Someone once said covering baseball requires the ability to articulate what is unsaid.
No sport has as much mingling between reporters and subjects as baseball, an everyday waltz between writer and player. There are no questions too stupid to ask, despite what Lou Piniella might believe.
Aside from trying to avoid having a 65-year-old man scream at you, one quickly learns that covering baseball requires more codebreaking than in a John le Carre novel - from making sense of the manager's pauses and sideways glances to filling in a player's non-answer.
Piniella, the archetype of the old-school manager who often seems like he'd rather do his post-game with a glass of red at Tavern on Rush, is consistently exasperated at the flood of questions that come his way. In a crowded, competitive media market like Chicago, there are no stupid questions.
One of his favorite answers, especially with a flagging pitcher, is, "Go ask the pitching coach." Sometimes he mixes it up with a "Go ask the hitting coach."
I must admit all of my Lou experience has come in group settings, hardly a way to get a good read on someone. My favorite part of a Piniella post-game is at the beginning when he does his brief recap, mostly, I think, to jog his own memory.
Usually it goes something like this: "Well, Lee had a homer, then Soriano got a big hit, DeRosa, Ramirez...and Lilly pitched well. It was a good game." Often Lou takes a break mid-recap, "How many runs did we score? Ah well..."
My second favorite part of a Lou interview is when he makes a joke and looks around the room, laughing, for validation. There's something so earnest about it, I often catch myself laughing along with him. If you listen to the post-game interviews, you can hear the laughter too.
Chicago baseball is in some kind of golden age. You know this. It's been 102 years since both teams made the post-season. Back then you went straight to the World Series, which incidentally was not sponsored by Blackberry and Dick Stockton's hair was naturally brown (or red- I can't tell what it's supposed to be).
Enjoy it while you can. As I write this, both teams are down 1-0 in their respective series. I watched and listened to the White Sox's 6-4 loss to Tampa Bay this afternoon, and like anyone who's followed the team, the outcome was no surprise. Javy Vazquez is a sub-.500 pitcher with ace stuff and the Sox hitters rely almost solely on home runs. In this case, it was Dewayne Wise and Paul Konerko providing bombs in a losing cause.
I can't imagine Ozzie Guillen was surprised either. Regardless of the schedule, I think he would've started Vazquez first, just to get his start out of the way. Now he can ride lefties Mark Buehrle and John Danks and the team's win leader, Gavin Floyd, who is available for long relief in the first two games.
Still, I'd love to hear Guillen's personal feelings on this game. When Guillen's talking, there are no awkward pauses, no salty glares, no semantic battles, just a steady stream of altered consciousness, unremitting expletives and often spot-on commentary on the culture of baseball, and often times, society itself.
Earlier this summer, some of the sports media were talking about the presidential election and someone asked Guillen about John McCain. Without flinching, he spat, "He look racist!" Guillen then looked around and said, "Don't he?"
Ozzie Unfiltered. He didn't mean anything by it, he wasn't trying to cast aspersions on McCain the person. He just has no filter. Guillen, a naturalized citizen, gets to vote in his first Presidential election, but hasn't tipped his hand yet. I'd imagine he'll vote for Obama, a self-professed White Sox fan.
As for his counterpart across town, I would guess Lou Piniella will be a McCain voter. Lou probably sees a lot of himself in the so-called Maverick candidate. Both are old, whip-smart and have been through the wars. McCain in 'Nam, Piniella in the Bronx. While Piniella seems to get the better of the comparisons, McCain never had to deal with Steinbrenner.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.