How Can LABOR People Hurt The Writers Strike?

Jack London wrote a famous essay about scabs -- those would be the low-lifes who break a strike. Which is what I thought about when I found out yesterday that two people linked closely to the labor movement had crossed the pickets lines of the Writers Guild of America. Follow this story and you will be, hopefully, appalled.

First, to set the tone, here is what London wrote:

"After God had finished the rattlesnake, the toad, and the vampire, he had some awful substance left with which he made a scab."

"A scab is a two-legged animal with a corkscrew soul, a water brain, a combination backbone of jelly and glue. Where others have hearts, he carries a tumor of rotten principles."

"When a scab comes down the street, men turn their backs and angels weep in heaven, and the devil shuts the gates of hell to keep him out."

"No man (or woman) has a right to scab so long as there is a pool of water to drown his carcass in, or a rope long enough to hang his body with. Judas was a gentleman compared with a scab. For betraying his master, he had character enough to hang himself." A scab has not.

"Esau sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. Judas sold his Savior for thirty pieces of silver. Benedict Arnold sold his country for a promise of a commission in the British army." The scab sells his birthright, country, his wife, his children and his fellowmen for an unfulfilled promise from his employer.

Esau was a traitor to himself; Judas was a traitor to his God; Benedict Arnold was a traitor to his country; a scab is a traitor to his God, his country, his family and his class."

Technically, a scab is someone who crosses a picket line to take a job from a striker. But, a scab's first-cousin is someone who crosses a picket line in defiance of the damage crossing a picket line does to the leverage workers have when they are on strike. It is as disgusting and reprehensible as literally taking someone's job because the end effect can be the loss of a striker's job.

On Monday, both Jon Stewart's Daily Show and The Colbert Report featured a discussion about the Writers Guild of America's strike against the Big Media.

The Daily Show featured Dean Ron Seeber, who is a full professor of, believe it or not, collective bargaining at Cornell's School of Industrial & Labor Relations. Despite pleas from a wide range of labor representatives, Seeber crossed the picket line; Seeber was, according to a letter circulated by Gene Carroll, Director of Cornells' Union Leadership Program (based in New York City), lobbied by "two union leaders who are Cornell trustees, Bruce Raynor, President of UNITE HERE and Denis Hughes, President of the NYS AFL-CIO, as well as the head of the NYC Central Labor Council, Ed Ott, and the head of the Writers Guild of America east, Mona Mangan." (Ott and Mangan both carry the title of executive director of their respective organizations).

Let me cut right to the chase: for his action, Seeber should be removed from his post as assistant provost of the university.

Why? People have forgotten that the The Wagner Act, which established the framework of collective bargaining, was aimed at "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining and by protecting the exercise by workers of full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing, for the purpose of negotiating the terms and conditions of their employment or other mutual aid or protection."

The law also provides for the principle of the right to strike, at least in theory. One reason that legitimate collective bargaining is dying in this country is that people really don't have the right to strike anymore. I don't want to get into a long digression here about why workers don't have a real right to strike anymore. But, undermining a strike is unconscionable.

And one way you undermine a strike is by crossing a picket line. It is a statement, not needing any verbal excuse or explanation. It speaks for itself.

Seeber represents an institution that is dedicated to advancing labor relations. By crossing the picket line, Seeber took sides: he helped undermine a strike and, thereby, undermined the fundamental principles inherent in collective bargaining. He cannot continue to serve an institution that presumes to advance labor relations and collective bargaining.

I wrote to Seeber to find out how he justified his actions. He wrote back: "will you print what I write word for word? it is complicated?" I assume he didn't mean to question whether it was complicated...I think he believes it is. I responded: "yes, within reason -- meaning not 3,000 words worth...people won't read that. But nothing to take it out context." I was writing on a Blackberry so my point was: I would represent his full position fairly. I haven't heard back.

I was drinking my morning tea yesterday morning reading The New York Times story on the return of Colbert and Stewart when I came upon this snipped referring to the Colbert Report:

Later, he did separate interviews with two authors who had crossed the picket lines (about 20 strikers gathered outside the theater on West 54th Street): Andrew Sullivan, who discussed an article about Barack Obama that he wrote for The Atlantic, and Richard B. Freeman, a scholar on labor movements who teaches at Harvard.

I understand why Sullivan has no appreciation of what he had done -- and maybe even took a secret delight in doing so -- but Richard Freeman? That had to be a mistake, I thought. His web profile tells us this about Freeman, who is a big academic presence in labor circles with many books about labor: he holds the Herbert Ascherman Chair in Economics at Harvard University. He is currently serving as Faculty Director of the Labor and Worklife Program at the Harvard Law School. He is also director of the Labor Studies Program at the National Bureau of Economic Research, Senior Research Fellow in Labour Markets at the London School of Economics' Centre for Economic Performance, and visiting professor at the London School of Economics.

I know Richard. I'm shocked that he would cross a picket line. I cannot imagine that he was unaware that the Writers Guild has been aggressively asking supporters not to cross the picket line. Lord, even celebrities who aren't always the most labor-conscious people have basically respected the picket lines. I wrote him but I have not received a response.

But, I say this with a heavy heart, too: how can Richard continue to serve as a director of a program on Labor and Worklife at Harvard Law School after he has crossed a picket line?

The line has to be drawn. Somewhere. I'd trace that line right between a picket line and the door of the employers.

Read more strike coverage on the Huffington Post's writers' strike page.

Comments

[babycakes]

Well, as long as the writers have leadership that won't even honor their own staff contracts, I don't know how they're going to make progress in other arenas. It's difficult to walk to moral high ground when, as an organization, you don't practice what you preach.

[unidentifiedman]

Are all strikes the same? Are all strikes justified, or prudent or even ethical? Is it possible to support the troops and oppose the war?

[Justice4Writers]

OK then, Mona Mangan should resign for this:

According to the Post, "The embarrassing battle began in early November over the staffers' labor contract, which was ratified in October but has yet to be signed. They claim WGA East Executive Director Mona Mangan revised the contract after it was ratified and insisted they sign it. The standoff became heated last month when Mangan told staffers their bonuses would be delayed until the contract dispute was resolved, according to e-mails reviewed by The Post."

In the name of labor and unionism shouldn't she be removed from her $500,000 post? She doesn't even deny ratifying it - she still insists they sign!!!

[zaneblue]

I always read your blog with great interest--you are one of my favorite bloggers here along with David Sirota. But seriously, you need to get some perspective on this. The WGA desperately needs people in the media telling their side, there has been a virtual blackout. If because of the awareness The Daily Show and The Colbert Report bring to the writers' strike, people turn off their televisions the rest of the week and tell their friends to do the same, wouldn't that have a larger impact? I could understand if you were objecting to an actor crossing the picket line to promote a movie, but these men crossed picket lines to promote union activism!

[eanderso]

God, I'm sick of this strike. Stop debating the minutia of how collective bargaining works, etc. and just keep making independent deals like the one made with United Artists. Make a deal with the Weinstein Company --- they are cutthroat businessmen who'd have no problem undercutting the other studios' bargaining position. There are others like them. Stop whining about the AMPTP and, instead, shake their foundation by working around them. Writers should build their own f%#@#ing studio and go out to private investors for financing. Forget about Spider-Man 6 and start working on changing the system and giving audiences films to get excited about again. If you don't like the system, change it. REALLY change it.