DEPRESSION, Boom/Bust, Boom/Bust (add several more) then today, more likely than not, a second Great Depression. The Fed gets a resounding, F-. They have made our economy anything but stable. This fiat currency scenario (which has failed under any economy that's attempted it, and is now failing us after 90+ years), and money=debt-upon-creation charade is coming to its disastrous close.

Watch a few of the videos from the site below, and if you can't swallow, or refuse to believe the content, then prove the material wrong. Don't just nay-say it. This information is all over the net, it's well documented, and "in the books," for those that know where to look. And at its core, it's quite easy to understand its workings, why it can't last, and who the culprits to the real problem are.

http://www.abolishthefederalreserve.com/?page_id=18
08:35 PM on 12/16/2008
We are becoming Muslims, no interest.

It won't work!

Banks are Hording.

Public works NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:25 AM on 12/17/2008
Federal govt spending on public works will mostly replace scheduled state spending on public works. It won't' give the economy nearly the lift that many seem to expect. It certainly won't create anything close to 2.5 million jobs, that's for sure.
03:21 PM on 12/17/2008
Really? What if the Gov order solar power systems for all appropriate government roofs?

That can absorb 10's of billions.

Solar create a lot of jobs per dollar.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/users/profile/research
08:53 PM on 12/17/2008
Many states do not have the money to do even the most necessary upkeep of their infrastructure, let alone invest in improvements. If the federal government were to step in and build streets and bridges and public buildings instead of bombs and UAVs, we would not simply reduce the load on the state budgets but we would finally invest money in things that have some measurable return.
08:23 PM on 12/16/2008
One question - when do we taxpayers demand our Congress to take a pay cut?
04:03 PM on 12/16/2008
It appears that the Fed has actually, without precedent, adopted a fed funds target rate of 0% - 0.25%. That's right, a RANGE and not a fixed number! Very interesting indeed. Obviously, transactions have already taken place in the fed funds mkt at zero and the fed will allow rates to fluctuate there on a temporary basis.

Former President of the St. Louis Fed, Richard Poole, was quoted as saying, “The Fed is sending a message that it will print money to an unlimited extent until it starts to see the economy expanding." [Translation: fight DEflation today at all costs. Once the velocity of the dollar picks up... re-tool the firetruck for INflation and fight THAT fire! Scary, scary, scary...]
04:01 PM on 12/16/2008
It would be nice if any elected official (I don't care which one) acknowledged that our need for such drastic monetary action is a direct result of the Legislative and Executive branch's policies and actions. Our kids need to learn the value of accepting responsibility when they make mistakes.
10:59 PM on 12/16/2008
No actually it would be nice if any elected official acknowledged that this monetary action is a direct result of previous monetary action. END THE FED