Some Super-delegates Are Using Their Noggins

Posted March 7, 2008 | 10:22 AM (EST)



stumble digg reddit del.ico.us news trust mixx.com

Earlier this week, I suggested that, rather than debate the often vague criteria that should drive a super-delegate's decision on who to support in the Democratic nomination, the uncommitted super-delegates should actually seek a clarification on where candidates stood on issues. I chose trade because I consider that to be the single-most important economic issue. And I suggested that Sen. Sherrod Brown and Rep. Marcy Kaptur were uniquely positioned to push the issue of trade given their terrific leadership on the topic over the years.

Well, Brown and Kaptur are doing just that, according to a story on Politico the other day:

Flexing their new power to determine the Democratic presidential nomination, a bloc of Ohio superdelegates is withholding endorsements from Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton until one or the other offers a concrete proposal to protect American jobs, two Ohio Democrats told Politico Wednesday.

The apparent deal among Ohioans is the first evidence of superdelegates' banding together and seeking concessions from the presidential candidates in return for votes at the convention. It's a practice that could become more common after Clinton's victories in Ohio and Texas on Tuesday put her back on solid footing in her race against Obama and ensured that the battle for superdelegates will continue for many weeks to come.

Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcy Kaptur, one of the leading protectionists in Congress, said Ohioans have many suggestions on economic and trade issues they hoped the candidates would address.

"We have a laundry list of measures we think would be effective, some involving tax policy, some involving investment policy, intellectual property incentives to hold investments in this country," Kaptur said. "I'm hoping superdelegates [who] are uncommitted that have the economy as their major concern will gravitate to our group and use that power to gain additional attention."


Good for them. To say quickly, I am not suggesting any connection between my post and their action. Actually, I thought my post was an obvious, modest proposal that was a no-brainer. I was particularly moved to write that super-delegates actually focus on issues because, until now, I've been, to put it mildly, pretty unimpressed by the arguments about how the super-delegates should vote (either to "reflect the will of the people" or "choose the most electable candidate").


So, rather than make a plea for something vague like "the will of the people" (in a process which is so flawed and, in some cases, anti-democratic that it just boggles the mind) or "choose the most electable candidate" (as if in March anyone can really tell how this election will play out in the Fall), I'm hoping that voters encourage super-delegates to demand from candidate's some very specific commitments (not based on "hope" or "experience") on real issues.

Yeah, good luck.


 
 

Comments
1
Pending Comments
0

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- grendl See Profile I'm a Fan of grendl



Yes, it does boggle the mind at how undemocratic a process wherein certain individuals can affect the outcome of a national election can be.

It boggles the mind those in the media don't really ask the superdelegates their own thoughts on wielding such unfair powers.

It boggles the mind the candidates, both of whom carry superdelegate status, can look into the eyes of the American electorate and tell them they're on our side. Oh, yeah? Well, put your money where your mouths are, and make your vote count the same as mine, elitist fucks.

The best thing that could happen to the democratic process was a close horserace like this, because now the spotlight is on this most undemocratic, and bizarre looking glass creation called the superdelegate. I hope they do attempt to swing the will of the voters Hillary's way, if only to enrage the public, and call for their ouster.

But more than likely it will just confirm what so many people thought to begin with. It's a system of privilege, those in power will not relinquish it willingly. So don't be surprised if this suddenly awakened sleeping giant of a youth vote , following such a delegate vote swing, heads lazily back to their dorm rooms to play Halo 4 for the next eight years, with a Republican in the White House.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 12:44 PM on 03/07/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in

 
 

 
 
Bloggers Index›
Read All Posts by
Jonathan Tasini›
 

 Site  Web ask.com