A friend in DC emailed last night, predicting that Trump will nominate a particular judge from the list he circulated awhile back.
That seems unlikely, and the list a mere distraction. To assume Trump will appoint a judge to the Supreme Court is to buy into tired old Beltway tropes.
It's exactly the sort of conventional thinking that cost Clinton, Bush and the others their shot at the presidency. Trump wasn't elected to coddle elites who lord it over the rest of the country with their qualifications, education and experience. Even Nixon knew that stupid people deserve representation on the Court too, but Trump seems particularly determined the fill the government primarily with fools and vagabonds.
Those who bemoan Trump's presidency should never forget how privileged we are: to live in the US, to live in an age of technological miracles and to live during the reign of what is likely to be the worst presidency in US history.
That's historic, by definition. It's yuge.
And though appointments are tough, Trump has delivered, at least if you're a fan of incompetents (Ben Carson, I'm looking at you), generals and billionaires. It may not be a smarter Cabinet than Obama's, but it's probably a bigger one. Any photos that suggest otherwise are fake news.
Personally, though, my fanboy crush is directed elsewhere. I dig Lewis Carroll, and from that perspective the Rick Perry nomination was the high water mark. Who else to lead an agency than someone who wants to eliminate it, can't remember its name, doesn't know what it does and has no experience in the field anyway.
It doesn't get much better than that, though I suppose "low energy" Jeb Bush would also have been a good choice for Energy Secretary. (Ah, the road not taken.) The fact that the agency holds the capability to vaporize the planet is just icing on the cake.
But back to the Court. If this were the 1930s, I'd expect Trump to appoint a celebrity criminal to the bench, like Al Capone, who had more experience in courtrooms than some judges. And Capone even vaguely resembled Scalia, which is certainly a plus.
What's more, Capone has been in movies, or at least has been portrayed in movies, which is pretty much the same thing.
Alas, today all the famous crooks are Mexican or Muslim, and are thus likely to impose Shariah law, or only affirm decisions by Mexican judges like Curiel, who somehow slipped over the border ... which shows why we need that wall. And as for getting Mexico to pay for it, that's easy -- the entire US population will just leave while nobody's looking, and Mexico will get stuck with the bill.
If not a judge or a crook -- or perhaps both -- who will Trump appoint? I think the standout choice for the seat is Ivanka.
Yes, Ivanka. She's young, attractive, and even to a gay guy, she's hotter than Scalia, even when he was alive and certainly now. Finally civics teachers will be able to stop whining that their students don't know who's on the Court. Ivanka can sell bangles from the bench, then resign in eight years to run for president. Or better yet, hold both jobs.
And Trump, by appointing a non-lawyer, not only gets to thumb his nose at elites but also manages to prove that he actually has read the Constitution, and knows that the Supreme Court is one of those entry level positions where prior experience is not required.
They've been serving up weak tea -- no doubt from teapot domes -- for several years now on the Republican side of the aisle on the Hill, and Trump has brought that philosophy to the Oval Office and Cabinet. Now it's SCOTUS's turn.
More vacancies to come? No worries: the US has a deep bench of bench candidates without depth. From the Kardashians to boy bands, WWE to reality rejects, in a few years we may have a Court that is truly Trump's equal -- although by then, he may be holed up in the Russian embassy seeking asylum from impeachment. A Penny for your thoughts?
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown — And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make — even as little as $2 — goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPostAlready contributed? Log in to hide these messages.