iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Jonathan_Miller

GET UPDATES FROM Jonathan_Miller
 

Join Me and the President and Make Your Voice Heard on Marriage Equality

Posted: 05/11/2012 9:08 am

One year ago today, in my inaugural column for The Huffington Post, I came out of the closet for marriage equality, and encouraged the President to do the same.

While I'm not presumptuous enough to think that my column made any difference (I am a recovering politician, after all), I still believe in my ultimate thesis:

Mr. President, the time is now. Yes, you can... trigger the tipping point. Exercising bold leadership -- instead of waiting to follow the generational tide -- might be your most enduring legacy.

The President's announcement is indeed the tipping point for the most important civil rights cause in a generation.

Because Obama made his voice heard, many other Americans will feel more comfortable in proclaiming their support for marriage equality.  Still others will take another close look at the issue.  When they understand that most of the counter-arguments are simply illogical -- gay marriage doesn't threaten traditional marriage; it doesn't lead to bigamy and bestiality;  it doesn't undermine family values -- they will join our cause as well.

And when support for marriage equality grows from a small majority today to an overwhelming majority in the coming months, there will be no stopping the momentum in state legislatures across the country into making marriage equality a reality for all Americans.

In the 24 hours since the President's announcement, I've already been surprised by some who've joined the gay marriage bandwagon. While I knew that Dick Cheney was on board, I had no idea about Bush speechwriter David Frum, or even that my friend, fellow No Labels co-founder, and Bush-Cheney campaign manager Mark McKinnon was a marriage equality advocate.  Mazel Tov, Mark!

Harvey Milk, perhaps history's most influential gay rights advocate, was right: When more gays and lesbians came out of the closet -- and the rest of us began to realize that friends and even loved ones were gay; that gay men and women too can do "heroic things" -- the stigma wore off, and it became politically and personally unacceptable to preach gay hatred. Similarly, when more people discover that those they respect support gay marriage, it will help lead us on a path to full equality.

Unlike Lady Gaga, we're not "born this way"-- in favor or opposed to gay marriage. Our positions can be transformed by the wisdom and examples of others.

That's why it is so critical for each of us to make our voices heard. Speak out on marriage equality -- on social media, at community forums, in private conversations -- let your friends and neighbors know where you stand. Perhaps then, they will change their minds, or even feel liberated to come out of hiding and stand with us.

President Obama got us to the tipping point.  It's up to the rest of us to make marriage equality a reality.

Let's get to work.

 

Follow Jonathan_Miller on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RecoveringPol

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hempy
12:02 PM on 05/11/2012
Government needs to get out of the marriage business. Let government issue a civil union certificate based on an agreement between consenting adults. Agreements should deal with financial matters, providing for offspring, property and duration of a civil union contract including the traditional "till death do us part" provision.

Liberty is an inalienable right. It can't be taken away by a majority vote no matter how large a majority.

If people want to be married, let that be either a religious ceremony or even a ceremony performed by a Justice of the Peace. Government has no business saying who the parties to such a contract are or their gender.

If a partner should become disabled, or disabled children become part of the household, government should assess a premium to pay for the health and long-term care for such parties. The premium should be sufficient to cover both adults should both become disabled. Children should not be left with the burden of providing for the care of disabled parents. Neither should to cost of such care be left for the state to incur.

Tax codes need to be adjusted as to how parties file taxes, based on income and not relationships. There should be no particular advantage in filing jointly or separately. Let government decide if it wants to provide dependency deductions or exemptions. Otherwise, the cost of children should be borne by parents/guardians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
candace9685
11:27 AM on 05/11/2012
So very proud of you, Jonathan, for standing up for the obvious - equality in all for all. You make your fellow Kentuckians very proud.
10:54 AM on 05/11/2012
I look at it as a semantic problem and constitutional issue. All religions, as a matter of religous freedom, should get to define the institution or sacrament of "marriage" in any way they like, including making it exclusively for same sex couples! However, the government cannot take a position on religious views and should embrace civil unions (including all mariages defined by religous institutions) regardless of gender, race etc.
It is civil unions (including all marriages) that needs to be recognized as a fundamental right of all citizens. I am glad tht the President has embraced same sex marriages, but it would be even better if he made clear that it is a constitutionally protected fundamental civil right for all. Althouhg Ted Olson has gotten almost everything wrong in the causes he has chosen, he and David Boies nailed it on this one!