As this thread winds down, I'll try once more to offer some perspective on some of the comments made here. I am not doing this out of "ego", and I do not think that I am "an authority" on the topic, but I do have a bit more than a "passing familiarity" with it, and with statistical analysis. My reason for this post, perhaps the last that will be made on this thread, is because even after several posts by people who argued for "reasoned and rational consideration of the issue" there still were many subsequent posts that I would not consider to be "reasoned" or "rational" (all too often, it seems, people who post have only read one or two comments in the thread prior to offering their opinions, no matter how uninformed). These should be addressed, at least one final time.
The article cited in Jon's Blog (for anyone who hasn't taken the time to read the entire piece) takes significant effort to explain that there is a dearth of data relevant to the debate. Their purpose in highlighting this fact, I believe, was twofold. First, they wanted to advocate for a more systematic collection of available data, that, as yet, has not been done. Second, they wanted to encourage their readers to "not jump to firm conclusion" of what the data they are presenting, indicates. Drawing a conclusion from incomplete data is folly, and a rational individual would do this at their own peril (less they sound ignorant).
Having read ALL the posts prior to this one, I am more than a bit concerned at some of the comments, many of which have not been challenged, which is also my intent in this post.
(cont)



Loading comments…

Posted January 14, 2008 | 11:25 AM (EST)